Mahder Geleta

ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT

POST GRADUATE PROGRAM
THE IMPACT Of SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER

SATISFACTION:
THE CASE OF NIB INSURANCE COMPANY (S.CO)
BY: MAHDER GELETA
RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

MARKETING MANAGEMENT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF ART
IN MARKETING MANAGEMENT.
MAY, 2015
ADDIS ABABA
1
THE IMPACT F SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

THE CASE OF NIB INSURANCE COMPANY (S.CO)
BY: MAHDER GELETA
ADVISOR: DR. RAKSHIT NEGI
RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

MARKETING MANAGEMENT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF ART
IN MARKETING MANAGEMENT
May, 2015
Addis Ababa
2
THE IMPACT OF SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER

SATISFACTION:
THE CASE OF NIB INSURANCE COMPANY (S.CO).
By: Mahder Geleta
APPROVED BY:
Dr. Rakshit Negi ____________ _____________
ADVISOR SIGNATURE DATE
EXAMINERS:
___________________________ _______________ _____________

INTERNAL EXAMINER SIGNATURE DATE
____________ _______________ _______________

EXTERNAL EXAMINER SIGNATURE DATE
3
Declaration
I, the under signed, declare that this thesis is my original work and has not
been presented for any degree in this or any other University and that all
sources of materials used for the thesis have been duly acknowledged.
Mahder Geleta
..................................................... .........................................
Signature and Date
4
Abstract
This study investigated the Impact of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in the
case of Nib Insurance Company (S.Co.) branches in Addis Ababa city. In this
research, the SERVQUAL instrument developed by (Graham, K.R., Evanglos T. &
Simy M., 2004) and Parasuraman et al., (1988), has been applied in designing the
questionnaire by using the five dimensions of service quality: tangibles, reliability,
responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The study was limited to corporate
customers of 16 branches of the company, which are found in Addis Ababa. A total
of 243 corporate customers was selected from each branches proportionatly and a
self administered questionnaire was distributed by using accidental sampling
method at the time of service delivery. The data collected through questionnaire was
analyzed by using frequency and percentage values. In addition, the mean score,
standared deviation and paired sample t-test was used to see the gap between
percieved and expected service quality. Moreover, pearson correlation was applied to
see the relationship between service quality dimensions and customer satisfaction.
Whereas, multiple linear regression analysis was employed to explore the impact
between service quality dimensions and customer satisfaction. Findings of the
results revealed that, among the five SERVQUAL dimensions reliablity, empathy,
assurance, tangibles are significantly determine customer satisfaction. where as,
responsiveness doesn’t have a significant impact on customer satisfaction in NIC.
Also, the negative gap between customers’ perceptions and expectations of each
service quality dimensions revealed that, NIC failed to deliver the expected service
quality, where by reliability and tangibles are appeared to be the two dimensions
with the highest negative gaps. Thus, NIC should pay due attention to these
dimensions in order to increase the level of service quality and associated with
customer satisfaction.
5
Acknowledgment
First and for most I would like to thank God the almighty for being my guiding
light and strength throughout my life without whom the completion of this paper
wouldn’t be possible. Secondly my deepest and sincerest appreciation and
gratitude goes to my advisor Dr Rakshit Negi for his priceless suggestions,
assistance and guidance throught out the completion of this research paper and
i would also like to thank the corprate customers of NIC for participating in
completions of the questionnaire. Last but not least, I would like to extend my
love respect and appreciation to my mother w/o Amsale Tadesse, and my
brother, Gedion Geleta for their support, understanding and encouragement.
6
Table of Contents
Abstract ................................................................................................................. i
Acknowledgment................................................................................................... ii
Table of Contents ................................................................................................. iii
List of Tables ...................................................................................................... vii
List of Figures .................................................................................................... viii

Acronyms ............................................................................................................. x
CHAPTER ONE:- INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study............................................................................. 1
1.2 Background of the Organization................................................................ 3
1.3 Statement of the Problem............................................................................ . 4
1.4 Research Questions .............................................................................. 5
1.5 Objectives of the study ................................................................................ 5
1.5.1 . General Objectives ............................................................... ..........5

1.5.2 . Specific Objectives...................................................................... .5
1.6 Significance of the Study ........................................................................ 6
1.7 Scope of the Study ................................................................................ 6
1.8 Definition of Terms ................................................................................ 7
1.8.1 . Conceptual Definition................................................................... 7

1.8.2 . Operational Definition of Terms. ............................................... 8
1.9 Organization of the Research Report ................................................. ........... .... 9
CHAPTER TWO:- LITRATURE REVIEWS

2.1 Theoretical Framework .................................................................. ........... ... 10
2.1.1 . Service Characterstics .......................................................................10

2.1.2 . Quality. ............................................................................... ........12
2.1.3 Service Quality ..................................................................................... 12
7
2.1.4 Customer Expectations, Perceptions & Satisfaction........................... 14
2.1.4.1 Customer Expectations.. ......................................................... 14
2.1.4.2 Customer Perceptions.. ...................................................... . 15
2.1.4.3 Customer Satisfaction......................................................... 16
2.1.4.3.1 Determinants of Customer Satisfaction ........................... 17
2.1.5 Service Quality Model .. .................................................................. 18
2.1.5.1 Gap Model.. ........................................................................ .18
2.1.5.2 SERVQUAL .. ..... ............................................................. . 21
2.1.5.3 Criticisms of SERVQUAL................................................... 22
2.2 Emperical Reviews .................................................................................. 24
2.2.1 Customer Satisfaction in Insurance Industry................................... 24
2.2.2 Relationship between Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction..... 24
2.2.3 Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in Insurance Industry. ... 26
2.3 Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis ............................................. .27
CHAPTER THREE:- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Paradigm ................................................................................. 29
3.2 Research Methods ................................................................................ .29
3.3 Research Design.................................................................................... .30
3.4 Population and Sample Size.................................................................... 31
3.4.1 Population.......................................................................................... 31
3.4.2 Sample Size......................................................................................... 31
8
3.5 Data Collection Approach.........................................................................33
3.5.1 Questionnaire Development and Pre- Testing................................... 33
3.5.2 Quantitative Administration............................................................. 33
3.5.3 Data Analysis Tools......................................................................... 33
3.6 Reliablity and Validity................................................................................34
3.6.1 Reliablity ...................................................................................... 34
3.6.2 Validity .............................................. ..........................................35
3.7 Ethical Considerations................................................................................35
CHAPTER FOUR:- DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

4.1 Profile of Responding firms.......................................................................36
4.2 Descriptive Statistics.................................................................................38
4.2.1 Gap Analysis .............................................................................. 38
4.2.2 Overall Customer Satisfaction .....................................................46
4.3 Correlation Analysis.................................................................................47
4.4 Regression Analysis..................................................................................49
4.4.1 The Impact of Service Quality Dimensions on Customer
Satisfaction....................................................................................50
4.4.2 The Impact of Overall Service Quality on Overall Customer
Satisfaction........................................................................................ 52
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND

RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary of Major Findings.....................................................................55
5.2 Conclusion.............. ................................................................................57
5.3 Recommendation......................................................................................59
5.4 Major Limitation and Direction for Future Research................................61
5.5 References.................................................................................................62
9
Appendix...............................................................................................
Appendix I .........................................................................................................................SPSS Out Put.
Appendix II- ............................................................................English Version Questionnaire
Appendix III- .......................................................................Amharic Version Questionnaire.
10
LIST OF TABLE
Table 3.1 Sample distribution of each branches .................................................. 32
Table 3.2 Reliablity test of each service quality dimension ................................... 34
Table 4.1 Nature of Buisness Catagory ............................................................... 36
Table 4.2 Respondents Service Experiance .......................................................... 37
Table 4.3 Respondent Annual Premium .............................................................. 38
Table 4.4 Descriptive statistics of Tangibles ....................................................... 39
Table 4.5 Descriptive statistics of Reliablity ........................................................ 40
Table 4.6 Descriptive statistics of Responsiveness .............................................. 42
Table 4.7 Descriptive statistics of Assurance ....................................................... 43
Table 4.8 Descriptive statistics of Empathy ....................................................... 44
Table 4.9 Overall Gap Analysis of SERVQUAL dimensions ................................. 45
Table 4.10 Overall customer satisfaction frequency distribution .......................... 46
Table 4.11 Correlation between SERVQUAL dimensions and customer satisfaction

........................................................................................................................... 48
Table 4.12 Multiple linear regression Analysis .................................................... 51
Table 4.13 The relationship between overall service quality and customer
satisfaction ......................................................................................................... 53
Table 4.14 Summary of Hypothesis results ......................................................... 54
11
LISTS OF FIGURES
Fig 2.1 Factors that influence customer expectations of service .......................... 15
Fig 2.2 The Gap Model ....................................................................................... 20
Fig 2.3 Conceptual Frame Work of the Study ..................................................... 27
12
ACRONYMS
NIC – Nib Insurance Company (S.Co)
VIF – Variance Inflation Factor
13
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
This chapter introduces the reader to the study of the Impact of service quality
on customer satisfaction in the case of Nib Insurance Company (S.Co), Branches
in Addis Ababa. It goes on to look at the Background to the study, Background
of Nib Insurance Company (S.Co), statement of the problem, research questions,
objectives of the study, conceptual definition of terms, significance of the study,
and Scope of the study and Organization of the research report.
1.1 Background of the Study.
The Ethiopian economy continued to register remarkable growth. This

remarkable growth was mainly attributed to service sector i.e (51.7%) (NBE
annual report, 2013). Insurance industry is one of the service entity that plays a
significant part for the growth of countries Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The
insurance sector in Ethiopia is currently growing as the current law facilitate for
private insurance companies to enter in the market.
In addition to this, the views of the societies perception toward insurance has
also changed from the thought of an instrument of saving to a risk-hedging tool.
This change has been facilitated by the emergence of a range of new insurance
products suiting diverse needs of consumers (Bodla & Chaudhary, 2012).
Insurance business in Ethiopia start early twentieth century European

entrepreneurs who came from Great Britain, Italy, France and others saw a
significant interest in insurance industry and foreign investors owned the lion
share of the investments (Hailu, 2007: 41-47). Jointly owned by the Emperor,
his supporters and foreign companies, the first domestic insurance company,
namely, Imperial Insurance Company started issuing policies in fire, life and
general accident since 1951. It also underscored a turning point in the history of
14
insurance business that ended in the issuance of the Commercial Code of
Ethiopia in 1960 (Hailu, 2007: 41-47).
Later, Proclamation No. 86/1994 ushered a new era in the history of insurance
business in which ‘Ethiopian insurance market has become an arena where the
public and private insurance companies contest to grab a large chunk of the
market’. The provisions in the legislation and the bold actions taken
subsequently have certainly transformed the Insurance Service industry.
In the service sector, the quality of service, one of the most dominant themes of
research in services, has become a strategic instrument for firms since 1990s
(Fisk et al., 1993; Donnelly et al., 1995).
Every organization strives to make its customer remains satisfied with its
products and services. Customer satisfaction is surely a very critical element
towards retaining profitable business relations with the customers. The
combined effect of a high retention rate and the enhanced profitability of loyal
customers can lead not only to higher profit, but to a better ‘quality of earnings’,
as the Customer base is less volatile (Waker & Baker, 2003). Customer
satisfaction and perceived service quality are also very interlinked constructs.
The service quality concept plays a central role in understanding customer

satisfaction and retention (Parasuraman et al., 1985). Further more, to remain
competitive, service providers must render quality service to their customers.
Moreover, understanding and meeting customers’ expectations and
subsequently being different from competitors are important in order to survive
in the today world of globalization.
One of the determinants of success of a firm is how the customers perceive the
resulting service quality, as the perceived service quality is the key driver of
15
perceived value (Collart, 2000). It is the perceived value, which determines
customer satisfaction. Many firms including Insurance industries begin to track
their customers’ satisfaction through measuring their level of service. The most
widely used model to measure perceived service quality known as SERVQUAL
was developed by Parasuraman et al. (1985, 1988).
Therefore, the researcher use the above method in finding the impact of service
quality on customer satisfaction in the case of Nib Insurance Company (S.Co.)
1.2 Background of the Organization.
Nib Insurance Company (S.Co.), is one of a Private Insurance Companies which

