2022 - Bishop Study
2022 - Bishop Study
2022 - Bishop Study
To cite this article: Gustavo Gomes Resende, Ricardo da Cruz Lage, Samara Quadros Lobê,
Amanda Fonseca Medeiros, Alessandra Dias Costa e Silva, Antônio Tolentino Nogueira Sá, Argenil
José de Assis Oliveira, Denise Sousa, Henrique Cerqueira Guimarães, Isabella Coelho Gomes,
Renan Pedra Souza, Renato Santana Aguiar, Roberto Tunala, Francisco Forestiero, Julio Silvio
Souza Bueno Filho & Mauro Martins Teixeira (2022): Blockade of interleukin seventeen (IL-17A)
with secukinumab in hospitalized COVID-19 patients – the BISHOP study, Infectious Diseases,
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2022.2066171
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Isabella Coelho Gomesb, Renan Pedra Souzac , Renato Santana Aguiarc , Roberto Tunalad ,
Francisco Forestierod , Julio Silvio Souza Bueno Filhoe and Mauro Martins Teixeiraf
a
Rheumatology Unit, Hospital das Clınicas - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil; bHospital
Risoleta Tolentino Neves, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; cDept. of Genetics, Ecology and Evolution - UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
d
Novartis, S~ao Paulo, Brazil; eDepartment of Statistics, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Brazil; fDepartment of
Biochemistry and Immunology UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with severe COVID-19 seem to evolve with a compromised antiviral response and hyperinflamma-
tion. Neutrophils are critical players in COVID-19. IL-17A plays a major role in protection against extracellular pathogens
and neutrophil attraction/activation. We hypothesized that secukinumab, an anti-IL17A monoclonal antibody, could prevent
the deleterious hyperinflammation in COVID-19.
Methods: BISHOP was a randomized, open-label, single-centre, phase-II controlled trial. Fifty adult patients hospitalized
with PCR-positive Covid-19, were randomized 1:1 to receive 300 mg of secukinumab subcutaneously at day-0 plus standard
of care (group A) or standard of care alone (group B). A second dose of 300 mg of secukinumab could be administered on
day-7, according to staff judgement. The primary endpoint was ventilator-free days at day-28 (VFD-28). Secondary efficacy
and safety outcomes were also explored.
Results: An intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in VFD-28: 23.7 (95%CI 19.6–27.8) in group A vs. 23.8
(19.9–27.6) in group B, p ¼ .62; There was also no difference in hospitalization time, intensive care unit demand and the
incidence of circulatory shock, acute kidney injury, fungal or bacterial co-infections. There was no difference in the inci-
dence of severe adverse events. Pulmonary thromboembolism occurred only in males and was less frequent in secukinu-
mab-treated patients (4.2% vs. 26.2% p ¼ .04). There was one death in each group. Upper airway viral clearance was also
similar in both groups.
Conclusion: The efficacy of secukinumab in the treatment of Covid19 was not demonstrated. Secukinumab decreased pul-
monary embolism in male patients. There was no difference between groups in adverse events and no unexpected events
were observed.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients randomised to secukinumab þ standard of care (group A) or stand of care alone (group B).
Group A (SEC þ SoC) n ¼ 25 B (SoC alone) n ¼ 25 p value
Demographic characteristics
Sex (male), n (%) 10 (40) 16 (64) .16
Age, median (IQR) 54 (45–65) 54 (40-63) .37
Comorbidities, n (%)
Systemic arterial hypertension 13 (52) 11 (44) .78
Diabetes mellitus 8 (32) 9 (36) 1.00
Obesity and overweight 15 (60) 9 (36) .16
Cardiopathy 3 (12) 1 (4) .61
Pneumopathy 2 (8) 3 (12) 1.00
N of comorbidities/patient 1.6 1.2 .75
Clinical and laboratory measures, median (IQR)
Time from symptoms onset to randomisation (days) 10 (8–12) 9 (8-11) .62
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 97 (93–100) 94 (90-102) .18
Haemoglobin (g/dL) 12.7 (12.1–14.3) 13.4 (12.5–13.9) .22
White blood cells (109/L) 8.5 (7.6–9.8) 8.9 (7.3–11.6) .27
Neutrophils (109/L) 6.8 (5.9–8.3) 7.8 (5.8–9.3) .34
Lymphocytes (109/L) 1.3 (0.7–1.9) 1.2 (0.9–1.5) .68
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio 5.2 (3.6–10.5) 6.5 (4.5–9.1) .44
Platelets (109/L) 251 (195–297) 220 (171–301) .32
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.70 (0.70–1.0) 0.75 (0.70–0,90) .76
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) 331 (296–451) 392 (324–499) .15
Ferritin (ng/mL) 659 (344–1296) 846 (428–1421) .54
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 43 (24–77) 63 (44–123) .11
Fibrinogen (mg/dL) 461 (436–559) 476 (442–527) .57
Troponin (ng/mL) 3.5 (1.8–8.9) 5.1 (3.3–14) .22
D-dimer (mcg/mL) 0.6 (0.3–1.3) 0.9 (0.4–2.3) .21
PaO2/FiO2 ratio 297 (216–384) 258 (174–339) .07
SOFA score 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 3.0 (1.0–3.0) .10
WHO scale 4 (4–4) 4 (4–4) .48
IQR: interquartile range; PaO2/FiO2 ratio: ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (in mmHg) to fractional inspired oxygen; SOFA score: Sequential Organ Failure
Assessment Score for sepsis; WHO scale: World Health Organisation Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement.
