AF Repet ComLetter4
AF Repet ComLetter4
AF Repet ComLetter4
0
f
0
s(n) +w
0
(n), (1)
r
i
(n) =
0
f
i
s(n) +v
i
(n), (2)
respectively, where
0
is the average total transmitted symbol
energy of the source, since we assume the information bearing
symbols s(n)s are normalized to one (M-PSK), and w
0
(n)
and v
i
(n) are complex zero-mean white Gaussian noises
with variances N
0
and N
i
, respectively. Under repetition-
based amplify-and-forward cooperation, each relay scales its
received signal with the scaling factor
i
. Then, the ith relay
retransmits the scaled version of the received signal towards
the destination in the ith interval of the second phase, i.e.,
y
i
(n) = g
i
i
r
i
(n) +w
i
(n), (3)
where w
i
(n) is a complex zero-mean white Gaussian noise
with the variance of N
0
. When there is no instantaneous CSI
at the relays, but statistical CSI of the source-to-ith relay link
is known, a useful constraint is to ensure that a given average
transmitted power is maintained. That is,
i
=
2
fi
+N
i
, (4)
where
i
is the average transmitted power at relay i, such that
all relays transmits with the same average power.
Assuming maximum ratio combining (MRC) at the desti-
nation, the total received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be
written as
d
=
0
+
R
i=1
i
, (5)
where
0
= |f
0
|
2
0
/N
0
is the instantaneous SNR between the
source and ith relay, and
i
can be shown to be
i
=
|f
i
|
2
|g
i
|
2
A
i
|g
i
|
2
+B
i
, (6)
for i = 1, . . . , R, where A
i
and B
i
are given by
A
i
=
N
i
0
, B
i
=
N
0
(
2
fi
0
+N
i
)
i
. (7)
III. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
A. Exact Symbol Error Probability Expression
In this subsection, we will derive the SER formula of a
repetition-based relay network with noncoherent relays, using
the MGF method. First, we will derive the PDF of
i
in (6).
This is needed for calculating the average SER.
Using the same procedure for calculating the CDF of
product of two exponential random variable which is given
in [3, Eq. (19)], and with the help of [12, Eq. (3.324)], the
CDF of
i
in (6) can be presented to be
Pr{
i
< } = 1 2 e
A
i
2
g
i
B
i
2
f
i
2
g
i
K
1
B
i
2
f
i
2
g
i
, (8)
where K
j
(x) is the modied Bessel function of the second
kind of order j [13]. Thus, the PDF of
i
can be found by
taking the derivative of (8) with respect to , and using [14,
Eq. (24.55)], yielding
p(
i
) =
2B
i
2
fi
2
gi
e
A
i
2
g
i
K
0
B
i
2
fi
2
gi
+
2A
i
2
g
i
B
i
2
fi
2
g
i
e
A
i
2
g
i
K
1
B
i
2
fi
2
g
i
. (9)
Recalling the independence of f
0
, f
i
, and g
i
, the MGF of
d
in (5), i.e., M
d
(s) = E{e
s
d
}, can be written as
M
d
(s) = M
0
(s)
R
r=1
M
i
(s) , (10)
where M
i
(s) is the MGF of
i
in (6), while M
0
(s) =
1
1+
2
f
0
0
s/N
0
is the MGF of
0
. Considering (9), and with the
help of [12, Eq. (6.643)], the MGF of
i
can be calculated as
M
i
(s) =
B
i
(s +
A
i
2
g
i
)
2
fi
2
gi
W
1
2
,0
B
i
(s +
A
i
2
g
i
)
2
fi
2
gi
+
A
i
(2)
2
gi
(s +
A
i
2
g
i
)
W
1,
1
2
B
i
(s +
A
i
2
g
i
)
2
f
i
2
gi
e
B
i
2(s+
A
i
2
g
i
)
2
f
i
2
g
i
,
(11)
where W
a,b
(x) is Whittakers function of orders a and b (see
e.g., [13] and [12, Subsection 9.224]). Note that Whittakers
function can be presented in terms of a generalized hyperge-
ometric function (see, e.g., [12, Eq. (9.220)]).