was established in 2002 by 658 Shareholders, with a paid up capital of birr 14
million, and a subscribed capital of birr 30 million as a sister company to Nib
International Bank. The company is currently rendering its general insurance
and life assurance services through its 28 branch offices situated in different
parts of the country with in and outside of Addis Ababa.
According to the annual report of NIC (2014), NIC which from the outset
emerged as a strong competitive private insurance Company is developing a
sound portfolio which is demonstrated by a prudent underwriting. Accordingly,
it has managed to increase its efficiency and expand its services over the past
twelve years. The Gross Written premium for the general insurance has
increased from Birr 20.63 million in 2002/03 to Birr 336.9 million in 2013/14
and that of the Life Assurance increased from Birr 1.1million in 2007/08 to
Birr15.3 million in 2013/14. According to the companies’ profile, NIC currently
stands 2nd in its market share from the private companies operating in the
Ethiopian Insurance Service sector.
16
1.3 Statement of the Problem
Globalization and open market system have created the complex competitive
environment not only for the manufacturing sector but also for the service
sector. Recent developments in global economy have led the service companies
especially the insurance companies to plan and execute their strategies

towards increasing customer satisfaction through improved service quality.
In a comptitive market place, understanding customer needs become an

important factor. As a result, companies has to move from product centric to
customer centric.
In Ethiopia, the insurance sector is growing at a fast pace, recently, new

insurance companies are joined the market to increase the level of competition.
Therefore, this fast growth can have both challenges and opportunities to the
existing firms.
The growth in the sector benefits the customer in offering the opportunity to
choose from one firm service to another one. Like wise, these also broden the
levels of the customer expectation from time to time, which creat a complexity
for the firms to depend on the existing service performance.
On the other hand, the growth has also a challege for each firms as there is a high
comptition between firms become stiffer than before . As a result, this forces each
firms to assess their services quality and the levels of customer satisfaction in order
to be competitive and stay in the market. Further more, according to Hazlina (2011),
service quality is a magnificent tool to measure the customer satisfaction. Empirical
findings demonstrate that customer satisfaction can be measured through an
outcome of service quality (Anderson et al., 1994).
Therefore, in order to determine the satisfaction levels of customer, service

quality study should be eximined, as Service quality has a strong correlation
17
with customer satisfaction, (Cronin et al., 2000; Wong et al., 2008). Although
many research works are conducted in the financial sector more with banks,
there remaind scarcity of studies in insurance sector.
Thus, this study attempted to examine the impact of service quality on customer
satisfaction the context of Nib Insurance Company (S.Co.)
1.4 Research Questions
• Does NIC customer experience the expected service quality?
• What is the level of satisfaction of NIC customer?
• Is their any significant relationship between service quality and customer

satisfaction in the NIC?
• Which service quality dimensions significantly contribute to determine

customer satisfaction?
1.5 Objectives of the Study
1.5.1 General objective
The general objective of this study was to examine the impact of service quality
on customer satisfaction in Nib Insurance Company (S.Co.).
1.5.2 Specific Objectives
The specific objectives include:-
 To examine the gap between customers’ perceptions and expectations of service

quality in NIC.
 To assess the level of customer satisfaction in NiC.
 To examine the impact of service quality on customer satisfaction.
18
1.6 Significance of the Study
The researcher believe that, the finding of this study will help the company
marketing department to see and align their marketing strategy if their is a need
for adjustment regading companies service quality performance and it will

further add value for the department to see the dimensions of service quality in
the insurance industry . More over, the study Provide an emperical reference for
the Board members and the managment team, to make the right decsion where
the appropraite resources could be assigned effectively and efficently . Further
more, this research will assist each share holders of the company, to know the
current levels of the companies service performance as well as the customers
perception toward the company service delivery. And this assist the managment
to make a strategic decision and strength the sustainablity of the company in
the market . Last but not least , the finding will add value to the literature on
the impact of percieved service quality on customer satisfaction in Insurance
sector for a future reference to other researchers.
1.7 Scope of the Study
The study is limited to service quality, customer satisfaction and establish if

there is a relationship between them. Due to cost and time constraints, the
study is geographically limited to branches found in Addis Ababa . Currently,
the total number of companies branches are reaching 28 and out of 28 around
18 branches are found in Addis Ababa and the remaining found outoff Addis
Ababa region.
In addition ,in order to collect a reliable data, the study exclude a newly opened
branches like Kera, and Gerji as the sample focused on those customer who do
have more than two years of experiance with the company. As a result, the
sample were taken only from 16 branches of the company which have been
operated in the market more than two years.
19
Besides, as the large sum of data is collected from Addis Ababa, the researcher
believe that, the findings will, to some extent, reflect the views of outlaying
branches customer. In addition to this, the study is limited to corporate clients
for the facts that, the companies 51% of their production is collected from
corporate clients.
Thus, the study took a samples from a corporate customers of non life/General
insurance section, whose premiums are above birr 50,000.00 and have been
insured more than two years with in the company.
1.8 Definition of Terms
1.8.1 Conceptual Definition of Terms
Service: - service is an act or performance offered by one party to another.

Although the process may be tied to a physical product, the performance is
essentially intangible and does not normally result in ownership of any of the
factors of production. (Lovelock & Wright, 2001).
Service quality: - Service quality has been defined in terms of key dimensions
that customers use while evaluating the services (Lewis & Booms, 1983).
Customer expectations: -are what customers think a service provider should

offer rather than what might be on offer (Parasuraman et al., 1988).
Customer perception: - is the actual level of service the customers received.

Perceived service quality is a component of customer satisfaction. Perceived service
quality has been defined as the discrepancy between what the customer feels
that a service provider should offer and his or her perception of what the service
firm actually offers Parasuraman et al., (1988).
Customer satisfaction: -Satisfaction as a person’s feelings of pleasure or

disappointment resulting from the comparison of product’s perceived
performance in reference to expectations is customers’ evaluation of
performance of an offering to date (Kotler & Armstrong, 2010).
20
1.8.2 Operational Definition
• Non life Insurance

Also called property and General insurance, is a type of coverage that is
very common and covers buisness and individuals, It protects them,
monetarily, from disaster by providing money in the event of a financial

loss. 2-definition-non-life-insurance.html.
• Underwriting
Underwriting is the process of assessing the eligibility of a customer in

receiving equity. An insurance underwriter evaluates the risk and exposures
of potential clients. He/she decides of the risk of an applicant seeker on
behalf of the insurance company; by determine if the particular insurance
package would be of beneficial to the applicant as well as the insurance
company. (http://www.my-insurance-guide.co.nz/roles-in-insurance.php).
• Claims
Claims are request made formally to an insurance company in returns for

payment base on the terms of an insurance policy. They are carefully
evaluated and given the needed attention, by claims staffs that examine the
policy, interview the claimant and those involved in getting evidence to
support claim.
(http://www.my-insurance-guide.co.nz/roles-in insurance.php).
1.9 Organization of the Research Report
This research report is organized in five chapters. Chapter 1 includes

introduction which contain background of the study, background of the
organization, statement of the problem, basic research questions, and objective
of the study, significance and Scope of the research and definition of terms.
Chapter 2 will contain all the relevant literatures reviewed with respect to
service, service quality and customer satisfaction. Chapter 3 will explains
methodology of the research including different tools of sampling and sampling
21
design employed in the study and methods of data collection and analysis used
in the research. In Chapter 4 findings and results of the study are discussed.
Chapter 5 contains summery of the study, conclusions and possible
recommendations of the study.
22
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter presents the review of literature related to service quality and
customer satisfaction. The researcher discusses issues on service; service quality
and customer satisfaction and defines relevant concepts and form a conceptual
model in order to enhance the researcher understanding on the topic and provide
answers to the research questions.
2.1 Theoretical Framework
2.1.1 Service characteristics
Service are processes of activities aiming to provide a solutions to customers’

Problems, with most other characteristics of services being consequences of their
process nature (Gronroos, 2000).
Where as according to (Kotler, 1999), service is any activity or benefit that one
party can offer to another which is essentially intangible and does not result in the
ownership of anything.
The main characteristics of services in which any company must consider when
designing a marketing programmes are :-
• Intangibility
Service intangibility means that senders cannot be readily displayed, so they

cannot be seen, tasted, felt, and heard or sine lied before they are bought. A buyer
can examine in detail before purchase the color, features and performance of an
Audio hi-fi system that he or she wishes to buy. (Kotler, 1999).
23
• Inseparability
Physical goods are produced, then stored, later sold and still later consumed. In
contrast, services are first sold, then produced and consumed at the same time
and in the same place. Service inseparability means that services cannot be
separate from their providers, whether the providers are people or machines.
(Kotler, 1999),
• Variability
As services involve people in production and consumption, there is considerable

Potential for variability. Service variability means that the quality of services
depends on who provides them, as well as when, where and how they are provided.
As such, service quality is difficult to control. (Kotler, 1999),
• Perishability
Service perishability means that services cannot be stored for later sale or use. In
the case of insurance, service can only last until the period of insurance expires.
(Kotler, 1999),
• Lack of ownership
When customers buy physical goods, such as cars and computers, they have
Personal access to the product for an unlimited time. They actually own the
Product. They can even sell it when they no longer wish to own it. In contrast,
Service products lack that quality of ownership. The service consumer often has
access to the service for a limited time. For example, an insurance policy is yours
only when you have paid the premium and continue to renew it. (Kotler, 1999),
24
2.1.2 Quality
Some of the definition of quality by different authors are stated below;
• (Crosby, 1979, p27) defines qulity as “conformance to requirements”.

• Quality is a subjective term for which each person has his or her own definition
(Feigenbaum, 1983),
• According to Parasuraman,) quality is Zero defects-doing it right the first
( Zeithaml and Berry,1985 ).
2.1.3 Service quality
Service quality has received a great deal of attention from both academicians and
practitioners (Negi, 2009), and has been widly used to evaluate the performance of
financial industries (Cowling and Newman, 1995). The prominent role of service
quality to companies is emphasized here is the fact that, it provide a competitive
advantage to companies to win in the market and assist them to improve it and to
bring customer satisfaction.
Moreover, in this study, service quality can be defined by different scholars in

different way as stated below;
 Parasuraman et al. (1985, 1988): service quality is determined by the

difference between customers expectations of service providers performance
and their evaluation the service they received.
 According to Asubonteng et al . (1996) service quality can be defined as “the

difference between customers expectations for service performance prior to
the service encounter and their peception of the service received”.
 Service quality is a measure of how well the service level delivered matches
customer expectation. Delivering quality service means conforming to
customer expectation on a consistent basis lewis and booms (1983).
25
 Gefan (2002) also defined service quality as the subjective comparison that
customers make between the quality of the service that they want to receive
and what they actually get.
 Service quality can also be defined as “a judgment about a service’s overall

excellence or superiority” (Schneider & White, 2004, p. 51).
Having said the above definition, gronroos classify service quality in two types,
these are ; technical quality and functional quality.
• Technical quality involves what the customer is actually receiving from

the services and gronroos (1982).
• Functional quality , which involves the manner in which the service is

delivered gronroos, (1982).
According to Negi (2009) customer-perceived service quality has been given

increased attention in recent years, due to its specific contribution to business
competitiveness and developing satisfied customers . In this study, the researcher
is not only interested in learning more about the factors associated to a quality
Service perceived by customers and how service quality is determined but also to
give fedeback for quality service enhancement in order satisfy customers and to
show the prominant role service quality dimention to customer satisfaction.
26
2.1.4 Customer Expectations, Perceptions and Satisfaction
2.1.4.1 Customer expectations

