Handout SDSD Revision STCW Adv 2019-05
Handout SDSD Revision STCW Adv 2019-05
Handout SDSD Revision STCW Adv 2019-05
1.1 Introduction
This course aims to provide knowledge and awareness to all seafarers with respect to Chapter XI-2 of the
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974, as amended, the International Ship and Port
Facility Security Code (ISPS), the Ship Security Plan (SSP), and Section A-VI/6-1 of the International Convention on
Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended.
At the end of the training, trainees are expected to achieve the following competencies:
Maintain the conditions set out in a ship security plan
Recognize security risks and threats
Undertake regular security inspections of the ship
Properly use available security equipment and systems
Current threats to maritime security provide a basis for understanding of the recent conventions and
legislation in this area and to fully grasp the importance of the training provided by this course. The prospective
security officers receiving this training must clearly sense the reality of today's security issues, which include
piracy, terrorism, contraband smuggling, cargo theft, and collateral damage.
Armed robbery – any illegal act of violence or detention or any act of depredation, or threat thereof, other than an
act of piracy, committed for private ends and directed against a ship or against persons or property on board such a
ship, within a State’s internal waters, archipelagic waters and territorial sea (International Maritime Organization)
Cargo theft – pilferage of ship’s cargo. This is an age-old problem that continues to plague the maritime industry
and causes financial losses in staggering amounts. Cargo Theft is the criminal taking of any cargo including, but not
limited to, goods, chattels, money, or baggage that constitutes, in whole or in part, a commercial shipment of
freight moving in commerce, from any pipeline system, railroad car, motortruck, or other vehicle, or from any tank
or storage facility.
Contraband smuggling – bringing on board goods that are forbidden by law to be exported or imported illegally,
either in defiance of a total ban or without payment of duty.
Collateral damage – general term for deaths, injuries, or other damage inflicted on an unintended target
Mutiny – forcible resistance to revolt against constituted authority on the part of the subordinates; specifically, an
insurrection of seamen against the authority of their commanders
Piracy – As defined in Article 101 of UNCLOS, consists of any of the following acts:
a. Any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew
or passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft and directed:
(i) On the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship
or aircraft;
(ii) Against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;
b. Any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making
it a pirate ship or aircraft;
c. Any act of inciting or of intentionally facilitating an act described in subparagraph (a) or (b).
Stowaways and refugees – persons who hide aboard the ship to obtain free passage or evade port officials; one who
flees from political or religious persecution
Terrorism – the use of, or the threat of the use of, directed or indiscriminate violence against innocent victims for
maximum and emotional effect, producing a long-term effect far greater than the incident itself would normally
warrant in attaining political objectives
SOURCE: Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships Report. ICC International Maritime Bureau
Ship Security Plan – a plan developed to ensure the application of measures on board the ship designed to protect
persons on board, cargo, cargo transport units, ship’s stores or the ship from the risks of a security incident
Company Security Officer – the person designated by the Company for ensuring that a ship security assessment is
carried out; that a ship security plan is developed, submitted for approval, and thereafter implemented and
maintained; and for liaison with port facility security officers and the ship security officer
Ship Security Officer – the person on board the ship, accountable to the master, designated by the Company as
responsible for the security of the ship, including implementation and maintenance of the ship security plan, and for
liaison with the company security officer and port facility security officers
Port facility - a specific location in a port where passengers or commodities are transferred between land and water
carriers or between two water carriers, including wharves, piers, sheds, warehouses, yards, and docks.
Ship/Port interface - the interactions that occur when a ship is directly and immediately affected by actions involving
the movement of persons or goods or the provision of port services to or from the ship.
Ship to ship activity - (STS) transfer operation is the transfer of cargo between seagoing ships positioned alongside
each other, either while stationary or underway. Cargoes typically transferred via STS methods include crude oil,
liquefied gas (LPG or LNG), bulk cargo, and petroleum products.
Port Facility Security Plan – a plan developed to ensure the application of measures designed to protect the port
facility and ships, persons, cargo, cargo transport units and ship’s stores within the port facility from the risks of a
security incident
Port Facility Security Officer - the person designated as responsible for the development, implementation, revision,
and maintenance of the port facility security plan and for liaison with ship security officers and company security
officers
Designated authority - The organization or the administration identified as responsible for ensuring the
implementation of Chapter XI-2 of the Safety Convention pertaining to port facility security and ship/port interface
from the point of view of the port facility.
Recognized security organization - An organization with appropriate expertise in security and anti-terrorism matters
recognized by the Administration and authorized by it to carry out assessment, verification, approval and
certification activities, required by SOLAS Chapter XI-2 or by Part A of the ISPS Code, on its behalf
Declaration of security - is defined by the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Convention as "an agreement reached
between a ship and either a port facility or another ship with which it interfaces, specifying the security measures
each will implement"
Security incident - is an event that may indicate that a ship or port facilities security have been compromised or that
measures put in place to protect them have failed.
Security level - The security levels under the ISPS code describe the current scenario related to the security threat to
the country and its coastal region including the ships visiting that country. The security levels are decided by the
cooperation of ship and port authority, keeping the current condition of national and international security. The
local government sets the security level and ensures to inform port state and ships prior to entering the port, or
when berthed in the port.
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has adopted a number of resolutions and conventions toward
maritime security. Early efforts of the IMO include the following:
Resolution A.545 (13)--Measures to Prevent Acts of Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships – Signed in 1983,
this resolution urged action to initiate a series of measures to combat acts of piracy and armed robbery ships
and small craft at sea.
Resolution A.584 (14)--Measures to Prevent Unlawful Acts Which Threaten Safety of Ships and Security of
Passengers – Adopted in 1985, following the hijacking of the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro, in October 1985,
which marked one of the first actual terrorist acts recorded in modern maritime history. This was later reviewed
in November of 2001 with IMO Resolution A.924 (22).
MSC/Circ.443--Measures to Prevent Unlawful Acts against Passengers and Crews On Board Ships – Approved in
1986, this is intended for application to passenger ships engaged on international voyages of 24 hours or more
and the port facilities that serve them.
Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA) – Adopted in
1988, the treaty ensures that appropriate judicial action is taken against persons committing unlawful acts
against ships. Unlawful acts would include the seizure of vessels by force, acts of violence against persons on
board vessels, and placing devices on board a vessel which are likely to destroy or damage it. The convention
obliges contracting governments either to extradite or prosecute alleged offenders. The SUA came into effect
on March 1, 1992.
The Organization has also adopted other maritime security instruments including the following:
MSC/Circs. 622 and 623, as revised, on Guidelines for administrations and industry on combating acts of piracy
and armed robbery against ships;
MSC/Circ. 754 on Passenger ferry security, providing recommendations on security measures for passenger
ferries on international voyages shorter than 24 hours, and ports;
Assembly resolution A.871(20) on Guidelines on the allocation of responsibilities to seek the successful
resolution of stowaway cases; and
Assembly resolution A.872(20) on Guidelines for the prevention and suppression of the smuggling of drugs,
psychotropic substances and precursor chemicals on ships engaged in international maritime traffic.
Following the tragic events of September 11, 2001, the Organization passed Assembly resolution A.924(22) which
called for a review of the existing international legal and technical measures to prevent and suppress terrorist acts
against ships at sea and in port, and to improve security aboard and ashore.
The adoption of resolution A.924(22) precipitated a Diplomatic Conference on Maritime Security in December 2002
attended by Contracting Governments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention. The 2002 SOLAS Conference adopted a
number of amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974, as amended.
This timetable of a little more than a year represents a landmark achievement for the IMO. It provides a clear
indication of the gravity of the situation as well as the intention to protect world shipping against security incidents
and threats.