Using M
d
(s), the the average SER for M-ary phase-shift
keying (M-PSK) can be written as [15, p. 271]
P
e
(R) =
1
(M1)
M
0
M
d
sin
2
d, (12)
where = sin
2
log (P
e
(R))
log ()
, where is the SNR [16, Eq.
(1.19)]. Furthermore, (12) can be upper-bounded by P
e
(R)
1
1
M
M
d
() < M
d
() [15, p. 271]. Hence, we have
G
d
lim
log(M
d
())
log()
. (13)
Therefore, using (10), we can nd the diversity order
of repetition-based AF system in which relays have partial
statistical CSI as follows:
G
d
lim
log (M
d
())
log ()
= lim
R
k=0
log (M
k
())
log ()
=
R
k=0
lim
log (M
k
())
log ()
. (14)
For the simplicity in deriving the expressions and without
lose of generality, similar to [11], we assume equal power
allocation among the two transmission phases and among the
relays, i.e.,
0
= R
i
, for i = 1, . . . , R, and N
i
= N
0
. Then,
by dening =
N0
0
, we have
lim
log (M
0
())
log ()
= lim
log
1 +
2
f0
log ()
= 1. (15)
Now, for calculating (14) we need to solve
lim
log(M
i
())
log()
, for i = 1, . . . , R.
With the help of the integral in [12, Eq. (9.22)], it can be
shown that W
,
1
2
+
(x) = x
e
x/2
(2+1, x), where (, )
is the incomplete gamma function [12, Eq. (8.350)]. On the
other hand, the incomplete gamma function can be represented
as exponential integrals E
n
(x) = x
n1
(1n, x), where n is
an integer [13, Eq. (5.1.45)]. Thus, we can represent W
1
2
,0
()
and W
1,
1
2
() in terms of exponential integrals, E
n
():
W
1
2
,0
(x) = x
1
2
e
x
2
E
1
(x), W
1,
1
2
(x) = e
x
2
E
2
(x). (16)
Therefore, M
i
() in (11) can be rewritten as
M
i
()=e
B
i
(+
A
i
2
g
i
)
2
f
i
2
g
i
B
i
(+
Ai
2
g
i
)
2
f
i
2
g
i
E
1
B
i
(+
Ai
2
g
i
)
2
f
i
2
g
i
+
A
i
(2)
2
gi
( +
A
i
2
g
i
)
E
2
B
i
( +
A
i
2
g
i
)
2
fi
2
gi
. (17)
0 5 10 15 20 25
10
6
10
5
10
4
10
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
T
/ N
0
[dB]
S
E
R
Sim. SER with R=1 and
1
as in [9]
Analytical SER with R=1
Sim. SER with R=2 and
i
as in [9]
Analytical SER with R=2
Sim. SER with R=3 and
i
as in [9]
Analytical SER with R=3
Fig. 1. The average SER curves of relay networks employing repetition-based
transmission with scaling factor in (4) and BPSK signals.
Furthermore, using [13, Eq. (5.1.11)], the series representa-
tion of E
i
(x), for x > 0, can be expressed as
E
1
(x) = log(x)
k=1
x
k
k k!
, (18)
E
2
(x) = e
x
+x +xlog(x) +
k=1
(x)
k+1
k k!
. (19)
where is Eulers constant, i.e., 0.5772156 [12]. Then,
using (18) and (19), and by dening C
i
=
R
2
g
i
, we have
lim
log (M
i
())
log ()
= lim
log
e
C
i
C
i
E
1
(C
i
) +
2Ai(2)
2
g
i
g
E
2
(C
i
)
log ()
= lim
log
e
C
i
C
i
E
1
(C
i
)
log ()
= lim
C
i
+ log (C
i
) + log (log (C
i
))
log ()
= 1. (20)
In the last equation, we have used the lHpitals rule. As a
result, by substituting (15) and (20) in (14), we nd that the
system provides full diversity, i.e., G
d
= R + 1.
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS
In this section, we show numerical results of the analytical
SER for binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation. We
plot the performance curves in terms of average SER versus
SNR of the transmitted signal (
T
/N
0
), where
T
is the total
transmitted power during two phases, i.e.,
T
=
0
+
R
i=1
i
.