Customer expectations are beliefs about a service that serve as standards
against which service performance is judged Zeithaml et al., (1988). The
customer’s personal philosophy about a particular service, by promises (staff,
advertising and other communications), by implicit service promises (such as
price and the tangibles associated with the service), by word-of-mouth
communication (with other customers, friends, family and experts), as well as
by past experience of that service Zeithaml and Bitner,(1996).
Customer expectations are internal standards that customers use to judge the
quality of a service experience. Customers' expectations about what constitutes
good service vary from one business to another. Customer expectations
embrace several different elements, including desired service, adequate service,
predicted service, and a zone of tolerance that falls between the desired and
adequate service levels. Lovelock and wright, (1999).
• Desired service: the "wished for" level of service quality that a customer
believes can and should be delivered.
• Adequate service: the minimum level of service that a customer will
accept without being dissatisfied.
• Predicted service: the level of service quality a customer believes a firm
will actually deliver.
• Zone of tolerance: the range within which customers are willing to
accept variations in service delivery. The inherent nature of services
makes consistent service delivery difficult across employees in the same
company and even by the same service employee from one day to
another. The extent to which customers are willing to accept this
variation is called the zone of tolerance A performance that falls below
the adequate service level will cause frustration and dissatisfaction,
27
whereas one that exceeds the desired service level will both please and
surprise customers, creating the "customer delight" that we discussed
earlier in this chapter. Another way of looking at the zone of tolerance is

to think of it as the range of service within which customers don't pay
explicit attention to service performance. When service falls outside this
range, customers will react either positively or negatively.
Fig 2.1 Factors That Influence Customer Expectations of Service

(Source: Parasuraman et al., 1993)
2.1.4.2 Customer perceptions
Customer perceived service quality can be defined as a global judgment or attitude

relating to the superiority of a service relative to competing offerings Parasuraman
et al., (1988) as cited on Zhilin, Minjoon, Robin (2004). It is argued that the key to
ensuring good service quality perception is in meeting or exceeding what
customers expect from the service. Thus, if perception of the actual service
delivered by the supplier falls short of expectation, a gap is created which should
be addressed through strategies that affect the direction either of expectations or
perceptions, or both Parasuraman et al., (1988).
28
2.1.4.3 Customer satisfaction
Customer satisfaction is a term that has received considerable attention and

interest among scholars and practitioners perhaps because of its importance as a
key element of business strategy, and goal for all business activities especially in
today’s competitive market (Anderson, Fornell, and Lehmann, 1994; Gro¨nroos,
1984).
In line with Tsoukatos and Rand (2006), customer satisfaction is a key to long-
term business success. To protect or gain market shares, organizations need to
outperform competitors by offering high quality product or service to ensure
satisfaction of customers.
The concept has been variously defined by many author. In proportion to Magesh
(2010), satisfaction means a feeling of pleasure because one has something or has
achieved something. It is also an action of fulfilling a need, desire, demand or
expectation. Customers compare their expectations about a specific product or
services and its actual benefits. As stated by Kotler & Armstrong, (2010),
satisfaction as a person’s feelings of pleasure or disappointment resulting from the
comparison of product’s perceived performance in reference to expectations.
Customer’s feelings and beliefs also affect their satisfaction level. Along with
Zeithaml (2009), satisfaction or dissatisfaction is a measure or evaluation of a
product or service’s ability to meet a customer’s need or expectations. Razak et al.
(2007) also reported that overall satisfaction is the outcome of customer’s
evaluation of a set of experiences that are linked with the specific service provider.
Satisfaction can be related to attribute-specific and overall performance. It is

attribute specific where it relates to a specific product or service (Cronin & Taylor,
1992). For example, with NIB Insurance Company, satisfaction can be related to a
specific attribute such as: Non motor Insurance /General insurance
29
product like:- Comprehensive Insurance, Third Party Insurance, Marine all risk
Insurance, Professional Indemnity, Group personal Insurance, Money , Fidelity or
satisfaction with all service processes among others. On the other hand, customer
satisfaction can be related to the overall performance of a product/service or the
overall performance of an organization’s products/services (Cronin & Taylor,
1992). The present study relates customer satisfaction to the overall performance
of services delivered by NIB Insurance Company (S.Co) in order to generalize the
findings for managerial implications.
2.1.4.3.1 Determinants of customer satisfaction
The followings are some of the determinants of customer satisfaction (Zeithaml,

Bitner, p-87, 2003). These are
• Product and service features: Customer satisfaction with a product or

service is influenced significantly by the customer’s evaluation of product or
service features. Customers of services will make trade – offs among different
service features depending on the type of service being evaluated and the
criticality of the service.
• Customer emotions: Customer’s emotions can also affect their perceptions

of satisfaction with products and services. These emotions can be stable,
pre-existing emotions.
• Attributions for service success or failure: Attributions – the perceived

causes of events – influence perceptions of satisfaction as well. When they
have been surprised by an 18 outcome (the service is either much better or
much worse than expected) consumers tend to look for the reasons, and
their assessments of the reasons can influence their satisfaction.
30
• Perceptions of equity or fairness: Customer satisfaction is also influenced
by perceptions of equity and fairness. Customers ask themselves: have I
been treated fairly compared with other customers? Did other customers get
better treatment, better prices, or better quality service? Did I pay a fair
price for the service? Was I treated well in exchange for what I paid and the
effort I expended?
• Other customers, family members and coworkers: In addition to product

and service features and one’s own individual feelings and beliefs, consumer
satisfaction is often influenced by other people like other customers, family
members and co-workers.
2.1.5 Service quality model
2.1.5.1 Gap model:
Parasuraman et al. (1985) proposed that service quality is a function of the

differences between expectation and performance along the quality dimensions.
They developed a service quality model based on gap analysis. The various gaps
visualized in the model are:-
Gap 1: Consumer expectation - management perception gap/the position gap/
Service firms may not always understand what features a service must have in
order to meet consumer needs and what levels of performance on those features
are needed to bring deliver high quality service. This results to affecting the way
consumers evaluate service quality.
Gap 2: Management perception - service quality specification gap /the gap

specification
This gap arises when the company identifies the consumers want but the means to
deliver to expectation does not exist. Some factors that affect this gap could be
resource constraints, market conditions and management indifference. These
could affect service quality perception of the consumer.
31
Gap 3: Service quality specifications – service delivery gap/the delivery gap/
Companies could have guidelines for performing service well and treating
consumers correctly but these do not mean high service quality performance is
assured. Employees play an important role in assuring good service quality
perception and their performance cannot be standardized. This affects the delivery
of service which has an impact on the way consumers perceive service quality.
Gap 4: Service delivery – external communications gap/the communication gap/
External communications can affect not only consumer expectations of service but
also consumer perceptions of the delivered service. Companies can neglect to
inform consumers of special efforts to assure quality that are not visible to them
and this could influence service quality perceptions by consumers.
Gap 5: Expected Service – perceived service gap/the perception gap/
From their study, it showed that the key to ensuring good service quality is
meeting or exceeding what consumers expect from the service and that judgment
of high and low service quality depend on how consumers perceive the actual
performance in the context of what they expected.
32
Fig 2.2 the gap model
Gaps 1-4 are within the control of an organization and need to be analyzed to
determine the cause and changes to be implemented which can reduce these four
gaps emerge from an executive perspective on a service organization’s design,
marketing and delivery of service.
They, in turn, contribute to another gap, mentioned earlier; gap 5 which is the
discrepancy between customers’ expected services and the perceived service
actually delivered. Thus, this study is mainly focuses on this gap, the difference
between customers’ expectations and percived service quality of Nib insurance
Company (S.Co) .
33
2.1.5.2 SERVQUAL
After the gap model, a SERVQUAL model which is a multi item scale was developed
to assess customer perceptions of service quality in service industries.
Parasuraman et al., (1988).
SERVQUAL was created to measure service quality and is based on the view that,
customer’s assessment of service quality is a paramount. It is operationalized in
terms of the relationship between expectations and outcomes (Gilmore, 2003, pp
40). SERVQUAL represents service quality as the discrepancy between a
customer's expectations for a service offering and the customer's perceptions of the
service received, requiring respondents to answer questions about both their
expectations and their perceptions. Parasuraman et al., (1988)
SERVQUAL is a concise multiple item scale with good reliability and validity that
retailers can use to better understand the service expectations and perception of
consumer and, as a result, improve service. The instrument has been designed to
be applicable across a broad spectrum of services. Parasuraman et al., (1985)
revealed ten dimensions viz., tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, competence,
courtesy, credibility, security, communication, understanding, and access in the
original model of service quality. But in the subsequent study of Parasuraman et
al., (1988), these ten dimensions were condensed into five viz., tangibles, reliability,
responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. This led to the development of a 22-item

SERVQUAL scale for measuring service quality.
Even though there is no one universally accepted measurement model of service

quality that is applicable for all types of services, there are two most popular
models namely SERVQUAL and SERVPERF. SERVPERF Cronin and Taylor, (1992)
is purely a Performance based approach to the measurement of service quality.
However, SERVQUAL is the most frequently used model to measure service quality
and made to be used by services organizations or industries to improve service
quality (Parasuraman et al., 1988).
34
2.1.5.3 Criticisms of SERVQUAL
According to Buttle (1995) notwithstanding its growing popularity and widespread

application, SERVQUAL has been subjected to a number of theoretical and
operational criticisms which are detailed below:
(1) Theoretical:
 Paradigmatic objections: SERVQUAL is based on a disconfirmation paradigm

rather than an attitudinal paradigm; and SERVQUAL fails to draw on
established economic, statistical and psychological theory.
 Gaps model: there is little evidence that customers assess service quality in
terms of P – E gaps.
 Process orientation: SERVQUAL focuses on the process of service delivery,

not the outcomes of the service encounter.
 Dimensionality: SERVQUAL’s five dimensions are not universals; the

number of dimensions comprising SQ is contextualized; items do not always
load on to the factors which one would a priori expect; and there is a high
degree of inter correlation between the five RATER dimensions.
(2) Operational:
 Expectations: the term expectation is polysomic; consumers use standards

other than expectations to evaluate SQ; and SERVQUAL fails to measure
absolute SQ expectations.
 Item composition: four or five items cannot capture the variability within
each SQ dimension.
 Moments of truth (MOT): customers’ assessments of SQ may vary from MOT

to MOT.
 Polarity: the reversed polarity of items in the scale causes respondent error.
35
 Scale points: the seven-point Likert scale is flawed.
 Two administrations: two administrations of the instrument cause boredom

and confusion.
 Variance extracted: the over SERVQUAL score accounts for a disappointing

proportion of item variances.
Despite of the above drawbacks, there have been several emperical studies of
(Stafford et al., 1998; Leste and Vittorio, 1997; Westbrook and Peterson, 1998;
Mehta et al., 2002; Evangelos et al., 2004; Goswami, 2007; Gayathri et al., 2005;
Siddiqui et al., 2010) have confirmed that the applicability of SERVQUAL, of the
five dimension model in insurance industry.
As a consequence, the researcher used SERVQUAL instrument to measure the

levels of services provided in NIC by using a SERVQUAL five dimensions;
This dimensions are:-
1. Reliablity:- The ability to perform the promised service dependably

and accurately.
2. Assurance :-The knowledge and courtesy of employees and ability to
trust and confidence.
3. Tangiblelity:-The appearance of physical facilities Equipment
Personnel and communication materials
4. Empathy :- The provision of caring, individualize Attention to

customers.
5. Responsiveness:-The willingness to help customers and provide
prompt service.
36
2.2 Emperical Reviews
2.2.1 Customer satisfaction in insurance industry
Gronroos (1984) suggested that consumers usually rely on extrinsic cues like
brand image to ascertain and perceive service quality. Crosby and Stephens (1987)
& Johnston et al. (1984) explained that the outcomes of insurance purchase are
often delayed, and thus do not allow immediate post-purchase valuation. Sherden
(1987) expressed that high quality service (defined as exceeding “customers’
expectations”) is rare in the insurance industry but increasingly demanded by
customers. Toran (1993) points out that pure service like insurance may,
therefore, call up different expectations than that of services that include tangible
products and quality should be at the core of what the insurance industry does.
Walker and Baker (2000) suggested those understanding consumers’ expectations
of insurance service is crucial as expectations serve as standards or reference
points against which service performance is assessed.
2.2.2 Relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction
Since customer satisfaction has been considered to be based on the customer’s

experience on a particular service encounter, (Cronin & Taylor, 1992) it is in line
with the fact that service quality is a determinant of customer satisfaction, because
service quality comes from outcome of the services from service providers in
organizations.
Regarding the relationship between customer satisfaction and service quality,