By June 2004, part of the agreement under IMO is the implementation of measures under the International Ship and
Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code) and the Convention on Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). These measures will
greatly affect both the public and private sectors. Specifically, the measures will be applied on governments, ships
and maritime carrier companies; and ports facilities and operators.
To ensure implementation of the foregoing requirements, the ISPS Code also emphasizes the importance of training
and drills.
World Customs Organization (WCO) Task Force on Security and Facilitation of International Trade
Upon the request of developed countries and the IMO, the WCO created a task force to promote security and trade
facilitation in the supply chain. The challenge to the task force is how to harmonize the various security initiatives
without affecting the international movement of goods. By June of 2003, the WCO has developed various initiatives
such as:
1. Export controls (e.g. Unique Consignment Reference and WCO Data Model); and
2. Guidelines for cooperation between business and governments (e.g. Legal and Procedural infrastructure
for Data Collection and Transmission / Advance Cargo Information).
The 2002 SOLAS Conference amended SOLAS Chapter XI to include the following special measures for maritime
security:
SOLAS Chapter XI was divided into two parts: Chapter XI-1: Special Measures to Enhance Maritime Safety;
and Chapter XI-2: Special Measures to Enhance Maritime Security.
SOLAS Chapter XI-2 incorporated new regulations regarding definitions and the requirements for ships and
port facilities.
These new regulations are supported by the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code)
which contains detailed security-related requirements for Governments, port authorities and shipping
companies in a mandatory section (Part A), together with a series of guidelines about how to meet these
requirements in a non-mandatory section (Part B).
The new SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code were intended to ensure the security of ships and port facilities by
treating this as a risk management activity and ensuring appropriate security measures through an assessment of
the risks in each particular case.
Before being assigned to shipboard duties, all persons employed or engaged on a seagoing ship which is required to
comply with the provisions of the ISPS Code, other than passengers, shall receive approved security-related
familiarization training.
The security-related familiarization shall be conducted by the ship security officer or an equally qualified person.
Documentary evidence must be retained by the ship to show that this familiarization has been carried out.
Seafarers employed or engaged in any capacity on board a ship which is required to comply with the provisions of
the ISPS Code on the business of that ship as part of the ship's complement without security duties shall, before
being assigned to any shipboard duties, receive appropriate approved training or instruction in security awareness
as set out in table A-VI/6-1.
An STCW Certificate of Proficiency in security awareness must be issued to the seafarer to show that this training
has been carried out.
Transitional provisions.
Until 1 January 2014, seafarers who commenced an approved seagoing service prior to the date of entry into force
of this section shall be able to establish that they meet the above requirements by previous equivalent training
and/or relevant sea service, and can be issued with an STCW Certificate of Proficiency without further training.
Every seafarer who is designated to perform security duties, including anti-piracy and anti-armed-robbery-related
activities, shall be required to demonstrate competence to undertake the duties and responsibilities listed in column
1 of Table A-VI-6-2.
An STCW Certificate of Proficiency in designated security duties must be issued to the seafarer to show that this
training has been carried out.
Transitional provisions
Until 1 January 2014, seafarers who commenced an approved seagoing service prior to the date of entry into force
of this section shall be able to establish that they meet the above requirements by previous equivalent training
and/or relevant sea service, and can be issued with an STCW Certificate of Proficiency without further training.
IMO guidance on preventing and suppressing acts of piracy and armed robbery against ships
Guidance to shipowners and ship operators, shipmasters and crews on preventing and suppressing acts of piracy
and armed robbery against ships
1 The Maritime Safety Committee, at its eighty-sixth session (27 May to 5 June 2009), approved a revised
MSC/Circ.623/Rev.3 (Guidance to shipowners and ship operators, shipmasters and crews for preventing and
suppressing acts of piracy and armed robbery against ships) as given at annex.
2 The revision was carried out on the basis of the outcome of the comprehensive review of the guidance provided
by the Organization for preventing and suppressing piracy and armed robbery against ships; and took into account
the work of the correspondence group on the review and updating of MSC/Circ.622/Rev.1, MSC/Circ.623/Rev.3 and
resolution A.922(22), established by MSC 84.
3 Member Governments and organizations in consultative status with IMO are recommended to bring this circular
to the attention of shipowners, ship operators, shipping companies, shipmasters and crews and all other parties
concerned.
It is important to bear in mind that shipowners, companies, ship operators, masters and crews can and should take
measures to protect themselves and their ships from pirates and armed robbers. While security forces can often
advise on these measures, and flag States are required to take such measures as are necessary to ensure that
owners and masters accept their responsibility, ultimately it is the responsibility of shipowners, companies, ship
operators, masters and ship operators to take seamanlike precautions when their ships navigate in areas where the
threat of piracy and armed robbery exists. Planning should give consideration to the crew’s welfare during and after
a period of captivity by pirates or armed robbers. Before operating in waters where attacks have been known to
occur, it is imperative for shipowners, companies, ship operator and masters concerned to gather accurate
information on the situation in the area. To this end the information on attacks and attempted attacks gathered,
analyzed and distributed by the IMO, IMB’s Piracy Reporting Centre and the ReCAAP Information Sharing Centre
(ReCAAP ISC), the Maritime Security Centre, Horn of Africa, Governments and others is vital information, upon
which precautionary measures should be based.
Note: For contents of (msc.1-circ.1334 - guidance to shipowners and ship operators’ shipmasters
and crews on preventin g and suppressing piracy and armed robbery)
Some governments have acted on a national level to produce legislation and/or regulations concerned with
measures to enhance maritime security. For instance, the United States government has the Maritime Transport
Security Act of 2002 (MTSA 2002) and the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT).
The Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) is a program through which the U.S. Customs provides
streamlined clearance of cargo to firms that establish appropriate security procedures. The Container Security
Initiative (CSI) is another program in which U.S. Customs is working with foreign ports to identify potentially
dangerous shipments before they arrive in the U.S.
OPERATIONS CONDITIONS
Intermodal Nature of Transportation and the Interfaces between Ships and other Modes
Intermodal freight transport involves the transportation of freight in an intermodal container or vehicle, using
multiple modes of transportation (e.g., rail, ship, and truck), without any handling of the freight itself when changing
modes. The method reduces cargo handling, and so improves security, reduces damage and loss, and allows freight
to be transported faster. Reduced costs over road trucking is the key benefit for inter-continental use. This may be
offset by reduced timings for road transport over shorter distances.
An intermodal transport chain is illustrated in figure below. In this example, loaded containers leave the shipper’s
facilities by truck to a railyard, where they are consolidated into a train and sent to another rail yard. Trucks are
again used to transport the containers from this rail yard to the sea container terminal/ this last operation may not
be necessary if the sea container terminal has an interface to the rail network, in which case freight is transferred
directly from one mode to the other. Containers are then transported to a port on another continent by ocean
shipping, from where they leave by either trucking or rail (or both) to their destinations.
.
FIG. INTERMODAL TRANSPORT NETWORK
Role of a harbor as the interface between sea transport and other modes of transport
When in harbor during these ship/port operations, the following are the general points to be kept in mind:
Subject to the provisions of regulation XI-2/3 and XI-2/7, set security levels and provide guidance for protection
from security incidents. Higher security levels indicate greater likelihood of occurrence of a security incident.
Factors to be considered in setting the appropriate security level include:
the degree that the threat information is credible;
the degree that the threat information is corroborated;
the degree that the threat information is specific or imminent; and
the potential consequences of such a security incident
When they set security level 3, issue, as necessary, appropriate instructions and shall provide security related
information to the ships and port facilities that may be affected
May delegate to a recognized security organization certain of their security related duties under SOLAS chapter
XI-2 and Part A of the Code
Test, to the extent they consider appropriate, the effectiveness of the Ship or Port Facility Security Plans, or of
amendments to such plans, they have approved, or, in the case of ships, of plans which have been approved on
their behalf.
