CRPC Repeated Question Answer
CRPC Repeated Question Answer
CRPC Repeated Question Answer
Q6. Explain the procedure of trying an accused person who is of unsound mind in a criminal court?
ANS. Section 328– procedure in case of the accused being a lunatic
According to Section 328 of the Act, if the magistrate believes that the person being investigated is unable to defend himself
or is mentally ill, the magistrate must guarantee that the subject is evaluated by a medical professional during the
investigation. If the defendant is unable to defend himself, the magistrate will hear the prosecution and examine the records.
The magistrate shall postpone the proceeding for a limited term until the person’s unsoundness is remedied, based on
medical proof.
Section 329– procedure where a person of unsound mind is tried before the court
According to Section 329 of the Act, if the magistrate believes the person being tried is of sound mind and incapable of self-
defence, the magistrate ensures this by having the subject evaluated by a medical professional. If the defendant is unable to
defend himself, the magistrate will hear the prosecution and examine the records. The magistrate shall record such a
determination and postpone the hearing based on medical evidence. The fact of insanity throughout the trial will be
considered part of the proceedings.
Section 330- release of a person of unsound mind pending investigation or trial
According to Section 330 of the Act, If the person is found unsound or incapable of making his defence during the inquiry
and trial (Sections 328 and 329), regardless of whether the offence is bailable or not, the Court may release him. In other
words, if the offence is non bailable, the magistrate must grant bail as well. If, on the other hand, bail cannot be granted, the
accused must be kept in a location where he can receive treatment.
Section 331- resumption of inquiry or trial
According to Section 331 of the Act, when the inquiry and trial are postponed or suspended, the magistrate shall summon
the person after he or she regains mental soundness or ceases to be insane and resume the inquiry and trial.
Section 332- procedure of accused appearing before the magistrate or the court
According to Section 332 of the Act, If the accused appears before the magistrate and the court believes he is capable of
presenting his defence, the investigation and trial will continue. If the person is still unable to recover from his condition,
the provisions of Section 330 will apply once more.
Section 333- when accused appears to have been of sound mind
According to Section 333 of the Act, when the magistrate has reason to believe the individual is of sound mind and there is
also evidence that acts were committed by the accused, when the act was committed by the accused, and when the act was
committed while the accused was of sound mind. The magistrate will then proceed with the case.
Section 334- judgement of acquittal of the accused on the ground of unsoundness of mind
According to Section 334 of the Act, if a person is acquitted on the grounds of insanity and is unable to identify the nature
of the act, the findings must state whether the act was committed by the accused or not.
Section 335- person acquitted on such ground to be detained in safe custody
According to Section 335 (1) of the Act, if a person is acquitted by a magistrate on the grounds of insanity, he or she should
be detained in safe custody or should be delivered to a family member or friend. When it comes to delivering an accused
person to a relative or friend, the court can only do so if the relative or friend makes an application to the magistrate and the
friend or relative assures the court of security.
Section 336- the power of state government to empower officer in charge to discharge
According to Section 336 of the Act, the State Government may delegate all or all of the functions of the Inspector-General
of Prisons under Section 337 or Section 338 to the official in charge of the jail in which a person is imprisoned under the
provisions of section 330 or section 335.
Section 337- procedure where the lunatic prisoner is reported capable of making his defence
According to Section 337 of the Act, the magistrate must proceed with Section 332 if it is determined that the lunatic is now
capable of defending himself.
Section 338- procedure where a lunatic detained is declared fit to be released
According to Section 338 of the Act, if a person is detained under Section 330 on the grounds of insanity and the authorised
person or inspector general certifies that the person is fit to be released, detained by the authorities, transferred to a public
mental institution then there should be no damage in doing so and the government may then release the individual.
Section 339- delivery of lunatic to the care of relative or friend
According to Section 339 of the Act, if a person’s relative or friend wishes for the person to be released to him, the relative
or friend must apply to the State Government for such a release.
Q7. What is a juvenile justice board ? power of JJB?
