NHP Appraisal Mission (Aide Memoire)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

NATIONAL HYDROLOGY PROJECT


Appraisal Mission, August 1- 5, 2016

I. Introduction

1. A World Bank project appraisal mission 1 was conducted from August 1 to 5, 2016 for the
National Hydrology Project (NHP). The mission objectives were to appraise the project and assess
the readiness of project for negotiation. The Aide Memoire summarizes mission findings and the
status of project preparation.

2. Detailed discussions were held with central and state agencies grouped according to major
river basins in Delhi. The discussion focused on readiness, MoA, detailed implementation
arrangements for various components of the project. Finally, the wrap-up meeting was concluded
under the chairmanship of Dr. Amarjit Singh, Officer on Special Duty, MoWR, RD&GR on August
5. The wrap-up was attended by senior management including the Additional Secretary, and central
organizations and north eastern states.

II. Key Project Data

Table 1: Tentative Features of Project


Nodal Implementing National Project management Unit (NPMU), MoWR, RD&GR
Agency
Implementing Agencies National project with 27 states and 2 UTs, two river basin
(IAs) organizations and eight Central Agencies (MoWR, RD&GR; CWC;
CGWB; NIH; CPCB; SoI; NRSC and CWPRS)

Project Negotiation September 2016


expected by
Bank funding USD 350 Million (IBRD=USD 175 Million; GoI= USD 175 Million;
(Total cost of project approved by CCEA is INR 3640 crore)

MoWR Scheme Central Sector Scheme with 100% grant in aid for States.

III. Project Status and Readiness

1
Mission Members Mmes/Messrs: Anju Gaur (Senior Water Resources Specialist and Task Team Leader);
Chabungbam Rajagopal Singh (Co-TTL Water Resources Management Specialist); Satya Priya (Senior Water
Resources Specialist); Tapas Paul and Pyush Dogra (Senior Environment Specialists); S. Krishnamurthy (Senior
Financial Management Specialist); Arun Kolsur (Senior Procurement Specialist); Jorge Luis Alva-Luperdi (Senior
Counsel, LEGES); and Jai Mansukhani (Program Assistant); World Bank Consultants: Anish Kumar Bansal, Samuel
Thangaraj; and Hitesh Thakur.

Page 1 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

3. The appraisal mission for the project was completed. Overall, the project has made
substantial progress towards readiness. The key actions to be undertaken in advance of negotiations
are summarized in the following table and comprise those actions which will ensure a timely
implementation of the project.

Table 2: Key Actions Leading up to Negotiations


Actions to be completed by Implementing Lead Agency By when
Agencies
1. MoA signed between the Ministry and MoWR, RD&GR October 15, 2016
implementing agencies
2. Opening of Bank accounts All IAs Immediately
3. All PMUs for IAs are staffed with core staff All IAs Immediately
4. Project Operations Manual finalized MoWR, RD&GR Immediately
5. Key procurements are at advance stage:
a. Issuance of RFPs for Technical and Immediately
management Consultancy MoWR, RD&GR
b. Tender for empanelment of MoWR, RD&GR Immediately
Hydromet equipment is floated

IV. Project Overview

4. MoWR, RD&GR and DEA have proposed to extend the innovative practices in flood
mitigation and IWRM practices developed under the prior two phases of Hydrology project to the
Ganga and Brahmaputra River basins. The project development objective (PDO) is to improve
the extent, quality, and accessibility of water resources information and to strengthen the
capacity of selected water resources management institutions in India. The cabinet committee
for economic clearance has been obtained for INR 3,640 Crore (~USD 600 Million) as central
sector scheme with 100% grant in aids to states. GoI is committed to the project through
establishment of permanent National Water informatics center and plans to continue as program
after the project. In order not to commit large amount, the proposed World Bank project would be
USD 350 Million (IBRD=USD 175 Million and GoI=USD 175 million). Based on the performance
of project and need during MTR/s, the opportunities for additional financing will be explored.

5. The project will be national in scope covering all the states/territories across India with eight
participating central agencies and two river basin organizations. It was encouraging to note that both
Ministry and states are adopting river basin approach to water resources management. The project
will facilitate the approach by developing national standardization of water information systems,
development and implementation of modelling tools and decision support platform for basin-scale
flood forecasting, dynamic basin-scale water resource assessments and river basin planning. The
Bank is fully committed to supporting this through facilitating access to global expertise.

