Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 56 views

    Comment On Foe Petras

    Uploaded by

    Raffy Pangilinan
    This document is a comment on the formal offer of evidence from the prosecution in the criminal case of People of the Philippines versus Rommel Petras. The defense objects to most of the exhibits (A through F, K through L, T, and T-1) on the grounds that they are self-serving, biased, or hearsay. Some exhibits are also objected to because they are photocopies instead of original documents. The defense prays that the court notes this comment. The comment was served electronically to the prosecutor and court due to COVID-19 protocols.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comment On Foe Petras

    Uploaded by

    Raffy Pangilinan
    56 views2 pages
    This document is a comment on the formal offer of evidence from the prosecution in the criminal case of People of the Philippines versus Rommel Petras. The defense objects to most of the exhibits (A through F, K through L, T, and T-1) on the grounds that they are self-serving, biased, or hearsay. Some exhibits are also objected to because they are photocopies instead of original documents. The defense prays that the court notes this comment. The comment was served electronically to the prosecutor and court due to COVID-19 protocols.

    Original Title

    comment on foe petras

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a comment on the formal offer of evidence from the prosecution in the criminal case of People of the Philippines versus Rommel Petras. The defense objects to most of the exhibits (A through F, K through L, T, and T-1) on the grounds that they are self-serving, biased, or hearsay. Some exhibits are also objected to because they are photocopies instead of original documents. The defense prays that the court notes this comment. The comment was served electronically to the prosecutor and court due to COVID-19 protocols.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    56 views2 pages

    Comment On Foe Petras

    Uploaded by

    Raffy Pangilinan
    This document is a comment on the formal offer of evidence from the prosecution in the criminal case of People of the Philippines versus Rommel Petras. The defense objects to most of the exhibits (A through F, K through L, T, and T-1) on the grounds that they are self-serving, biased, or hearsay. Some exhibits are also objected to because they are photocopies instead of original documents. The defense prays that the court notes this comment. The comment was served electronically to the prosecutor and court due to COVID-19 protocols.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    National Capital Judicial Region


    REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
    Branch 282, Valenzuela City

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,

    -versus- Crim. Case No. 278-V-21


    For: Murder
    ROMMEL PETRAS y CORPUZ,
    Accused.
    x--------------------x

    COMMENT ON THE FORMAL OFFER OF


    PROSECUTION’S EVIDENCE

    The above-named accused, represented by the Public Attorney’s


    Office, unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully submit this comment
    to the Formal Offer of Exhibits of the prosecution and aver as follows:

    Exhibit Comment
    A self-serving and biased
    B hearsay as the affiants were not presented in court
    to testify on the contents thereof
    C self-serving and biased
    D photocopy which is violative of the original
    document rule pursuant to Section 3, Rule 130 of
    the 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Rules on
    Evidence
    E self-serving and biased
    F self-serving and biased; affiant has no personal
    knowledge regarding the facts and circumstance
    surrounding the death of the victim
    G photocopy which is violative of the original
    document rule pursuant to Section 3, Rule 130 of
    the 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Rules on
    Evidence
    H admitted only as to existence but objected to for the
    I purpose for which they were offered
    J
    K and series self-serving and biased
    L and series
    M
    N admitted only as to existence but objected to for the
    O purpose for which they were offered
    P

    1|Page
    Q
    R
    S
    T self-serving and biased
    T-1 not found in the records
    U and series
    V
    W
    X
    PRAYER
    WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed
    that this comment be noted by the Honorable Court.

    Other reliefs, just and equitable, are likewise prayed for.

    Metro Manila, Valenzuela City, Metro Manila, 24 November 2021.

    PUBLIC ATTORNEY’S OFFICE


    VALENZUELA DISTRICT OFFICE
    st
    1 Floor, Metropolitan Trial Court Bldg.
    Justice Hall Compound, C.J. Santos St., Poblacion II,
    Malinta, Valenzuela City

    Through:

    ATTY. RAFAEL D. PANGILINAN


    Public Attorney II
    Roll No. 64684
    IBP OR No. 162981 dated 8/3/21 / CALMANA Chapter
    MCLE Compliance No. VI - 0006876 dated 3/20/18

    Copy furnished:
    ACP Aileen S. Agacita
    Office of the City Prosecutor of Valenzuela City
    ocpvalenzuela.ereceiving@gmail.com / aileen_saquing@yahoo.com

    Explanation on the mode of service:


    Service of the foregoing comment was made to the Office of the City
    Prosecutor of Valenzuela City and the Honorable Court through electronic
    means in accordance with Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 72-
    2021 which reiterated and maintained the “no personal filing” policy unless
    for exceptionally urgent matters and only after having been properly
    communicated and cleared with the proper office.

    ATTY. RAFAEL D. PANGILINAN


    2|Page

    You might also like