Elia Polysystemism
Elia Polysystemism
Elia Polysystemism
Alessio Elia
The physical aspects of sounds are at the center of my musical research. I use acoustic
phenomena as the means to shape timbres and musical form and as tools for the com-
poser to organize musical material and command the forces that underlie it. In order to
achieve a large palette of physical phenomena, I have explored the interactions between
different types of tuning systems, because the resources a composer has for bringing
out the physical qualities of sound when employing only 12-tone equal temperament
(12-ET)1 are minimal, due to the limited frequencies that one tuning system has and the
consequent limited combinations possible.
The process of using different tuning systems simultaneously, which I have named
“Polysystemism,” presently includes eight tuning systems: 12-ET, 24-ET,2 just intonation
(JI),3 Werckmeister I, II, and IV, meantone,4 and Pythagorean, plus different types of com-
mas, especially the Pythagorean, which are a direct consequence of the tuning systems
themselves. A central aspect of my musical investigation is the perception of sonic and
aural phenomena, and the tools by which it is possible to draw the attention of the listener
to them through a formal construction that takes into account the way human beings
perceive transformations through time.
In recent years, much attention has turned to sonic material in its residual traces, so
that a large group of composers have written, and continue to write, a type of music close
to the borders of silence and noise.5 It is certainly an interesting field to investigate, but
this approach to composition still acts within the domain of sound matter (this is also valid
for spectral music in all its forms).
With Polysystemism, however, I wish to affirm that music is primarily a sensation
and therefore strictly connected to the way our organ of hearing can perceive it (with
its qualities and limits). This last consideration can be related without hesitation to the
famous motto of the Irish philosopher George Berkeley (1685–1753), Esse est percipi
(to be is to be perceived),6 which underlines the importance of perception in the process
of creating our experience of the world around us and even of ourselves. Polysystemism
makes phenomena as they are perceived through the organs of hearing the foundation
for the music objects employed in a composition, and also the ultimate result of their
transformation through time.
1 Or any other tuning system. Here I refer symbolically to 12-ET, its being the most frequently employed.
2 It is also possible to consider 24-ET as an extension of 12-ET, the quarter tone being half a semitone.
3 Sometimes I refer to just intonation as “natural tuning.” The two terms are interchangeable.
4 Whenever the term meantone appears in the text, I am always referring to quarter-comma meantone.
5 I think, for example, of Sciarrino, Lachenmann, Mark Andre, and many other composers whose music is
addressed to the development of a kind of musique concrète realized through acoustic instruments.
6 Extendedalso to Esse est percipi (aut percipere)—to be is to be perceived (or to perceive); see Principles
#3 in George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (Dublin: Printed by
Aaron Rhames, for Jeremy Pepyat, 1710).
This article aims to analyze the possibilities for the use of non-tempered sounds,
demonstrating how these pitches play an important role in the realization of acoustic
phenomena.
7 Luminescences, for clarinet, violin with scordatura, viola with scordatura, cello with scordatura, and
percussion. First performance: 6 August 2005, Chigiana Music Academy, Siena. Ensemble of the Chigiana
Academy conducted by Mauro Bonifacio. The piece was awarded the Chigiana Academy Merit Diploma
2005.
8 Potentially
it is also possible to have an interval belonging to Werckmeister II and another from
Werckmeister IV. By using the fifth harmonic of each harmonic series, which is 14 cents lower, we can obtain
the 7M of WII (-14 cents) and the 2M of WIV (-14 cents).
9 We must also consider that the instruments are designed to respond to an ordinary tuning, and when this
is altered, consequently the physical qualities of the instrument also change, altering the timbre.
10 The pitch of the open strings and of the natural harmonics cannot be altered. In the first case, the left
hand does not touch the fingerboard of the instrument, in the second the natural harmonics are emitted only
in the nodal points of the strings, and the variation of frequency is only susceptible to a few cents which
are negligible from the point of view of perception. In some positions of natural harmonics, in particular the
octave, it is possible to alter the frequency of the sound significantly, but this entails special techniques—such
as bending realized by pulling the string—and not an ordinary execution of these sounds.
