Strategic Management Reviewer
Strategic Management Reviewer
Strategic Management Reviewer
What is a Strategy?
A Strategy – is an idea, plan, and support that firms employ to compete successfully against rivals . (Pitss and Lei)
A master plan stating how the corporation will achieve its mission and objectives (Wheelen, et al., 2018).
The means by which long-term objectives will be achieved (David)
It is a coordinated set of commitments and actions designed to exploit core competencies and gain a competitive
advantage (Hitt, et al., 2020)
It is designed to help firms achieve competitive advantage.
A firm has competitive advantage when its strategy has created a superior value for customers and competitors
cannot duplicate it or it is too costly for them to imitate. Strategic competitiveness is achieved when a firm
successfully formulates and implements a value creating strategy (Dess, et al., 2017)
The Stages of Strategic Management Process
Strategic management process – the steps by which management converts a firm’s values, mission, and goals or objectives
into a workable strategy. It consists of three major stages: strategy formulation, strategy implementation and strategy
evaluation.
1. Strategy formulation – includes developing a vision and mission, identifying an organization’s external opportunities and
threats, determine internal strengths and weaknesses, establishing long-term objectives, generating alternative strategies,
and choosing particular strategies to pursue.
2. Strategy implementation – requires a firm to establish annual objectives, devise policies, motivate employees, and
allocate resources so that formulated strategies can be executed. This is often called the “action stage” of strategic
management. It means mobilizing employees and managers to put formulated strategies into action.
3. – is the final stage in strategic management. It includes reviewing bases for current strategies, measuring performance,
and taking corrective actions. Organization activities and performance results are monitored so that actual performance can
be compared with desired performance.
Nonfinancial Benefits Strategic management offers other tangible benefits such as:
enhanced awareness of external threats,
an improved understanding of competitors’ strategies,
increased employee productivity,
reduced resistance to change, and a clearer understanding of performance-reward relationships.
It also enhances the organization’s problem-prevention capabilities.
It empowers managers and employees.
According to Greenly, some nonfinancial benefits of a firm utilizing strategic management are increased discipline,
improved coordination, enhanced communication, increased forward thinking,
improved decision-making, increased synergy, and
more effective allocation of time and resources.
The major benefits of strategic management are according to Wheelen, et al. (2018):
1. Clearer sense of strategic vision for the firm.
2. Sharper focus on what is strategically important.
3. Improved understanding of a rapidly changing environment.
4. Guides the entire management hierarchy.
5. Increases level of profitability.
6. Helps organizations make better strategies
7. Boost managers and employees’ commitment to attain long-term goals.
8. Allows the organization to be more proactive than reactive in shaping its own future.
9. It empowers individuals.
Strategic Decision Making
The distinguishing characteristic of strategic management is its emphasis on strategic decision making. As organizations
grow large more complex with more uncertain environments, decisions become increasing complicated and difficult to
make.
Importance (Benefits) of Vision and Mission Statements King and Cleland recommend that organizations carefully develop
a written mission statement in order to keep the following benefits:
1. To ensure unanimity of purpose within the organization
2. To provide a basis, or standard, for allocating organizational resources
3. To establish a general tone or organizational climate
4. To serve as a focal point for individuals to identify with the organization’s purpose and direction
5. To facilitate the translation of objectives into work structure involving the assignment of tasks
6. To specify organizational purposes and then to translate these purposes into objectives in such a way that cost, time, and
performance parameters can be assessed and controlled. Reuben Mark, former CEO of Colgate, maintains that a clear
mission must make sense internationally.
Characteristics of a Mission Statement:
Broad in scope
Less than 150 words in length
Inspiring
Identify the utility of a firm’s products
Reveal that the firm is socially responsible
Reveal that the firm is environmentally responsible
Include nine components
Enduring
Mission Statement Components Mission statements can and do vary in length, content, format, and specificity. Since a
mission statement is often the most visible and public part of strategic management process, it is important that it includes
all the essential components:
1. Customers – Who are the firm’s customers?
2. Products or services – What are the firm’s major products or services?
3. Markets – Geographically, where does the firm compete?
4. Technology – Is the firm technologically current? 5. Concern for survival, growth, and profitability – Is the firm committed
to growth and financial soundness?
6. Philosophy – What are the basic beliefs, values, aspirations, and ethical priorities of the firm?
7. Self-concept – What is the firm’s distinctive competence or major competitive advantage?
8. Concern for public image – Is the firm responsive to social, community, and environmental concerns?
9. Concern for employees – Are employees valuable asset of the firm?
ORGANIZATION OBJECTIVES
The need for strategic objectives
While the vision and mission statements guide the top management on what to achieve and how to go about it, the
strategic objectives specifies what is envisaged behind the vision and mission statement into quantifiable terms.
Goals – represent the desired general ends toward which efforts are directed.
Objectives – can be defined as specific results that an organization seeks to achieve in pursuing its basic mission. It
narrows the focus to more specific organizational direction. They are specific and quantified version of goals.
