Key Differences Between CMAC and HMAC - Cbgist
Key Differences Between CMAC and HMAC - Cbgist
Key Differences Between CMAC and HMAC - Cbgist
in CELEBRITY
- by E LI ALFRE D - 5 MINS READ
CMAC and HMAC are both cryptographic hash functions, but they are used for different
purposes. These two hash algorithms can be used to verify the integrity of files or
authenticity of data. CMAC stands for content-based message authentication code, whereas
HMAC stands for hybrid message authentication code. Both of these have their own pros
and cons, which is why you should understand the differences between CMAC and HMAC
before choosing one over the other for your project.
What is CMAC?
CMAC stands for content-based message authentication code. CMAC was originally
developed in 1993 by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with
the aim of authenticating computer data. CMAC is a secure hash algorithm suitable for
authenticating data sent using wide-area networks. The algorithm has been designed to be
used with any type of data, whether it be text or binary, compressed or not. CMAC is a
cryptographic hash function that can be used to verify the integrity of files or authenticity of
data. CMAC calculations produce a fixed length output. The length of the output is
independent of the length of the input data. This is a key difference between CMAC and
HMAC. As there is no variable length, this makes it less susceptible to length extension
attacks.
Open
What is HMAC?
The main difference between CMAC and HMAC is that CMAC is a fixed-length hash while
HMAC is a variable-length hash. This means that the length of the hash generated by CMAC
is always the same, while the length of the hash generated by HMAC can vary. CMAC uses a
block cipher to generate the hash, while HMAC uses a cryptographic hash function. There
are key differences between these two types of algorithms. Block ciphers work on fixed-
length data blocks, while hash functions work on an arbitrary amount of data. CMAC is
designed for authentication purposes, while HMAC is designed for both authentication and
integrity purposes. Authentication is used to verify the authenticity of a piece of data.
Integrity is used to verify the accuracy of a piece of data.
Open
Open
CMAC is a secure hash algorithm suitable for authenticating data sent using wide-area
networks. The algorithm has been designed to be used with any type of data, whether it be
text or binary. CMAC is a cryptographic hash function that can be used to verify the integrity
of files or authenticity of data. CMAC calculations produce a fixed length output. The length
of the output is independent of the length of the input data. This makes it less susceptible
to length extension attacks. CMAC can be used as a substitute for both HMAC and hash
function algorithms. This gives it great flexibility, which makes it suitable for a wide range of
use cases.
HMAC is a hash function that is used for data integrity purposes. This means that it
calculates a unique identifier for a piece of data. If the data is altered or tampered with, the
identifier will change. This can be used to detect a data breach or unauthorized access.
HMAC is an iterated hash function, which means that a hash is generated from the hash.
The hash from the previous iteration is used as the input to the next iteration. This means
that multiple hash values can be calculated from the same data. This can allow for a single
hashed piece of data to be used for multiple applications. HMAC is an algorithm that is
commonly used in network applications such as SSL/TLS. This means that the algorithm is
well tested, and there is a proven track record of its successful use in the real world.
Open
Summary
CMAC and HMAC are both cryptographic hash functions that can be used to verify the
integrity of files or authenticity of data. CMAC is a fixed-length hash function that can be
used as a substitute for HMAC, while HMAC is an iterated hash function that can be used as
a substitute for hash function algorithms. They have many differences, with the most
notable being their different length outputs, and they have different usage cases.