In all my works that make use of scordaturas, only open strings and natural harmonics
are used.
The use of stopped pitches is rare, and limited either to doubling some sounds of
other instruments (in this case the pitch belongs to the intonation system of the doubled
sound), or to glissando-tremolos whose sounds are calculated through the 12-ET system
with reference to the open string on which they are played, which means that they preserve
the tuning deviations of the open string itself. As can be seen in the following example,
taken from the piece Traces from Nowhere (2017), the B, the D, and the D# preserve the
deviation in tuning of the open string, tuned 32 cents below the ordinary. This means that
in relation to the open string, these sounds are played according to the 12-ET (Fig. 2).
The piece that marks the transition to a more radical use of this compositional technique
is Beyond Perturbative States (2013), a work that I consider the musically concretized
“manifesto” of Polysystemism. It is with this piece that I extended the number of the
tuning systems employed up to seven: 12-ET, just intonation, Pythagorean, meantone11
and Werckmeister I, II, IV.12
It is in this work that, for the first time in Polysystemism, the scordaturas of the strings
are based on open strings no longer tuned according to equal temperament, whether in
relation to each other or considering their frequencies in themselves (Fig. 3).
It is precisely because of this different approach to the scordaturas that the different
Werckmeister temperaments (I, II, IV) and meantone can be achieved, not only by relating the
frequencies produced by the strings (open strings and natural harmonics) but also by taking
into account the different intervals emerging by a superimposition of those frequencies onto
the ones produced by the other musical instruments involved. Before turning to a detailed
analysis of the intervals that emerge from the string scordaturas, and that belong to different
tuning systems, in order to understand how the piece is constructed, it is necessary to
introduce the subject of perturbative states and their relationship to string theory.13
From the agitated and restless world of quantum objects, a characteristic due to the
uncertainty principle,14 string/antistring pairs, which produce opposite vibrational patterns,
13 String theory postulates the existence of one-dimensional strings of matter whose vibrations would give
life to elementary particles.
14 The uncertainty principle, also called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle or indeterminacy principle,
is a statement, articulated (1927) by the German physicist Werner Heisenberg, that the position and
the velocity of an object cannot both be measured exactly, at the same time, even in theory. See
“Uncertainty principle,” Britannica, accessed 20 September 2020, https://www.britannica.com/science/
uncertainty-principle.
can momentarily come into existence, taking energy from the universe at the moment of
their creation and giving it back once they annihilate each other. These string/antistring
pairs, which recombine in one loop after they annihilate, are called virtual strings.15 As one
loop appears at the center of the diagram representing the course of this recombination,
this development is named the one-loop process (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Virtual strings. At point 1 the two virtual strings collide, creating a single loop. At point 2 the quantum
fluctuations create a pair of virtual strings whose annihilation occurs at point 3, creating a single string again.
At point 4 this single string releases its energy, splitting into two strings, each of which will continue its path
separately.
As quantum fluctuations can divide these virtual strings again and again, the one-loop
process can occur several times, making the calculations very difficult. To solve this
problem, string theorists assume that a good approximation is made when the whole
procedure is considered as a zero-loop process, so that the one-loop processes represent
just a refinement of the zero-loop result. This is an example of a perturbative approach. We
can then define the perturbative states as an approach to the one-loop process, which
occurs between a couple of virtual strings. This approach approximates the difficulties
caused by the complexity of calculation and assumes an approximation starting from the
zero-loop process. Put simply, the perturbation is a way to get closer to the exact result
and to make the calculations easier.
The BPS (Beyond Perturbative States) are instead those approaches to the one-loop
process that can describe the virtual strings without employing a perturbative calculation
(i.e. without making approximations). In music, the BPS correspond to the exact frequencies
of the intervals.
In my piece Beyond Perturbative States, the perturbative version of the intervals are
intervals whose frequencies are not precisely the ones that correspond to the exact
15 For further insights, see chapter XII, “Beyond Strings: In Search of M-Theory,” in Brian Greene, The
Elegant Universe (New York: W. W. Norton, 2003).
frequencies of the tuning systems from which they are taken.16 Intervals present in the
score belong both to the domain of exact frequencies and to the “perturbative” category.