ANS. What does juvenile justice board do?
The JJB consists of judicial magistrate of the first class and two social workers, at least one of whom should be a woman.
JJB are meant to resolve cases within a four month period. Most circumstances the juvenile can be released on bail by the
JJB. The Juvenile Justice Board has established in ever district by the State Government under Section 4 of the Juvenile
Justice (Care and Protection of Children)Act,2015 to exercise the powers and discharging its functions relating to children
in conflict with law. As per Section 2(13) of the Act ,child in conflict with law means a child who is alleged or found to
have committed an offence and who has not completed eighteen years of age on the date of commission of such offence.
The High Court and Children’s Court may exercise the same power of the Board if any proceedings come before them in
the form of revision, appeal, etc. The Powers , Functions and responsibilities of the Board is mentioned in Section 8 of the
same Act.
FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD
To ensure the informed participation of child and the parent or the guardian in every step of the process.
To ensure child’s rights are protected throughout the process of apprehending the child, inquiry, aftercare and
rehabilitation.
To ensure child’s rights are protected throughout the process of apprehending the child, inquiry, aftercare and
rehabilitation.
To ensure availability of legal aid for the child.
To provide a qualified translator/interpreter by the board when the child fails to understand the language used in
proceeding.
To submit a social investigation report of the case within a period of fifteen days from the date of first production
before the Board to ascertain the circumstances in which the alleged offence was committed. This investigation is
directed to Probation Officer or in case a Probation Officer is not available to the Child Welfare Officer or a social
worker.
To adjudicate and dispose of cases of children in conflict with law in accordance with the process of inquiry
specified in section 14 of the same act.
Transferring to committee when the child in conflict with law to be a child in need of care and protection at any
stage. Therefore, there is a need for the Committee and the Board to be both involved.
To dispose the matter and passing a final order that includes an individual care plan for the child’s rehabilitation
including follow up by the Probation Officer or the District Child Protection Unit or a member of a non-
governmental organization as required.
To conduct inquiry for declaring fit persons regarding care of children in conflict with law.
To conduct at least one inspection visit every month of residential facilities for children in conflict with law and
recommend action for improvement in quality of services to the District Child Protection Unit and the State
Government.
To order the police for registration of FIR for offences committed against any child in conflict with law and any
child in need of care and protection under the Act or any other law on a complaint made.
To order the police for registration of FIR for offences committed against any child in conflict with law and any
child in need of care and protection under the Act or any other law on a complaint made.
Any other function as may be prescribed.
Hence the Juvenile Justice Board aims to deal with such children in conflict with the law with special care and protection by
providing proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration and by adopting a child-friendly approach in
the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children instead of treating them as criminals.
Q8. Feature of probation of offenders act?
ANS. The Probation of Offenders Act (Act No. 28 of 1958) contains elaborate provisions relating to probation of offenders,
which are made applicable throughout the country. We will now observe the salient features of the Act:-
·The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is intended to reform the amateur offenders by providing rehabilitation in
society and to prevent the conversion of youthful offenders into obdurate criminals under environmental influence
by keeping them in jails along with hardened criminals.
·It aims to release first offenders, after due admonition or warning with advice, who are alleged to have committed
an offence punishable under Sections 379, 380, 381, 404 or Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and also in case of
any offence punishable with imprisonment for not more than two years, or with fine, or with both.
·This Act empowers the Court to release certain offenders on probation of good conduct if the offence alleged to
have been committed is not punishable with death or life imprisonment. However, he/she should be kept under
supervision.
·The Act insists that the Court may order for payment by the offender such compensation and a cost of the
proceedings as it thinks reasonable for loss or injury caused to the victim.
·The Act provides special protection to persons under twenty-one years of age by not sentencing them to
imprisonment. However, this provision is not available to a person found guilty of an offence punishable with life
imprisonment.
·The Act provides freedom to the Court to vary the conditions of bond when an offender is released on probation of
good conduct and to extend the period of probation not to exceed three years from the date of original order.