6. The project is designed to minimize duplication in information generation and database


management, which will reduce the financial burden on states and ensure sustainability beyond the
life of the project. MoWR is working on establishing data integration and accessibility protocols for

Page 2 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

IndiaWRIS 2 and centralized database management which would enable real-time data exchange
among river basin entities. Major products from MoWR, RD&GR: DTM at 3 m resolution, Remote
sensing products, Weather forecast, streamflow forecast and river basin water planning platform.
Control system would at central server and state. The state would have access to their river basin
information system.

7. The mission was pleased to note that majority (74%) of agencies are complying with the
readiness of project including establishment of Project Management Units and preparation of key
project documents (for details, refer to the project website
http://www.indiawrm.org/ProjectStatusDetails.aspx).

8. The mission was also pleased to note that most agencies (excepting Tripura and Delhi) have
submitted key documents including PIPs, Annual Work Plans and Procurement Plans. Further, it is
noteworthy that 74 percent of state agencies have a core team in place for their Project Management
Units and have been trained in proposed core project activities, including procurement and hydro-
met systems 3. Over the last two years, the Bank and Ministry have supported 12 training events
(with a total of around 505 unique participants) to prepare project teams. More importantly, the
exchange among old and new agencies within the project has assisted new states tremendously in
project preparation.

V. PDO Level Results Indicators

9. The Project key results indicators are the following: a) Improving the extent, quality, and
accessibility of water resources data: Number of new or upgraded water resources monitoring
stations operated by implementing agencies providing validated data online; b) Improving the
accessibility of water resources information: Number of information products produced under the
project made available to the stakeholders; and c) Strengthening capacity: Number of water
resources institutions achieving benchmark performance levels.

VI. Project Components

10. The project has four components and the details are provided in the draft Project Appraisal
Document and Table 3. The component-wise allocation to each agency is provided on the project
website (www.indiawrm.org). The lending instrument will be Investment Project Financing. Table 1
shows the project costs and financing share by component. The total project cost for stage 1 would
be US$350 million, evenly divided between the World Bank and the GOI.

Table 3. Project Cost and Financing (US$, millions)


Description Project Financing
Component
Cost Share

2
IndiaWRIS is a web enabled portal with geo-spatial and temporal information system. It is maintained by CWC
(MOWR, RD&GR) with non-classified data available to public.
3
Hydromet system refers to the monitoring network of climate, surface water and groundwater and the associated
management of data generated

Page 3 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

World
GOI
Bank
Expand and upgrade water resources
A: Water Resources monitoring and data acquisition systems
150 75 75
Monitoring Systems (including Real time systems) and data
centers
Develop and support National centralized
database management and information
B: Water Resources
systems, water resource data sets, 50 25 25
Information Systems
including remotely sensed information;
and strengthen state-WRIS.
Develop River basin platform in selected
C: Water Resources
river basins for flood forecasting and
Operations and 66 33 33
reservoir operations, water resources
Planning Systems
planning and management etc.
Capacity building through establishing
D: Institutional
and supporting water resources data
Capacity 84 42 42
centers, trainings, and centers of
Enhancement
excellence
Total 350 175 175

VII. Implementing Agencies

11. The project will cover all major river basins of India (Figure 1) and will require strong
collaboration among central and state levels of government. As shown in Table 4, a total of 49 IAs
have participated in preparation of which 21 agencies are new from 15 new states / UTs and two
central agencies.

Table 4: Summary of implementing agencies


Implementing Number
Agency – Continuing from HP New Total
Type II
States 20 17 37
Union Territories 1 1 2
Central Agencies 6 2 8
River Basin 1 1 2
Organizations
Total 28 21 49

Page 4 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

Figure 1: Implementing agencies and major river basins. (Map not to scale)

VIII. Implementation Arrangements

12. Implementation arrangements are based on the implementation model and lessons learned
from HP-I and HP-II, where each state had one to two IAs. With the central-level IAs, this resulted
in a total of 29 IAs under HP-II. The large number of IAs for the NHP is inevitable given (a) the
GOI’s decision to expand the geographical reach of earlier projects to cover virtually the entire
nation; (b) the current institutional make-up described above (that is, with separate surface water
and groundwater departments in some states); and (c) the federated structure of the GOI, where
states have constitutional rights to manage water within their jurisdictions, while the central
government’s mandate is limited to a regulatory role and provision of technical support.

13. Consistent with the NHP’s conceptualization as a national project covering the entire
country, the MoWR, RD&GR is introducing the NHP as a ‘central sector scheme’, where funds will
be allocated to the IAs as a grant from the central government. This is distinct from HP-I and HP-II,
which were multistate loans and demonstrates the GOI’s strong commitment to the objectives of the
project.