In the following figures (Figs. 5–7) we see some of the intervals belonging to different
tuning systems. The lower staff (POS = positions) shows where to touch the strings, the
higher staff (S.R. = suoni reali) shows the relevant resulting harmonics.
16 The maximum difference between the theoretical exact intervals and the perturbative ones used is 4 cents,
a difference practically imperceptible to the ear.
Additionally, in Beyond Perturbative States the piano is prepared, which has the role of
creating sounds similar to the kempul,19 the pitched gong used in the Indonesian gamelan.
17 In regard to the neutral second (11:10), I use JI considering possible all the interval combinations that arise
from the pitches belonging to the harmonic series.
18 The Pythagorean comma is the difference between 12 perfect fifths and 7 octaves.
19 Generally forged in bronze, the kempul is a metal gong, part of a Javanese iron gamelan. It is used to
articulate the underlying cyclical formal structure of a piece (gendhing) by being played at prescribed
moments of that structure.
The preparation is realized in such a way that soft rubbers are inserted at specific nodal
points of the piano strings to provide not only this particular timbre but also a residual
sound of the harmonics isolated by the rubber itself (Fig. 8).
The first orchestral piece to make use of Polysystemism, Dimensioni nascoste (Hidden
Dimensions) was written in the same year (2013), and went on to receive the first prize in
the orchestral category of that year’s UMZF competition (Forum of New Hungarian Music),
whose jury was chaired by Peter Eötvös.20 In this work I decided to renounce scordaturas
in the strings and entrust the wind and brass instruments with the task of realizing unequal
frequencies, using the untempered pitches belonging to the harmonic series of these
instruments, with the explicitly manifest aim for the first time of using Polysystemism as
a tool for the production of physical-acoustic phenomena.
As the title of the piece suggests, the idea refers to the challenge of generating the
extra dimensions assumed by string theory with sounds. Those dimensions can be created
by a meticulous positioning of the physical-acoustic phenomena in specific registers within
the global audible range, an achievement that is directly connected with the idea of inner
space, to be discussed later in this paper.
Although it will be extremely difficult to validate string theory, and one day it may even
turn out to have been nothing more than fantasy, nevertheless I believe that it indicates
a path in music that is certainly true. The acoustic quality of a sound is given not only by
its frequency, that is, by its vibrational motion, but also, and I would say above all, by the
greater or lesser presence, in terms of acoustic weight, of its spectral components, plus
other parameters that will not be analyzed in this paper. In the same way, string theory
assumes that the vibrational motion of the strings determines the “birth” of each elementary
20 Dimensioninascoste, for large orchestra. First performance with the Hungarian title Rejtett dimenziók,
26 September 2013. Bartók Hall, Művészetek Palotája (Palace of Arts), National Hungarian Auditorium,
Budapest. National Hungarian Radio Orchestra conducted by Gergely Vajda.
21 A study on the possibilities of timbres to shine through each other was conducted by composer and
music theorist Koechlin in his treatise on orchestration and subsequently discussed by Frédéric Chiasson
et al. in the article “Koechlin’s volume: Perception of sound extensity among instrument timbres from
different families,” Musicae Scientiae 21, no. 1 (2017): 113–131. Unlike Koechlin, who takes into account
the parameters of volume and intensity, meaning by volume “the extensity of an instrument sound, the space
it seems to occupy in the auditory scene” and for intensity (intensité) “its perceived loudness or strength,”
my approach is to deduce the degree of permeability by comparing the “phonic weight” of the partial
components of each sound, i.e. their greater or lesser presence in the acoustic spectrum.
22 Trasparenze,for large orchestra. First performance 21 May 2014, Studio 6 of the National Hungarian
Radio. National Hungarian Radio Orchestra conducted by László Tihanyi. Live broadcast by Bartók Radio.
The scordaturas that we see in the figure above are designed to allow the emergence
of intervals belonging to the following intonation systems: 12-ET, JI, meantone, Pythagorean,
Werckmeister I, II, IV. The following figures show some of these intervals (Fig. 10–12).
As we can see, most of them have exact frequencies. Some, however, are “perturbative
frequencies,” approximated within 1 or 2 cents, maximum 4.