We use the block fading model and it is assumed that the
relays and the destination have the same value of noise power
(N
i
= N
0
). We assume all the source-relays and relays-
destination links have unit-variance Rayleigh at fading, i.e.,
2
fi
=
2
g
i
= 1, and the direct source-destination has doubled
distance as source-relays link, which by assuming path loth
exponent 2,
2
f
0
= 1/4. Furthermore, we assume equal power
allocation scheme, i.e.,
0
= R
i
, for i = 1, . . . , R, which is
a reasonable choice [7], [10].
Fig. 1 conrms that the analytical SER expressions in
Subsection III-A for nding the average SER have similar
performance as simulation result. We consider a network with
R = 1, 2, 3 and we have averaged the error rate over 200 000
fading realization. The analytical results are based on (12).
V. CONCLUSION
Performance analyzes for AF cooperative networks with
noncoherent relays over independent, non-identical, Rayleigh
fading channels has been investigated. The closed-form ex-
pressions for the CDF, pdf, and MGF of the total received SNR
at the destination have been derived. Then, we have computed
the exact SER of a repetition-based cooperative network with
R parallel relays and M-PSK signaling using the gain in (4).
Using the asymptotic analysis of the SER expression, we have
shown that this cooperative network achieves full diversity
order R + 1. Simulations are in accordance with analytic
results.
REFERENCES
[1] J. N. Laneman, D. Tse, and G. Wornell, Cooperative diversity in
wireless networks: Efcient protocols and outage behavior, IEEE Trans.
Inform. Theory, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 30623080, Dec. 2004.
[2] R. U. Nabar, H. Blcskei, and F. W. Kneubuhler, Fading relay channels:
Performance limits and space-time signal design, IEEE Journal on
Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 10991109, Aug.
2004.
[3] B. Maham and A. Hjrungnes, Distributed GABBA space-time codes
in amplify-and-forward cooperation, in Proc. IEEE Information Theory
Workshop (ITW07), (Bergen, Norway), pp. 189193, Jul. 2007.
[4] K. Seddik, A. Sadek, A. Ibrahim, and K. Liu, Design criteria and
performance analysis for distributed space-time coding, IEEE Trans.
on Vehicular Technology, to appear, 2008.
[5] T. Wang, Y. Yao, and G. B. Giannakis, Non-coherent distributed space-
time processing for multiuser cooperative transmissions, IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 33393343, Dec. 2006.
[6] P. A. Anghel and M. Kaveh, Exact symbol error rate probability of
a cooperative network in a Rayleigh-fading environment, IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 14161421, Sep. 2004.
[7] A. Ribeiro, A. Cai, and G. B. Giannakis, Symbol error probablity
for general cooperative links, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4,
pp. 12641273, May 2005.
[8] T. Wang, A. Cano, G. B. Giannakis, and J. N. Laneman, High-
performance cooperative demodulation with decode-and-forward re-
lays, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 830841, Apr. 2007.
[9] D. Chen and J. N. Laneman, Cooperative diversity for wireless fading
channels without channel state information, in Proc. Asilomar Conf.
Signals, Systems, and Computers, (Monterey, CA), Nov. 2004.
[10] Y. Jing and B. Hassibi, Distributed space-time coding in wireless relay
networks, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 3524
3536, Dec. 2006.
[11] Y. Jing and H. Jafarkhani, Using orthogonal and quasi-orthogonal
designs in wireless relay networks, IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. 53,
no. 11, pp. 41064118, Nov. 2007.
[12] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and
Products. San Diego, USA: Academic, 1996.
[13] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions.
New York, USA: Dover Publications, 1972.
[14] M. R. Spiegel and J. Liu, Schaums Mathematical Handbook of Formulas
and Tables. United States: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
[15] M. K. Simon and M.-S. Alouini, Digital Communication over Fading
Channels: A Unied Approach to Performance Analysis. New York,
NY: Wiley, 2000.
[16] H. Jafarkhani, Space-Time Coding Theory and Practice. Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge Academic Press, 2005.