Table 3. Incidence of adverse events of interest in secukinumab þ - in the control group. No allergic reactions or reactions
standard of care (group A) compared to standard of care alone at the injection site occurred in either study arm.
(group B).
Chronological analysis (from day-0 to day-14) of the
A (SEC þ SoC) B (SoC alone)
Group n ¼ 25 n ¼ 23 p value neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ferritin, and CRP lev-
Patients with SAE, n (%) 5 (20) 6 (26) .73 els during hospitalisation revealed a very similar evolu-
Any SAE, n (Incidence/100 patient-days) 16 (2.3) 11 (1.7) .56
Pulmonary thromboembolism, n (%) 1 (4) 6 (26) .04 tion of the inflammatory markers. NLR tended to
Secondary bacterial infection, n (%) 4 (16) 2 (8.7) .67 increase from days 10 to 14 in group A and decrease in
Secondary fungal infection, n (%) 1 (4) 0 1.00
Circulatory shock, n (%) 4 (16) 1 (4) .35 group B. Still, there were few hospitalised patients dur-
Acute kidney injury KDIGO III, n (%) 1 (4) 1 (4) 1.00 ing this period, and the differences were not statistically
Death, n (%) 1 (4) 1 (4) 1.00
SAE: serious adverse events; p < 0.05 ¼ statistically significant. significant (Figure 2).
The WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement had
control group, these differences were not statistically dif- comparable evolution, from randomisation to day 28 in
ferent (Table 2). Similarly, there was an nominally longer both groups. The score in the WHO Ordinal Scale for
duration of mechanical ventilation (3.8 vs. 2.0 days) and Clinical Improvement at day 28 was not different
longer permanence in the ICU (4.0 vs. 3.2 days) in secuki- between groups (2.3 points in group A vs. 2.1 in group
numab-treated than control patients, but this was also B). There was a higher proportion of patients in group A
without statistical significance. (48%) than group B (26%), achieving a score of one on
The frequency of serious adverse events (SAE) was the scale throughout the 28 days of follow-up, although
generally comparable in both groups (20% vs. 26%; without significance (p ¼ .14). In the survival analysis
p ¼ .73) (Table 3). Secukinumab-treated individuals had a (Cox regression model), only baseline CRP (lower values)
higher rate of secondary bacterial infection (16% vs. 9%; were associated with higher cumulative hazard of
p ¼ .7) and circulatory shock (16% vs. 4%; p ¼ .3), albeit achieving score one on the WHO scale, as shown in
not significantly different. The frequency of pulmonary Figure 3.
thromboembolism (PTE), as confirmed by chest CT angi- Viral clearance, as defined by the change (2-DDCT) in
ography, was lower in the secukinumab-treated than in RNA viral load in the upper airway between day-0 and
the control group (4% vs. 26%; p ¼ .04). The incidence of day-7, was similar in both groups. After seven days,
PTE (per 100 patient-days) was 0.14 in group A and 0.93 there was viral clearance in 83% in group A and 77% in
in group B, with a relative risk reduction of 85% (Table group B, as shown in Figure 4.