Oliver (1993) first suggested that service quality would be antecedent to customer
satisfaction regardless of whether these constructs were cumulative or transaction-
specific. Some researchers have found empirical supports for the view of the point
mentioned above (Fornell et al 1996; Spreng & Macky 1996); where customer
satisfaction came as a result of service quality.
37
In relating customer satisfaction and service quality, researchers have been more
precise about the meaning and measurements of satisfaction and service quality.
Satisfaction and service quality have certain things in common, but satisfaction
generally is a broader concept, whereas service quality focuses specifically on
dimensions of service. (Wilson et al., 2008, p. 78).
Some authors have agreed to the fact that service quality determines customer
satisfaction. Parasuraman et al., (1985) in their study, proposed that when
perceived service quality is high, then it will lead to increase in customer
satisfaction. Some other authors did comprehend with the idea brought up by
Parasuraman (1995) and they acknowledged that “Customer satisfaction is
basedupon the level of service quality that is provided by the service providers”
(Saravana , p. 436, Lee et al., 2000, p. 226). More evidence of this relationship has
been proven by past researches.
Su et al., (2002) carried a study to find out the link between service quality and
customer satisfaction, from their study, they came up with the conclusion that,
there exist a great dependency between both constructs and that an increase in
one is likely to lead to an increase in another. Also, they pointed out that service
quality is more abstract than customer satisfaction because, customer satisfaction
reflects the customer’s feelings about many encounters and experiences with
service firm while service quality may be affected by perceptions of value (benefit
relative to cost) or by the experiences of others that may not be as good.
(Wang & Hing-Po, 2002 p. 50-60) This study blended the study of customer
satisfaction and service quality with customer value which added more weight to
the linkage between customer satisfaction and service quality because value is
what customers look in an offer.
38
2.2.3 Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in
Insurance Industry
Research has shown that the quality of services and the achievement of customer
satisfaction and loyalty are fundamental for the survival of insurers. Taylor (2001)
concluded that the quality of after sales services can lead to very positive results
through customer loyalty, positive WOM, repetitive sales and cross-selling.
Lawrence A. Crosby, Nancy Stephens (1987) explained that insurance consists
largely of credence properties & insurance providers should engage themselves in
relationship-building activities that emphasize buyer-seller interaction and
communication. Leonard L. Berry (1995) said that because of the amount of money
that is typically invested in an insurance policy, customers seek long-term
relationships with their insurance companies and respective agents in order to
reduce risks and uncertainties. Raj Arora, Charles Stoner, (1996) on their research
found that perceived service quality has a significant effect on the attitude towards
obtaining insurance. Westbrook and Peterson (1998) also found that professional
customers evaluate the quality of services in the same way as retail customers.
Overall, the causal relationships between service quality and customer satisfaction
have been examined by a number of studies, in service settings around the world.
A review of literature revealed that the earlier studies on measurement of customer
perceived service quality were very few for insurance and banking industry, more
so in the Ethiopian context. The topic therefore needs to be investigated. This is a
literature gap that this research attempts to narrow by reporting its findings.
39
2.3. Conceptual Frame Work and Hypothesis
This study is designed to determine the impact of Overall perceived service quality
on customer satisfaction and assess if their is a relationship between service
quality dimensions with customer satisfaction. Fig 2.3 below presents the
conceptual frame work of this study.
Overall Service
Quality
Tangiblity H6
H1
Reliability
H2
Customer
H3
Responsiveness Satisfaction
H4
Empathy H5
H1
Assurance
Figure 2.3 Conceptual Frame Work
40
In line with the above mentioned research frame work the following hypothesis are
formulated.
H1: Tangeblity is significantly and positively related to customer satisfaction.
H2: Reliablity is significantly and positively related to customer satisfaction.
H3: Responsiveness is significantly and positively related to customer

satisfaction.
H4: Empathy is significantly and positively related to customer satisfaction.
H5: Assurance is significantly and positively related to customer satisfaction.
H6: Overall service quality is significantly and positively related to customer

satisfaction.
41
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The methodology adopted in this study provided a design that empirically

addresses the identified research problem and recaps how the study results can be
replicated, generalized and employed in prediction for effective decision making.
The methodology adopted describes the population, sampling procedure,
instrumentation and data collection approach used. It allowed for description of
the influence of service quality on customer satisfaction.
3.1 Research Paradigm
Research philosophy is the underlying assumptions and intellectual structure

upon which research in a field of inquiry is based. Sobh and Perry (2006) posit
that the paradigm employed by a researcher is antecedent to the choice of research
methodology and the types of questions to be asked. Guba and Lincoln (1994)
identified three elements of a paradigm; ontology, epistemology and methodology.
Essentially, ontology is “reality”, epistemology is the relationship between the
reality and the researcher and methodology is the technique used by the
researcher to discover that reality. The key ontological feature under the positivist
paradigm is that the researcher and reality are separate. The term epistemology
comes from the Greek word episteme meaning knowledge.
3.2 Research Methods
Researchers are overly concerned with the choice a quantitative methodology.

Essentially, quantitative researchers use numbers and large samples to test
theories, while qualitative researchers use words and meanings in smaller samples
to build theories (Easterby-Smith et al., 1991). Consistent with the positivist
approach, this study adopted quantitative research in examining the
42
Variable and in testing the relationship between service quality, and customer
satisfaction.
This study adopted a positivist paradigm with an epistemological element because

this approach allowed for reporting of findings as observed, explanation of the new
knowledge discovered and assured of independence of the researcher from the
study.
3.3 Research Design
The research purpose is a broad statement of what the research hopes to achieve.
According to purpose, research could be broadly divided into descriptive,
exploratory and explanatory (Saunders et al., 2000, & Schindler 2004). Descriptive
research includes surveys and fact-finding enquiries of different kinds. The major
purpose of descriptive research is description of the state of affairs as it exists at
present. (Kothari, 2004). It involves formalizing the study with definite structures
in order to better describe or present facts about a phenomenon as it is perceived
or as it is in reality.
An explanatory research tries to establish relationship that exists between

variables. It aims at identifying how one variable affects the other; it seeks to
provide an empirical explanation to the causality and causes and effects
relationship between one or more variables (Saunders et al., 2000, & Malhotra
2006). They are also used when the purpose of the study is to answer ‘why’ in a
given context. Lastly, research may be exploratory where a study is conducted to
explore and find out what is happening or to seek new insights about a phenomenon
in a new light” (Robson, 2002). Mostly, it is used when a researcher wants to have
a deeper understanding of a situation or a problem, or where the area of study is
so new or vague that it becomes critically important to examine unknown variable
that may affect a particular phenomenon. It, therefore, involves the use of methods
like searching for library materials, asking for expert’s opinion, and conducting a
focus group interviews.
43
This study employe a quantitative techenics and use both explanatory, and
descriptive purposes. Firstly, the study is descriptive as it seeks to describe in
detail the state of customer satisfaction and service quality in NIC. Secondly, an
explanatory method is selected since it seek to determine the relation ship between
the service quality variable with customer satisfaction and how service quality
dimension affect the overall customer satisfaction in NIC.
3.4 Population and Sample Size
3.4.1 Population
The target population of this study is focused on the exsiting coorporate customers
of non life section. According to the annual reports of Marketing and Development
Department, as of September 2014, the company has 747 existing corporate
clients with a premium amount of more than 50,000.00 birr per year in across all
branches.
Out of the total population, 620 corporate customer were found in Addis Ababa .
3.4.2 Sample Size
Participants of the study were all corporate client of Addis Ababa branches have
been insured more than two years . The study focused on corporate client, because
of , the majority of companies production i.e (51%) is collected from a corporate
clients specifically from Non Life/ General Insurance Sector. In addition to this, in
order to make a representative data, the researcher use only those having two
years experiance with the company.
A total of 243 corporate clients were taken as the study sample by using the
formula proposed by Yamane (1967).
n= N = 620
1+ N (e) 2 1+620(0.05)2
44
From the above formula, n was the sample size, N was the population size and e
was the confidence level (0.05). Using N = 620 in the formula, the resulting sample
size (n) was 243 and distributed to the branches as shown in Table 3.1 below.
Table 3.1 Sample distribution of each branch

No. of Annual No of
customer premium in
Branch sample Percentage
(birr)
1. Main 174 53,564,804.42 68 27.98
2. Genet 47 19 7.81
11,755,285.43
3. Ras 45 9,179,270.31 18 7.40
4. Urael 41 6,849,779.86 16 6.58
5. Megenagna 21 11,410,960.07 8 3.28
6. Tiret 26 3,724,975.75 10 4.11
7. Tana 31 4,099,000.00 12 5
8. Piassa 24 10,841,147.74 9 3.7
9. N.Silk 41 7,536,054.81 16 6.58
10. Lideta 39 7,116,345.12 15 6.14
11. Bole 31 9,470,101.58 12 4.9
12. A.Ketema 11 3,143,328.02 4 1.64
13. Gotera 26 5,442,144.59 10 4.11
14. Lebu 14 2,804,803.90 6 2.46
15. G.Shola 24 3,405,627.26 10 4.11
45
16. Meshualekia 25 3,691,211.16 10 4.11
Total 620 154,034,845.02 243 100
(Source: Company report, 2014)
The study took a sample from all Addis Ababa branches , except for two newly
opened branches as the study scope exclude those having less than two years
experiance. Thus, a total of 243 corporate customers were selected
proportionatly from the above listed branches and based on each branches
sample size, a self administered questionnaire was proportionaltely distributed
by using accidental sampling method at the time of service delivery.
3.5 Data Collection Approach
Both secondary and primary data is used for this study. The primary data was
collected through a pretested structured questionnaire with five point likert scale
and Secondary data were collected from companies’ websites, published articles
etc.
3.5.1 Questionnaire Development and Pre-testing
The questionnaire is used to collect data from respondents. The questionnaire

items were adopted from previous studies (Graham, K.R., Evanglos T. & Simy M.,
2004) and Parasuraman et al., (1988). The questions were modified to suit the
insurance industry context in Ethiopia, and sought respondents’ feelings about
overall customer satisfaction and the impact of service quality on customer
satisfaction and evaluation of each service quality dimensions in insurance
sector.
Specifically, the questionnaire has three main parts: Background Information,

Service Quality and Overall Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction of NIC.
46
3.5.2 Quantitative Administration
After the items are refined, the questionnaire was administered to the target
population through personal contact by the researcher and with the help of front
desk officer of each branch representative.
This was completed from the periods of April 11, 2015 up to April 15, 2015.
3.5.3 Data Analysis Tools
The Data was analyzed with the help of Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS). The data gathered from respondents was summarized using a descrptive
statistic method through tables, frequency counts, percentages, and to test the gap
between perceived and expected service quality a mean score, standard deviations
and a paired sample t test were used to offer a condensed data.
In addition, pearson correlation analysis, was used to explore the relationship

between service quality dimensions and customer satisfaction. Where as, a
multiple linear regrassion analysis was used to find out the impact of independent
variables on the dependent .
3.6 Reliablity and Validity
In order to reduce the possiblity of getting the answer wrong, attention need to be
given to the : reliablity and validity, (Saunders et al., 2003).
3.6.1 Reliablity
Internal consistency reliability is a measure of consistency between different items

of the same construct. If a multiple-item construct measure is administered to
respondents, the extent to which respondents rate those items in a similar manner
is a reflection of internal consistency. Hence, a multiple–item measurement scale
internal consistency method is used to the study. A sample of 30 questionniares
was used for a pilot test whether the questionniares are reliable or not. According
to George & Mallery, (2003) a cronbach alpha coefficient greater than 0.9 implies
47
excellent, greater than 0.8 is good, greater than 0.7 is acceptable, greater than 0.6
is questionable, greater than 0.5 is poor, and less than 0.5 is unacceptable”.
Accordingly, the reliablity test of each dimension is described here under (Table
3.2).
Table 3.2 Reliablity test of each service quality dimension

