Brainlanguage
Brainlanguage
Brainlanguage
Ashwini Vaidya
Early scientists like Franz Joseph Gall (1758-1828) proposed the idea
of localization i.e. different cognitive abilities being localized in
specific areas of the brain
These were somewhat fanciful- language located near the eyes ,
regions for ‘friendship’ and ‘hope’
Most of these ideas are not taken seriously- however localization as
an idea was upheld by subsequent brain research
Brain
The surface of the brain is the cortex, often called ‘gray matter,’
consisting of billions of neurons
The brain is composed of cerebral hemispheres on the right and left
These hemispheres are joined by the corpus callosum, a network that
allows the two hemispheres to communicate with each other
I In general, the left hemisphere controls the right side of the body, and
the right hemisphere controls the left side (contralateral)
Aphasia
Any language disorder that results from brain damage caused by
disease or trauma
Paul Broca proposed that language is localized to the left hemisphere
of the brain, and more specifically to the frontal part of the left
hemisphere (now called Broca’s area)
Carl Wernicke, described another variety of aphasia that occurred in
patients with lesions in areas of the left hemisphere temporal lobe,
now known as Wernicke’s area
Patient has damage in left frontal region of the brain due to a stroke
Damage in the left posterior temporal and lower parietal region, also due
to stroke
(HSS-Linguistics, IITD) Brain and Language I 16th Jan 2023 15 / 24
Aphasia
Aphasia
Most aphasics do not show total language loss, rather, we see
selective impairment
The kind of impairment is related to the location of the brain damage
We can see certain linguistic characteristics of the two types of
aphasias
While each patient is different and there is sometimes not an exact
mapping of (cognitive) deficit and brain area, a broad set of
syndromes can be described
These give us evidence for where language processing can be localized
in a healthy or undamaged brain
Broca’s Aphasia
This type of aphasia is also known as agrammatic aphasia
Primarily affects a persons ability to form sentences with the rules of
syntax
Language lacks articles, prepositions, pronouns, auxiliary verbs, and
other grammatical elements
Brocas aphasics also typically omit inflections such as the past tense
suffix -ed or the third person singular verb ending -s
DOCTOR: Could you tell me what you have been doing in the hospital?
PATIENT Yes, sure. Me go, er, uh, P.T. [physical therapy] none o’cot,
speech . . . two times . . . read . . . r . . . ripe . . . rike . . . uh
write . . . practice . . . get . . . ting . . . better
Wernicke’s Aphasia
Patients have fluent speech with good intonation, and adhere to the
rules of syntax, sometimes also called fluent aphasia
But language is often semantically incoherent, difficult to recall
content words aka anomia
Difficulty naming objects presented to them and also in choosing
words in spontaneous speech
They may make numerous lexical errors (word substitutions), often
producing jargon and nonsense words
While Broca’s aphasics visibly struggle to produce speech, Wernicke’s
aphasics are unaware that they’re making no sense
I The only thing that I can say again is madder or modder fish sudden
fishing sewed into the accident to miss in the purdles.
Aphasia
Damage to different parts of the brain results in different kinds of
linguistic impairment (e.g., syntactic versus semantic).
This supports the hypothesis that mental grammar consists of distinct
components or modules with different functions.
E.g content words and function words appear to be processed in
different brain areas
Note that the extent of damage to language comprehension can
depend on the amount of damage to the area (varies among patients)