Agency - Dy Buncio V Ong Guan

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Category: Obligations of a principal

DOCTRINE:
Alienating a property as a task of an agent requires a special power of attorney and must be specifically stated in the written SPA.

TITLE FACTS ISSUE(S) RULING(S)


G.R. No. L-40681 Context: 1934, Capiz Issue: Who owns the rice mill & The owner is Ong Guan Can, because the Deed of Sale between him as
October 2, 1934 Cast: camarin – is it Ong Guan Can or principal and Juan Tong was invalid, bec his son Ong Guan Jr. did not
Dy Buncio & Co. Inc., petitioner – Through a Juan Tong? have the power to sell this property under his Special Power of Attorney.
court judgment, claims the rice mill and
DY BUNCIO & COMPANY, camarin owned by Ong Guan Can as
INC., plaintiff-appelle, payment for Can’s unpaid debt
Juan Tong – claims that Can sold him the rice
vs. mill & camarin through his agent, his son Ong
Guan Can Jr.
ONG GUAN CAN, ET AL.,
Pua Giok Eng – claims to be the lessee of
defendants.
the ricemill & camarin, with Tong as lessor
JUAN TONG and PUA GIOK
ENG, appellants. Ong Guan Can owes Dy Buncio. He is
unable to pay. Dy Buncio is awarded by the
TOPIC: court the ricemill & camarin belonging to his
debtor Ong Guan Can as payment for his
Obligations of a principal
unpaid debt.

Juan Tong challenges the judgment, claiming


that the Court cannot award the ricemill &
camarin to Dy Buncio bec it was actually sold
to him by Ong Guan through his agent Ong
Guan Can Jr.

Pua Giok Eng also challenges the court


judgment, saying that he is the lessee of the
subject camarin & rice mill, with Juan Tong as
his lessor.
GER WORDS/ KEYWORD(S):
special power of atty; deed of
sale

You might also like