14. Implementation responsibilities are distributed across the central and subnational IAs to
maintain the balance and risk between centralized and state-based activities and minimize
interdependence between the center and states while ensuring the integration and standardization of
systems. All central and subnational IAs will be required to have project management units
(PMUs), with a multidisciplinary team required to implement project activities. Each IA will be
accountable for technical, fiduciary, safeguards, and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) aspects and
will have designated trained experts to perform these functions. The eligibility to participate in the

Page 5 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

project as an IA requires the establishment of a PMU, submission of detailed project


implementation plans (PIPs) and signing of MoA.

15. The implementation setup and responsibilities are summarized below and detailed in annex
3. Figure 2 provides a schematic of the implementation arrangements.

Figure 2. Project Implementation Arrangements

16. Majority of IAs have formed the PMUs who would be responsible for coordination with
Ministry World Bank and compile the plans of various divisions. The agencies are also advised to
work out the execution arrangements with concerned division/centers. Some sample models of AP
and West Bengal for implementation arrangements at state levels have been shared on project
website.

IX. Institutional Capacity Assessment

17. Of the total 39 state/UT IAs, 31 already have established hydrological monitoring; the six
northeastern states (excepting Nagaland) are yet to establish hydrology divisions. The 21 HP2 IAs
have appropriate institutional arrangements established but can further improve these and streamline
implementation arrangements, particularly for irrigation/reservoir management. Amongst the 21
new agencies, 10 are familiar with World Bank procurement while 11 (primarily northeastern) will
require familiarization. Nonetheless, the mission was highly impressed with the dedication of the
northeastern states to the project – they have already nominated dedicated teams and have actively
participated in project implementation training.

Page 6 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

Table 5: Assessment of implementing agencies

Type of Number Agencies with Agencies PMUs


Agencies existing familiar with strengthene
Hydrological Bank d with core
monitoring procurement team
divisions*
States 37 31 27 32
UT 2 1 1 1
Central 8 5 8 6
agencies
RBO 2 2 2 2
Total 49 39 38 41
Percent of 83* [34/41] 78 84
total
*Percent represent with respect to total state/UT/RBO agencies

18. Using World Bank technical assistance support, various learning and sharing workshops
have been organized to familiarize IAs with global bests practices and innovative tools through
various workshops and trainings in particular on hydromet, groundwater surface and sub-surface
geophysics, hydrological modelling and procurement. Since September 2014, 14 training events
have been organized, with around 642 participants. Details on training events and participation are
on the project website and are summarized in Table 6. Now MoWR, RD&GR has also organized
two training recently.

Table 6: Type of training and number of participants


S. Event Type Category Number of Number of participants
No. trainings
1 Training/workshop Hydromet system 4 226
2 Training/workshop Hydrological 3 180
modeling
3 Training Groundwater 4 112
geophysics
4 Training Procurement 3 124
Grand Total 14 642

19. The implementing agencies have initiated discussions with participating states and central
agencies on project design and operation. Project consultations have evolved as a technology-driven
platform (WhatsApp and email) for information exchange, coordination and consultation. New
project states have been linked with prior HP states to provide project preparation advice, provide
‘peer to peer’ technical assistance and support exchange meetings. The cooperation of HP2 states
and West Bengal is particularly appreciated for hosting trainings and visits and providing guidance
during visits to new states. The mission encourages IAs to continue these exchanges.

Page 7 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

X. Status of project readiness

20. Table 7 below and Annexures 2 summarize the status of readiness (using DEA criteria) in
terms of strengthening of PMU and key procurements. More than 80 percent sub-national agencies
have already constituted the PMU strengthened with core team and have shown their capacity to be
“satisfactory” based on the assessment of mission considering: (i) PIP preparation, (ii) capacity of
staff working on the project, (iii) status of PMU, and (iv) procurement capacity.

Table 7: The assessment of agencies for implementation readiness


Type of Number PMUs Institutions who 18 PIP in
Agencies strengthened have capacity to Months completion
with core implement the AWP & Stage
team project PP
States 37 32 30 32 35
UT 2 1 1 1 1
Central 8 6 5 5 6
agencies
RBO 2 2 2 2 2
Total 49 41 38 40 44
Percent of 84 78 82 90
total

21. A total of more than 84 percent sub-national IAs have demonstrated preparation with the
creation of PMU by deploying their core team. Several agencies have submitted their Annual Work
Plan and Procurement Plan and also have bid documents ready for processing. If the retroactive
financing will be allowed by MoWR, RD&GR, they could start tendering.

