AO10494 - Demo Projects-Outline Proposal - Template
AO10494 - Demo Projects-Outline Proposal - Template
AO10494 - Demo Projects-Outline Proposal - Template
Demonstration Projects
Prepared by TIA-AP
Reference ESA-TIAA-PR-2020-2114
Issue/Revision 1. 4
Date of Issue 24/08/2022
Status Issued
INTRODUCTION
The ARTES 4.0 Downstream Applications is dedicated to develop pre-operational
downstream applications and services using existing space technologies, integrated,
when needed, with terrestrial solutions.
An Outline Proposal is a means for the Tenderer to provide an initial iteration on the
content and justification of the planned ARTES 4.0 Downstream Applications
activity.
The Tenderer is reminded that the ARTES 4.0 is an optional programme of the
European Space Agency, and as such every activity has to explicitly receive the
financial authorisation by the National Delegation(s) of the relevant countries of the
consortium. The Tenderer / Sub(s) shall therefore contact their National
Delegation(s) before submitting their Outline Proposal 1. Should the National
Delegation(s) request access to the Outline Proposal, this shall be handled directly
by the Tenderer / Sub(s) and the National Delegation(s).
1. Parts in red font in this template should be modified as appropriate for your
proposed activity.
2. Text in blue and in a smaller font size (example) is for guidance and can be removed
from the completed outline proposal document.
3. In case the Tenderer has already produced an Activity Pitch Questionnaire
(APQ), the specific section AP.X.Y of the APQ can be directly copied where
identified as: [from AP.X.Y].
The Terminology used in ESA Business Applications document provides an
explanation of the relevant terminology and shall be used as a reference in
preparation of the Outline Proposal.
The funding requested for the proposed project shall not exceed 50% of the
corresponding cost, and up to 80% for activities performed by micro, small and
medium-sized enterprises (i.e. enterprises fulfilling the criteria defined in the
1
Contact details of the National Delegations can be found under: https://business.esa.int/national-
delegations
For Italian companies, it is NOT required to contact the National Delegation (ASI), because ESA has
been delegated by ASI to interface with the Tenderer in the whole stage of the bidding process.
European Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 (2003/361/EC) or as
updated).
Please use this page as the cover page of the Outline Proposal and remove the previous three pages
(Template Title page and Introduction)
This outline proposal shall be no longer that 30 pages. Use 10 point font and do not increase page margins.
Project Name
Outline Proposal for ARTES 4.0 Downstream Applications
Demonstration Project
Programme Line: BASS
Date: ……
Reference: ……
Page 1/23
1 PROJECT SUMMARY AND RATIONALE
Have you (or your partners) contacted your National Delegation or ESA Business Applications Ambassadors
(where available)? [from AP.1.7]
Indicate if you have been in touch with your National Delegation and if you have received any early feedback regarding this application.
Also indicate if you have discussed this application with your ESA Business Applications Ambassadors, if applicable.
In the case that the activity is proposed for the Strategic Programme Lines (5G or 4S), explain how your
service makes use of 5G networks/secure space systems
5G SPL: Indicate the value of using space assets and data together with 5G technologies, indicate the level of 5G and other
technology(ies) maturity, indicate the 5G actors (e.g. telecommunication operators) involved in the value chain and their level of
engagement in the project
Page 2/23
4S SPL: indicate if the service is specifically addressed to institutions or relates to public safety objectives, if there is a need to
deploy/utilize secure satellite communications and which are the actors involved in the value chain related to 4S (e.g. institutional users,
secure satcom providers, ..)
Innovation / unique selling point with respect to what is available in the market: [from AP.2.4]
Indicate the key innovation or unique selling point that would justify the commercial success of the product / service.
Space technology / space asset(s) intended to be used, and rationale: [from AP.2.5]
Indicate how the space assets / technology will be used in the product / service provision and justify their need in comparison to other
solutions. Note that in most situations there are alternative technologies, but they are not appropriate due to specific reasons that need
to be presented.
