Good Governance Case Number 2 Share Holder Activism
Good Governance Case Number 2 Share Holder Activism
Good Governance Case Number 2 Share Holder Activism
The Philippines still lags behind most of its neighbors in protecting the rights of minority
shareholders in corporations, making the country’s equity market less attractive to potential
investors.
The result is that investors, who entrust their hard-earned money to company managers, rarely
get a voice in decision-making or even the chance to question a corporation’s actions.
“Other countries have investor groups that are very active in participating in company affairs.
When minority investor groups are solid, they get louder voices,” SharePhil chairperson Evelyn
Singson said.
She said the main advocacy of the newly formed group would be to educate investors of their
rights and duties as part owners of corporations.
The group wants to make sure that minority investors are no longer kept in the dark about the
details of the operations of both listed and privately held companies, Singson said.
Also, lack of investor protection has made the country a less attractive investment destination
compared to its neighbors, said Francis Lim, former president of Philippine Stock Exchange and
one of SharePhil’s trustees.
“There is the perception that companies are not up to corporate governance standards,” Lim
said.
SharePhil also stressed the need to educate new investors such as housewives, overseas
workers and retirees on how to invest in stocks to make their money work for them and, in the
process, help pump-prime the economy.
MARJORIE L. SEDROME BS-ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Questions:
1. Do you believe that at this point in time that our country needs more Shareholder
Activism? If you agree or disagree with the article, state your reason.
2. Given that you have the ownership and the right leverage to change a certain
company in our country, what aspects in the Philippine setting do you believe
requires change for us to reach corporate governance standards? Explain your
answer for each aspect.
● Accountability
- Boards of directors should be accountable to the groups and individuals
affected by their actions, such as shareholders, stakeholders, vendors,
employees, and the general public.
● Transparency
- Good corporate governance reflects the transparency and accessibility of
records and processes to the shareholders and stakeholders. Financial
records should not be exaggerated or inflated. They must be presented to
shareholders and stakeholders in a way that allows them to truly
understand and interpret the findings. Transparency entails informing
stakeholders of the individual who can answer questions and explain
reports if necessary.
● Equity and Inclusiveness
- Each board director is given an equal seat at the table. Each director has
the ability and responsibility to use their voice to share their experiences,
opinions, and viewpoints in order to strengthen and expand discussions.
Nobody should feel excluded or as if their opinions are less important
than those of others.
3. What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of Shareholder Activism,
given that it is strongly utilized in our country.