Assessing of The Impact of Good Governance and Institutions On Economic Growth in Indonesia
Assessing of The Impact of Good Governance and Institutions On Economic Growth in Indonesia
Assessing of The Impact of Good Governance and Institutions On Economic Growth in Indonesia
Fact ors Affect ing Recruit ment and Select ion Pract ice on Performance of Civil Service Organizat ion i…
Muna Fat hmat h
T he Impact Of Vot er Turnout And Peculiarit ies Of Elect ions In Post -Soviet Armenia
Emil Ordukhanyan
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 8, ISSUE 11, NOVEMBER 2019 ISSN 2277-8616
Abstract: Government performance and quality of government institutions will encourage economic growth through the creation of effective government
systems. The goal of good governance is to manage resources in a country more effectively for sustainable economic development. The research
objective is to analyze the relationship between government performance and the quality of government institutions with economic growth in Indonesia.
The analysis in this study uses the method Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) time series. The variables used in this study are the variables of
economic growth (GDP), then to describe Good Governance the variable voice and accountability (VA), political stability and absence of violence (PV),
control of corruption (CC) and government effectiveness (GE) ) which is used to describe government performance. While the variable used to describe
the quality of the institution is variable the rule of law (RL) and quality of regulation (QR). The results showed that government performance and
institutional quality have a role in driving economic growth. Strategies that need to be carried out in improving government performance and institutional
quality through evaluation and monitoring.
2594
IJSTR©2019
www.ijstr.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 8, ISSUE 11, NOVEMBER 2019 ISSN 2277-8616
Figure 1 explains the relationship of fluctuations in resources the application of good governance can have an
economic growth with indicators of good governance in impact on increasing economic growth and the size of
Indonesia in 2002 to 2018. Indonesia has a volatile power through increased productivity and increased output.
economic growth with a range of between 4 to 6% during Liu et al. (2018) is slightly different from the results of
2002-2018 except in 2002, which had economic growth of research conducted by Fraj et al. (2018) who found that
only 4.50%. Meanwhile, when viewed in terms of governance does not have a significant influence on
management and institutional quality in Indonesia tends to economic growth, while the exchange rate system adopted
increase from 2002 to 2018 except for the indicator of by a country has more significant influence on economic
control of Corruption, which experienced a significant growth, especially on the market. On the other hand, a
decline in 2009. This shows that the level of corruption in government that adheres to a flexible exchange rate system
Indonesia in 2009 was greater than previous years. In requires good governance to stimulate economic growth so
addition to Control of Corruption, several indicators of Good Fraj et a. (2018) concludes that the exchange rate system
Governance, which also experienced a decline, were adopted by a country will determine the quality of
Political Stability, Government Effectiveness, Rule of Law, governance used. Nirola and Sahu (2019) who examined
Regulatory Quality, Voice, and Accountability. A decrease in the impact of the size of government power on economic
several indicators of indicators Good Governance occurred growth on various quality institutions in 23 Indian states
in the same year, namely 2015. The decline shows that found that greater government power has a negative
there was a decrease in performance and the quality of relationship to economic growth, especially in the State.
institutions from the government, on the other hand the The size of the negative influence of government power on
level of economic growth in 2015 also slowed. Therefore, economic growth in the State depends on the quality of
the research will focus on the relationship between good institutions in each State. The negative impact received by
management and the quality of institutions on economic States that have good quality institutions will be smaller
growth in Indonesia. than those that have poor quality institutions.
2595
IJSTR©2019
www.ijstr.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 8, ISSUE 11, NOVEMBER 2019 ISSN 2277-8616
Table 2 is the result of GMM analysis on the relationship is significantly influential. This condition can be seen from
between government performance and institutional quality the probability value of the government's performance in
with economic growth. The results showed that government controlling corruption by 0.024 less than the alpha value (α
performance and institutional quality have a significant = 5%). Government performance in maintaining an increase
relationship to economic growth with different probability in corruption will have an influence on economic growth
levels. On the other hand, economic growth is not only (Salawu, et al, 2018; Shchegolev & Hayat, 2018). The
influenced by government performance and institutional effectiveness of government performance makes it one of
quality, but is influenced by growth in the past period (t-1). the sources of economic growth influence. The
This condition can be seen from the probability of economic effectiveness variable probability of government
growth in the past period (GDPt-1) of 0,000 which is smaller performance is 0.032 less than the alpha value (α = 5%).
than the alpha value of significance (α = 1%). Thus, the The significant correlation between the effectiveness of
current movement of economic growth can be caused by government performance variables with economic growth
economic growth in the past period. On the other hand, the shows that the more effective government performance will
government's performance in maintaining political stability drive economic growth. Ineffective government
and non-violence has a significant positive effect on performance will reflect the management of government
economic growth. This can be seen from the probability objectives not achieved (Mira & Hammadache, 2017;
value of 0.0571 smaller than the alpha value (α = 10%). Yerrabati & Hawkes, 2015). One indicator that reflects
This condition shows that the government's performance in government performance is governance accountability.
political stability and non-violence has an impact on Government accountability probability which shows 0.068
economic growth. One source of increased economic which is smaller than the value of alpha (α = 10%). This
growth is investment by investors. Investors will invest in a shows that the existence of government accountability can
country with a good level of political stability and a little non- affect economic growth. Governments that transparently
violence (Pay, 2016; Zubair & Khan, 2014). The account for government performance can encourage good
government's performance in controlling the growth of economic growth (Habyarimana & Dushimayezu, 2018; Liu,
corruption is one of the efforts to increase economic growth. et al, 2018) Indicators of measuring the quality of
The relationship between economic growth and corruption government institutions through indicators of quality
2596
IJSTR©2019
www.ijstr.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 8, ISSUE 11, NOVEMBER 2019 ISSN 2277-8616
2597
IJSTR©2019
www.ijstr.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 8, ISSUE 11, NOVEMBER 2019 ISSN 2277-8616
2598
IJSTR©2019
www.ijstr.org