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
In Trasparenze, the frequencies not belonging to the 12-ET are also realized through
glasses played with the bow by violinists, cellists, and percussionists (Figs. 13 and 14).
Fig. 13. Frequencies obtained through glasses played by the percussionists, Trasparenze (2014)
Fig. 14. Frequencies obtained through glasses played by the string players, Trasparenze (2014)
The idea of a sound flow in continuous development is the de facto main focus of sound
organization in Trasparenze, where harmony, rhythm, melody, timbre, effects, and noises
become integrated parts of an iridescent sound magma, from which some peculiarities
of the components that constitute it suddenly emerge (hence the title of the piece, which
suggests elements that shine through a global sound surface).
A separate experience is the Heisenberg Suite (2013; new version 2016), in which,
although different intonation systems cannot be found explicitly, the focus on the physical
dimension of the sound is a fundamental feature of the work. The main focus of the piece
is the application of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle to musical parameters. The
principle asserts a fundamental limit to the precision in the evaluation and measurement of
specific pairs of physical quantities. If we know one of them exactly, we can have only an
approximate knowledge of the other. A similar conception can emerge in pairs of musical
parameters highlighted by an appropriate musical writing.
Such is the case, for example, with the speed/frequency pairing in the following writing
for strings (Fig. 15).
The tremolo G#–B# produces as a resulting pitch B# two octaves higher (artificial
harmonic of major third). In this gesture, the frequencies are known. When the glissando
is added to the tremolo, and if during the sliding of the fingers we keep the position of
the major third (the physical distance between the two fingers), we know the speed of the
gesture (given by the length of time from the beginning to the end of the gesture itself)
but we lose the exactness of the frequency because of the position of the major third,
which at the beginning has a resulting pitch but does not have one anymore during the
glissando, because the distance between the two fingers does not correspond to any
interval having a resulting pitch in terms of artificial harmonics.23 The result is a mixture
of pitched sounds (the ones resulting from the glissando realized by the base finger) and
noises (emerging from the gesture of the tremolo with harmonic pressure realized with
the “trembling” finger), which have a very transparent texture.
The most recent pieces written with Polysystemism are: Ekpyrotic suicide24 (2019),
commissioned by UMZE, the historical ensemble founded by Bartók; Implicate Inklings25—
Clarinet Concerto (2019), written for Csaba Klenyán and Concerto Budapest orchestra
conducted by Zoltán Rácz;26 Caducae resonantiae (2020), a short piece for solo guitar
commissioned by Katalin Koltai for the event “Bloomsday in Budapest”; and Incantesimi di
Merseburg27 (2019) for a 16-part choir of soloists commissioned by Kammerchor Stuttgart
conducted by Frieder Bernius, this last piece being also the first employment of Poly-
systemism with voices. Most recently, Outskirts of matter (2020) was commissioned by
the ensemble Wiener Collage, with soloists and members of the Wiener Philharmoniker.
23 Thisis because to maintain the same interval (the major third in the specific case) as one goes up towards
higher positions, the distance between the fingers must decrease.
24 First
performance at BMC (Budapest Music Center) on 31 March 2019. UMZE Ensemble conducted by
László Tihanyi.
25 First performance at Grand Hall of the Liszt Academy on 4 May 2019.
26 For whose ensemble, Amadinda, Ligeti wrote his last work, Síppal, dobbal, nádihegedüvel.
27 The piece was premiered on 21 February 2020 at the Paul-Gerhardt-Kirche in Mannheim and the day after
at the Gedächtniskirche in Stuttgart. The Merseburg charms or Merseburg incantations (die Merseburger
Zaubersprüche in German) are two medieval magic spells written in Old High German. They are the only
known examples of Germanic pagan beliefs preserved in the language. As far as I know, my piece is the first
to put these texts to music.
Fig. 16. Cover of Incantesimi di Merseburg with special tuning forks (2019)
28 The deviations in tuning of these harmonics are as follows: 5th (-13,715 ≃ 14 cents); 7th (31,185 ≃ -31);
10th (-13,715 ≃ 14 cents); 11th (-48,74 ≃ -49).