Contracting Governments may authorize a Recognized Security Organization (RSO) to undertake certain
security-related activities, including:
approval of Ship Security Plans, or any amendments, on behalf of the Administration;
verification and certification of compliance of ships with the requirements of chapter XI-2 and part A of the
Code on behalf of the Administration; and
conducting Port Facility Security Assessment required by the Contracting Government.
May also advise or provide assistance to Companies or port facilities on security matters, including Ship Security
Assessment, Ship Security Plans, Port Facility Security Assessment and Port Facility Security Plans.
1.4.4.3 Company
Designate a Company Security Officer for the Company and a Ship Security Officer for each of its ships whose
duties, responsibilities and training requirements are defined in Part A of the Code
Shall ensure that the ship security plan contains a clear statement emphasizing the master’s authority, i.e., that
master has the overriding authority and responsibility to make decisions with respect to the safety and security
of the ship and to request the assistance of the Company or of any Contracting Government as may be
necessary
Shall ensure that the company security officer, the master, and the ship security officer are given the necessary
support to fulfill their duties and responsibilities in accordance with SOLAS chapter XI-2 and Part A of the Code.
1.4.4.4 Ship
Required to have, and operated in accordance with, a Ship Security Plan approved by, or on behalf of, the
Administration
Carry an International Ship Security Certificate indicating that it complies with the requirements of SOLAS
chapter XI-2 and Part A of the Code
Have onboard information, to be made available to Contracting Governments upon request, indicating who is
responsible for deciding the employment of the ship’s personnel and for deciding various aspects relating to
the employment of the ship
Port facilities shall comply with the relevant requirements of this chapter and part A of the ISPS Code, taking
into account the guidance given in part B of the ISPS Code.
Contracting Governments with a port facility or port facilities within their territory, to which this regulation
applies, shall ensure that:
.1 port facility security assessments are carried out, reviewed and approved in accordance with the
provisions of part A of the ISPS Code; and
.2 port facility security plans are developed, reviewed, approved and implemented in accordance with
the provisions of part A of the ISPS Code.
Contracting Governments shall designate and communicate the measures required to be addressed in a port
facility security plan for the various security levels, including when the submission of a Declaration of Security
will be required.
Required to have, and operated in accordance with, a Port Facility Security Plan approved by the Contracting
Government or the Designated Authority concerned
Act upon the security level set by the Contracting Government within whose territory it is located. Security
measures and procedures shall be applied at the port facility in such a manner as to cause a minimum
interference with, or delay to, passengers, ship, ship’s personnel and visitors, goods and services.
A Ship Security Officer shall be designated on each ship whose duties and responsibilities include, but are not
limited to:
undertaking regular security inspections of the ship to ensure that appropriate security measures are
maintained;
maintaining and supervising the implementation of the ship security plan, including any amendments to the
plan;
coordinating the security aspects of the handling of cargo and ship’s stores with other shipboard personnel
and with the relevant port facility security officers;
proposing modifications to the ship security plan;
reporting to the Company Security Officer any deficiencies and non-conformities identified during internal
audits, periodic reviews, security inspections and verifications of compliance and implementing any
corrective actions;
enhancing security awareness and vigilance on board;
ensuring that adequate training has been provided to shipboard personnel, as appropriate;
reporting all security incidents;
coordinating implementation of the ship security plan with the company security officer and the relevant
port facility security officer; and
ensuring that security equipment is properly operated, tested, calibrated, and maintained.
The Company shall designate a company security officer whose duties and responsibilities include, but are not
limited to:
advising the level of threats likely to be encountered by the ship, using appropriate security assessments
and other relevant information;
ensuring that ship security assessments are carried out;
Revision No. 01 as of 2019 July 01 Page 12 of 54
Security Awareness Training and
Seafarers with Designated Security Duties
ensuring the development, the submission for approval, and thereafter the implementation and
maintenance of the ship security plan;
arranging for internal audits and reviews of security activities;
arranging for the initial and subsequent verifications of the ship by the Administration or the recognized
security organization;
ensuring that deficiencies and non-conformities identified during internal audits, periodic reviews, security
inspections and verifications of compliance are promptly addressed and dealt with;
enhancing security awareness and vigilance;
ensuring adequate training for personnel responsible for the security of the ship;
ensuring effective communication and cooperation between the ship security officer and the relevant port
facility security officers;
ensuring consistency between security requirements and safety requirements;
ensuring that, if sister-ship or fleet security plans are used, the plan for each ship reflects the ship-specific
information accurately; and
ensuring that any alternative or equivalent arrangements approved for a particular ship or group of ships
are implemented and maintained.
A person designated as the Company Security Officer may act as the company security officer for one or more
ships provided it is clearly identified for which ships this person is responsible.
Designated for each port facility whose duties and responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
conducting an initial comprehensive survey of the port facility, taking into account the relevant port facility
security assessment;
ensuring the development and maintenance of the port facility security plan;
implementing and exercising the port facility security plan;
undertaking regular inspections of the port facility to ensure the continuation of appropriate security
measures;
recommending and incorporating, as appropriate, modifications to the port facility security plan in order to
correct deficiencies and to update the plan to take into account relevant changes to the port facility;
enhancing security awareness and vigilance of the port facility personnel;
ensuring adequate training has been provided to personnel responsible for the security of the port facility;
reporting to the relevant authorities and maintaining records of occurrences which threaten the security of
the port facility;
coordinating implementation of the port facility security plan with the appropriate Company and ship
security officer(s);
coordinating with security services, as appropriate;
ensuring that standards for personnel responsible for security of the port facility are met;
ensuring that security equipment is properly operated, tested, calibrated and maintained, if any; and
assisting ship security officers in confirming the identity of those seeking to board the ship when requested.
Shipboard personnel having specific security duties and responsibilities shall understand their responsibilities
for ship security as described in the ship security plan and shall have sufficient knowledge and ability to
perform their assigned duties, including as appropriate:
knowledge of current threats and patterns;
recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices;
recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of persons who are likely to threaten security;
techniques to circumvent security measures;
crowd management and control techniques;
security related communications;
knowledge of emergency procedures and contingency plans;
operations of security equipment;
testing, calibration and maintenance while at sea of security equipment and systems;
inspection, control and monitoring techniques; and
methods of physical searches of persons, personal effects, baggage, cargo and ship’s stores.
Port facility personnel having specific security duties and responsibilities shall understand their responsibilities
for port facility security as described in the port facility security plan and shall have sufficient knowledge and
ability to perform their assigned duties, including as appropriate:
Crew members of the ship and other port facility personnel who attended security training awareness and
security drills in response to all security levels set under the ISPS code also have roles in ensuring that the
security plans work and will help recognize areas for enhancement of maritime security.
Role of military, industry and intergovernmental organizations in the prevention, suppression and reporting of
piracy and armed robbery against ships [as indicated in MARINA outline]
The ISPS Code identifies three Maritime Security (MARSEC) levels which describe the security threat that a country
and its coastal region are facing. The local government sets the security level with the help of ship and port
authority.
MARSEC Level 1
The normal level that the ship or port facility operates on a daily basis. Level 1 ensures that security personnel
maintains minimum appropriate security 24/7.
In this level, all those liable to board must be searched. The frequency of the same should be specified in the SSP.
Such searches are to be carried out in coordination with the port facility. It is important to remember the human
rights angle of the individual being searched and the search should not violate their dignity.