22. Majority of the procurements in states are small and there are only three major procurements at
central level. Therefore procurement needed for readiness is the responsibility of central agencies –
including empanelment of hydromet equipment and procurement of technical and management
consultancy. HP II agencies have prepared bid documents for hydromet/SCADA equipment, while
others, particularly new agencies, have prepared for buildings such as the data center. It is estimated
that bid documents for around INR 30 Crore have been prepared for hydromet equipment (Table 8).
The IT equipment would be primarily procured through DGS&D.

Table 8: Major procurement required for DEA readiness of project prior to negotiation of project
Agency Type Value Status
(Crore)
MoWR/ CWC Empanelment of Hydromet 600 Tender to be issued by Aug 10
equipment and ready with the
recommendation by Oct 15, 2016.
States Hydromet and SCADA 66 50 % of bids document are almost
ready.
States (6) Data centers (Bldg) 200 Some states have identified the
government land and started

Page 8 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

preparing building plan.

Total 866
Consultancies
MoWR Technical and management 100 RFP to be issued to shortlisted
consultancy firms by Aug 20, 2016

CWC River basin Planning and 100 TOR in draft stage and will take
management time. As it requires consultation
with the states.
Total 200

XI. MIS and Monitoring and Learning

23. Building on systems and experiences under HP-I and HP-II, a results-based M&E system
will be set up before the start of project implementation. The system will do the following:
• Track implementation progress against the PIP and the agreed annual work programs.
• Track results against the agreed project results framework to measure overall results at the
national level for the project as a whole and disaggregated at the level of each IA and state.
• Track the performance of each IA and state, based on progress toward the agreed results and
on implementation progress.
• Carry out three major assessments of project performance, results, and emerging impacts, as
inputs to the two proposed midterm reviews (MTRs) (year 3 and year 5) and to the
Implementation Completion and Results Report at the end of the project implementation
period (year 8).

24. The result framework is attached in Annexure 2 and the rating criteria for Institution
benchmarking and water data center are further developed in excel and are shared on website for
trial.

25. The MIS system for physical monitoring the preparation and physical progress is already
developed. It has been highly useful to compile the PIP and monitor readiness of project
(www.indiawrm.org). Similarly the monitoring tools are being developed for various indicators
which has introduced healthy competition.

XII. Financial management

26. The FM arrangements were confirmed with the client. This would be a Central sector
scheme funded 100% by the central government. A budget head along with allocation has been
done by the Central Government. The fund flow issue was discussed in detail and the option of
transferring to the nodal agency bank account was agreed by the client. Project funds would be
transferred as grants to the state implementing agencies. To facilitate this transfer, the implementing
agencies would be required to open a bank account in the name of the nodal officer/SPMU head4 so
that these amounts could be received and expended. The states/UTs are required to open bank
4
The person who will operate the bank account would be designated by the state.

Page 9 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

accounts by negotiation, and this needs to be authorized by their finance department. MoWR,
RD&GR has issued an overall Government Order/s (GO) outlining the mechanism and detailed
guidelines are outlined in the FM manual. The FM Manual has been discussed and agreed during
appraisal. The IUFR formats has been designed and discussed during appraisal. The audit
arrangements have been discussed and firmed up during appraisal. The external audit TOR has been
developed and would be agreed during negotiations, while the internal audit TOR would be
developed during the first year of project to have flexibility in designing the TOR as per the needs
of the project. Disbursements will be based on interim unaudited financial reports (IUFRs). The
MoWR, RD&GR will submit one consolidated IUFR within 60 days from the end of each half year,
which will form the basis of disbursement from the World Bank. There will be a single
disbursement category with 50 percent disbursement for all expenditures. The key action to be
completed by negotiations from FM view point is the opening of bank accounts by States/UTs and
agreeing to the fund flow mechanism suggested by MOWR.

XIII. Procurement

27. Procurement Arrangements: All 49 IAs would be responsible for carrying out
procurement under the project. There are 20 IAs which are new entities and were not part of the
earlier hydrology project, and most of them have no prior experience of carrying out procurement
under Bank funded projects.
28. Procurement Capacity Assessment: The procurement capacity assessment on a sample of
the IAs has been carried out. The mission interacted with central and state level implementing
agencies. The large number of agencies with varying procurement capacities poses a huge
challenge, and there is a need to come up with a good and workable procurement strategy for the
project. The list of equipment and systems to be procured by the states / IAs were reviewed. The
Procurement arrangements and strategy developed for the project was discussed with the IAs.
29. It was agreed that due to the weak procurement capacity, a number of procurement
workshops would be conducted to provide a detailed overview of the Bank’s procurement
guidelines and policies, standard bidding documents and the provisions etc that would have to be
followed under the Bank funded project. It was agreed, that the Bank team would organize
procurement workshops for the officials of the north eastern states on a priority basis followed by
workshops in other regions.