SERVQUAL dimensions Number of items Cronbach's Alpha Based on
Standardized Items
Tangibles 4 0.937
Reliability 7 0.929
Responsiveness 4 0.746
Assurance 4 0.885
Empathy 5 0.89
Overall items used 24 0.937
(Source: Survey data, 2015).
Table 3.2 above indicates that the cronbach alpha of each service quality
dimensions is between 0.746 and 0.937, which is in line with the above guid line .
Thus the study is reliable.
3.6.2 Validity
Validity describes the extent to which data collection method or methods

accurately measure what they are intended to measure (Saunders et al., 2003).
The validiy of scientific study increases using various sources of evidence (Yin,
1994). The researcher used a content validity, as it asses how well a set of scale
items match with the relevant content domain of the construct that it is trying to
measure.
48
Thus a number of different steps are taken to confirm the validity of the study, as
follows:
• Questioner has been developed based on different litrature review and a

frame of reference.
• Questionnaire has been pre tested by the respondent before distributing all
the sample to the respondent. A pilot test has been made from 30
respondent.
• The collected data was collected from a reliable source, from corporate
clients , having more than two years of experiance with the company
service.
• Data has been collected for one week, and no new event has been observed
related with the topic.
3.7. Ethical Considerations
All information obtained from the respondents were treated with confidentiality
without disclosure of the respondents’ identity. Moreover, no information was
modified or changed, hence information was presented as collected and all the
literatures collected for the purpose of this study were appreciated in the reference
list.
49
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
In this chapter a Respondent profile, A gap analysis, descriptive analysis,

correlation analysis, regression analysis and summery of findings are discussed.
The questionnaire was planned to distribute to NIC corporate customer of 16

branches which is found in addis Ababa based on the criteria that is mentioned in
the methodology section.
A total of 220 out of 243 questionnaires (90% of the response rate) were collected
back and used for data analysis purpose.
4.1 Profile of Responding Firms
The demographics characters include Buisness catatgory; number of experiance

with the company, and amount of annual premium. The analysis of each is given
on table 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3.
TABLE 4.1 Nature of buisness catagory
Buisness Type Frequency Percent

Government 9 4.1
NGO 36 16.4
Private limited
113 51.4
company
share company 62 28.2
Total 220 100.0
(Source: survey data, 2015)
As can be observed from Table 4.1 of 220 respondents 9 (4.1%) of are government
Organization, 36 (16.4%) were NGO’s, where as 113 (51.4%) respondents are
50
private limited company’s and the remaining 62 (28.2%) of the respondents were
share company.
This indicates that most of the respondents were Private Limited companies and
the lowest portions of the respondent were covered by Governments institution.
In order to understand the Customers’ experience with the insurance service, the
responses are collected. It can be noted from the below table that 43 (19.5%) of the
respondents have used the insurance service for more than 2 years, 50 (22.7%)
used the the insurance service between four to seven years, and 61 (27.7%) & 66
(30%) have used the insurance service between 7 to ten years, and greater than
ten year respectively. Thus from the above data we can learn that most of the
respondents have a good experience in using the companies service.
TABLE 4.2: Respondents’ service experience
Experiance in (Year) Frequency Percent

2-4 43 19.5
4-7 50 22.7
7-10 61 27.7
More than 10
66 30.0
years
Total 220 100.0
TABLE 4.3: Respondents’ annual premium
Range of Annual Frequency Percent

Premium in (Birr)
50,001-250,000 35 15.9
250,001-350,000 38 17.3
351,000-450,000 54 24.5
above 450,000 93 42.3
Total 220 100.0
51
Accordingly, about 35 (15.9%) of the respondents are paying an annual premium

ranging from birr 50,001-250,000.00, from birr 250,001-350,000.00 are 38
(17.3%), where as a respondent whose premium covered from birr 351,000.00-
450,000.00 are 54 (24.5%) and the rest 93 (42.3%) are above birr 450,000.00.
This shows that, from the overall sample size the majority of the respondents are
those who have been generating a higher income to the company, i.e more than
450,000.00 Birr.
4.2 Descriptive Statistics
4.2.1 Gap Analysis
The overall SERVQUAL score is the result of average perception score minus the
average expectation score derived from the SERVQUAL instruments. Table 4.4
Shows the service quality gap on the over all items of each dimension for NIC.
The minimum and maximum responses of this study are ranging from 1 to 5 for all
the variables used in the descriptive statistics section , the mean value represents
the average of all customer response on certain dimensions while, standard
deviation shows how diverse the responses of the respondents are meaning, if the
standard deviation shows smaller number it indicates that the response of the
respondents shows close opinions and when the standard deviation is high it
indicates the response of the respondents shows high variation.
52
TABEL 4.4 Descriptive statistics of tangibles
Expectation Perception Gap
(E) (P) (P-E)

Attributes
N Mean Std. Mean Std. Mean
deviation deviation
NiC has visually

appealing physical
220 4.50 .616 3.21 1.092 -1.29
facilities
Has up to date
equipment and
technology. 220 4.51 0.755 2.72 1.183 -1.79
The employees of
NIC are neat in
their appearance 220 4.58 .595 3.32 1,064 -1.26
Materials
associated
with the service 220 4.56 .533 3.24 1.020 -1.32

The
are visually
appealing at NIC.
Overall Tangebiles
average mean. 4.5386 3.1216 -1.417
average mean for the perception of tangibles indicates that the customers of NIC
Corporate believes that, the tangibles aspects of the service provided by NIC are
satisfactory but when we see their expectation it was high which is (4.54) but their
perception average mean was (3.12) which indicates that, even if their
53
perception of service quality with respect to tangible dimension are above neutral ,
customers expectations were higher than their perception and when customers’
expectations exceed their perception they become dissatisfied. More over, among
the four items used to measure the tangible dimensions of service quality the part
where the ‘employees of NIC are neat in their appearance ‘ shows the smallest gap
when we compare it to others. In addition to this, an attribute of ‘NIC has up to date
equipment and technology’ implies the highest gap which make it the least
contributor for customer satisfaction.
TABEL 4.5 Descriptive statistics of Reliablity Dimension
(E) (P) (P-E)
Attributes N Mean Std. Mean Std. Mean

deviation deviat
ion
keeping promises
when promise to do
something by a 4.56 .533 2.68 1.279 -1.88
certain time 220
Issuing Insurance
contracts with
clear, transparent
and non -1.85
4.65 .621 2.79 1.202
ambiguous terms
220
Settles claims
easily and with no
unnecessary delays 4.58 .564 2.97 1.162 -1.6
220
Show sincere 220

interest in solving 4.68
-1.33
customers .478 3.35 1.098
problems
Employees show
dependability in 4.56 .683 1.150 -1.52
220
handling Service
54
problem. 3.04
Issuing error free

bills, statements,
receipts, contracts, 220 4.60 510 1.133 -1.5
3.10
claims and other
documents
Performs its service

right the first time
without
unnecessarily 4.54 0.552 1.129 -1.62
discomforting 220
customers 2.91
Overall average
mean Reliability 4.5935 -1.47
3.1201
As it shown on table 4.5 Reliability dimension has an average gap score of -1.47.
This illustrates, corporate customers do not perceive the NIC service to be
consistent. More specifically, the attribute “keeping promises when promise to do
something by a certain time” and “Issuing Insurance contracts with clear,
transparent and non ambiguous terms” has a high gap score of -1.88 and -1.85
respectively. This demonestrate, NIC fails to meet its explicit or implicit service
promises, and the roughness of policy by itself, contribute for having such a gap in
the minds of customers . In veiw of the above, a further negative gap is seen at
attribute ‘Performs its service right the first time without unnecessarily
discomforting customers’ and ‘Settles claims easily and with no unnecessary delay’
scores a the second and third negative gap . i.e -1.62 and -1.6 respectively.
Thus, according to this study the NIC service reliability, in general, is in

unsatisfactory.
55
TABEL 4.6 Descriptive Statistics of Responsiveness
(E) (P) (P-E)
Attributes N Mean Std. Mean Std. Mean

deviat deviation
ion
Employees of Nic will -1.01

never be too busy to
220 4.48 .705 3.46 .856
respond to customers
requests .
Tell customers exactly -0.88

when services will be 4.53 .552 3.65 .840
performed 220
Employees Will always -0.76

be willing to help 4.54 .622 3.77 .893
customers
220
Are accessible, listen to -0.86

and provide prompt .
4.58 3.72 .933
honest responses to 220 .521
customers’ inquiries
Overall 4.53 3.64 -0.88

Responsiveness
average mean.
Responsiveness has an average gap score of -0.88. All the attributes in this
dimension have a low gap score except the attribute of ‘Employees of Nic will never
be too busy to respond to customer’s requests’, which has a score of -1.01 showing
a deficiency on this attribute.
56
TABEL 4.7 Descriptive Statistics of Assurance
(E) (P) (P-E)

Attributes
N Mean Std. Mean
deviation
The behavior of
employees at
NIC will instill
confidence in 220 4.57 0.604 3.70 .913
customers .
-0.88
Customers feel
safe in
transactions . 220 4.59 .521 3.69 .889 -0.90
Employees are 220

consistently
courteous with 4.59 .502 3.67 .898 -0.92
customers
Employees and
agent have a
requisite
knowledge to give
4.60 .544 3.19 1.127
professional
service to -1.41
customers.
220
Overall 4.59 3.56 -1.03

Assurance
average mean.
Assurance as a dimension of service quality has a gap score of -1.03. The

“Employees and agent have a requisite knowledge to give professional service to
customers.” attribute has the largest negative gap score among the attributes in
this dimension i.e. -1.41 which shows, the staff and the agent are not able to
57
answer all customers’ questions. The other attributes which have a relatively lower
value and more specifically “The behavior of employees at NIC will instill
confidence in customers” attribute indicates that, customers are less concerned
with the behiviour of employee in instiling confidence in their minds.
TABEL 4.8 Descriptive Statistics of Empathy
(E) (P) (P-E)
Attributes N Mean Std. Mean Std.

devi deviation
ation
Employees have -0.95

consistently customers’ 220 4.52 .527 3.57 .794
best interest at heart
NIC give customers -0.87

individual attention 220 4.49 .652 3.62 .827
Employees of NIC do -0.79

Know the needs of 220 4.51 .630 3.72 .777
their customer
Have operating hours -0.37

convenient to all. 220 4.58 .539 4.20 .843
NIC has employees who -0.76

give customers 220 4.42 .674 3.66 .738
personal service.
Overall Empathy 4.50 3.75 -0.8

average mean.
The last dimension Empathy has an average gap score of -0.8 (Table 4.8)
indicating the corportate customer were neutral with this dimension as the overall
empathy perception is score 3.75. Thus ,even if they are neural, there still seen a
58
gap between customer perception and expectation, which result a disatisfied
customers.
Among all the above empathy attributes, a high gap is scored specifically in the
attribute of , ‘’Employees have consistently customers best interest at heart’ and
“Staff giving customers Individual attention’’ attribute with a gap score of -0.95
and 0.87 respectively. Conversely, the item that score highest in customer
peception of service quality with low standard deviation or having a respondent
close opinion in their agreements are, ‘NIC have operating hours convenient to all’
with an average a gap score of -0.37. This reflects a positive side of the company
in having a convienint working hours.
TABLE 4.9 Overall Gap analysis of SERVQUAL dimensions
Service quality Mean Gap Rank

dimensions
Perception Expectation (P-E)
Overall Tangible 3.12 4.54 -1.42 2
Overall Reliability 3.12 4.59 -1.47 1
Overall Responsiveness 3.65 4.53 -0.88 4
Overall Assurance 3.56 4.59 -1.03 3
Overall Empathy 3.75 4.50 -0.75 5
Overall average mean 3.44 4.55 -1.11
(Source: Survey data, 2015)
As it is shown on table 4.9. Among the five dimension of SERVQUAL, reliablity