3). PTE occurred only in males. Within this group with
PTE, younger men were more affected. The mean age Discussion
(SD) of the male patients was 42 (15) years-old in the To the best of our knowledge, this is the first rando-
subgroup with PTE and 56 (13) years in the subgroup mised clinical trial exploring the effects of secukinumab
without PTE (p ¼ .04). We used logistic regression ana- in COVID-19 patients. Our results show that secukinu-
lysis to evaluate whether PTE associated independently mab was well tolerated and not associated with a sig-
with the treatment with secukinumab. Because of the nificant increase of adverse events or secondary
robust association found with the male sex, no model infections. However, the anti-IL-17 antibody was not
that included sex showed any other variable (age, treat- effective in ameliorating the pulmonary failure observed
ment, baseline CRP, ferritin and D-dimer) that associated in severe acute respiratory syndrome COVID-19 patients.
with PTE. Only after multiple adjustments, in a model in Indeed, there was no decrease in the number of ventila-
which sex was excluded as an explanatory variable, a tor-free days at day 28 with secukinumab in addition to
weak association was seen with the interaction between the standard therapy used. Moreover, days in the hos-
age and treatment. In this model, secukinumab treat- pital, admission to ICU, and time to recovery (as
ment were marginally associated with a lower incidence assessed by the WHO score) were similar in
of PTE in younger patients (p ¼ .09). both groups.
There was one death and one patient who developed As seen in Table 2, there was no difference in the
acute kidney injury (KDIGO III) requiring haemodialysis in percentage of individuals intubated and the duration of
each group. There was only one fungal infection (vaginal intubation. Similarly, ICU admission and ICU stay were
candidiasis, treated with oral antifungal, without study similar between both groups. These results suggest that
interruption) in a secukinumab-treated patient and none the most severe forms of the disease are not altered in
6 G. G. RESENDE ET AL.
Figure 2. Chronological analysis of blood tests. CRP: C-reactive protein; NLR: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Shadow areas represent the 95%
confidence interval.
Figure 3. Cumulative hazard of achieving score one at day 28 on the World Health Organisation Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement
evolution. A - comparison between who had baseline CRP lower than the mean (77 mg/L) and who had baseline CRP higher or equal to
mean. B – comparison between the groups of allocation in the study. Error lines (shadow areas) represent the 95% confidence inter-
val (95%CI).
in secukinumab-treated individuals, but there was no started in September 2020, all patients were already tak-
statistical difference between the two groups. The ten- ing corticosteroids because of its benefits in oxygen-
dency to increase NLR as the disease progressed seen in dependent COVID-19 patients [38]. Possibly, this issue
group A (Figure 2) could reflect that difference since improved the challenge to show significant effects of an
neutrophil blood count started to rise on day-7 (data anti-inflammatory intervention on top of steroid use. In
not shown). fact, smaller studies with another anti-cytokine therapy
Of special interest, our study showed that the number (anti-IL-6R) have also reported no improvement in
of clinically relevant thromboembolic events was lower COVID-19 patients, while two larger trials clearly showed
in secukinumab-treated patients, although the logistic a benefit [39]. Furthermore, the optimal dose, route of
regression did not confirm that treatment was an inde- administration, and timing of secukinumab to ensure
pendent variable associated with this outcome. therapeutic tissue concentrations in COVID-19 are
Interestingly, only male subjects presented PTE during unknown. The dose regimen chosen in this study was
the study. This sex predominance may be due to mere the maximum weekly dose, currently approved for other
chance, especially considering the small sample of this indications. In addition, our chosen method to assess
study. But it may also be due to some sex-linked genetic
viral clearance (RNA viral load in the upper airway) is
differences since it has already been shown that the risk
not adequate to measure viral aggression in lower
of thromboembolism recurrence in men is higher than
respiratory tract, and also it cannot be translated as
in women [27].
viable viral particle.
It is estimated that 1% of patients tested for SARS-
In conclusion, secukinumab exhibited a satisfactory
CoV-2 develop pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) [28].
safety profile in severe COVID-19 patients. The blockade
Clinically relevant PTE was estimated at 8% (95%CI,
of anti-IL-17A with secukinumab appears not to show a
4–11%) [29]. Notably, in critically ill patients, this preva-
clear benefit, compared to the standard of care, in the
lence is remarkably higher, with prevalences reported of
context of COVID-19 pulmonary failure. There was a
up to 76% in this population [30]. In our cohort, the
reduction of pulmonary thromboembolism in male
prevalence of PTE in the control group (26%) was close
patients and this find needs to be confirmed in larger
to that reported in the literature. Therefore, the substan-
tial reduction of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) clinical trials.
seen in secukinumab-treated patients was remarkable.