In case Earth Observation data is used, specify data provider and access to data.
How does the proposed product / service fit within your current business activities and your mid- / long-term
strategy? [from AP.3.3]
Indicate how this project will support the growth of your market share, complement existing product / service, or expand to adjacent
markets. For new companies preparing to launch their first commercial product / service, indicate your mid- / long-term strategy within
the context of the project.
2 BUSINESS PLAN
Elements 2.1 to 2.9 below can also be presented using a single page Business Model Canvas (available at:
https://business.esa.int/documents).
You must complete the Financial Forecast Workbook and paste the results into section 2.13.
Assuming a favourable feedback of your outline proposal by the Agency, the business plan provided here in the outline proposal should
be carried forward to form part of your associated Full Proposal (with updated information, as appropriate).
The following table provides a summary overview of the key customers, the associated high level
characterisation in relation to the target product / service and their representativeness for the targeted market
segment.
Page 3/23
Table 2.1 Key Customers/Customer Segments and their Needs
If the product / service is/are targeting a few important customers, each customer should be clearly identified. Add any supplementary
text you feel is necessary to clarify the nature of your intended customers and to explain their main needs. Please note that the problems
must be specific and show a detailed understanding of the customer pain. Possible examples: maintenance of water flow sensors takes
a lot of time: the average call out time is 2 hours and total savings due to the product / service would be 200kEUR/year. Additionally, the
risk of flooding would be reduced (2 major incidents last year) with an expected value of R (reduction in probability of accident occurring)
× (expected loss in case of accident).
Please note that the formulation of the User Needs is not required here. For the difference between Customer and Users, please refer to
the ESA Business Applications Terminology.
Page 4/23
2.3 Channels
In the commercial exploitation stage, our product / service will be sold to the customers via these channels.
Indicate whether or not the sales channels are already established. If not, explain how they will be created. If these are new customers
(i.e. your company has not sold product / service to them in the past), please explain your approach to reaching these customers.
Provide the rationale for the pricing model including the assumptions that justify the fees (as
detailed in the yellow cells in Table 1) for each Service Type.
.
Resources could include, for example, assets, company competences, money, manpower, know-how / expertise, key suppliers,
consultancy service, and manufacturing, test or other facilities. Indicate whether or not the resources are expected to be in place at the
time of need. If not, explain the actions to be taken to secure their availability on time. Indicate potential issues associated with each key
resource. These could include, for example, long lead items, software licensing, patent constraints, procurement policies and
national/international restrictions (e.g. export restrictions).
Page 5/23
2.7 Key Activities
To realise our product / service and deliver the value propositions we need to perform the key activities
identified in the table.
Please, take into account partners during the project stage may not be the same as during exploitation (e.g. HW factory producing the
designed product may not have a role during the project, but it will be necessary during exploitation). Please explain the status of those
relationships (existing, in progress, to be established…) complementary to the info of the table above.
The following diagram describes the project partners and their role in the commercial exploitation stage of the
product / service.
Page 6/23
Figure 2.8 Project Team Composition and Roles
Page 7/23
Please note that statements such as “There is no such product / service on the market, ergo there is no competition” are not considered
acceptable, because the number one competition stems always from the existing way the problem is solved currently by the
users/customers. The number two competition typically disregarded is from other solutions the customers might be able to take up
(substitutes which do not require space assets).
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
- List of strengths - List of weaknesses
OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
- List of opportunities - List of threats
Strengths are characteristics that give you an advantage over your competitors. Weaknesses are characteristics that place you at a
disadvantage with respect to the competition. Opportunities are (usually external) elements that you could exploit to improve your
business prospects. Threats are elements (e.g. external influences) that could threaten your business prospects. Add supplementary
material as necessary to fully describe the competitive environment. On the basis of the SWOT analysis, please identify your strategic
options to achieve the commercial goals.