dimension has the highest score with a gap of (-1.47) followed by tangibles (-1.42),
Assurance (-1.03), responsiveness (-0.88) and Empathy(-0.75) in descending
orders.
In addition, all the gaps across SERVQUAL dimensions are found to be statistically
significant with (p < 0.01).
59
The above data reveal that, overall perception of service quality of the five
dimensions customers are more neutral about the levels of the overall perceived
service quality, scores a medium value of (3.34).
Though the customers feel nuetral about the levels of service quality , their is still
a gap between customer’s perception and expectation of service quality in NIC.
This further Indicates that, the customers’ perceptions fall short of their
expectations with a gap score of -1.11. In other words, the levels of service quality
that the customers receive are lower than their minimum tolerable expectation, i.e.
there is a certain degree of dissatisfaction in NIC. Thus NIC should give due
emphesise to reliablity, tangeblity and Assurance as they contribute higher value
to customer dissatisfaction . Moreover, the other dimension like empathy and
responsivenness shall not left over as it contribute less to customer disatisfation
rather the company should further exceed their clients need in order to
consistently satisfy their need.
60
4.2.2 Overall Customer Satisfaction Analysis
TABLE 4.10 Overall customer satisfaction frequency distribution.
Overall Satisfaction
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
Highly
6 2.7 2.7 2.7
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied 40 18.2 18.2 20.9
Neutral 80 36.4 36.4 57.3
Satisfied 70 31.8 31.8 89.1
Highly
24 10.9 10.9 100.0
satisfied
Total 220 100.0 100.0
(Source: Survey data, 2015)
The above table shows, the overall levels of satisfaction with respect to the service
quality provided by NIC are, the cumulative percentage of 20.9 % are dissatisfied
whearas, 57.3 % of them were indifferent about the service quality while, 89.1 % of
them were satisfied.
These shows that, the overall levels of NIC is performing not so bad but still it
have a lots of things to improve on the indifferent corporate clients Since, they are
neither satisfied nor dissatisfied about the current levels of service quality.
61
4.3 Correlation Analysis
Correlation analysis is one of the most widely used and reported statistical method
in summarizing scientific data (Tyler, 1990), Correlation can be either negative or
positive (Greasley, 2008) as presented here under:
• Positive correlation: an increase in values for one variable is associated with

an increase in values for the other variable,
• Negative correlation: an increase in values for one variable is associated
with a decrease in values on another variable .
The strength of a correlation is indicated on a scale ranging from -1 to +1 As a

general guideline, a value ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 would be classed as a weak
correlation, and anything above 0.5 would be regarded as a strong correlation
(Cohen, 1988).
A value approaching zero indicates the absence of any relationship between two
variables, in other words no correlation (Greasley, 2008). , a correlation of 1.0
indicates a perfect positive correlation, and a value of -.01 indicates a perfect
negative correlation. Further more, (Cohen, 1988) suggests the following as guidelines:
r = 0. 01 to 0. 029 or r= -.010 to -00.29 , Small

r = 0. 030 to 0. 049 or r= -0. 030 to -0. 049, Medium
r= 0. 050 to 1.0 or r –.050 to –1.0, Large
Pearson correlation analysis is used to determine whether there is a positive or

negative relationship among the five dimensions of SERVQUAL and Customer
Satisfaction having such analysis enable us to see the significance of each
dimension with one another with the presense of the dependent value i.e Customer
satisfaction.
62
Accordingly, the correlation of each servqual dimension is dipicted under table
4.11.
TABLE 4.11 Correlation between a SERVQUAL dimensions and Customer

Satisfaction.
Correlations
Customer
Dimension Tangibility Reliability Responsiveness
Assurance Empathy satisfaction
Tangibles 1
Reliability .727** 1
Responsiveness .484** .705** 1

Assurance .547** .775** .754** 1
Empathy .397** .550** .548** .600** 1
Overall
satisfaction .649** .809** .645** .729** .591** 1
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The results in the above table 4.11 indicate that, there is positive and strong
relationship between overall tangebles and reliablity where (r = 0.727, P < 0.01)
which tells, an increase in the value for overall tangebliles is associated with an
increase in the values for the overall reliablity, like wise, overall tangebiles has a
strong positive relation ship with overall assurance and overall satisfaction as (r =
0.547, p < 0.01), (r = 0.649, p < 0.01).
where as, a relation ship between overall tangibles with overall responsiveness and
overall empathy, is a positive but it is a week relation since (r = .484, P < 0.01)
and (r = 0.397, P <0.01), respectively .
63
Overall reliablity has a strong positive relation with overall responsiveness,
assurance, empathy, customer satisfaction since (r = 0.705, P < 0.01), (r = 0.775, P
<0.01), (r = 0.55, P <0.01 ) and (r = 0.809, P <0.01) respectively, and an increase in
the value of overall reliablity will increase the value of the overall responsiveness,
assurance and empathy and customer satisfaction.
As shown in table 4.10 overall responsiveness has also a strong positive correlation
with overall assurance, overall empathy and customer satisfaction with a
correlation value of (r = 0.754, P < 0.01), (r = 0.548, P <0.01) ( r= .645, P < 0.01)
respectively.
overall assurance has a strong positive relation with empathy and customer
satisfaction as (r = 0.600, P <0.01) and (r = .729, P <0.01). Which means an
increase in the levels of overall empathy will increase in the level of overall
customer satisfaction. Lastly, Overall empathy has a strong correlation with
customer satisfaction since, (r = .591, P <0.01).
The result show that, all the independent variables have correlation with the
dependent variables.
4.4 Regression Analysis
- Linear regression:- is a method of estimating or predicting a value on some

dependent variable given the values of one or more independent variables. Like
correlations, statistical regression examines the association or relationship
between variables. Unlike with correlations, however, the primary purpose of
regression is prediction. For example, insurance adjusters may be able to predict
or come close to predicting a person’s life span from his or her current age, body
weight, medical history, history of tobacco use, marital status, and current
behavioral patterns (Marczyk, Dematteo & Festinger, 2005).
There are two basic types of regression analysis: simple regression and multiple
regressions. In simple regression, we attempt to predict the dependent variable
with a single independent variable. In multiple regressions, as in the case of the
64
insurance adjuster, we may use any number of independent variables to predict
the dependent variable (Marczyk, Dematteo & Festinger, 2005).
4.4.1 The Impact of Service Quality Dimensions on Customer

Satisfaction.
The main aim of the study was to examine the extent service quality dimensions
contribute to determine customer satisfaction.
To investigate the relationship between SERVQUAL dimensions and customer

satisfaction, a multiple linear regression model was applied. By taking each
SERVQUAL dimensions as independent variables and overall Customer
satisfaction as a dependent variable.
The beta coefficients indicated that, how and to what extent SERVQUAL
dimensions such as tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy
influence customer’s satisfaction of the NIC Non life section.
The mathematical representation of the above relationship is displayed as;
Y= α + 𝞫𝞫1(TAN) + 𝞫𝞫2(REL) + 𝞫𝞫3(RES) + 𝞫𝞫4(ASS) + 𝞫𝞫5(EMP)
Where, Y= Overall Customer Satisfaction
α = Constannt
Tan, Rel, Res, Ass, Emp = Dimensions of the service quality
β1, β2, β3, β4, β5 = Beta Coefficients of each dimension
65
TABLE 4.12 Multiple Linear Regression analysis
Unstandardized Standardized t Sig. Co linearity Statistics

Service Quality Dimension Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta Toleranc VIF

e
(Constant) -.423 .244 -1.736 .084
Tangibiles .139 .055 .137 2.538 .012 .469 2.131
Reliability .464 .075 .462 6.197 .000 .247 4.049
Responsiv
.042 .073 .034 .576 .565 .386 2.587
eness’
Assurance .203 .080 .174 2.547 .012 .296 3.379
Empathy .256 .077 .159 3.346 .001 .609 1.641

R= .840 R2 = .699 F=102.609
Dependent Variable: Overall Customer satisfaction
*Significance at 0.05 level
Before interpreting the beta coeficient it is important to evaluate the model in

terms of the issue of multicoliniarity. The issue has been addressed by the
outcome of both the variance inflation factor (VIF) and the tolerance level. If the
tolerance values less than 0.10 may merit further investigation where as if the VIF
value is greater than 10 may merit further investigation. As it can be seen from the
table this requirments are not invalidated in our results and there is no issue of
multicolinearity.
The above table demonstrate that, about 69.9% (R2=0.699) of the variance in the
overall satisfaction is explained by overall Service quality dimension. This in fact,
is a strong explanatory power of regression. More over, the results further
demonstrate that, there is positive and statistically significant (p<0.05, F=102.60)
relationship between the SERVQUAL dimensions and overall customer
satisfaction.
66
Inaddition , the reliablity (β=0.462, P<0.05), Empathy (β=0.159, P<0.05), tangebles
(β=0.137, P<0.05) and assurance (β=0.174, P<0.05) of the service quality
dimensions have statistically significant and positive relationship with customer
satisfaction having P<0.05. Among these dimensions reliablity is the most
significant one due to its highest beta standard coefficient which is (β=0.462,
P<0.01).
Thus, H1, H2, H4 and H5 are supported.
The Regression Model is
Customer Satisfaction= -0.423+0.137(TAN)+0.462(REL) +0.34(RES)
+0.174(ASS) +0.159(EMP)
From the result shown in the above table, Reliablity with (beta =0.462, t=6.197,
P<0.05) have the highest influence or significant impact on customer’s satisfaction
when we compare it with other dimensions.
From this, NIC should give due emphesis on those dimension which have a
statistical significance i.e (P< 0.05) and a higher Beta value.
4.4.2 The Impact of Overall Service Quality on Overall Customer

Satisfaction.
To analyze the relationship between overall service quality and customer
satisfaction a simple linear regression was applied. The following table 4.13 shows
the impact of overall service quality of NIC None life section and customer
satisfaction.
67
TABLE 4.13 The relationship between overall service quality and customer
satisfaction
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig. Collinearity

Coefficients Coefficients Statistics
B Std. Beta Tolerance VIF

Error
1 (Constant) .241 .078 3.105 .002
Overall .931 .023 .941 41.192 .000 1.000 1.000

service
quality
R= 0.941a R2 = .886 F=1696.75
Dependent Variable: Overall Customer Satisfaction
The result on table 4.13 indicates that about 88.6% (R2=0.886) of the variance in
the overall Customer Satisfaction is explained by the overall service quality. In
addition, the result demonstrate that, there is a positive and statistically
significant (p<0.05) relationship between overall service quality and overall
customer satisfaction. This will further explain, when the levels of service quality
increase the customer become satisfied.
Therefore, NIC should focus on service quality since it has significant and positive
relationship with customer satisfaction.
Thus, H6 is supported.
Based on the findings of the study, the result of the formulated hypothesis
whether it is supported or not are summarized under table 4.14.
68
TABLE 4.14 Summary of hypothesis results.
Hypothe Statement of the hypothesis Method of Result

sis Analysis
Supported
used
/Failed
Tangeblity is significantly and positively

H1 Linear Supported
related to customer satisfaction. Regression
Reliability is significantly and positively

H2 Linear Supported
related to customer satisfaction.
Regression
Responsiveness is significantly and

H3 Linear Failed
positively related to customer satisfaction.
Regression
Assurance is significantly and positively

H4 Linear Supported
Regression
Empathy is significantly and positively

H5 Linear Supported
Regression
Overall service quality is significantly and

H6 Linear Supported
positively related to customer satisfaction.
Regression
69
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In this chapter conclusion about the study are formulated and based on these
conclusion a possible recommendations are drawn.
5.1 Summary of Major Findings
The primary objective of the study was to examine the impact of service quality on
customer satisfaction in Nib Insurance Company (S.Co). To achieve this objective,
data was collected by using accidental sampling method from 16 branches of the
company.
Then, after the data collected, a t paired sample test, correlation and regression
methods were employed. After that, the data further analyzed by SPSS , version 20
software.
Accordingly, the following finding from the analysis is stated hereunder;
The demographic characteristics of respondents at the 16 branches show

that, the majority of their respondents are Private Limited Company (51.4%).
Share Company (28.2%), NGO’s (16.4%) and Government Institution (4.1%).
Also most of the respondents are relatively have well experianced with the
company as 30% of the majority respondents do have > 10 years of relation
with the company.
Regarding the annual premium, 42.3% of the corporate customers are

contributes more than 450,000.00 br per year.
The dimension of Tangibles has a gap score of -1.417 with an attribute of ‘

has up to date equipment” has highest negative score (-1.79).
70
The study also reveals that, NIC has relatively worrisome Reliability score as
judged by the respondents’ average score of the attribute “keeping promises
when promise to do something by a certain time” has a gap score of -1.88
Responsiveness has a gap score of -.88% among the attributes “Employees of