·The Act empowers the Court to issue a warrant of arrest or summons to the offender and his sureties requiring
them to attend the Court on the date and time specified in the summons if an offender released on probation of good
conduct fails to observe the conditions of bond.
·The Act empowers the Court to try and sentence the offender to imprisonment under the provisions of this Act.
Such order may also be made by the High Court or any other Court when the case comes before it on appeal or in
revision.
·The Act provides an important role to the probation officers to help the Court and to supervise the probationers put
under him and to advise and assist them to get suitable employment.
·The Act extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. This Act comes into force in a State
on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. It also provides liberty to
State Governments to bring the Act into force on different dates in different parts of that State.
Q9. Explain procedure of sessions trial ?
ANS.
Parties to trial
Prosecution
Defense
Support persons
Notice of Appearance
Open Court Proceedings
Discharge
Framing of charge
Compliance of documents
Issuance of witness summons
Examination of Witnesses
Examination of accused under section 313 of CRPC
Examination of defense witnesses
Final arguments
Judgement
Hearing of accused on the point of sentence if the judgment of conviction is pronounced by the Judge
Q10. The provision relating to maintenance of wife and children ?
ANS. Section 125 of the code of criminal procedure provides that any person having sufficient means to maintain himself
cannot refuse the maintenance to the wife, children, and parents if they are unable to maintain themselves.
Consult the best lawyer online
Persons entitled to claim maintenance: The following person is entitled to claim maintenance as per section 125(1) of
CrPC, under some circumstances:
Wife: If any person as per Section 125(l) (a) of the Code have sufficient means but neglects or refuses to maintain his wife,
who is not able to support herself, a Magistrate of the first class may, upon proof of such refusal or neglect, direct such
person to give a monthly allowance for his wife’s maintenance at such monthly rate the Magistrate deems fit, and to pay the
same to such person as the Magistrate may direct from time to time. Here ‘wife’ includes a woman who has been divorced
or has obtained a divorce from her husband and has not remarried.
‘Wife’ for the meaning of Section 125 means a legally married woman. As per Section 125(l)(a) of CrPC, a maintenance
allowance could not be given to every wife who is neglected by her husband or whose husband deny to maintain her,
Instead, this can only be given to a wife who is unable to support herself but not to a wife who is maintaining herself with a
certain difficulty. By the phrase ‘unable to maintain herself’, it is not meant that she must be completely destitute and
should be first on the street, should beg and be in worn-out clothes, and then only she will be entitled to file an application
under Section 125 of the Code.
Child: As per Section 125(1)(b) of the Code, if any person who have sufficient means but refuses to support his legitimate
or illegitimate minor child, whether married or not, who is unable to maintain themselves or according to Section 125(1)(c)
of the Code, his legitimate or illegitimate child (not a married daughter) who has reached majority, where such child due to
any physical or mental abnormality or injury are not able to maintain themselves. A magistrate of the First class upon
finding such neglect or refusal may order such person to grant a monthly allowance for the maintenance of such child, at
such monthly rate as the magistrate deems fit, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may direct from time to
time. Here ‘minor’ means a person who does not attain the age of majority under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act,
1875.
Father or Mother: According to Section 125(l)(d) of the Code, if any person who has sufficient means, but neglects or
refuses to maintain his father or mother, not able to support himself or herself, a Magistrate of the first class may upon
finding proof of such neglect or refusal may order such person to provide a monthly allowance for the maintenance of his
parents, at such monthly rate the Magistrate deem fit, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may direct from
time to time.
The daughter whether she is married or unmarried will also be liable to maintain the parents.
Essential conditions for granting maintenance:
Sufficient means to maintain: According to Section 125(1) of the CrPC, the person from whom maintenance is claimed
must have sufficient means to maintain the person or persons claiming maintenance. Here, the expression ‘means’ does not
signify only visible means such as real property or definite employment.