There is evidence that IL-17 may contribute to throm-
boinflammation under various circumstances. Upon Disclosure statement
stimulation, COVID-19 platelets released significantly GGR received personal payments for lectures from Abbvie,
larger amounts of IL-17, among other cytokines, com- Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB; support for attending meetings
pared with control platelets [31]. IL-17A promotes and/or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB; and
in vitro platelet aggregation and activation, neutrophil personal payments for participation on a data safety monitoring
extracellular trap (NET) release, and vein endothelial cell board or advisory board Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis. RCL
activation. These effects were lost in platelets deficient received honoraria for presentations and speakers bureaus; and
support for attending meetings, including travel and hotel
for the IL-17 receptor (IL-17R) [32–34], resulting in less
expenses from Novartis. RT and FF were Novartis employees until
deep venous thrombosis (DVT) formation in two animal this submission. ADCS, AFM, ATNS, AJAO, DS, HCG, ICG, MMT,
models [35,36]. Besides, a series of thrombectomies SQL, RSA, JSSBF and RPS declare no competing interests.
observed that the coronary thrombus, superimposed on
ruptured atherosclerotic plaques, contains NETs coated
Funding
with IL-17 [37]. While this six-fold reduction of clinically
significant PTE in COVID-19 patients treated with secuki- Novartis Brazil supported this research providing expert input in
numab is of interest, larger studies are needed to con- the development of the project, drug supply, data management,
and monitoring. This project was also supported by CNPq (R.S.A.:
firm this protective effect of blocking IL-17.
312688/2017-2 and 439119/2018-9). MEC/CAPES 118 (14/
This study had some limitations. It was open-label 2020 23072.211119/2020-10), FINEP (0494/20 01.20.0026.00),
with a small sample size. The sample size was calculated UFMG-NB3, FINEP n 1139/20 (RSA) and The National Science and
based on the risk of intubation and death observed at Technology Programs (INCT Program project number 465425/
the beginning of the epidemic in Brazil. When inclusions 2014-3 funded by MCTI/CNPQ/CAPES/FAPS research call 16/2014).
8 G. G. RESENDE ET AL.
psoriasis treated by interleukin-17 inhibitors. J Dermatolog with acute coronary syndrome. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):
Treat. 2022. DOI:10.1080/09546634.2021.1905766 e40641.
[27] Douketis J, Tosetto A, Marcucci M, et al. Risk of recurrence [34] Hot A, Lenief V, Miossec P. Combination of IL-17 and TNFa
after venous thromboembolism in men and women: induces a pro-inflammatory, pro-coagulant and pro-throm-
patient level Meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d813. botic phenotype in human endothelial cells. Ann Rheum
[28] Giannis D, Barish MA, Goldin M, the COVID-19 Consortium Dis. 2012;71(5):768–776.
Group, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism and [35] Mo JW, Zhang DF, Ji GL, et al. Detection of targets and
mortality in patients with initial presentation of COVID-19. their mechanisms for early diagnosis of traumatic deep
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021;51(4):897–901. vein thrombosis. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(1):2413–2421.
[29] Gratz J, Wiegele M, Maleczek M, et al. Risk of clinically rele- [36] Ding P, Zhang S, Yu M, et al. IL-17A promotes the forma-
vant venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with tion of deep vein thrombosis in a mouse model. Int
COVID-19: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Front Immunopharmacol. 2018;57:132–138.
Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:647917. [37] de Boer OJ, Li X, Teeling P, et al. Neutrophils, neutrophil
[30] Kollias A, Kyriakoulis KG, Lagou S, et al. Venous thrombo- extracellular traps and interleukin-17 associate with the
embolism in COVID-19: a systematic review and Meta-ana- organisation of thrombi in acute myocardial infarction.
lysis. Vasc Med. 2021;26(4):415–425. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109(2):290–297.
[31] Taus F, Salvagno G, Cane S, et al. Platelets promote throm- [38] Pulakurthi YS, Pederson JM, Saravu K, et al. Corticosteroid
boinflammation in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. ATVB. 2020; therapy for COVID-19: a systematic review and Meta-ana-
40(12):2975–2989. lysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore).
[32] Maione F, Cicala C, Liverani E, et al. IL-17A increases ADP- 2021;100(20):e25719.
induced platelet aggregation. Biochem Biophys Res [39] Abani O, Abbas A, Abbas F, et al. Tocilizumab in patients
Commun. 2011;408(4):658–662. admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a rando-
[33] Zhang S, Yuan J, Yu M, et al. IL-17A facilitates platelet mised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet. 2021;
function through the ERK2 signaling pathway in patients 397(10285):1637–1645.