Nic will never be too busy to respond to customers requests” has a higher
gap score -1.01.
The Assurance dimension at NIC has a score average mean of -1.03, and the
attribute ‘Employees and agent have a requisite knowledge to give
professional service to customers’ has a highest gap score of -1.41.
And the last dimension Empathy has a gap score of - 0.80 and the attribute
of “Employees have consistently customers best interest at heart” has a gap
score of -0.95.
And the highest service quality gap is found for Reliablity (-1.47) followed by
Tangibiles (-1.42). The remaining dimension is more or less has a lower gap
scores.
All the five SERVEQUAL dimensions are positively correlated with each other
with the existance of the dependent variable and no multicolliniarity exist.
The overall satisfaction of corporate clients with the existing service quality
results shows that, a cummulative value of 70 (89.1%) were comfortable with
the service quality . Hence 80(57.3) of the respondent were indifferent about
the current service quality of NIC.
Except responsiveness, all dimensions of service quality have significantly

positive relation with customer satisfaction.
71
Overall customer satisfaction has positively influenced by overall Service
quality. About 88.6% of the variance in overall customer satisfacion is due to
overall service quality.
5.2 Conclusion
Delivering customer satisfaction is at the heart of every service provider. The most
important aspect of the relationship between service provider and customer is that
there is a disconnect between what customers want and what service providers
offer. This is particularly true in case of services like insurance. This study has
been undertaken to determine the impact of service quality on customer
satisfaction and to measure the Gap between the perception and expectation of
service quality .
In analyzing the impact of service quality on Customer satisfaction. As said by

Wilson et al. (2008), service quality is a focused evaluation that reflects the
customer’s perception of reliability, assurance, responsiveness, empathy and
tangibility. The study established, the combination of each dimension i.e
tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy to reflect the impact
of service quality in determining whether it have a significant relation with
customer satisfaction or not. The findings of this research brought answers to the
pre-stated research questions. Thus, the following conclusion is forwarded in line
with the research questions.
RQ 1 : Does NIC Customer experiance the expected service quality?
According to the research result, the highest gap is seen in overall perceived
quality is from reliablity dimension with a gap score of -1.47, which contribute the
highest gap of all dimensions. An Emperical study which is conducted in Greek
and Kenya Insurnace Company also explored that reliablity creates a higher gap in
the perceived service quality (Tsoukatos, Marwaa, & Rand 2004). Thus, reliablity
dimension is crusial in determining the gap between perceived and expected
service quality.
72
RQ 2 : What is the level of satisfaction of NIC customers?
The research result reveal that, a cumulative value of 89.1% respondent were
satisfied with the service rendered at NIC, where as, 57.3% of them were indifferent
and 20% are dissatisfied with the service.
Thus, Nic service quality is some what satisfactory . How ever, since 57.3% of the
respondent were nuetral, the company should maintain an assessment on their
service expectation.
RQ 3 : Is their any relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in

NIC?
Regarding this research question, the objective is to determine wheather there is a

relationship between service quality and customer satisfacion. Accordingly, the
result revealed that, overall service quality has significantly positive relationship
with customer satisfaction. Concerning the relationship between customer
satisfaction and service quality, some researchers have found empirical supports
for the the finding mentioned above (Anderson & Sullivan, 1993; Fornell et al
1996; Spreng & Macky 1996); where customer satisfaction came as a result of
service quality. Thus, regarding this research question, the result obtained by
present research is in accordance with the findings of the previous researchers.
RQ 4 : Which Service quality dimensions contribute significantly to determine

customer satisfacion?
In this research, all service quality dimensions except, responsiveness have

significantly contribute in determining customer satisafaction. Reliablity followed
by Assurace, Empathy and Tangebles are significantly influence customer
satisfaction in decending order.
73
Furthermore, emperical research done on the impact of Service Quality on
Customer Satisfaction of private sector banks in Bangladesh, it is observed that,
out of five service quality dimensions, Tangible is having a high Mean score and
the bank should concentrate on Responsiveness as it has the least mean score. In
addition , The study establish the combination of tangibility, reliability,
responsiveness, assurance and empathy together have significant effect on
customer satisfaction (Karim & Chowdhury, 2014) .
Therefore, service quality has positive effect on customer satisfaction. These two
variables should work hand in hand to ensure success and survival of the private
sector banks. The study accomplished that quality service is an important factor to
satisfied customer satisfaction.
5.3 Recomendation
Based on analysis of the data and findings, the following recommendations are
drawn:
• According to the finding, the highest and least percentage of the

respondent are from Private limited companies with (51.4%) and
Government institution (4.1%) respectively. Thus, NIC should adjust their
marketing strategy to expand their buisness relation with all types of firms
in order to be sustainable in the market. Inaddition further research should
be conducted on the expected value of pubic institution toward NIC .
• The respondent service experiance with NIC ranges from 2-4 yeear (19.5%)
to more than 10 years (30%). From this, NIC should maintain an
appreciation mechanized to up hold sustainablity of long term buisness
relation ship.
• From the study, NIC lack to use an up to date technological equipment, So

, the company should strive to acquire technological capacity that will
enable them to provide a wide array of Insurance service promptly and
efficiently to their customers. like wise Nic Physical facility is not as such
74
an eye catching thus, the managment especially the marketing and
development department should give due emphesis on the visually
appealing of each service encounter so that it will enhance the levels of
service quality.
• One of the worst score of NIC is reliablity, NIC fail to give a reliable service
to customer, thus, the employees of the company should work on keeping
their promises when promise to do something by a certain time, show a
sincere interest in solving client problem, inform users of the time required
to perform transaction, and perform service right the first time and should
maintain a strategy to settle claims easliy with unnesessary delay .
Furthermore, the companies should give the policy terms and condition
with easy ,understandable terms and even should be delivered/interpreted
in a local language.
• According to the findings, 88% among other attributes of responsivenees

“Employees of Nic will never be too busy to respond to customers requests”.
Thus, Nic should hire the required number of employee, who are self
motivated, enthusiastic employees who will like to deal with customer and
will try to solve customer complaints and other issues in an effective
manner. Only then the insurer can render customer services efficently and
enjoy the benfit in the long run.
• From the finding assurance and empathy have score a gap of -1.03 and -
0.80 from the attributes of “Employees and agent have a requisite
knowledge to give professional service and “Employees have consistently
customers’ best interst at heart” respectively. As a result, NIC should
provide a training programs for front line employees, so that they become
confident enough to handle customer requests. In addition, among the
• attributes of empathy “NIC have operating hours convienient to all” score

the least gap of -.37. This shows,the positive implication to NIC as, the
company set the working hours convienient to all customer.
75
• According to the findings Reliablity dimensions score the highest gap of all
( -1.47) followed by tangebles (-1.42). Therefore, since there is a need to fix
service quality leakages in the two dimension, NIC should prioritized
deployement of resources to these dimensions as the they have the
potential to positively impact the overall service quality .
• Furthermore, all the five service quality dimension are positively correlated
with each other, thus, NIC should see the effects /behaviour of each
dimension to one another while making a strategic decision as each of them
are strongly correlated. In addition, the study presents, except
responsivenss all the five dimensions of service quality, have significantly
positive influence on customer satisfaction. Therefore, Nic should further
give attention to those dimensions having significantly positive relation to
customer satisfaction.
5.4 Major Limitation and Direction for Future Reseach
The focus of the study is assessing the impacts of service quality on customer
satisfaction, a future study can be conducted in the area of service quality for Life
products and expand its horizon in determining service quality for areas outside
addis ababa branches. In addition, as employees are important in the area of
service quality it will be a potential issue to research service quality from the
employee perspective in the organization. Further more, as the study use a
quantitative research method, it become bases for future researcher to see the
implication of the result in qualitaive or using both methodologies. Last but not
least, future research shall also be conducted by exploring other service quality
dimension which might have a higher potential in determining customer

satisfaction.
76
REFERENCES
A.V Feigen baum (1983) total quality control, 3rd ed, MC Graw-hill.
Anderson, E.W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D.R. (1994), customer satisfaction, market
share and profitability: findings from Sweden, Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53-66.
Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K.J. & Swan, J.E. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: a critical
review of service quality, The Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.10, Number 6, p.62-
81.
Arora R and Stoner C (1996), “The Effect of Perceived Service Quality and Name
Familiarity on the Service Selection Decision”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 10,
No. 1, pp. 22-34.
A Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL; review, critique, research agenda, European Journal of

Marketing, Vol. 30, Number 1, p.8-32.
Barbara R. Lewis (1993) Marketing Intelligence & Planning, MCB University Press,
11(4), 4-12. 0263-4503.
Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services–growing interest, emerging

perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (Fall), 236-245.
Bodla & Chaudhry (2012), ‘’a study of service quality expected and perceived by the
customers of icici prudential life insurance company’’, The Journal of Computing and
Business Research, Vol. 3 ,No.3 P24-52.
Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business research methods. New York:

McGraw-Hill.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77
Collart, D. (2000), Customers Relationship management , price water house cooper,
New York, USA.
Cowling, A., and Newman, K. (1995). Banking on People. Personnel Review, Vol. 24,
issue 7, pp. 25-41.
Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992) Measuring service quality; a re-examination and
extension. The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, Number 3, p.55-68.
Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K. and Hult, G. T. (2000) Assessing the effects of quality, value,
and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments,
Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
Crosby, L. A. & Stephens, N. (1987). Effects of relationship marketing on satisfaction,

retention, and prices in the life insurance industry. Journal of Marketing Research,
24(November), 404-411.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. New York:
American Library.
Donnelly M, Wisniewski M, Dalrymple JF, Curry A(1995). Measuring service. quality in

local government: the SERVQUAL approach. Int J Public Sector Manage; P. 15–20.
Eshghi, A., Roy, S. K., & Ganguli, S. (2008). Service quality and customer satisfaction:
An empirical investigation in Indian mobile Telecommunications services, Marketing
Management Journal, 18(2) 119-144.
Evangelos, T., Simmy, M., & Graham, R.K. (2004). Quality improvement in the Greek
and Kenyan insurance industries. Archives of Economic History, 16 (2), pp. 93-116.
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1983), Total Quality Control, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
78
Fisk, R.P., Brown, S.W., & Bitner, M.J. (1993). Tracking the evolution of the services
marketing literature. Journal of Retailing, 69 (1), pp. 61- 103.
Fornell, C., Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J. and Bryant, B.E. (1996), The
American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose and findings, Journal of
Business Research, 60(4), 7-18.
Gayathri, H., Vinaya, M.C., & Lakshmisha, K. (2005). A pilot study on the service
quality of insurance companies. Journal of Services Research, 5 (2), pp. 123-38.
Gefen, D. (2002). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. International Journal of
Management Science, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 725-37.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and
reference. 11.0 update (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Goswami, P. (2007). Customer satisfaction with service quality in the life insurance
industry in India. ICFAI Journal of Services Marketing, 5 (1), pp. 25-30.
Graham, K Rand,Evanglos Tsoukatols, Simy Manua,(2004),Diagnosis and

improvement of service quality in the insurance industry of Greece and
Kenya;department of managment science lancer university managment
school,Lancaster UK.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, In N.