MARSEC Level 2
A heightened level for a time period during a security risk that has become visible to security personnel. Appropriate
additional measures will be conducted at this security level.
At this level, the SSP should establish the measures to be applied to protect against the heightened risk. Higher
vigilance and tighter control with regard to the security of the ship is in play here.
MARSEC Level 3
Will include additional security measures for an incident that is forthcoming or has already occurred that must be
maintained for a limited time frame. The security measure must be attended to although there might not be a
specific target that has yet been identified.
Again, the SSP should be adhered to and with strong liaison with the port facility. The following measures should be
put in place with the highest degree of vigilance and detail:
The Ship Security Officer should and is responsible for reporting all security incidents to the CSO, PFSO, and the
contracting governments as specified in the code.
.1 those considered to be sufficiently serious that they should be reported to relevant authorities by the CSO,
including:
Unauthorized access to restricted areas within the ship for suspected threat-related reasons
Unauthorized carriage or discovery of stowaways, weapons or explosives
Incidents of which the media are aware
Bomb warnings
Attempted or successful boardings
Damage to the ship caused by explosive devices or arson
.2 those of a less serious nature but which require reporting to, and investigation by the SSO, including:
Unauthorized access to the ship caused by breaches of access control points
Inappropriate use of passes
Damage to equipment through sabotage or vandalism
Unauthorized disclosure of a ship security plan
Suspicious behavior near the ship when at a port facility
Suspicious packages near the ship when at a port facility
Unsecured access points to the ship
Ship security plans shall address procedures for responding to security threats or breaches of security, including:
.1 Provisions for maintaining critical operations of the ship/port interface; and
.2 Procedures for reporting security incidents
Ships intending to enter ports of [State] may be required to provide the following information prior to entry into
port:
that the ship possesses a valid certificate and the name of its issuing authority;
the security level at which the ship is currently operating;
the security level at which the ship operated in any previous port where it has conducted a ship/port
interface within a specified time frame;
any special or additional security measures that were taken by the ship in any previous port where it has
conducted a ship/port interface within a specified time frame;
that the appropriate ship security procedures were maintained during any ship-to-ship activity within a
specified time frame; or
other practical security-related information (not to include details of the ship security plan).
Examples of other practical security-related information that may be required as a condition of entry into port in
order to assist with ensuring the safety and security of persons, port facilities, ships and other property include:
Drills and exercises must test the proficiency of vessel personnel in assigned security duties at all Security
Levels and the effective implementation of the Ship Security Plan (SSP). They must enable the Ship Security
Officer (SSO) to identify any related security deficiencies that need to be addressed.
4. To ensure the effective implementation of the Ship Security Plan, drills shall be carried out at
appropriate intervals taking into account the ship type, ship personnel changes, port facilities to be
visited and other relevant circumstances, taking into account the guidance given in the ISPS Code.
Drills.
(1) The SSO must ensure that at least one security drill is conducted at least every 3 months, except
when a vessel is out of service due to repairs or seasonal suspension of operation, provided that in
such cases a drill must be conducted within one week of the vessel’s reactivation. Security drills may
be held in conjunction with non-security drills where appropriate.
(2) Drills must test individual elements of the SSP, including response to security threats and incidents.
Drills should take into account the types of operations of the vessel, vessel personnel changes, and
other relevant circumstances. Examples of drills include unauthorized entry to a restricted area,
response to alarms, and notification of law enforcement authorities.
(3) If the vessel is moored at a facility on the date the facility has planned to conduct any drills, the
vessel may, but is not required to, participate in the facility’s scheduled drill.
(4) Drills must be conducted within one week whenever the percentage of vessel personnel with no
prior participation in a vessel security drill on that vessel exceeds 25 percent.
Exercises.
Various types of exercises which may include participation of Company Security Officers, port facility
security officers, relevant authorities of Contracting Governments as well as Ship Security Officers, if
available, should be carried out at least once each calendar year with no more than 18 months between
the exercises.
These exercises should test communications, coordination, resource availability, and response.
Exercises may be vessel-specific or part of a cooperative exercise program to exercise applicable facility
and vessel security plans or comprehensive port exercises.
Each exercise must test communication and notification procedures, and elements of coordination,
resource availability, and response.
Exercises are a full test of the security program and must include the substantial and active participation
of relevant company and vessel security personnel and may include facility security personnel and
government authorities depending on the scope and the nature of the exercises.
A high level of awareness by company personnel of these simple measures can help prevent the ship
from becoming an easy target.
The Ship Security Plan (SSP) should establish security measures that could be undertaken at each security level
covering the following:
1. Access to the ship by ship’s personnel, passengers, visitors, etc.
At security level 1, SSP should establish the security measures to control access to the ship, which may
include the following:
Checking the identity of all persons seeking to board the ship and confirming their reasons for doing
so by checking, e.g., joining instructions, passenger tickets, boarding passes, work orders, etc.;
In liaison with the port facility the ship should ensure that designated secure areas are established
in which inspections and searching of persons, baggage, personal effects, vehicles and their
contents can take place;
In liaison with the port facility the ship should ensure that vehicles destined to be loaded on board
car carriers, ro-ro, and other passenger ships are subjected to search prior to loading, in accordance
with the frequency required in the SSP;
Segregating checked persons and their personal effects from unchecked persons and their personal
effects;
Segregating embarking from disembarking passengers;
Identification of access points that should be secured or attended to prevent unauthorized access;
Securing, by locking or other means, access to unattended spaces adjoining areas to which
passengers and visitors have access; and
Providing security briefings to all ship personnel on possible threats, the procedures for reporting
suspicious persons, objects or activities and the need for vigilance.
At security level 2, the SSP should establish the security measures to be applied to protect against a
heightened risk of a security incident to ensure higher vigilance and tighter control, which may include:
Assigning additional personnel to patrol deck areas during silent hours to deter unauthorized
access;
Limiting the number of access points to the ship, identifying those to be closed and the means of
adequately securing them;
Deterring waterside access to the ship, including, for example, in liaison with the port facility,
provision of boat patrols;
Establishing a restricted area on the shore-side of the ship, in close co-operation with the port
facility;
Increasing the frequency and detail of searches of persons, personal effects, and vehicles being
embarked or loaded onto the ship;
Escorting visitors on the ship;
Providing additional specific security briefings to all ship personnel on any identified threats, re-
emphasizing the procedures for reporting suspicious persons, objects, or activities and the stressing
the need for increased vigilance; and
Carrying out a full or partial search of the ship.
At security level 3, the ship should comply with the instructions issued by those responding to the security
incident or threat thereof. The SSP should detail the security measures which could be taken by the ship, in
close co-operation with those responding and the port facility, which may include:
Limiting access to a single, controlled, access point;
Granting access only to those responding to the security incident or threat thereof;
Directions of persons on board;
Suspension of embarkation or disembarkation;
suspension of cargo operations, deliveries etc;
Evacuation of the ship;
Movement of the ship; and
Preparing for a full or partial search of the ship.
Recommended actions in response to attacks and attempted attacks by pirates and armed robbers
Fortunately, there are tools and techniques for avoiding, preventing and surviving pirate attacks. A satellite system
allows shipping companies to monitor the location of their ships. This can be particularly useful if pirates hijack or
steal a ship. Companies can also install non-lethal electrical fences around a ship's perimeter, as long as that ship
does not carry flammable cargo. In addition, International Maritime Organization regulations require ships to be
able to send distress signals and warnings covertly in case of pirate attack.