The position of our product / service in the market is summarised in the matrix below.
PRODUCT / SERVICE
Page 8/23
For example, if the product / service tries to resolve a potential need not yet expressed by users, the market positioning will be New, and
shall be indicated accordingly in the above table (MN). If the intended project tries to improve (e.g. by increasing features, reducing
costs) a product / service, the product / service positioning will be existing (PE). Possible combinations of Markets / Product / services
shall be marked in the table (either with a “X”, or with the name of the product / service) as appropriate.
In terms of the market, our projection is to capture in the short-term for each of the identified customer
segments in presented in ‘Table 1. Sales of products/services” in the Cashflow Forecast Workbook.
Provide below the rationale for the assumptions that justify the units sold (tallow cells) for each Service Type.
Time of commercial entry into the market and way forward to bring the activity results to commercial product /
service: [from AP.3.5]
Expected economic, social or environmental benefits inside and outside the consortium, and associated
timescale: [from AP.3.6]
Page 9/23
2.13 Cashflow Forecast
A profit and loss and cash flow statement is provided in the Cashflow Forecast Workbook.
The tables and graph below are just an example. Paste below the Tables 1. To 4. Plus the Operating Profit and Cashflow chart from the
Cashflow Forecast Workbook.
Table 1. Sales of products/services
Units Commercial
Year 3 4 5
Service type #1- Installlation and annual fee
Name of service- Insert here
Units sold Sales 10 40 50
Initial installation fee Euros 800 8,000 32,000 40,000
Annual fee per year (cumulative) Euros 800 8,000 40,000 80,000
Costs of production and installation costs Euros 1,000 10,000 40,000 50,000
Costs of running service per year (cumulative) Euros 300 3,000 15,000 30,000
Income service 1 3,000 17,000 40,000
Page 11/23
Table 2. Profit and Loss
Units Development Commercial
Year 1 2 3 4 5
INCOME
Gross profit from sales of products/services Euros 14,000 97,000 931,000
ESA project price Euros 150,000 150,000
EXPENSES
Human resources
Management FTE 0.2 0.2 0.2
Euros 30,000 30,000 30,000
Technical support FTE 0.2 0.2 0.3
Euros 20,000 20,000 30,000
Development costs after ESA project FTE 0.2 0.2 0.2
Euros 20,000 20,000 20,000
Marketing & Advertising FTE 0.3 0.3 0.3
Euros 24,000 24,000 24,000
Other expenses
Marketing & Advertising Euros 10,000 15,000 20,000
General costs and overheads Euros 50,000 50,000 75,000
Depreciating costs Euros 20,000 20,000 30,000
Development cost of ESA project Euros 300,000 300,000
TOTAL EXPENSES 300,000 300,000 174,000 179,000 229,000
Table 3. Human resource costs per year per full time employee
Employment cost per year Cost per hour
Management employees 150000 83
Technical employees 100000 56
Marketing & Advertising employees 80000 44
Page 12/23
(The above tables and graph are just an example. The above tables and graph should be extracted from the Cashflow Forecast
Workbook)
Page 13/23
The tables and graph below are just an example. Paste below the Tables 1. To 4. Plus the Operating Profit and Cashflow chart from the
Cashflow Forecast Workbook.
.
The intended approach to identify the user requirements during the project execution will be based on …. (e.g.
waterfall, agile). The planned level of involvement of the pilot user/customer in this process is ….
Page 14/23
Figure 3.1 System/service Architecture
EXAMPLE
Identify any differences in the System/service architecture between the pilot and the full commercial deployment.
With reference to the figure above, the pilot system to be deployed in the proposed activity will consist of the
following elements:
Remote terminals…/ number of remote sites
Service centre…
Etc.
