IACVC2 Materi
IACVC2 Materi
IACVC2 Materi
60 52,3
IHCA 47,7
ROSC 50
17 % 40
30 18,9 22,1
Hospital 20
10
Discharge
0
ARREST ROSC DEAD
Time
Mid-2018 Early-2019
Girotra, S., Chan, P. S., & Bradley, S. M. (2015).. Heart, 101(24), 1943–1949.
POST CARDIAC ARREST SYNDROME
MORE
EFFECTIVE Systemic Persistent
Reperfusion Precipita<ng
Injury pathology
A
B
C
36’C
33’C
33’C
Posi<ve Studies
Neutral Studies
Bernard
TTM 2
Hyper-ion
TTM
HACA
32-36°C
24-48 Hour
0,25-0,5°C/ Hour
6 Hour 12 Hour
1.Fukuda, T. (2016).. Journal of Intensive Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0139-2
2. Nolan, J. P. (2015).. Resuscitation, 95, 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.018
Prognostication
NURSING ROLE in TTM Patient
• Assessment of the exclusion criteria
• Reduce delayed time to attempt TTM
• Downtime max 60 minutes after ROSC
PRE-INDUCTION • Optimizing coordination between ED and CVICU Through Team
Leader/MPP
• Patient/’s Family education
S
• Rewarming should be started after the time targeted of maintenance
E phase has achieved
REWARMING • Temperature should rise at range 0,25-0,5 “Celsius per hour max 37,5 º C
• Prevent rebound hyperthermia at least 72 Hour after ROSC
POTENTIAL SIDE EFFECTS
• Monitor vital sign 15,30,60 minute during initial of induction phase
Hemodynamic • Target MAP >65 mmHg favor in the first hour after ROSC
• Monitoring for presences of cardiac arrhythmias
Initiated in ED
Methods Environment
ICVCU
outdated Initiated Other hospitals does
Unavailable
protocol not have
Time equipment/protocol
consume Inter-
Mul.ple
Not meeting diciplinary
department
AHA/ERC leadership
recommendation Improving
MD’s Patient
care
CC Nurses Surface/ IV
Colling
People material
Clear
New protocol
communication
LIHAT Study
(Lactate Clearance in Heart Arrest)
All Resuscitated Patients Who Received TTM
N=16
Age
Number of adult in
q <60 years old 8 50
hospital cardiac Arrest
Cohort study q > 60 Years old 8 50
July 2018- April 2019
Sex
Flow Diagram of Study Pts N = 155 q Male 13 81.3
Enrolled q Female 3 18.7
Non ROSC
N =77 Diagnoses on admission
ROSC q STEMI 8 50
q Heart failure 8 50
N=78
Etiology Cardiac Arrest
Non TTM q Shockable (VT/VF) 9 56.3
TTM
(excluded) q Non Shockable (PEA/Asystole) 7 43.7
N = 60
Excluded: N = 18
In hospital intervention
Muldple comorbidides n= 25 q PPCI 5
Dead during TTM process n= q IABP 1
13 q RRT 2
Poor neurological status q TPM 1
Total Study
before cardiac arrest n= 6 q MULTIPLE 3
Subjects
q No 5
N : 16
(Enrolled) CPR Duration
q < 20 minutes 9 56.3
q >20 minutes 7 43.7
Non Survival to discharge 6 37.5
Survivor
Survivor
N=6 Favorable Neurological Outcome 6 37.5
N= 10
(37.5%)
(62,5%)
THE POST CARDIAC ARREST TEAM
Cardiologist
Intensivist Goal :
Improving
Brain
Rapid Feedback & Favorable
preservation
Response Rehabilitation system outcome
or
team improvement
Hypothermia Cardiac
Critical
Nurse
PROGNOSTICATION