Neglect or refusal to maintain: As per Section 125(1) of the Code, the person from whom maintenance is claimed must
have neglected or refused to maintain the person or persons entitled to claim maintenance. Neglect means a default or
omission in the absence of demand whereas ‘refuse’ means a failure to maintain or a denial of obligation to maintain after
demand.
Special requirements where maintenance is claimed by wife:
The wife must not be living in adultery: As per Section 125(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no wife shall be entitled
to receive an allowance for the maintenance or the interim maintenance and expenses of the proceeding, as the case may be,
from her husband under Section 125 if she is living in adultery. The term ‘living in adultery’ means outright adulterous
conduct where the wife lives in a quasi-permanent union with the man with whom she is committing adultery.
Q11. Power of session judge and high court ?
ANS. Powers of High Court
Original Jurisdiction
This states that High Court Judges have the power to hear a case as the first sample as an original court. The high courts of
Calcutta, Mumbai, and Madras have the provision of original jurisdiction in civil and criminal cases because civil and
criminal cases have been arising in these states. One advantage that the judges of the high court get is that they can hear
civil cases involving property worth over Rs 20000. The judges of high courts have the supreme power to issue writs in case
of enforcement of fundamental rights. The high court judges have the right to power original jurisdiction on cases that deal
with divorce, will, admiralty, or contemporary of court. Election petitions also can be heard by the high court judges.
Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Jurisdiction states that someone who fought a case in the district court before and is not satisfied with the
judgment of the district court then they can file an appeal in the high court about the same case and district court’s
judgment. The appeal can also be from subordinate courts if the case dispute involves a value higher than Rs 5000/- or it’s a
question of fact or law. This happens in Civil Cases. In Criminal Cases, the case gets extended as per decision sessions and
additional sessions for judges. In this, the session judge can announce imprisonment for 7 years or more. The session judge
may award capital judgment. The jurisdiction of the high court extends all cases under state or federal laws.
Court of Record
High Court is majorly known as the Court of records. The records of judgment in the High Court can be used by other
subordinate courts. All the high courts have the power to punish all contemporary cases by any person.
Administrative Powers
High Court has a couple of administrative Powers. The High Court can order or have over control of all subordinate courts.
The High Court may ask for all the details or cases and proceedings from subordinate courts. The high court judges have the
power to transfer a case from one court to another or it can also transfer the case to itself. It has the authority to inquire
about any case or documents related to it in subordinate courts. High Court Judges also have the power to appoint their
administrative staff and can decide their salary, allowances, and condition of services too.
The Power of Judicial Review
Another most interesting power of high court judges is that they can announce any law or ordinance unconditionally if it is
found against the Indian Constitution. Judicial Review is considered to be among the most important powers of high court
judges.
Power of session court
The Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law except a sentence of death or of
imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.
The Court of a Magistrate of the first class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three
years, or of fine not exceeding ten thousand rupees, or both.
The Court of a Magistrate of the second class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding one
year, or of fine not exceeding five thousand rupees, or of both.
The Court of a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate shall have the powers of the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate and
that of a Metropolitan Magistrate, the powers of the Court of a Magistrate of the first class.
It includes discovery, arrest, It includes recording of evidence only It adjudicates upon the
seizure, search and medical evidence so recorded.
examination, etc
Q13. Various criminal court and state the power to arrest a person and right of an arrested person?
ANS.
The various classes of criminal courts in India are:
Supreme Court.
High Courts.
The Courts of Session.
The Judicial Magistrates of the First Class, and, in any metropolitan area; the Metropolitan Magistrates.
The Judicial Magistrates of the Second Class.
The Executive Magistrates.
Rights of an arrested person
Right to be informed of the grounds of arrest
Right to be released on bail
Right to be produced before a magistrate
Protection against arrest and detention
Right to consult a legal practitioner
Right to free legal aid
Right to be examined by a medical practitioner
Arrest by a Police officer
The police officers have been authorized to arrest any person without the warrant ordered by the court under Sections 41,
42, 151 of CrPC. Section 41 of CrPC provides for those instances where a police officer has been authorized to arrest an
individual without a warrant from the magistrate. This happens.