If more than one pilot demonstrator is proposed, identify which part of the pilot system are used in each proposed pilot demonstrator
The expected goals / outputs at the end of the activity and the way they will contribute to the final product /
service are: [from AP.4.3]
Our proposed development approach is the following: …… (describe the source of the key building blocks,
such as existing elements and/or all items to be developed). This will result in the following hardware /
software models to be built, verified and delivered: prove of concept, fully operational prototype, commercial
service.
The overall service development approach is here outlined: …….
Page 15/23
Provide supplementary text as necessary to fully explain the development approach.
We will assess the success of the demo project based on the following KPIs (please, at least one KPI per
objective) …….
The pilot-demonstration service activities will be based on the following undertakings: users/customers
involvement, envisaged utilisation of the system, e.g. 2 hours of use every day, duration of the pilot-
demonstration stage e.g. 8 months, etc.
The expected preparation activities of the pilot-demonstration will include: specify as needed (e.g.
deployment, integration within the user environment, acceptance, logistics, training).
Table 3.4 Involvement of Users, Customers and Other Stakeholders in the Pilot-Demonstration
Preliminary considerations for evaluating system and service performance during the pilot-demonstration are
here summarised: ….
The success criteria / goals to be achieved during the pilot/demonstration to gain customer commitment are:
….
The success criteria / goals shall be presented in terms of Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) that quantitatively measurable and are
relevant for inferring commercial uptake of the service after the end of the project. Therefore, the KPI’s must be relevant to the pilot
users and potential customers and their interest in adopting the service. KPI’s must be related to the value propositions.
Page 16/23
3.5 Technical and Non-Technical Risks
The major technical, operational and business related risks associated with the proposed activity and the
associated mitigation plans are: [from AP.4.7]
Table 3.5 Overview of the Major Risks and the proposed Risk Mitigation Actions
Our approach to promote the commercial uptake of the system/service is: …. (e.g. incentives for project pilot-
demonstration users to subscribe to the operational service).
The table below provides a high level description of the key activities (e.g. first level Work Packages, to be
provided in graphical format if it’s available) to be performed including the time planning information.
Table 4.1 Key tasks and high level information
Page 17/23
The table below provides a high level description of the proposed team, including the internal source of co-
funding.
Company SME Country Budget (cost) kEUR ESA contribution Source of co-
Name yes/no kEUR funding
……… yes/no ……… ……… ……… ………
……… yes/no ……… ……… ……… ………
……… yes/no ……… ……… ……… ………
Examples of possible sources of co-funding are: existing funds in bank account coming from sales / profit, already approved /
prospective bank loan, investment from external source e.g. private investment funds, other contributions. Note that public grant funding
cannot be considered as the source of co-funding.
The purpose of this information is to provide evidence on the capabilities of the involved company(ies) to pay their share of the cost of
the proposed activity elements (procurements, facilities, manpower) and, as such, can serve the obligations of the activity.
Page 18/23
** Please note that expenditure outside the member state of the bidder may be subject to approval by the relevant National Delegation. If
the expenditure is outside ESA member states for an amount equal or above 100 kEUR, specific authorisation(s) from additional
committee(s) may be required.
The table below provides the description of the links (if any) of the proposed project with activities undertaken
by the members of the consortium in the frame of other publicly funded national and/or international
programmes.
The table below provides the breakdown of costing and pricing per company.
Table 4.6 Breakdown cost and price per company
Status
Price (kEUR) National
Company/ (e.g. Cost % Funding
Country (requested Delegation
Organisation University, (kEUR) from ESA
from ESA) Support2
SME)
yes/no/under
Prime ……… ……… ……… ……… ………
discussion
yes/no/under
Sub 1 ……… ……… ……… ………
discussion
yes/no/under
Sub 2 ……… ……… ……… ………
discussion
2
yes = The National Delegation has been contacted and is in favour of the proposed activity.
no = The National Delegation has not yet been contacted.
under discussion = The National Delegation has been contacted and discussions are ongoing.
Page 19/23