Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 24 views

    Book 1

    Uploaded by

    Érik Januário da Silva
    This document contains the results of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing the means of 4 treatments (R1, R2, R3, R4) across 5 levels (0, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35). The ANOVA found a significant difference between the group means. Post-hoc Tukey tests found several significant differences between specific treatment-level pairs. A polynomial regression identified a quadratic model that best fit the data with an R^2 of 0.92.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Book 1

    Uploaded by

    Érik Januário da Silva
    24 views9 pages
    This document contains the results of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing the means of 4 treatments (R1, R2, R3, R4) across 5 levels (0, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35). The ANOVA found a significant difference between the group means. Post-hoc Tukey tests found several significant differences between specific treatment-level pairs. A polynomial regression identified a quadratic model that best fit the data with an R^2 of 0.92.

    Original Title

    Book1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains the results of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing the means of 4 treatments (R1, R2, R3, R4) across 5 levels (0, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35). The ANOVA found a significant difference between the group means. Post-hoc Tukey tests found several significant differences between specific treatment-level pairs. A polynomial regression identified a quadratic model that best fit the data with an R^2 of 0.92.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    24 views9 pages

    Book 1

    Uploaded by

    Érik Januário da Silva
    This document contains the results of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing the means of 4 treatments (R1, R2, R3, R4) across 5 levels (0, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35). The ANOVA found a significant difference between the group means. Post-hoc Tukey tests found several significant differences between specific treatment-level pairs. A polynomial regression identified a quadratic model that best fit the data with an R^2 of 0.92.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 9

    tratamentos R1 R2 R3 R4 X Y

    0 3.25 3.37 3.56 3.19 0 3.3425


    10 3.9 3.8 3.62 3.49 10 3.7025
    15 3.88 4.16 3.94 3.89 15 3.9675
    20 4.09 4.06 3.88 3.88 20 3.9775
    25 4 3.86 3.81 3.64 25 3.8275
    30 4.14 3.79 3.63 3.87 30 3.8575
    35 3.73 3.87 3.59 3.71 35 3.725
    0 10 15 20 25 30 35
    3.25 3.9 3.88 4.09 4 4.14 3.73
    3.37 3.8 4.16 4.06 3.86 3.79 3.87
    3.56 3.62 3.94 3.88 3.81 3.63 3.59
    3.19 3.49 3.89 3.88 3.64 3.87 3.71
    ANOVA: Single Factor

    DESCRIPTION Alpha 0.05


    Group Count Sum Mean Variance SS Std Err Lower Upper
    0 4 13.37 3.3425 0.026625 0.079875 0.078099 3.180085 3.504915
    10 4 14.81 3.7025 0.033492 0.100475 0.078099 3.540085 3.864915
    15 4 15.87 3.9675 0.017158 0.051475 0.078099 3.805085 4.129915
    20 4 15.91 3.9775 0.012825 0.038475 0.078099 3.815085 4.139915
    25 4 15.31 3.8275 0.022092 0.066275 0.078099 3.665085 3.989915
    30 4 15.43 3.8575 0.045425 0.136275 0.078099 3.695085 4.019915
    35 4 14.9 3.725 0.013167 0.0395 0.078099 3.562585 3.887415

    ANOVA
    Sources SS df MS F P value Eta-sq RMSSE Omega Sq
    Between Groups 1.129393 6 0.188232 7.715185 0.00018 0.687923 1.388811 0.589991
    Within Groups 0.51235 21 0.024398
    Total 1.641743 27 0.060805
    TUKEY HSD/KRAMER alpha 0.05
    group mean n ss df q-crit
    0 3.3425 4 0.079875
    10 3.7025 4 0.100475
    15 3.9675 4 0.051475
    20 3.9775 4 0.038475
    25 3.8275 4 0.066275
    30 3.8575 4 0.136275
    35 3.725 4 0.0395
    28 0.51235 21 4.597
    Q TEST
    group 1 group 2 mean std err q-stat lower upper p-value
    0 10 0.36 0.078099 4.609553 0.00098 0.71902 0.049109
    0 15 0.625 0.078099 8.002695 0.26598 0.98402 0.000225
    0 20 0.635 0.078099 8.130739 0.27598 0.99402 0.000184
    0 25 0.485 0.078099 6.210092 0.12598 0.84402 0.00405
    0 30 0.515 0.078099 6.594221 0.15598 0.87402 0.002177
    0 35 0.3825 0.078099 4.89765 0.02348 0.74152 0.03196
    10 15 0.265 0.078099 3.393143 -0.09402 0.62402 0.247157
    10 20 0.275 0.078099 3.521186 -0.08402 0.63402 0.212723
    10 25 0.125 0.078099 1.600539 -0.23402 0.48402 0.910932
    10 30 0.155 0.078099 1.984668 -0.20402 0.51402 0.794093
    10 35 0.0225 0.078099 0.288097 -0.33652 0.38152 0.999992
    15 20 0.01 0.078099 0.128043 -0.34902 0.36902 1
    15 25 0.14 0.078099 1.792604 -0.21902 0.49902 0.858812
    15 30 0.11 0.078099 1.408474 -0.24902 0.46902 0.949343
    15 35 0.2425 0.078099 3.105046 -0.11652 0.60152 0.338632
    20 25 0.15 0.078099 1.920647 -0.20902 0.50902 0.816928
    20 30 0.12 0.078099 1.536518 -0.23902 0.47902 0.925261
    20 35 0.2525 0.078099 3.233089 -0.10652 0.61152 0.295608
    25 30 0.03 0.078099 0.384129 -0.32902 0.38902 0.999958
    25 35 0.1025 0.078099 1.312442 -0.25652 0.46152 0.96356
    30 35 0.1325 0.078099 1.696571 -0.22652 0.49152 0.886558
    mean-crit Cohen d
    0.35902 2.304776
    0.35902 4.001348
    0.35902 4.065369
    0.35902 3.105046
    0.35902 3.297111
    0.35902 2.448825
    0.35902 1.696571
    0.35902 1.760593
    0.35902 0.80027
    0.35902 0.992334
    0.35902 0.144049
    0.35902 0.064022
    0.35902 0.896302
    0.35902 0.704237
    0.35902 1.552523
    0.35902 0.960323
    0.35902 0.768259
    0.35902 1.616544
    0.35902 0.192065
    0.35902 0.656221
    0.35902 0.848286
    Polynomial Regression

    OVERALL FIT
    Multiple R 0.9603978268 AIC -32.36374
    R Square 0.9223639857 AICc 27.63626
    Adjusted R Square 0.8447279715 SBC -32.5801
    Standard Error 0.0854798027
    Observations 7

    ANOVA Alpha 0.05


    df SS MS F p-value sig
    Regression 3 0.260428 0.086809 11.88062 0.035856 yes
    Residual 3 0.02192 0.007307
    Total 6 0.282348

    coeff std err t stat p-value lower upper


    Intercept #NAME? #NAME? 39.20183 3.652E-05 3.060229 3.600994
    Degree 1 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
    Degree 2 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
    Degree 3 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
    degree R-square p-value
    1 0.309902
    2 0.91983 0.005271
    3 0.922364 0.774828

    opt deg 2
    PROD X TRAT
    4.2

    4
    f(x) = − 0.00128595041322314 x² + 0.055555785123967 x + 3.33837809
    3.8
    R² = 0.919829849756284
    3.6

    3.4

    3.2

    3
    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    Y Polynomial (Y)
    TRAT

    5555785123967 x + 3.33837809917355

    25 30 35 40

    Polynomial (Y)

    You might also like