The best defense against a pirate attack is evasion -- it's easier to keep pirates from boarding than to force them to
leave. Upon detecting the approach of pirates, a crew should:
Call for help and warn other ships in the area
Take evasive action and attempt to out-maneuver the attackers
Sound the alarm, use the ship's lights to illuminate the vessel, and do anything else to make the
pirates aware that they have lost the element of surprise
If the pirates approach the ship, the crew should first try to throw off any grappling hooks or poles before the
pirates can board. Crew can also use the ship's fire hoses to deter pirates or try to push them overboard. However,
experts discourage crew members from carrying firearms, since the presence of weapons can encourage attackers
to respond with violence.
Once the pirates board the ship, the crew's first priority is to ensure their own safety. The crew should also try to
stay in control of the craft and encourage the pirates to depart.
Under the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS), every shipping company must take certain steps
into consideration to ensure security of the crew, ship and environment.
Several plans and procedures have been introduced to ensure utmost security of the ship and its crew.
A ship security plan (SSP) is a must for every ship under the ISPS Code.
Moreover, in order to ensure that every ship follows all the protective measures specified in the SSP, a Ship
Security Assessment is carried out by the concerned authority.
The ship security assessment (SSA) is generally carried out before making the ship security plan (SSP).
The chief security officer (CSO) checks that the people with the necessary skills carry out the ship security
assessment.
The ship security assessment (SSA) includes an on-scene security survey which includes:
1. Identification and evaluation of key shipboard operations which require additional care while carrying out
Under key shipboard operations, critical processes such as cargo handling, navigation, machinery handling etc. are
taken into consideration for evaluation. Along with that, critical spaces such as stores, bridges, machinery spaces,
and steering control system are also taken into consideration.
Under security measures, procedures such as response to emergency conditions, security patrol, security
communication systems, handling of surveillance equipment, including door barriers and lightings are taken into
account.
On the basis of identification of various other aspects, a list of objectives would be detailed such as new security
measures to be implemented, determination of mitigation strategy etc.
4. Identification of human factors that can be a threat to safety and security of the ship
Shipboard protective measures, procedures, and operations are evaluated to identify possible weakness pertaining
to human factors.
Aspects such as monitoring of restricted areas to ensure only authorized persons are allowed, ensuring
performance of security duties, supervising and handling of cargo etc. are taken into consideration to identify such
factors.
Under this, the company identifies various threat scenarios to a ship under specific circumstances. Threat
scenarios would be considered keeping in mind various aspects of the ship such as types of ship, crew, type of
cargo etc.
The vessel owner and operator have the primary responsibility for ensuring the physical and safety of their vessel.
Therefore, in addition to meeting the requirements of the ISPS Code, the SSA should also prepare a means to
promote sound security practices. The SSA is an essential and integral part of the process of developing and
updating the Ship Security Plan (SSP).
Appreciating that every ship is unique – in design, operations, cargo, voyage pattern, etc. – a ship owner/operator
may wish to demonstrate that specific recommended security measures are not appropriate for his specific ships.
It should be recalled that achieved security is highly dependent on the human element. Vigilance, prevention and
response can only be as good as the crew’s skills, knowledge experience and attitude related to security.
The on-scene security survey is an integral part of any Ship Security Assessment.
The on-scene security survey is an integral part of any SSA. The on-scene security survey should examine
and evaluate existing shipboard protective measures, procedures and operations for:
Security aspects of a ship’s layout are identified and the most critical operations, systems, areas and
personnel to protect, with respect to a security incident, are prioritized.
Physical Security
Physical security aboard ship is a part of risk management that is concerned with physical
obstacles disposed in depth to frustrate attempts to penetrate the security defenses.
Structural Integrity
It is of vital importance to know the significance of structural integrity for ships and other
structures in accessing the ship’s vulnerability—that is, to know that the “why,” “how,” ”when,”
and “where” factors apply to the effectiveness of such particular condition.
Access Control
Ship Security Alert System
Security Equipment, if available
Procedure Policies
Putting in place the proper procedures and effectively implementing such will prevent and
mitigate security incidents. These include assessment of the ship’s vulnerability to threats, in
terms of likelihood and potential consequences taking into account motives, existing measures
and critical operations when assessing the likelihood and potential outcome of the scenarios.
Other areas
Proper training in security awareness is mandatory to all crew to be able to identify security risk
areas around the ship or within a port facility. One identified area is the ship’s access point.
Establish a table for identification of vulnerabilities and criteria based on the example scenario, as
well as table for counter-measures (mitigation) that will be developed to reduce risk for that
scenario.
It is of paramount importance to have in place the emergency plans that deal with contingencies. When
emergency plans are in place, the ship personnel function more effectively in an organized environment.
In case of breach of security, the SSO shall evaluate, review and amend the security measures
specified in the ship security plan.
Hijacking- If in case hijackers were already in control, all crew should cooperate with the Hijackers,
give them whatever they want and should treat them in a “Seamanlike Manner” to prevent loss of
life, ship, cargo, or environmental catastrophe.
Bomb Threat- All crew should know the drills for the response to such threat, like thorough search
of the bomb around the ship or evacuation of crew if bomb has been discovered.
Unidentified Objects/Explosives on Vessel- Crew should not touch nor move the suspected objects,
immediately call the PFSO to inform bomb squad and evacuate the area.
Damage to/Destruction of Port Facility- ship should immediately leave the port facility, stay in a safe
area and wait for further instructions from the CSO or Contracting Government.
Piracy- Anti-piracy watch should be exercised as stated in ship’s anti-piracy guide. However, if
heavily armed pirates had boarded the ship, the crew must stay calm, act in full cooperation with
the pirates, which is a “Must,” and act in a “Seamanlike” manner. The safety of the crew, ship, and
its cargo is the primordial concern.
Stowaways- Thorough search for stowaways will be carried out prior departure from port. However,
if stowaways have been found after ship had left the port for some time, treat them fairly in
accordance with IMO guidelines regarding stowaways until they are repatriated to their home
country. While in port, stowaways should be confined in a secured cabin to prevent them from
deserting.
Documents and records for ship security shall be kept on board at all times.
A verification of the ship’s security system and any associated equipment will be made to ensure that the
ship fully complies with applicable requirements of the ISPS Code and is in satisfactory condition and fit for
service for which the ship is intended. Such verification shall be endorsed on an International Ship Security
Certificate. This certificate shall be issued for a period specified by the Administration, which shall not
exceed five years. The verification of ships shall be carried out by officers of the Administration or a
Recognized Security Organization (RSO).
Every ship shall be issued with a Continuous Synopsis Record. This record is intended to provide an on-board
record of the history of the ship. This shall be issued by the Administration to each ship that is entitled to fly
its flag and shall contain the following:
Records of the following activities addressed in the ship security plan shall be kept on board for the minimum
period, as specified by the Administration.
Declaration of Security
The Declaration of Security is a document that may be required for a port visit when specific security requirements
exist. The Declaration address the security requirements that could be shared between a port facility and a ship, or
between ships, and states the responsibility for each.
The ship is operating at a higher security level than the port facility or another ship it is interfacing with
There has been a security threat or a security incident involving the ship or involving the port facility
The ship is at a port which is not required to have and implement an approved port facility security plan
The ship is conducting ship to ship activities with another ship not required to have and implement an
approved ship security plan
The port facility security officer or, if the Contracting Government determines otherwise, by any other body
responsible for shore-side security, on behalf of the port facility
Having a good plan, though essential to the ship’s security, is not enough. Diligence of the crew in
implementing the plan is just as important. The best defense against terrorists and criminals is good security
awareness and observation on the part of all crew.
Ship Security Officers should be cautioned that no security equipment or measure is perfect. They should be
appraised for known techniques that can be employed to penetrate and break the security systems and
controls such as the disabling of alarm systems, picking of locks, jamming of radio signals, etc.