Long-term objectives – are results desired in pursuing the mission and normally extend beyond one year.
Short-term objectives – sometimes called “annual objectives,” are designed to achieve the firm’s long-range objectives.
This performance targets normally covers one year or less.
Objectives are essential for organizational success because:
They state direction
Aid in evaluation
Create synergy
Reveal priorities
Focus coordination, and
Basis for effective planning, organizing, motivating, and controlling activities.
Strategic Objectives – a set of organizational goals that are used to operationalize the mission statement and that are
specific and cover a well-defined time frame.
Strategic objectives are characterized by the following:
1. converts vision and mission into specific performance targets;
2. they serve as yardsticks to tract performance;
3. it pushes the firm to be inventive and focused on results;
4. it helps prevents complacency; and
5. it serves as pull or magnet toward common direction
Qualities of Effective Organizational Objectives:
S—Specific (specifies the what, who, and time)
M—Measurable (can be measured in quantitative and qualitative terms)
A—Attainable (reachable, reasonable)
R—Result-oriented (output and outcome-oriented)
T—Time bound (can be attained in a specified time period)
C—Challenging (not too low, not too high, motivating)
C—Consistent (compatible with the mission, consistent in the long-run and the short-run).
STRATEGIC DIRECTION
Strategic direction – is defined in terms of a firm’s vision of where it is heading, the businesses in which it is involved, and its
purpose.
It is established and communicated through vision, mission, values statement, and/or a code of ethics.
Some firms don’t have a physical mission statement, but they still have a strategic direction, although it may not be
well-defined or communicated.
Influences on strategic direction
1. internal stakeholders
3. external stakeholders
2. broad environment
4. history and inertia
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
Several authors have identified a few key characteristics of good strategic leaders that lead to high performance:
1. Vision, eloquence, and consistency
2. Articulation of the business model
3. Commitment
4. Being well-informed
5. Willingness to delegate and empower
6. Astute use of power; and
7. Emotional intelligence
Forecasting Tools and Techniques Forecasts – are educated assumptions about future trends and events. Forecasting is a
complex activity because of factors such as technological innovation, cultural changes, new products, improved, services,
stronger competitors, shifts in government priorities, changing social values, unstable economic conditions, and unforeseen
events.
Oftentimes managers rely on published forecasts to identify key external opportunities and threats.
Accurate forecasts can provide major competitive advantage for organizations
Making Assumptions
McConkey defined assumptions as the “best present estimates of the impact of major external factors, over which the
manager has little if any control, but which may exert a significant impact on performance or ability to achieved desired
results.”
Reasonable assumptions based on available information must always be made in formulating strategies. Wild guesses
should be made in planning.
Business Analytics Business Analytics – is an MIS technique that involves using software to mine huge volumes of data to
help executives make decisions. It also called predictive analytics, machine learning, or data mining – a software that
enables a researcher to assess and use the aggregate experience of an organization, which is a priceless strategic asset for a
firm. Business analytics enables a company to benefit from measuring and managing risk.
PESTEL Analysis
A to assess political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors
What is a PESTEL Analysis?
A PESTEL analysis is a strategic framework commonly used to evaluate the business environment in which a firm operates.
Traditionally, the framework was referred to as a PEST analysis, which was an acronym for Political, Economic, Social, and
Technological; in more recent history, the framework was extended to include Environmental and Legal factors as well.
The framework is used by management teams and boards in their strategic planning processes and enterprise risk
management planning. PESTEL analysis is also a very popular tool among management consultants to help their clients
develop innovative product and market initiatives, as well as within the financial analyst community, where factors may
sinfluence model assumptions and financing decisions.
Key points from a PESTEL analysis can be incorporated into other industry and firm-level frameworks, such as Ansoff’s
Matrix, Porter’s 5 Forces, and SWOT Analysis.
Political Factors – Broadly speaking, political factors are those driven by government actions and policies.
Economic Factors – relate to the broader economy and tend to be expressly financial in nature.
Social Factors – tend to be more difficult to quantify than economic ones. They refer to shifts or evolutions in the ways that
stakeholders approach life and leisure, which in turn can impact commercial activity. Social Factor Example: Post-pandemic,
management at a technology firm has had to seriously reevaluate hiring, onboarding, and training practices after an
overwhelming number of employees indicated a preference for a hybrid, work-from-home (WFH) model.
Technological Factors – In today’s business landscape, technology is everywhere – and it’s changing rapidly. Management
teams and analysts alike must understand how technological factors may impact an organization or an industry.
Technological Factor Example: A management team must weigh the practical and the financial implications of transitioning
from on-site physical servers to a cloud-based data storage solution.
Environmental Factors – Environmental factors emerged as a sensible addition to the original PEST framework as the
business community began to recognize that changes to our physical environment can present material risks and
opportunities for organizations.
