Lecture 3 Part 3

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

PHILOSOPHY OF LAW

LECTURE 3
Br. Irol Torres, SVD
LAW AND MORALITY

▪ Law and Morality = spring from the same source: the social conscience

▪ “But what is legal is not necessary moral, and what is moral is not necessarily
legal.”
▪ E.g.:
▪ artificial contraception may be legal, but not moral;
▪ polygamy may be morally acceptable, but not allowed in other countries.
▪ Mendicancy may be moral, but not legal

▪ Moral obligation does not establish a juridical or legally enforceable tie.


LAW AND MORALITY

▪Art. 20. Every person who, contrary to law, willfully or


negligently causes damage to another, shall indemnify
the latter for the same.

▪Art. 21. Any person who willfully causes loss or injury


to another in a manner that is contrary to morals, good
customs or public policy shall compensate the latter for
the damage.
LAW AND MORALITY

▪Art. 20 vs. Art. 21:


▪Art. 20- The act is contrary to law; the act is done
either willfully or negligently.
▪Art. 21- The act is contrary to morals, good
customs or public policy; the act is done willfully.
▪Note: “Willful” may mean not merely voluntary but with a
bad purpose.
LAW AND MORALITY

▪1. A student willfully humiliates a professor, causing him to have a


nervous breakdown. This would be contrary to good customs and morals,
and the professor can sue for damages.
▪2. Justin seduces the 19 year-old daughter of John, with a promise of
marriage. The girl becomes pregnant. Under the present criminal laws,
there is no crime as the girl is above 18 years of age. Neither can any
civil action for breach of promise be filed. Under Art. 21, she and her
parents would have the right to bring an action for damages against A.
▪defrauded or deceived the girl (not necessarily “seducing” her, as the
term is used under the Revised Penal Code).
LAW AND MORALITY
▪Reason for Art. 21:
▪This provision was enacted because of the countless gaps in the
statutes, which leave so many victims of moral wrongs helpless,
even though they have actually suffered material and moral injury.
It provides for adequate legal remedy for that untold number of
moral wrongs, which it is impossible for human foresight to
capture in the statutes.
▪It is based on the idea that inasmuch as the legislative cannot
foresee all wrongs that cause damage to another person, there
should be an all-embracing clause that will provide remedy in all
such unforeseen situations.
MALA IN SE VS. MALA
PROHIBITA
▪Mala in se = offenses that are prohibited
because they are wrong in themselves, e.g.
murder, theft.

▪Mala prohibita = prohibited only because of a


special law, e.g. jaywalking.
▪Not in themselves morally wrong.
RELIGIOUS MORALITY
VS. SECULAR MORALITY
▪Religious Morality = sectarian morality
▪Ultimate basis: Word of God
▪E.g. 10 Commandments

▪Secular Morality = public morals; are considerations of the law.


▪ morality based on popular ideals, sources of law, and common
aspirations as expressed in policies, preambles and declaration of
policies.
▪E.g., obedience to the law

You might also like