Interference or jamming and monitoring of the ship’s communications system. Efforts made to
broadcast over the system, damage the radio transmitter or antenna, or cut telephone lines are often
the first indication that an attack is imminent.
Damage to locks and doors such as scratches around the locks.
Lost or stolen keys.
Normally locked doors being found open for no reason.
Dirty finger marks on clean doors or windows, or clean marks on dirty doors.
False alarms on security systems. The criminal or terrorist may be testing the response time and
reaction procedures, or trying to incapacitate the alarm system.
Apparently wanton, or accidental damage to essential equipment. This may be an indicator that an
attempt is about to be made to attack the ship.
Though armed with the most modern weaponry, the modern-day pirates still use small motorized fishing
boats which are fast and too small to get detected by the ship’s radar system. When these boats are used by
the pirates, generally at night, they are literally invisible to the ship’s crew. The pirates wait in these small
boats, under the darkness of night, and speed up as soon as they see a big ship coming their way.
From piracy attacks in the past, it is said that pirates generally attack the ship from its astern side, using ropes
attached with hooks at one end. Some of the pirates also use long bamboos to attach the ropes with hooks
on the ship’s side. Some pirates have also been seen using light ladders made out of wood and bamboo. The
pirates are really fast with these activities and aboard the vessel way before the ship’s crew realizes and
raises the alarm.
Although all the huge cargo and tanker vessels are basically too high to climb, when fully loaded, these
vessels move quite low with a fairly high draught. This makes it even easier for the pirates to board the
ships. Moreover, most of the piracy attacks mainly take place near to the shoreline using small speed boats.
However, some of the recent piracy attacks have even taken place at a distance of three to four hundred
nautical miles from the shore. In such cases, pirates use a bigger mother ship and anchor is near the sea
route. When the targeted ship arrives, they use small power boats to attack the ship.
Present day pirates are using the best of modern technology to assist them in their piracy attacks. Equipped
with the most modern and automatic weapons such as AK-47 rifles and rocket propelled grenades (RPGs),
the pirates mercilessly and aimlessly fire on the targeted ship.
Though huge in size, the ships are both defenseless and helpless in front of these lethal weapons. In many
piracy attacks in the past, the pirates have opened fire on the cargo ships to bring them to a halt. The
master of the ship has no option other than slowing down the ship or stopping it, allowing the pirates to
come on board.
Thus, technically, a merchant ship in Somali waters is a sitting duck, waiting to be hit by the pirates. Unless
and until any substantial step is taken to fight the growing piracy activities in Somalia waters, merchant ships
will always remain an easy target for the modern-day pirates.
Suspicious patterns of behavior while emphasizing the importance of avoiding racial profiling and ethnic
stereotyping. These include the following:
Various weapons, dangerous substances and devices, the damage they can cause, and appearance are as
follows:
Handguns are generally small and suitable for concealed carriage. There are extremely small handguns
called “Delinger” which has single loaded capacity. Some are all light-weight plastic or polymer. It is
very difficult to detect using an X-ray machine or metal detector.
Rifles are considered to be bulky. However, recent military assault rifles are considerably small and
easy to disassemble. As for shotguns, some are with barrels cut short for concealed carriage.
Bullets
Full-metal jacket bullets have good piercing capability. However, in case the bullet hits the human
body, there would be considerable energy loss (as it penetrates), and the damage to the human body
may tend to be relatively small.
Semi-metal hollow point bullets are widely used, which once they hit the human body, the bullets are
deformed in a mushroom shape expanding diameter, thus giving a bigger damage to the human body.
Heavy Arms
Explosives
Military explosives such as grenades, plastic-bonded explosives, industry explosives such as dynamites
or handmade explosives made of fireworks are used.
Military explosive gives strong destruction power, but even handmade explosives, if there is a mass of
them, can have catastrophic destruction power.
Dynamite
Grenade
It can kill personnel within the 2m radius of its explosion
The explosive can cause a high-velocity explosion stream (8750m/sec), which is very strong. C-4 has
off white color or light brown color; Semtex has dark gray color.
Vehicle bomb
Incendiary Bombs
A possibility of NBC attack can’t be totally eliminated. It is believed that terrorist groups have already
obtained these materials.
As for biological weapons, anthrax virus, botulinos virus, and small fox virus, are possible weapons.
ANTHRAX
VIRUS
SARIN GAS
Ship Security Officers should be familiar with the basic patterns of behavior of people in groups during
time of crisis. Demonstrate to learners about the proper way to control the crowd on board in case there
is a bomb threat. The critical importance of clear communication with the vessel personnel, port facility
personnel, passengers, and others involved should be underscored.
A crisis refers not necessarily to a traumatic situation or event, but to a person’s reaction to an event. One
person might be deeply affected by an event while another individual suffers little or no ill effects. A crisis
presents an obstacle, trauma, or threat.
Situational crises are sudden and unexpected, such as accidents and natural disasters.
Crowd control management is a specific training program that all individuals of a ship’s crew need to learn.
Crowd safety, is not just about trying to merely control the crowd, it involves using the right kind of
communication and effectuating the perfect leadership skills to manage the crowd. This is why the crowd
control safety program has been recommended by the STCW stipulations.
In case of any emergency, panic is the first reaction. In cruise ships, in case of complications, the element
of panic will be on the higher side. This is why crowd managers in cruise ships need to have the knowledge
to pacify the crowd and provide with them with the necessary information, in a manner that does not
cause them to panic further.
Leadership skills, also is an aspect devoted to in the crowd control for cruise ships program. A leader is a
person who is able to guide others without being rude and incoherent. In a situation of extreme exigency,
the people in the cruise ship will want to listen to someone who is able to give them clear instructions and
reason things in the calmest manner.
Understanding the psyche is another area where the safety program looks into. In a cruise ship, lots of
people are around so the problem of communication differences and other minor conflicts arising is but
natural. Crew members need to pay close attention to people so that they can prevent such conflicts from
arising and thereby avoid a stressful scenario.
Security information and communication have certain sensitivity according to the prevailing levels of
security. Seemingly benign conversations, therefore, may result in disastrous consequences. All personnel
will need to appreciate the risk of security leaks through communication by improper methods or to the
wrong persons.
To safeguard maritime interests against unlawful acts which threaten the security of passengers and crews
on board ships, reports on incidents and the measures taken to prevent their recurrence should be
provided to the authorities as soon as possible. This information will be used in updating or revising these
agreed measures, as necessary.
The individual circumstances of any particular incident may require a departure from this guidance to
achieve the overall primary objective of personnel safety. Mention of the difference should be contained in
any incident report in order to ensure that guidance can be continually improved and kept up to date.
It is well noted that, unless there are clear security grounds, crew members should not be required to
search their colleagues or their personal effects. It should be conveyed that any search shall be undertaken
in a manner that fully takes into account the human rights of the individual and preserves his/her basic
human dignity.
A physical search is always conducted in the most professional and respectful manner possible. A physical
search:
Is always done by a screening officer of the same gender as the passenger. In exceptional situations,
when a screening officer of the same gender is not available, alternative screening options will be
offered.
Is usually performed over clothing, though the screening officer may need to move, shift or slightly
lift clothing during the search.
Is safe and hygienic; screening officers must wear gloves during the search, and you can ask the
officer to change gloves before your search.
May be performed in a private search room. If you choose this option, one screening officer of the
same gender as you will carry out the search. A witness (of the same sex as the person being
searched, if possible) will also be present. Witnesses will be a screening officer or another
independent third-party witness (e.g. airline representative, airport security personnel, police
officer). Bring all of your personal belongings with you so they don’t get lost or stolen.
All passengers need to be searched regardless of age. Physical searches may only be conducted by screening
officers of the same gender as the person who is being searched.