Fig. 17. Frequencies for the special tuning forks in Incantesimi di Merseburg (2019)
In order not to lose the pitch, the piece is written so that the voices can listen to one
another. When a voice comes out of 12-ET, it can re-enter it in two ways: by re-singing
the sound it sang before (which is always in 12-ET), or by singing the sound of a nearby
voice in spatial terms (also in 12-ET); see Figs. 18–19.
Fig. 18. Incantesimi di Merseburg. Soprano 1 sings G, then leaves 12-ET by singing F-31 (whose reference
pitch is given by the special tuning fork), and re-enters 12-ET by singing G again.
Fig. 19. Incantesimi di Merseburg. Soprano 4 sings D, then leaves 12-ET by singing F-31 (whose reference
pitch is given by the special tuning fork), and re-enters 12-ET singing E, taking the sound from Soprano 3.
In this first section of this paper, we have seen some of the tools at our disposal to
get untempered pitches, which are an important base for the achievement of the acoustic
phenomena on which Polysystemism relies. In the following section, I will deal with the
acoustic phenomena that emerge from the use of Polysystemism and the repercussions
on timbre and formal structure.
The table below clarifies how Polysystemism significantly shapes acoustic phenomena,
being able to vary considerably the degrees of their manifestation (see Table 1).
Table 1
Acoustic phenomenon / Results achieved through Polysystemism
Sound features
Beats Increase in the variety of beat rates available.
Beats produce an internal rhythm in static sounds (sustained sounds) in
which speed varies in relation to the frequencies used. Therefore, by having
a larger amount of frequencies as a result of using different tuning systems,
it is possible to articulate the rhythm of beats in very different ways and vary
the speed significantly.
Virtual fundamental29 Better audibility of the virtual fundamental, especially when the frequencies
of the two or more sounds employed correspond exactly to the relevant
frequencies in the harmonic series emanated by the fundamental we wish to
resonate.
Differential tones Increase in the number of differential tones available, because of a larger
number of frequencies at our disposal.
Sound roughness Creation of different types of sound roughness.
As roughness basically occurs only if the frequency difference between two
sounds lies in the range 31–100 Hz,30 the 12-ET can only realize a small
number of its types. It goes without saying that the more tuning systems we
use, the more typologies of roughness we obtain.
Colours The employment of different tuning systems affects not only the intonation
of the intervals but also changes the colors of the instruments.31 The
combination of harmonic spectra not belonging to 12-ET fundamentals
considerably modifies the timbre of the instruments through the interactions
of their constituents.32
Sonic permeability Having modified the timbres of the instruments, through the employment of
different tuning systems, the possibilities of sounds interacting with each
other is significantly increased.33
29 Havingtwo frequencies, the ear is able, in particular cases, to identify a common fundamental of which
the two sounds are partials or harmonics.
30 The concept of the critical band, which will not be discussed here, should also be considered. Further
insights can be found in William A. Sethares, Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale (London: Springer, 1999).
31 This aspect has been discussed previously. Changing the pitch of the strings through scordaturas and
tuning the winds with tuning forks lower than the standard ones necessarily alters the physical characteristics
of the instruments, and with them the timbre.
32 This phenomenon is clearly related to the superimposition of sounds. When two or more sounds are
superimposed, their relevant spectra are also superimposed. It goes without saying that the spectra of
sounds whose fundamentals are not harmonically related (because they belong to different tuning systems)
create a very wide variety of beats and sound roughness.
33 Since the sound permeability between two or more sounds is given by the relationship of their spectral
components, having changed the timbre of the instruments through the different tuning systems, and having
consequently modified the phonic weight of these components, it follows that the sound permeability will
also have undergone a modification.
34 The project, developed by me and the conductor Andreas Luca Beraldo, provides for the integration
of the Disklavier within the ensemble, with the consequent relation between the machine and the human
performers. The project debuted at the LAC in Lugano on 16 February 2017, within the “Late Night Modern”
concert series of the Oggimusica Festival, with the Impronta ensemble conducted by Andreas Luca Beraldo.
The first performance of Traces from Nowhere took place in this context.