Examples of environmental considerations are:
Carbon footprint
Climate change impacts, including physical and transition risks
Increased incidences of extreme weather events
Stewardship of natural resources (like fresh water)
Environmental factors in a PESTEL analysis will overlap considerably with those typically identified in an ESG (Environmental,
Social, and Governance) analysis. In fact, it’s widely believed that the addition of environmental factors to the PESTEL
framework evolved from the growing popularity of movements such as CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) and ESG.
Legal Factors
Legal factors are those that emerge from changes to the regulatory environment, which may affect the broader economy,
certain industries, or even individual businesses within a specific sector.
They include, but are not limited to:
Industry regulation
Licenses and permits required to operate
Employment and consumer protection laws
Protection of IP (Intellectual Property)
PESTEL and Financial Analysis Combined, the above six factors can have a profound impact on risks and opportunities for
firms. It’s imperative that the analyst community recognize these and attempt to quantify them in their financial models and
risk assessment tool
Resources – are assets, competencies, processes, skills, or knowledge controlled by the corporation.
A resource is a strength if it provides a company with a competitive advantage.
Tangible resources – assets that can be seen and quantified. Examples: financial resources, organizational
resources, physical resources, and technological resources
Intangible resources – include assets that typically are rooted deeply in the firm’s history and have accumulated over
time.
They are a superior and more potent source of core competencies. Examples are human resources’ knowledge, trust.
Managerial capabilities, innovation resources, reputational resources.
Capabilities – are the firm’s capacity to deploy resources that have been purposely integrated to achieve a desired result.
Capabilities emerge over time through complex interactions among tangible and intangible resources.
Core competencies – are resources and capabilities that serve as a source of a firm’s competitive advantage over rivals.
Distinctive competencies – a firm’s strengths that cannot be easily imitated by competitors.
Management
The functions of management consist of five basic activities: planning, organizing, motivating, staffing, and controlling.
Planning – consists of all those managerial activities related to preparing for the future. (Strategy Formulation)
Organizing – includes all those managerial activities that result in a structure of task and authority relationships. (Strategy
Implementation)
Motivating – involves efforts directed toward shaping human behavior. (Strategy Implementation)
Staffing – activities are centered on personnel or human resource management. (Strategy Implementation)
Controlling – refers to all those managerial activities directed toward ensuring that actual results are consistent with
planned results. (Strategy Evaluation)
Marketing – is the process of defining, anticipating, creating, and fulfilling customer’s needs and wants for products and
services.
There are seven basic functions of marketing: (1) customer analysis, (2) selling products/services, (3) product and
service planning, (4) pricing, (5) distribution, (6) marketing research, and (7) Cost/benefit analysis.
Understanding these functions help identify and evaluate marketing strengths and weaknesses.
Cost/ Benefit Analysis – involves assessing the costs, benefits, and risks associated with marketing decisions.
Three steps are required to perform a cost/benefit analysis:
(1) compute the total costs associated with a decision,
(2) estimate the total benefits from the decision, and
(3) compare the total costs with the total benefits. When expected benefits exceed total costs, an opportunity becomes
more attractive.
Key cost/benefit indicators:
1. Net present value (NPV)
2. Present value of benefits (PVB)
3. Present value of costs (PVC)
4. Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = PVB/PVC
5. Net benefit = PVB – PVC
6. NPV/k (where k is the level of funds available)
Breakeven Analysis. Lowering of prices to compete is usually done by firms because many consumers are price sensitive.
As firms lowers prices, its breakeven (BE) point in terms of units sold increases. The breakeven point – is the quantity of
units that a firm must sell for its total revenues (TR) to equal its total costs (TC).
Management Information Systems Billions of bits of information are now “in the cloud.” Information ties all business
functions together and provides the basis for all managerial decisions. An MIS’ purpose is to improve the quality of
managerial decisions and thus improving the performance of an enterprise. An effective IS thus collects, codes, stores,
synthesizes, and presents information in such a manger that it answers important operating and strategic questions. It
gathers data about marketing, finance, production, and personnel matters internally, and all environmental factors
externally.
MIS Audit questions include the following:
1. Do all managers in the firm use the information system to make decision?
2. Is there a chief information office or director of IS position in the firm?
3. Are data in the IS updated regularly? Etc.
Value Chain Analysis Value Chain Analysis (VCA) – refers to the process whereby a firm determines the costs associated
with organizational activities from purchasing raw materials to manufacturing product(s) to marketing those products. VCA
aims to identify where low-cost advantages or disadvantages exist anywhere along the value chain from raw material to
customer service activities. VCA can enable a firm to identify its own strengths and weaknesses, especially as compared to
competitors’ value analyses and their own data gathered.
Benchmarking – is an analytical tool used to determine whether a firm’s value chain activities are competitive compared to
rivals and thus conducive to winning in the market place. Benchmarking entails measuring costs of value chain activities
across an industry to determine “best practices” among competing firms for the purpose of duplicating or improving upon
those best practices. This will enable a firm to take action to improve its competitiveness by identifying (and improving
upon) value chain activities where rival firms have comparable advantages in cost, service, reputation, or operation.