Section 42 specifies yet another situation where a police officer can arrest a person. According to this section, if a person
commits an offense in the presence of a police officer or where he has been accused of committing a non-cognizable offense
and refuses, on demand being made by a police officer to give his name and residence or gives false name or residence, such
person may be arrested but such arrest shall be only for the limited purpose of ascertaining his name and residence.
Arrest Made by Magistrate
Section 44 of CrPC provides for the provision of an arrest made by a magistrate. The sub-section 1 of this section provides
that when an offense is committed in the presence of the magistrate within his jurisdiction, he may himself arrest or order
someone to arrest the offender and may commit the offender to custody. Under sub-section 2 the magistrate can arrest or
order for the arrest of a person for whose arrest he is competent to issue a warrant.
Arrest by Private Persons
Section 43 of CrPC provides the procedure for arrests made by private individuals. This section gives the right to a private
person to arrest on the individual, who in his/her presence, commits a cognizable or a non-bailable offense or who is a
'proclaimed offender' The private person can arrest such an offender to hand over his custody to the nearest police station
and if the police officer finds such person coming under the provisions of section 41, the police officer has to re-arrest the
offender.
Q14. Power of supreme court and high court?
ANS. Powers of High Court
Original Jurisdiction
This states that High Court Judges have the power to hear a case as the first sample as an original court. The high courts of
Calcutta, Mumbai, and Madras have the provision of original jurisdiction in civil and criminal cases because civil and
criminal cases have been arising in these states. One advantage that the judges of the high court get is that they can hear
civil cases involving property worth over Rs 20000. The judges of high courts have the supreme power to issue writs in case
of enforcement of fundamental rights. The high court judges have the right to power original jurisdiction on cases that deal
with divorce, will, admiralty, or contemporary of court. Election petitions also can be heard by the high court judges.
Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Jurisdiction states that someone who fought a case in the district court before and is not satisfied with the
judgment of the district court then they can file an appeal in the high court about the same case and district court’s
judgment. The appeal can also be from subordinate courts if the case dispute involves a value higher than Rs 5000/- or it’s a
question of fact or law. This happens in Civil Cases. In Criminal Cases, the case gets extended as per decision sessions and
additional sessions for judges. In this, the session judge can announce imprisonment for 7 years or more. The session judge
may award capital judgment. The jurisdiction of the high court extends all cases under state or federal laws.
Court of Record
High Court is majorly known as the Court of records. The records of judgment in the High Court can be used by other
subordinate courts. All the high courts have the power to punish all contemporary cases by any person.
Administrative Powers
High Court has a couple of administrative Powers. The High Court can order or have over control of all subordinate courts.
The High Court may ask for all the details or cases and proceedings from subordinate courts. The high court judges have the
power to transfer a case from one court to another or it can also transfer the case to itself. It has the authority to inquire
about any case or documents related to it in subordinate courts. High Court Judges also have the power to appoint their
administrative staff and can decide their salary, allowances, and condition of services too.
The Supreme Court has reiterated the nature of its power thus:
1. Where the allegations in the FIR/complaint, even if they are taken at their face value do not prima facie constitute any
offence against the accused.
2. Where the allegations in the FIR or other materials do not constitute a cognizable offence justifying an investigation by
the police under Section 156(1) of the code except under an Order of a Magistrate within the purview of Section 155(2).
3. Where the uncontroverted allegations in the FIR/complaint and the evidence collected thereon do not disclose the
commission of any offence.
4. Where the allegations in the FIR or other materials do not constitute a cognizable offence but constitute a non- cognizable
offence to which no investigation is permitted by the police without Order of a Magistrate under Section 155(2).
5. Where the allegations are so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a
just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused.
6. Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or statute concerned (under which the
proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in
the code or in the statute concerned, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party.
7. Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide intention and/or where the proceeding is maliciously
instituted with an ulterior motive for wrecking vengeance on the accused with a view to spite him due to private and
personal vengeance.