The use of scordaturas in the strings is preserved as a valid resource for the expansion
of the frequential and timbric domain (Fig. 21).
The rapid pattern of pitches in the Disklavier part at the beginning of the piece is
written in such a way that in holding the sustain pedal down, the emerging cloud of
sounds emanates a large number of harmonic reverberations, and, at the same time, the
nearness of the involved pitches also generates micro-beats that give a particular sonic
halo to the passage. On the surface, this part seems just an ornamental expansion of
the trill (or turn, depending on the number of pitches we take into consideration) placed
at the very beginning of the piece, but actually the third level is already comprehended
in the writing itself. Its presence becomes more manifest once the remaining part of the
ensemble gradually enters, reinforcing the waving sound already present in the micro-
-beats generated by the Disklavier. Because all the instruments of the ensemble are tuned
differently, the pitches they produce interfere with the pitches played by the Disklavier,
with their harmonic resonances, and also between themselves.
Looking at the following example (Fig. 22), we see how E♭played by the Bassoon and
the F played by the Clarinet generate a sound roughness within themselves and beats with
the pitches of the Disklavier. At bar 3, the pitches played by the strings interfere with the
pitches of the Disklavier and with their harmonic projections. The same thing happens for
the F# played by the Oboe, whose frequency is placed in between the frequencies of the
tremolo played by the Disklavier and also interferes with the harmonic octave projection
of the F in the Disklavier part.
By re-analyzing the whole passage in the light of the three levels of music composition,
we observe a first level made of two layers: the trill (or turn) of the Disklavier, and the
sustained sounds of the ensemble. The second level consists in the functions of these
layers: the Disklavier part generates harmonic resonances and micro-beats; the ensemble
reinforces these micro-beats by creating a more intense friction between the harmonic
resonances of the Disklavier and the pitches played by the ensemble itself; the ensemble
also adds new timbre colors to the harmonic resonances generated by the Disklavier;
the ensemble has the function to provide a harmonic dimension (chord) through the
superimposition of sustained sounds.
The third level is also related to the criterion of “invisible sound,” which is the gene-
ration of physical phenomena (in this case complex beats and sound roughness), clearly
perceptible, that are not immediately observable in the notation, a type of topic comparable
with dark matter, invisible matter the existence of which is inferred from its effects on
visible matter.
Finally, there is also a connection between the third level and a process I use to
shape the musical form of a piece: the implicate/explicate order. This idea is related to
the holographic interpretation of the universe and will be the topic of the next section of
this paper.
The concept of a music based on sonic flux implies the notion of non-locality, as
everything occurring in the flux itself directly affects and modifies the global perception
of the sound matter, much more so than in a type of music where the modification of
one parameter does not necessarily imply the alteration of another one. The notion of
non-locality describes events that occur simultaneously although separated in space,
without being directly connected by an intermediate agency or mechanism.35
In music, the idea of non-locality can be expressed, furthermore, through the abolition
of musical boundary parameters. If we think of the matter of music as a flux with sonic
properties, without dividing it into the components of its parameters (harmony, melody,
rhythm, layers, etc.), everything that occurs in the sonic matter will directly affect the
global perception of the flux, determining an immediate effect on the sonic mass itself. If
the placement of the instruments in the space of the performance (stage, concert hall,
auditorium, etc.) determines the subjective perception of external space related to the
position of the listener (each listener will perceive one instrument to be closer or farther
in terms of the distance between themselves and the sound source), the establishment of
the internal space of the sound based on multi-dimensions will point out the perception of
the space within the sound material itself, which will be an objective perception of space
not related to the spatial position of the listener.
The idea of a constant flow of sound in continuous variation can definitely be traced
back to the works of the English composer Thomas Tallis (ca. 1505–1585)—see, for
example, his piece Spem in alium (ca. 1570)—or even earlier, to the production of the ars
subtilior (14th century) and the works of, in my opinion, its highest exponent, Paolo da
Firenze (ca. 1355–1436). This idea of a musical composition whose parts create a sur-
prising resultant global effect, not thought of as a mere superimposition of its constituted
elements, has gone through the whole history of music, from Debussy36 to Scelsi (his whole
output), passing through Ligeti37 and Penderecki38 (especially in his 1960s production),
and more recently through Horaţiu Rădulescu and his idea of sound plasma 39 and the
spectral school, French and otherwise.
