Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 136 views

    Field Density Test: REF NO.: SP-FM-OPN-06.01 REF: ASTM D1557

    Uploaded by

    vernileo pambid
    This document summarizes the results of a field density test conducted on a construction site. Four test holes were dug in the top layer of an embankment to determine the wet density, moisture content, dry density and percent compaction of the material. Tests found that hole 3 met the compaction requirement of 95% while holes 1, 2 and 4 failed with compaction levels below the target.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Field Density Test: REF NO.: SP-FM-OPN-06.01 REF: ASTM D1557

    Uploaded by

    vernileo pambid
    136 views1 page
    This document summarizes the results of a field density test conducted on a construction site. Four test holes were dug in the top layer of an embankment to determine the wet density, moisture content, dry density and percent compaction of the material. Tests found that hole 3 met the compaction requirement of 95% while holes 1, 2 and 4 failed with compaction levels below the target.

    Original Title

    FDT

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes the results of a field density test conducted on a construction site. Four test holes were dug in the top layer of an embankment to determine the wet density, moisture content, dry density and percent compaction of the material. Tests found that hole 3 met the compaction requirement of 95% while holes 1, 2 and 4 failed with compaction levels below the target.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    136 views1 page

    Field Density Test: REF NO.: SP-FM-OPN-06.01 REF: ASTM D1557

    Uploaded by

    vernileo pambid
    This document summarizes the results of a field density test conducted on a construction site. Four test holes were dug in the top layer of an embankment to determine the wet density, moisture content, dry density and percent compaction of the material. Tests found that hole 3 met the compaction requirement of 95% while holes 1, 2 and 4 failed with compaction levels below the target.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    FIELD DENSITY TEST

    REF NO.: SP-FM-OPN-06.01


    REF: ASTM D1557
    Contract : 082201-OCFDT EMBANKMENT
    Project : (FDT) Field Density Test Kind Of Material : (Construction Materials)
    Location : Venare Subd., Brgy. Canlubang, Calamba City, Laguna Date : 22-Sep-21
    Client : Bureau Veritas S.A. Philippines Depth of Hole : 15.24cm

    FIELD TEST
    A. Hole no. 1 2 3 4
    B. Station No. Doc. Quadra House
    C. Hole Elevation / Layer No. TOP LAYER TOP LAYER TOP LAYER TOP LAYER
    1. Wt. of app. filled with sand (before),gm 8133 7487 7406 7339
    2. Wt. of app. filled with sand (after),gm 3399 3629 3229 2927
    3. Wt.of sand in hole, plate & cone 4734 3858 4177 4412
    4. Wt. of sand in cone & plate (cal) 1394 1394 1394 1394
    5. Wt. of sand in hole, gm 3340 2464 2783 3018
    6. Bulk Density of sand, gm/cu.cm. 1.39 1.39 1.39 1.39
    7. Volume of test hole, cu.cm 2403 1773 2002 2171
    8. Wt. of wet soil, gm 3263 3102 3321 2730
    9. WET DENSITY, gm/cu.cm. 1.36 1.75 1.66 1.26
    MOISTURE DETERMINATION
    10. Tare No. SP5 S1 SP85 SP129
    11. Container + Wet Soil, gm 145.60 181.60 143.00 152.10
    12. Container + Dry Soil, gm 110.40 136.10 117.50 111.40
    13. Moisture, gm 35.20 45.50 25.50 40.70
    14. Container, gm 17.60 19.20 19.70 20.20
    15. Dry Soil, gm 92.80 116.90 97.80 91.20
    16. ACTUAL MOISTURE CONTENT,% 37.93 38.92 26.07 44.63
    17. Dry Density of soil, gm/cu.cm 0.98 1.26 1.32 0.87
    18. Maximum Dry Density, gm/cu.cm 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38
    19. Optimum Moisture Content, % 25.80 25.80 25.80 25.80
    20. PERCENT COMPACTION, % 71 91 95 63
    21. Compaction Requirement, % 95 95 95 95
    22. Remarks Failed Failed Passed Failed

    Name Signature Date


    Tested By: Gary A. Villalon 7-Sep-22

    Reviewed By: Eleanor V. Acop 13-Sep-22

    Approved By: Engr. Delia O. Parayno 14-Sep-22

    Witnessed By:
    Effective 01 February 2016 Sheet 1 of 1
    LAB QUALITY MGT SYSTEMS

    You might also like