K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (105-117).
Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
Grönroos, C. (2000) Service Management and Marketing. A Customer Relationship

Management Approach. Chichester: John Wiley.
Grönroos, C. (1982) ‘An Applied Service Marketing Theory’, European Journal of

Marketing 16(7): 30–41.
79
Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 18: PP. 36-44.
Hailu Zeleke 2007. Insurance in Ethiopia: Historical Development, Present Status and
Future Challenges. Addis Ababa: Master Printing Press.
Hazlina (2011). Impacts of service quality on customer satisfaction: Study of Online

banking and ATM services in Malaysia, Int. J. Trade. Econ. Fin. 2(1).
Johnson, M. D. & Fornell, C. (1991). A Framework for comparing customer satisfaction

across individuals and product categories. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12 (2): 267-
286.
Kuo. YF (2003) A study on service quality of virtual community websites, Total Quality
Management & Business Excellence, 13 (4), 461-473.
Kotler, P., and Armstrong, G.(2010) Principles of Marketing (13th ed.), Pearson
Education, London.
Kotler, P. , Armestrong ,G and Sounders, J.(1999) Principle of Marketing , (16th
ed.), Prentice Hall Europe, New Jersey, USA.
Lewis, R.C. and Booms, B.H. (1983), “The marketing aspects of service quality”, in
Berry, L.L., Shostack, G.L. and Upah, G.D. (Eds), Emerging Perspectives on Services
Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 99-104.
Leste, M.R., & Wanderley, V. (1997). The interactive approach to service quality and
management. Deuxième Congres International Franco-Quebecois de Génie Industriel,
ALBI 1997.
Lovelock,C. & Lauren,W. (1999) principles of service marketing and management

Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.
80
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (6th ed.). London:
Pearson Education.
Marczyk.G .,Dematteo , D and Festinger, D,(2005) Essentials of Reseach Design and

Methodology, John wiley & sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jesey, USA.
Matzler K, Sauerwein E, Heischmidt KA, 2003. Importance-performance analysis

revisited: The role of factor structure of customer satisfaction. Service Ind. J. 23:112-
129.
Magesh, R. (2010) A Study on Quality of Service as a Tool for Enhancement of Customer

Satisfaction in Banks, Global Journal of Finance and Management, 2, 123-133.
Mehta, S.C., & Durvasula, S. (1998). Relationship between SERVQUAL dimensions and
organizational performance in the case of a business-to-business service. Journal of
Business and Industrial Marketing, 13 (1), pp. 40-53.
National Bank of Ethiopia Annual Report 2013/14.
Negi, R. (2009). Determining customer satisfaction through perceived service quality: A

study of Ethiopian mobile users, International Journal of Mobile Marketing; Vol.4,
Number 1; p.31-38.
Parasuraman, A. et al. (1985): A conceptual model of service quality and its implications
for future research, Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L., Zeithaml, V.A., (1991). Refinement and reassessment of
the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, Vol 67, pp. 420-450.
Parasuraman, A. Berry, L. and Zeithaml, V.A. (fall 1985) “A conceptual model of Service
quality and its implication for future research,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.49, No.4,
pp.41-50.
81
Parasuraman, A. Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. (spring, 1988). SERVQUAL: A aMultiple-
Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing,
Vol 64, NO.1 pp.12-40.
Razak, R. M., Chong, C.S. and Lin, B. (2007) Service quality of a local Malaysian bank:
Customers’ expectations, perceptions, satisfaction and loyalty. International Journal of
Services and Standards, 3(1), 18-38.
Robson, C. (2002). Real word research. Oxford: Blackwell.
Saravanan, R. & Rao, K. S. P. (2007). Measurement of service quality from the

customer’s perspective – An empirical study, Total Quality Management, 18(4) p.435
449.
Saunders, M. ,Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., (2000) Research methods for buisness students
second edition, UK, Financial times, prentice Hall.
Schneider, B., and White, S. (2004). Service Quality Research Perspectives. Sage,
Thousand Oaks, CA. share and profitability: findings from Sweden, Journal of
Marketing, 58(3), 53-66.
Sherden, W. (1987). The erosion of service quality. Best’s Review, 88 (5), 22.
Siddiqui, Masood H., & Sharma, T.G. (2010). Measuring the customer perceived service
quality for life insurance services: an empirical investigation. International Business
Research, 3 (3), pp. 171-186.
Sivadas, Eugene; Baker-Prewitt, Jamie L (2000) An examination of the relationship

between service quality, customer satisfaction, and store loyalty, Journal of Retaill &
Distribution Management, 28(2)73-82.
Smith, G., Smith, A. & Clarke, A. (1991). Evaluating Service Quality in Universities: A
Service Department Perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(3), 334-351.
Sobh, R. & Perry, C. (2006). Research Design and Data Analysis in Realism Research.
European Journal of Marketing, Vol 40, No. (11/12), pp.1194-1209.
82
Spreng, R.A., Mackenzie, S.B. and Olshavsky, R.W. (1996) A re-examination of the
determinant of customer satisfaction, journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15-32.
Stafford, M.R., Stafford, T.F. and Wells, B.P. (1998). Determinants of service quality and
satisfaction in the auto casualty claims process. Journal of Services Marketing, 12 (60),
pp. 426-440.
Sureshchandar G.S., Rajendran C, & Anantharaman R.N. (2002) the relationship

between service quality and customer satisfaction – a factor specific approach, Journal
of Services Marketing, 16(4), 363 – 379.
Tam J L M and Wong Y H (2001), “Interactive Selling: A Dynamic Framework for

Services”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 379-396.
Taylor S.A. (2001). Assessing the Use of Regression Analysis in Examining Service
Recovery in the Insurance Industry: Relating Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction
and Customer Trust. Journal of Insurance Issues, vol. 24 No.2 PP:30-57 .
Toran, D. (1993). Quality service (quality everything!). LIMRA’S Market Facts, Vol 12,
No. 2, pp. 10-11.
Tsoukatos, E. and Rand, G. (2006) Path analysis of perceived service quality,

satisfaction and loyalty in greek insurance, Managing Service Quality, 16, 501-19.
rd
Valarie A. Zeithaml and Mary Jo Bitner (2003), Services Marketing, 3 edition, New
Delhi New York.
Walker, J. & Baker, J. (2000). An exploratory study of a multi-expectation framework

for services. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 411-431.
Wang Y. & Hing-Po L. (2002.) Service quality, customer satisfaction and behavior
intentions: Evidence from China’s telecommunication industry, 4(6), 50-60.
83
Westbrook, K.W. and Peterson, R.M. (1998). Business-to-business selling determinants
of quality. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.27 pp. 51-62.
Wilson A., Zeithaml V.A., Bitner M.J., Gremler D.D. (2008) Services Marketing.
McGraw-Hill Education. Wong, D. H., Rexha, N. and Phau, I. (2008) Re-examining

traditional service quality in an e-banking era. International Journal of Bank Marketing,
26 (7), 526-45.
Xi Liang & Shuai Zhang (2009) Investigation of customer satisfaction in student food
service: An example of student cafeteria in NHH, International Journal of Quality and
service Sciences, 1(1), 113-124.
Yin, RK., (1994),case study research: design and methods, sage publication, inc.
Zeithamel V.A (1988). “Consumer perception of price,quality and value: a means-end

model and synthesis of evidence”, Journal of Marketing,Vol,52, July,PP.2-22.
Zeithaml, V. A. (2009) Service Quality, Profitability, and the Economic Worth of

Customers: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, Journal of Academy of
Marketing Science, 28(1), 67-85.
Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., Parasuraman, A. (1996), "The behavioral consequences of

service quality", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 No.2, pp.31-46.
Ziethaml, A. V. and Bitner, M. J. (1996). Services Marketing. McGraw Hill Inc.,

Singapore.
Zeithaml V. A., Bitner M. J., Gremler D. D. (2006) Services marketing, 4th edition,
McGraw-Hill.
84
- Internet Sources
http://www.emeraldinsight.com
http:// www.nibinsurancethiopia.com
http://www.my-insurance-guide.co.nz/roles-in-insurance.php).
http://www.my-insurance-guide.co.nz/roles-in-insurance.php).
http://2-definition-non-life-insurance.html.
85
APPENDIXES
86
Appendix I
Statistical out put
1. Reliability test
- Reliability test of tangibility
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.0937 4
- Reliability test of reliability
.929 7
- Reliability test of responsiveness
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.746 4
87
- Reliability test of assurance
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.885 4
- Reliability test of empathy
0.89 5
- Reliability test of overall items
.937 24
88
2. Regression Out put of each dimensions
Unstandardized Standardized Co linearity

Coefficients Coefficients Statistics
Std.
Model B Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
1 (Constant) -.423 .244 -1.736 .084
Overall Tangibility .139 .055 .137 2.538 .012 .469 2.131
Overall Reliability .464 .075 .462 6.197 .000 .247 4.049
Overall Responsiveness .042 .073 .034 .576 .565 .386 2.587
Overall Assurance .203 .080 .174 2.547 .012 .296 3.379
Overall Empathy .256 .077 .159 3.346 .001 .609 1.641
Mo d e l S u m m a ry b
Std.
Error of
Adjusted R the Durbin-
Model R R Square Square Estimate Watson
1 .840a .706 .699 .538 1.985
a. Predictors: (Constant), Overall Empathy, Overall Tangibility, Overall Responsiveness,

Overall Assurance, Overall Reliability
b. Dependent Variable: Overall satisfaction
ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model Squares df Square F Sig.
1 Regression 148.329 5 29.666 102.609 .000b
Residual 61.871 214 .289

Total 210.200 219
a. Dependent Variable: Overall satisfaction
b. Predictors: (Constant), Overall empathy, Overall Tangibility, Overall Responsiveness, Overall Assurance,
Overall Reliability
89
3. Correlations out put
Correlations
Tangibles Reliability Responsiveness Empathy Overall satisfaction
Assurance
Pearson Correlation 1 .727** .484** .547** .397** .649**
Overall Tangibility Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N 220 220 220 220 220 220

** ** ** **
Pearson Correlation .727 1 .705 .775 .550 .809**
Overall Reliability Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N 220 220 220 220 220 220
** ** ** **
Pearson Correlation .484 .705 1 .754 .548 .645**
Overall
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
Responsiveness
N 220 220 220 220 220 220
** ** ** **
Pearson Correlation .547 .775 .754 1 .600 .729**
Overall Assurance Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N 220 220 220 220 220 220
** ** ** **
Pearson Correlation .397 .550 .548 .600 1 .591**
Overall Empathy Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N 220 220 220 220 220 220
** ** ** ** **
Pearson Correlation .649 .809 .645 .729 .591 1
Overall satisfaction Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N 220 220 220 220 220 220
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
90

Mahder Geleta

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mahder Geleta

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mahder Geleta

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the research about?

What is the research about?

What dimensions of service quality are examined?

What dimensions of service quality are examined?

ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF COMMERCE

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT

THE IMPACT Of SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER

BY: MAHDER GELETA

RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

THE IMPACT F SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

BY: MAHDER GELETA

ADVISOR: DR. RAKSHIT NEGI

RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

THE IMPACT OF SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER

By: Mahder Geleta

Dr. Rakshit Negi ____________ _____________

ADVISOR SIGNATURE DATE

___________________________ _______________ _____________

____________ _______________ _______________

Signature and Date

Table of Contents ................................................................................................. iii

List of Tables ...................................................................................................... vii

List of Figures .................................................................................................... viii

CHAPTER ONE:- INTRODUCTION

1.2 Background of the Organization................................................................ 3

1.3 Statement of the Problem............................................................................ . 4

1.4 Research Questions .............................................................................. 5

1.5 Objectives of the study ................................................................................ 5

1.5.1 . General Objectives ............................................................... ..........5

1.7 Scope of the Study ................................................................................ 6

1.8 Definition of Terms ................................................................................ 7

1.8.1 . Conceptual Definition................................................................... 7

CHAPTER TWO:- LITRATURE REVIEWS

2.1.1 . Service Characterstics .......................................................................10

2.1.3 Service Quality ..................................................................................... 12

2.1.4.1 Customer Expectations.. ......................................................... 14

2.1.4.2 Customer Perceptions.. ...................................................... . 15

2.1.4.3 Customer Satisfaction......................................................... 16

2.1.4.3.1 Determinants of Customer Satisfaction ........................... 17

2.1.5 Service Quality Model .. .................................................................. 18

2.1.5.1 Gap Model.. ........................................................................ .18

2.1.5.2 SERVQUAL .. ..... ............................................................. . 21

2.1.5.3 Criticisms of SERVQUAL................................................... 22

2.2 Emperical Reviews .................................................................................. 24

2.2.1 Customer Satisfaction in Insurance Industry................................... 24

2.2.2 Relationship between Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction..... 24

2.2.3 Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in Insurance Industry. ... 26

2.3 Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis ............................................. .27

CHAPTER THREE:- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Paradigm ................................................................................. 29

3.2 Research Methods ................................................................................ .29

3.3 Research Design.................................................................................... .30

3.4 Population and Sample Size.................................................................... 31

3.4.2 Sample Size......................................................................................... 31

3.5.1 Questionnaire Development and Pre- Testing................................... 33

3.5.2 Quantitative Administration............................................................. 33

3.5.3 Data Analysis Tools......................................................................... 33

3.6 Reliablity and Validity................................................................................34

3.6.1 Reliablity ...................................................................................... 34

3.6.2 Validity .............................................. ..........................................35

Dr. Rakshit Negi _

___________________ _ _______

____ _ _________