The next step that I believe I have taken with Polysystemism is to root the result of
this sonic magma in the initial choice of the material itself. In particular, I am referring to
the intervals of the different tuning systems, intervals that emerge only in local contexts,
35 See, for example, Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard, and Gérard Roger, “Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities
using time-varying analyzers,” Physical Review Letters 49, no. 25, (December 1982): 1804–1807.
36 I am thinking, for example, of La Mer.
37 Not
only his micro-polyphonic works, but also the very first orchestral works of his maturity, Apparitions
(1958–59) and above all Atmosphères (1961).
38 Threnody for the Victims of Hiroshima (1960), Polymorphia (1961), De Natura Sonoris no. 1 (1966).
39 See Roger Heaton, “Horaţiu Rădulescu, Sound Plasma,” Contact 26, no. 1 (1983): 23–24.
precisely because they are the result of scordaturas in the strings or different diapasons in
the other instruments. Taking this track, these effects only come out in these instruments,
with their timbres, with their pitches, and in their specific registers. This way of proceeding
in the composition of a piece very deeply binds the final result to the specific structure of
the instruments and to the choices made for them in terms of frequency alteration, which
brings with it not only a timbre alteration but also specific acoustic phenomena that occur
only between certain instruments and in specific ranges.
Implicate/explicate order
Composing with different tuning systems simultaneously, and connecting these systems
directly with the acoustic phenomena that emanate from them, brings with it the concept
of formal and architectural construction based on the concept of implicate/explicate order.
In the second half of the twentieth century, composers became very critical of linear
construction. They assumed that it could no longer offer a valid approach to the develop-
ment of form, as music had abandoned the hierarchical structure of relations between the
different degrees of a scale (both in a melodic and harmonic sense), which had somehow
ruled also the ways composers dealt with form. In my opinion, however, this consideration
is based on a paradox. Even if the way we construct form is non-linear, we make sense of
music and sound according to our perception, which lines up the sound events in a linear
way according to their order of manifestation.
My answer to form construction lies basically in the idea of implicate/explicate order
assumed by the holographic theory of the universe developed by David Bohm. Applying
this idea to form, the choice of linear or non-linear construction shifts in the background,
as the concept of implicate/explicate order establishes a constant relation between
transformations in time and the way they are perceived through listening.
In this approach, choosing a linear or non-linear architecture is equivalent, because
selecting one or the other will affect the shape of the piece (and this is clear), but will
not affect how we perceive the connections between elements and the aural role of
their functions, an aspect that is one of the most prominent features of a valid and well-
-constructed form.
The implicate/explicate order assumes that what we perceive, what we call reality, is
the manifestation of something hidden at a deeper level. The implicate order is the hidden
reality while the explicate order consists of its unfolded manifestations: “In the enfolded
[or implicate] order, space and time are no longer the dominant factors determining the
relationships of dependence or independence of different elements. Rather, an entirely
different sort of basic connection of elements is possible, from which our ordinary notions
of space and time, along with those of separately existent material particles, are abstracted
as forms derived from the deeper order. These ordinary notions appear in what is called
the ‘explicate’ or ‘unfolded’ order, which is a special and distinguished form contained
within the general totality of all the implicate orders.”40 According to Bohm, rather than
a collection of separate objects, it is an undivided whole as the ultimate aspect of physical
reality that manifests itself in a continuous dynamic flux.
An example of implicate/explicate order in music is the very beginning of my Dimensioni
nascoste (Fig. 23).
40 David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order (London: Routledge, 1980), xv.
The tremolo between the G# and B# (harmonic) played by Violin I produces a resulting
sound of B# two octaves higher than the B# harmonic. This sound is therefore implied in
the tremolo itself. In the third beat of the bar, the flutes make it more manifest, unfolded,
reinforcing the resulting sound of the harmonic. The way the sound is produced by Violins
I, the tremolo, is the manifestation in the explicate order of the beat occurring in the
implicate order between the G# of Violin I and the G natural of the Celli, the beat being
an inner and rhythmical articulation of static (sustained) sounds. Here the phenomenon of
beats that produce a specific manifestation of rhythm gives birth to the way the sound is
produced by Violin I, the tremolo that is in the same way a rhythmic expression of sound.41
The beat frequency in question has a value of 11,432 oscillations per second.42 But when
the Contrabasses enter, new beat frequencies are added to this one.