30. E-procurement system: Procurement under the project would need to be carried out using
e-procurement systems which have been assessed by the Bank and approved for use under Bank
funded projects. Most of the IAs’s e-procurement systems have been assessed and approved for use.
However, there are a few IAs whose e-procurement system assessment has not been carried out, the
IA were requested to submit the details of the system/ platform and service provider, so that the
process of assessment can be initiated and completed at the earliest. .

31. Procurement Plan and Readiness: During the mission detailed discussions and
deliberations were held with officials of MoWR and the IAs on the draft procurement plans. The
IAs need to finalize the procurement plans of at least the first 18 months, and these need to be
shared with the Bank for review at the earliest and prior to negotiations. This would also assist the
Bank team to gauge the readiness of the project with regards to procurement, and how much it
meets the DEA readiness filter.

Page 10 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

32. The Technical and Management Consultant (TAMC) to be hired by MOWR, has been
initiated with the issue of the Expression of interest. The Bank team requested that priority be given
to this large and critical procurement, by preparing the short list and the Draft RFP. The above need
to be shared with the Bank for review at the earliest. The TAMC selection is a critical for project
implementation and hence this selection and ready to be awarded at the earliest, but prior to
negotiations.

33. The procurement of Hydromet equipment (empanelment) has been initiated and it was
agreed that needs to be completed by October / November 2016.

34. Procurement Manual: The guidelines, examples and standard bid documents are available
on project websites. The MoWR needs to compile it and finalize the procurement manual (part of
Operation Manual) and this should be submitted to the Bank at the earliest and approved by the
Bank prior to negotiations.

35. The mission discussed and identified the critical procurements such as empanelment of
hydro met equipment, TAMC etc need to be completed for meeting the DEA readiness filter.

XIV. Social (including Safeguards)

36. The project is not expected to have adverse impacts, and it does not trigger social safeguard
policies on Indigenous Peoples and Involuntary Resettlement. The project will cover modernization
of existing and expansion of hydrology monitoring stations, laboratories in existing buildings, or on
government-owned land, free of any encumbrances. New hydromet stations would be
predominantly installed in the northeastern states while other states would largely upgrade the
existing ones. Hydromet sensors for river flow measurement will be located very close to the river
bed, on public land that is free from any use. For each installation in the project where land is
required (even if public), a formal and transparent screening will be undertaken to determine and
certify that such land is free from encroachment and private use. In very rare and exceptional cases,
where government-owned sites are not available, small (approximately, 5 m2) equipment rooms
could be built on private land after leasing from landowner for a mutually agreed lease rent. The
terms and conditions for lease will be clearly explained to landowners before signing of mutually
agreed lease. If required, a family member of the landowner could be appointed as a watchperson to
take care of the facility. The process of agreement of landowners for such a lease will be clearly and
fully documented before installation of any equipment. At the end of the first year of
implementation, the process of installation of equipment on public (and the exceptional cases of
private) land will be evaluated. In the unlikely event of issues noticed during this evaluation,
appropriate mitigation plans will be prepared, including if required, relocation of the installed
monitoring equipment.

XV. Environment (including Safeguards)

Page 11 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

37. The project triggers OP/BP 4.01 as it might cause minor potential environmental impacts
arising from implementation of Components A and C. Component A, which will set up monitoring
stations, data centers, and associated facilities and infrastructure, may have minor construction-
related environmental impacts.

38. The borrower has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) which identifies multiple
enhancement opportunities in the project and proposes ways of mitigating small negative impacts.
Construction-related impacts will be managed by application of National Building Codes in
designing and construction of the small buildings and careful in situ disposal of all construction
wastes. The EA, including its Executive Summary, was disclosed in-country on June 16, 2016 and
in the World Bank InfoShop on June 29, 2016, and can be accessed from the website of the ministry
(www.mowr.nic.in) and www.indiawrm.org.