Infants: The gender of the parent or guardian is the determining factor, not the gender of the child.
Younger than 12 years of age: A witness of the same gender is needed. Witnesses will be a screening
officer or another independent third-party witness (e.g. airline representative, airport security
personnel, police officer). A parent, guardian or airline representative must also observe the search.
Revision No. 01 as of 2019 July 01 Page 36 of 54
Security Awareness Training and
Seafarers with Designated Security Duties
12 to 15 years of age: A guardian, family member or escort may observe a private physical search.
Such passenger-requested observers do not replace the requirement for screening personnel or an
independent third-party witness.
Gathering and assessing information with respect to security threats and exchanging such
information with appropriate Contracting Governments,
Requiring the maintenance of communication protocols for ships and port facilities,
Preventing unauthorized access to ships, port facilities, and their restricted areas,
Preventing the introduction of unauthorized weapons, incendiary devices or explosives to ships or
port facilities,
Providing means for raising the alarm in reaction to security threats or security incidents,
Requiring ship and port facility security plans based upon security assessments, and
Requiring training drills and exercises to ensure familiarity with security plans and procedures.
The following security procedures are implemented when conducting a security assessment with new
measures in place:
Ensuring that ship security communication, information and equipment are readily available
After performing above items and observing that vulnerabilities were reduced, there will be no
further mitigating measures to apply.
Note: There may be other kinds of security procedures to follow that are not included in the list.
The SSP should establish the security measures covering all means of access to the ship identified in the SSA.
This should include the following:
.1 Access ladders,
.2 Access gangways,
.3 Access ramps,
.4 Access doors, side scuttle, windows and ports,
.5 Mooring lines and anchor chains, and
.6 Deck Cranes and hoisting gears
For each of these, the SSP should identify the appropriate locations where access restrictions or prohibitions
should be applied for each of the security levels. For each security levels the SSP should establish the type of
restrictions or prohibitions to be applied and the means of enforcing them.
Checking the identity of all persons seeking to board the ship and confirm their reason for doing
so by checking their boarding permit, crew embarkation order, work orders, and passenger ticket,
In liaison with the port facility officer, the ship should ensure that the designated access points
are provided with security staff or personnel,
Locking or securing access points,
Using surveillance equipment to monitor the areas,
Using guards or patrols, and
Using automatic intrusion-detection devices to alert the ship’s personnel of unauthorized access.
The Company Security Officer has established the following procedures to describe what the ship security
officer shall do:
Provide security briefings to all crew and passengers prior to departing on any specific threats and
the need for vigilance and reporting suspicious persons, objects, or activities.
Increase the frequency and detail of inspecting persons, carry-on items for prohibited weapons,
explosives, etc.
Positively identify personnel prior to each embarkation.
Inspect all persons, carry-on items for prohibited weapons, explosives, etc.
Provide security briefings to all crew and passengers, prior to each embarkation and
disembarkation, on any specific threats and the need for vigilance and reporting suspicious
persons, objects, or activities.
Escort all service providers or other personnel who need to board.
Assign additional personnel to guard designated areas.
Assign personnel to continuously patrol designated areas.
Increase the detail and frequency of controls used for people boarding the ship.
Suspend embarkation or disembarkation.
The SSP should identify the restricted areas to be established on the vessel, specify their extent, time of
application, the security measures to be taken to control access to them, and those to be taken to control
activities within them. The purposes of restricted areas are to provide security in the following manner:
Designation of Restricted Areas - The vessel owner or operator must ensure restricted areas are designated
on board the vessel, as specified in the approved plan. Restricted areas must include, as appropriate:
Increased the frequency and intensify monitoring the control and access to restricted areas,
Establishing restricted areas adjacent to the access point,
Continuously monitoring surveillance equipment,
Dedicating additional personnel to guard and patrol restricted areas.
Setting up additional restricted areas on the ship in proximity to the security incident, or the
believed location of the security threat, to which access is denied, and
Searching restricted areas as part of a search of the ship.
The monitored areas mainly include the restricted areas, vulnerable areas and the surrounding of the ship
including likely boarding access.
Security Lighting:
While the ship is at sea, on the premise of securing the safe navigation, the lights are to be switched
on as many as possible, and sufficient lights are to be provided for both sides and stern of the ship.
The searchlight is to be added to enhance the visibility over the water surface surrounding the ship.
Marker light is also to be switched on. The person on duty is often to use Morse code light and
strong light torch for the sea surface to show that the ship is capable of defending itself. The light
for the cargo area is to be switched on and the stern light is also to be added when necessary.
While the ship is at mooring or anchorage, all the lightings on the deck and inside the ship are to be
kept in good condition. At night, the lights are to be switched on to ensure the lighting for the deck,
stern areas and access points of the ship, so that the crew can see the conditions of the areas over
the hip and of the areas surrounding the ship. At higher security level, the lighting is to be
cooperatively used for dock facility. The additional lights include strong spot light to be used for
both sides and the stern of the ship to enhance the visibility of the deck and the water surface
surrounding the ship
Security persons are to be arranged for as watch-keepers on the deck including patrol.
While the ship is at sea, the equipment such as radar, binoculars etc. can be used for detailed
search for the suspected target over the sea.
Audible and/or visual alarm is to be activated, such as siren warning and search lighting warning for
suspected target.
Or all the means mentioned above can be combined in use.
At dark night or under poor visibility condition, when the ship/port facility interface activities,
mooring or anchoring operations are carried out, the lighting for the deck, the area of the stern and
access points of the ship are to be ensured.
While the ship is at dock, at anchorage or is at sea, the deck and the ship sides in darkness or in
poor visibility are to be provided with appropriate lighting upon the security level and the judgment
of the master. But it is not to affect the navigating light or the safety of navigation.
The master and the chief officer are responsible for checking the conformity of the cargoes to be
loaded and cargoes listed, and for ensuring that only permitted cargoes can be loaded on the ship. If
they are not in conformity, they can refuse the cargoes to be loaded on the ship.
The ship security officer is responsible for the monitoring of the cargo handling. If a suspected case
is detected, he is to contact the port facility officer, shipper or other relevant party to arrange
detailed inspection of the cargoes.
The officer on duty is responsible for the monitoring during cargo handling and normal inspection of
cargo unit upon the handling instructions given by the chief officer, and for ensuring the loading
cargo complete and without damage.
If the items in the contract signed with the shipper or other responsible party cover the contents of
allopatric inspection, box sealing, date arrangement and bill providing etc., the company security
officer and the ship security officer are to notify the port facility security officer of the contract and
have him agree on it.
All the cargo areas are to be inspected before commencement of the operation.
The cargo areas are permitted to enter while the ship is at sea.
During cargo handling, unauthorized persons are not allowed to enter the cargo areas.
Entrance to the dangerous cargo areas are to be strictly controlled.
The cargo handling equipment is to be fastened when it is not in use.
Before the loading, the master is to check the written cargo information submitted by the shipper
or the charterer, so as to ensure the safety of the cargo to be loaded on the ship or to be unloaded
to the harbor. If there is any suspected case, he is to report to the company and the relevant party
of the cargo.
The officer on duty is to carry out the normal check of the cargo, cargo carriage unit and cargo areas
before or during cargo loading to ensure the cargoes being loaded on the ship matches the cargo
documentation.
Check the proper strip seal or other means to prevent being damaged, so as to ensure the cargoes
were not changed.
Before the commencement of the operation of the cargo handling, all the cargoes and cargo
hauling equipment are to be checked to see whether there are weapons, ammunition, flammable
or explosive substance, drugs and contraband. The check of the cargoes may be carried out by
means of the following:
Visual and physical examination
Sample examination of the loaded cargoes (at least 25%) is to be carried out with
scanning/detection equipment, mechanical devices or dogs.
