Brian Mazetese. (M198069) ENVIRONMENTAL Law Assignment
Brian Mazetese. (M198069) ENVIRONMENTAL Law Assignment
Brian Mazetese. (M198069) ENVIRONMENTAL Law Assignment
QUESTION :
:
The Zimbabwean Constitution of 2013 now includes environmental rights in section
73. It is important to note that this right was absent in the constitution before 2013.
Environmental rights were only enshrined in other Acts such as the EMA Act. The
inclusion of environmental rights in the constitution is a major development in the
history of environmental governance and natural resources management in the
country1. This writing seeks to show the importance of the inclusion of environmental
right in the protection of environment.This paper shall include a brief history of
environmental law so that we truly appreciate the milestone which the constitution
has achieved into making environmental concerns a constitutionally guaranteed
right.
The history of environmental laws in Zimbabwe can be traced back to the colonial
era. It must be noted that during this time environmental rights were not valued as
the settlers wanted maximum exploitation of the Zimbabwean resources. Before
colonization the native Zimbabweans had a system to ensure the protection of the
environment. According to Katerere, there were mechanisms to ensure sound
exploitation of mineral resources as checks and balances were in places to guard
against over exploitation. 7 Management of natural resources was centrally vested in
the chiefs and village heads. Through customary beliefs, concepts of sacred forest
and totems regulated the consumption of wildlife products. Thus, the utilisation of
environmental resources was achieved in a sustainable way.
During the colonial era, the colonial government enacted a number of laws that were
dealing with the environment. Such laws include, water Act, Forest Act, Parks and
Wildlife Act among others. All these pieces of legislation had one goal which was
protection of the environment. These laws were not popular with natives who felt
that, they were instruments of disenfranchising them of their natural resources. This
was mainly due to the fact that this system of laws was foreign to them.
8
Mtisi 2004
9
Zimbabwe homeless people’s federeation v
10
Section 2 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No.20) 2013
been infringed or is likely to be infringed. 11 Environmental rights are included in the
Constitution, therefore everyone have got locus standi and can enforce this right in a
court of law.
In South Africa the issue of environmental rights was interpreted in the Fuel
Retailers case of 2002 (the South African Constitution also protects environmental
rights in its Section 2112). Ngcobo J provided a useful synopsis of the development
of the concept of sustainable development. 13 In interpreting section 24, he identified
both the inherent tension between development and environmental protection, and
the need to reconcile the two for the purposes of sustainability. 14 The same
interpretation can be applied in the Zimbabwean Constitution as it is similar to its
South African counterpart. The challenge that the country is facing is that, there is
very little litigation on this right rendering it one of silent rights in the constitution.
Another key section that reflects on environmental rights is section 62 (2) which
gives everyone the right of access to any information held by any person, including
the State, in so far as the information is required for the exercise or protection of a
right.15 Access to information guarantees a greater citizen participation. 16 This help to
ensure that the people of Zimbabwe know the need to protect the environment.
On the other hand the Constitution have got some shortcomings. The Constitution
have the “progressive realization “ clause , this is a clause that guarantees that any
redress sought by a private actor against the government can or will be done in
accordance with the state’s time and own resource and at their choosing. 17 The
problem with such a clause is that it gives the state a way to dodge responsibilities,
this due to the fact that the term “progressive” cannot be quantified. According to
Madebwe when he commented on the clause he said that such a qualified and
generic clause is simply inadequate , in the Zimbabwean context , more needs to
be done by directing the legislature to put legislation measures that ensure the
citizens enjoy their rights not limit them. 18 This shows us that the clause can be used
to limit people’s right to a good and clean environment.
11
Ibid
12
Constitution of South Africa sec 24
13
Fuel retailers Association SA PTY LTD v Director-General Enivironmental management, Mpumalanga and
Others 2007 (2) SA 163 (SCA).
14
Ibid.
15
Section 62 (2) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No.20) 2013
16
Dhliwayo :A Critical Examination of the Scope , content and Extent of Environmental Rights in the
Constitution if Zimbabwe
17
see not 14 above
18
Madebwe :African Human Rights Law Journal ,2015 P.p 124
In conclusion it can be noted that the 2013 constitution have improved the protection
of the environment to a lager extent although it have got some shortcomings.
BIBLIOGRAPHY .
ARTICLES
Dhliwayo :A Critical Examination of the Scope , content and Extent of Environmental Rights
in the Constitution if Zimbabwe
CASES
STATUTES
INTERNET SOURCES
Sec.73-A-New-Hope-for-Environmental-Justice-in-Zimbabwe.pdf (mushoriwapasi.co.zw)
(PDF) Environmental Rights and the Zimbabwean Constitutional Debate: Implications for
Policy and Action (researchgate.net)