Introduction To Sociolinguistics
Introduction To Sociolinguistics
Introduction To Sociolinguistics
Definition :
Sociolinguistics, the study of the sociological aspects of language. The discipline concerns itself with the
part language plays in maintaining the social roles in a community. Sociolinguists attempt to isolate those
linguistic features that are used in particular situations and that mark the various social relationships among
the participants and the significant elements of the situation. Influences on the choice of sounds,
grammatical elements, and vocabulary items may include such factors as age, sex, education,
occupation, race, and peer-group identification, among others.
‘Sociolinguistics is the study of our everyday lives – how language works in our casual conversations and
the media we are exposed to, and the presence of societal norms, policies, and laws which address language’
And
‘Sociolinguistics’ and ‘language and Society’ are terms that are often used interchangeably to refer to an
interdisciplinary field of research in which linguistics and sociology, and other human sciences, join together
to study verbal and other human conducts; but in fact their definition is a highly controversial matter.
The purpose of this dscipline is to take language samples from sets of random population subjects and looks
at variables that include such things as pronunciation, word choice, and colloquialisms. The is data is then
measured against socio-economic indices such as education, income/wealth, occupation, ethnic heritage,
age, and family dynamics to better understand the relationship between language and society.
Thanks to its dual focus, sociolinguistics is considered as a branch of both linguistics and
sociology. However, the broader study of the field may also encompass anthropological
linguistics, dialectology, discourse analysis, ethnography of speaking, geolinguistics, language contact
studies, secular linguistics, the social psychology of language, and the sociology of language.
The roots of sociolinguistics are to be found in traditional dialectologyn , the term was first recorded
between 1935-1940. The study of language and society – sociolinguistics – can be dated to about the middle
of the twentieth century. Before that there were authors who commented on how language use was
influenced or indeed guided by socially relevant factors, such as class, profession, age or gender. In the early
days, sociolinguistics was an interdisciplinary,loosely defined field of research in which scholars, mainly in
linguistics and sociology but also in anthropology, psychology, philosophy, education, gender study and so
on, developed a wide variety of lines of research focusing on language and, mainly, on talk in interaction.
Indeed the father of modern linguistics, Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913), saw language as a type of
social behaviour and in this he reflected French sociological thinking of his day.
Since the 1960s a very fruitful coalition has developed among scholars in linguistics interested in the
relation between social phenomena and language,while sociologists and social scientists became
increasingly aware of the centrality of language in any social and cultural phenomenon sociolinguistics. The
development of sociolinguistics is bound up with the activity of American and British linguists since the
early 1960s. First and foremost of these is William Labov who, in a pioneering investigation of the English
of New York city published in 1966, arrived at many new conclusions concerning language variation and
language change. Labov stressed that 1) structural systems of the present and changes in languages of the
past can be investigated in relation to each other, 2) language change can be observed in progress in present-
day language varieties and 3) the fact that so-called ‘free variation’ was not in fact free at all but determined
by deliberate, if not conscious, choices by speakers. Labov further stressed the need to collect data reliably.
The linguist must be aware that informants will show the following features in their speech:
1) style shifting (during an interview),
2) varying degree of attention, i.e. some speakers pay great attention to their own speech (so-called
‘audiomonitoring’
3) The use of preferred methods of investigation (e.g. tape recording rather than questionnaire, allowing for
later control)
Since the basis of sociolinguistic theory is language use I would like to introduce you to certain basic
concepts.
1- Speech Community The term 'speech community' is widely used by sociolinguists as well as by
linguists. Bloomfield defined a speech community as "a group of people who interact by means of
speech" (1933:42). Lyons (1970:326) says that a speech community comprises " all the people who
use a given language (or dialect)". The speech community can share more than one language or
dialect.
2- Speech/ Verbal Repertoire : Speech repertoire refers to the range of languages or varieties of a
language available for use by a speaker each of which enables him/ her to perform a particular social
role. Gumperz (1964), "verbal repertoire…is not simply composed of linguistic forms. It is always a
set of varieties each with its own internal structure". The concept of speech/ verbal repertoire allows
us to deal with speech communities of all types – monolingual, bilingual and multilingual.
3- Speech Situation/Speech Act : within a community one readily detects many situations associated
with (or marked by the absence of) speech. Such situations can naturally be described as ceremonies,
fights, hunts, meals, and the like. Hymes suggests that such situations may enter as contexts into the
statement of 'rules of speaking' as aspects of setting. A speech event is a smaller unit of description
than the speech situation. Hymes (1974) says that, the term speech event will be restricted to
activities or aspects of activities that are directly governed by rules or norms, for the use of speech.
For example a conversation, a lecture, a formal introduction The speech act is the smallest unit of the
concept that we are discussing. It represents a level distinct from the sentence, and not identifiable
with any single portion of other levels of grammar. A speech act is a functional unit while a sentence
is a formal unit.
4- The Linguistic Variable :
The recognition of variation implies that we must recognize that a language is not just some kind of
abstract object of study. It is also something that people use. Although some linguists, following
Chomsky’s example, are focused on what language is, sociolinguists have argued that an asocial
linguistics is scarcely worthwhile and that meaningful insights into language can be gained only if
performance is included as part of the data which must be explained in a comprehensive theory of
language. When examining sociolinguistic behaviour linguists have found that some features of a
variety tend to vary more than others. Not only that, there are features for which the variation has
special social significance. In order to capture such features and describe them, the term linguistic
variable is used. This refers to a specific feature which can be used as a tag for classifying a
speaker’s speech. For example, as William Labov has pointed out in his investigation of English in
New York, the realisation of /r/ is just such a variable. The realisation of /r/ varies significantly
across the groups within the city.
Limits of Sociolinguistics
Some investigators have found it appropriate to try to introduce a distinction between sociolinguistics (or
micro-sociolinguistics) and the sociology of language (or macro-sociolinguistics). In this distinction,
(micro-) sociolinguistics is concerned with investigating the relationships between language and society with
the goal being a better understanding of the structure of language and of how languages function in
communication; the equivalent goal in the sociology of language is trying to discover how social structure
can be better understood through the study of language.
Coulmas (1997, 2) says that ‘micro-sociolinguistics investigates how social structure influences the way
people talk and how language varieties and patterns of use correlate with social attributes such as class,
gender, and age. Macro-sociolinguistics, on the other hand, studies what societies do with their languages,
that is, attitudes and attachments that account for the functional distribution of speech forms in society,
language shift, maintenance, and replacement, the delimitation and interaction of speech communities.