39. Overall, the project will contribute to sustainable environmental management in India and
will build capacity in environmental management. Greater use of hydrological models and
analytical tools based on improved data will help incorporate mainstream environmental concerns
into water resources planning and management. Project investments will make it easier to collect
information on environmental impacts, identify issues, and implement measures aimed at
diminishing adverse effects and enhancing positive ones.

List of Annexures

S. No. Annexure
1. Simplified Result Framework

2. Readiness of Implementing agencies

Page 12 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

Annexure 1 a: Simplified Result Framework

S. No. Indicator Name Baseline End Target


1 Water resources monitoring stations operated by
implementing agencies providing validated data 1,500 7,500
online (Number)
1.a -Surface water stations
100 1,000
(Number - Sub-Type: Breakdown)
1.b -Groundwater station
1,000 5,000
(Number - Sub-Type: Breakdown)
1.c -Meteorology stations
500 1,500
(Number - Sub-Type: Breakdown)
2 Information products produced under the
project made available to the stakeholders 5 50
(Number)
3 Water resources institutions achieving
10 25
benchmark performance levels (Number)
Intermediate indicators
1 Beneficiaries that feel project investments
0 50
provided services satisfactorily (Percentage)
2 Water data centers functioning satisfactorily
10 20
(Number)
3 Annual increase in number of page views
5 10
(Percentage)
4 River sub-basins publishing water availability
3 30
report regularly (Number)
5 Critical streamflow forecasting stations with
200 400
improved lead time (Number)
6 Flood risk area benefited from advanced flood
40,000 100,000
forecasting and management (square kilometer)
7 Targeted professionals trained (Number) 0 2,000

Page 13 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

Annexure 1b: Scoring criteria for Institutional Benchmarking

Page 14 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

Page 15 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

Annexure 2: Summary of agency wise readiness

Percent of agencies with


80 82 80 41 94 84 82 82 16 80 69
satisfactory progress
Cod Implementing Over Office Bid PIP PIP Procur Annual Bank Fin.As Trainin
e Agency All Order PMU Docu Cost Writeup ement Work Account sesme g Need
Readin for staff on ment Table Plan Plan Opened nt Assess
ess PMU board Form ment
1011 Andhra Pradesh (GW) 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1012 Andhra Pradesh (SW) 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1023 Assam 27 0 2 0 10 0 0 10 0 5 0
1031 Bihar (GW) 35 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 5
1032 Bihar (SW) 100 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 5 5
1041 Chattisgarh (GW) 80 0 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1042 Chattisgarh (SW) 80 0 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1053 Goa 61 10 6 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 0
1061 Gujarat (GW) 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1062 Gujarat (SW) 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1072 Haryana 66 10 6 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1083 Himachal Pradesh 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1093 Jharkhand 40 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
1102 Karnataka 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1111 Kerala (GW) 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1112 Kerala (SW) 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1123 Madhya Pradesh 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1131 Maharashtra (GW) 55 0 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 0
1132 Maharashtra (SW) 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1143 Manipur 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1153 Meghalaya 65 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 0
1163 Mizoram 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1173 Nagaland 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1181 Odisha (GW) 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
Page 16 of 17
Aide Memoire August 1-5, 2016

Percent of agencies with


80 82 80 41 94 84 82 82 16 80 69
satisfactory progress
Cod Implementing Over Office Bid PIP PIP Procur Annual Bank Fin.As Trainin
e Agency All Order PMU Docu Cost Writeup ement Work Account sesme g Need
Readin for staff on ment Table Plan Plan Opened nt Assess
ess PMU board Form ment
1182 Odisha (SW) 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1193 Punjab 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1203 Rajasthan 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1213 Sikkim 80 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 5 5
1223 Tamil Nadu 60 10 10 0 10 10 10 0 0 5 5
1231 Telangana (GW) 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1232 Telangana (SW) 70 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1241 Tripura 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1251 Uttar Pradesh(GW) 50 10 10 0 10 0 10 10 0 0 0
1252 Uttar Pradesh (SW) 76 10 6 20 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
1263 Uttarakhand 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
1271 West Bengal (GW) 30 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
1272 West Bengal (SW) 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5
2053 Delhi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2073 Puducherry 65 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 5 0
3013 MOWR 70 10 10 20 0 10 0 0 10 5 5
3023 CWC 100 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 5 5
3033 CGWB 75 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 5 0
3043 NIH 80 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 5 5
3053 CWPRS 100 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 5 5
3063 CPCB 22 10 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
3093 SOI 16 0 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
3103 NRSC 20 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
4013 BBMB 100 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 5 5
4023 DVC 90 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 0 5 5

Page 17 of 17

You might also like