Being the resulting G# of the Contrabasses the 5th harmonic of the E fundamental
(open string), its frequency is ca. 14 cents lower than its equivalent in 12-ET (played here
by Violins I). Its value in frequency is 206,015 Hz (41,203 × 5). This frequency interacts
both with the G# played by Violin I (207,65 Hz), having a beat frequency of 1,635, and
with the frequency of the G natural played by Celli II (196,218), causing a beat frequency
of 9,797. When Flute I enters, playing the C as the unfolded order of the tremolo played
by the Violins I (being the C [B#] the resulting sound of the artificial harmonic G#–B#),
we find also the transformation of the simple beat we had at the beginning (between G#
of Violins I and G natural of the Celli) into a complex beat (when the Contrabasses enter),
complex because it is made by two beat rates, the one occurring between the G# of
Violins I and G natural of the Celli, and the other occurring between the C of the Flute (in
12-ET) and the resulting B# of the artificial harmonic in the Violins (G#–B#), that pitch,
being the 5th harmonic of G#, has a frequency 14 cents lower.
An additional consideration about implicate/explicate order is that it shows another
side of immaterial objects that have the possibility to be heard once they pass from being
just implied in the musical material to a manifestation of their potential.
41 Unlike
Grisey’s Partiels (1975), in which the composer tries to convert the beat rates into explicit rhythms,
in my piece the relationship is in reference to the modality of sound production, in this specific case both
musical gestures give it rhythmic expression.
42 The frequency of a beat is given by the difference of the frequencies calculated in Hz. Therefore:
G# = 207,65 Hz // G nat. = 196,218 Hz (65,406 × 3, as the G here is the third harmonic of fundamental
C – open string). Beat frequency 207,65 – 196,218 = 11,432 Hz.
Conclusions
During my musical research, I have tried to highlight the phenomenal aspects of
sound, to place the human being and the human ability to perceive at the center of the
compositional art. The substantial aspect of music has thus become not so much the
material but the sensation that this material generates in the listener. To create a large
number of acoustic phenomena, and to be able to vary their gradations in a meaningful
way, the simultaneous use of different tuning systems turns out to be an effective tool in
the composer’s hands.
I believe that by proceeding in this way it is possible to gradually go beyond the concept
of language to reach a place in which forms of energy, conveyed by sound, can lay the
basis for a new aesthetic and, who knows, perhaps also for a new way of understanding
existence. For, as Plato said, if music changes, even the most important institutions will
change accordingly.43
Bibliography
Aspect, Alain, Jean Dalibard, and Gérard Roger. “Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying
analyzers.” Physical Review Letters 49, no. 25 (December 1982): 1804–1807.
Berkeley, George. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (Dublin: Printed by Aaron
Rhames, for Jeremy Pepyat, 1710).
Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order (London: Routledge, 1980).
Britannica. “Uncertainty principle.” Accessed 20 September 2020. https://www.britannica.com/science/
uncertainty-principle
Chiasson, Frédéric et al. “Koechlin’s volume: Perception of sound extensity among instrument timbres from
different families.” Musicae Scientiae 21, no. 1 (2017): 113–131.
Greene, Brian. The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate
Theory (New York: W. W. Norton, 1999, ed. 2003).
Heaton, Roger. “Horaţiu Rădulescu, Sound Plasma,” Contact 26, no. 1 (1983): 23–24.
Sethares, William A. Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale (London: Springer, 1999).
Alessio Elia is an Italian composer whose field of sound investigation is the search for
a musical writing capable of combining acoustic phenomena with their sensorial percep-
tion. He has received commissions from major institutions, orchestras, and ensembles on
the international scene. His music is published by Universal Music Publishing EMB and
released on CD by Warner Classics.
www.alessioelia.com