Sample check of the identification number of the empty containers and the non-container carried
cargoes is to be carried out upon the cargo documentation (where applicable)
Keep close contact with the port facility department to ensure that the transportation tools of
with designated percentage are to be loaded on the vehicle carrier and the roro ship and
passenger ship. Check is to be carried out before loading. (The company is to determine the
appropriate percentage)
Once the suspected cargo is detected on board, the operation of the cargo handling is to be ceased, which
is to be reported to the chief officer, ship security officer and company security officer.
The Ship Security Officer is to contact the port facility security officer requiring cooperation in full and more
detailed inspection.
Cooperate with the emergency responding body and the port facility security officer in full check of the
dangerous goods loaded on board and their locations, and cooperate with the emergency responding body
in handling of the suspected goods in accordance with the relevant instructions given by the emergency
responding body.
The following measures for cargo handling, depending on the security level, can be used:
Source: https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-safety/security-levels-under-isps/
Control of Suppliers
The company is to make requirements for control of suppliers of ship’s stores, including the requirements
for inquiring about the security backgrounds.
Before delivery of the ship’s stores, the company is to provide the ship in time with the list of the stores
ordered including name of the supplier, address, liaison, telephone and fax, etc.
Before delivery of the stores, the supplier is to notify the ship, indicating the date and time they are to be
delivered.
Ensure the stores mentioned in the list provided by the company to match the spare stores on board. Only
after satisfactory examination, can they be loaded on board; otherwise, they are to be refused.
At an appropriate security level, the packages of the stores integrity are to be checked before they are
loaded so as to ensure the stores are not damaged or accompanied by other articles.
At an appropriate security level, visual and physical inspections are to be given to all the stores including
using scanning/detection equipment, mechanical devices or dogs to sample the loaded cargo to see
whether there are weapons, ammunition, flammable or explosive substance, drugs and contraband.
After being accepted, the ship’s stores are to be stockpiled and fastened in time. This is avoid tampering of
the stores.
The following measures for ship’s store delivery, depending on the security level, can be used:
Thorough checks prior to loading stores and intensifying inspections of the same
Source: https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-safety/security-levels-under-isps/
Basic items or equipment that may be employed in conducting searches include the following:
Procedures to be followed to ensure effective and efficient searches include the following:
Crew members and facility personnel should not be allowed to search their own areas in
recognition of the possibility that they might conceal packages or devices in their own work or
personal areas.
The search should be conducted according to a specific plan or schedule and must be carefully
controlled.
Special consideration should be given to search parties working in pairs with one searching “high”
and one searching “low.” If a suspicious object is found, one of the pair can remain on guard while
the other reports the findings.
Searchers should be able to recognize suspicious items.
There should be a system for marking or recording “clean” areas.
Searches should maintain contact with the search controllers, perhaps by UHF/VHF radio.
Searchers should have clear guidance on what to do if a suspected package, device, or situation is
found.
Searchers should bear in mind that weapons and other dangerous devices may be intentionally
placed in disguise such as toolbox in an engine room.
o Search Preparation – Prior to starting a search, the person should be given an opportunity to assist
with the process by emptying the contents of their pockets and any bags, as well as removing
specific clothing items, such as their jacket.
o Gender Specific Searches – When possible, it’s important to have same-sex searched conducted.
While this may not always be a possibility, it should be striven for to help make the person being
searched more comfortable to potentially prevent any claims against harassment.
o Don’t Search Alone – When possible, you should always have a co-worker or supervisor with you
during a search process. This is important as a colleague can serve as a witness throughout the
search should the person accuse you of any type of misconduct. If not possible, clearly gain consent
to perform the search and inform the person what you plan on doing as part of the search and if
they are uncomfortable with any portion. Clear communication is imperative to prevent any
misunderstandings between you or the person.
o Remain Sensitive to Persons – There will be cases where the person who requires a search features
religious garments or has mobility issues. When this is the case, it’s important to ensure the person
feels comfortable executing the search in the current location. If the person has religious issues with
the search, or is not comfortable being searched in a crowded room, do what you can to
accommodate their needs. If you are unable to satisfy the needs of the person, call your supervisor
to have them make the final judgment call about moving forward.
o Contact Management – Should any illegal or forbidden items be found during the search, it’s
important to immediately contact your manager or supervisor. Do not simply place the forbidden
items in your pocket and move forward. Doing so could result in serious legal issues for you and
your security company. Once your manager/supervisor arrives, he or she will determine if calling law
enforcement officers is necessary.
o Confiscate Illegal/Forbidden Items – While waiting for your manager or supervisor to arrive, you
should immediately confiscate the illegal or forbidden items. Many times, the person will simply
take the item and leave; however, depending on what was found, this may be a serious legal issue.
There are many places on board a ship where weapons, dangerous substances, and devices can be
concealed. Some of these are the following:
Cabins
Companionways
Ducts
Wire harnesses
Railings
Fire extinguishers
Fire hoses and compartments
Access panels in floors, walls, ceiling
Behind or inside water coolers, igloos
Deck
Engine Room
Locks, seals
Monitoring equipment, automatic intruder detector
Light, ID system for passenger, ID system for vehicle
Ship Security Alert System
Searching/Screening Equipment
Baggage Inspection
CCTV Camera
Combination Lock
Hand Wand
Panel Kit
Metal Detector
Scanmail
Locks and Seals are applied to access control areas and cargo in order to restrict its opening and closing.
Locks/Seals are inexpensive and can perform unauthorized access/opening.
Surveillance/Monitoring Device (CCTV) is a devise used for monitoring and maintaining surveillance to
remote areas. It is widely used in shore; however, certain precautions are to be applied:
Consider cameras’ fitness for the purpose (resolution, black/white or colored, night vision capacity, field
of vision, magnifying capacity) and number should be adequate for the areas to be monitored. Cameras
on weather decks should be provided with weatherproof coverings.
Automatic Intrusion Detection System is a device wherein a motion active sensor function is added to
the said surveillance device (CCTV).
Lights - strong light identifies intruders and deters intrusion. There are two types: 1) continuously switch
on and 2) switch on only when a sensor detects presence of the intruder. Bear in mind that this light
should not conflict with requirements of COLREG Convention.
Hand-Held Metal Detector is used for a person’s reaction at gate prior entering the ship/premises.
Comparatively inexpensive and easy to handle, but caution is to be exercised against running out of
battery. It is necessary to confirm the function of the equipment by test piece (coin) before using the
device.
Baggage X-ray Machine (Box Scatter) is used for baggage and it is known for its effectiveness compared
to older models. However, the operators need to be trained as the cost of the machine is very high.
Walk-through Metal Detector - is used in the screening of individuals prior boarding the ship. Like the
Baggage X-ray machine, the operators must be trained because the cost of the unit is high.
Identification System for Passenger and Crew – a system of identification for passengers and crew. It
should be noted that in case of visiting a port in the USA, ID cards with a photograph is required. It
should be noted that a magnetic card could be forged easily.
Vehicle Identification system– a system of scanning vehicle’s registration plate automatically and alarms
automatically for a subject vehicle registered in advance to exercise caution.
Testing, calibration, and maintenance of security equipment and systems should be carried out to
ensure accuracy, efficiency, and operational readiness of selected items of security equipment.
(a) Security systems and equipment must be in good working order and inspected, tested, calibrated
and maintained according to the manufacturer's recommendation.
(b) The results of testing completed under paragraph (a) of this section shall be recorded and any
deficiencies shall be promptly corrected.
(c) The Ship Security Plan (SSP) must include procedures for identifying and responding to security
system and equipment failures or malfunctions.