LAING O’RORKE

Evaluation & Implementation of Strategic Goal

Introduction
Strategic planning determines an organization's direction and how to utilize its resources to get
there. Strategic planning is a sort of organizational management that sets priorities, focuses
energy and resources, improves operations, and ensures all stakeholders and workers are working
toward the same objectives.

The presentation of LAING O'ROURKE is a engineering and construction organization too.

They are conveying cutting-edge foundation and working for clients in the UK, Middle east, and
Australia. Condition of the framework implies the best current innovation utilized by the firm.
LAING O'ROURKE is completely mastery with deliberate innovation, sending developments
like computerized designing and artificial intelligence to deliver strong outcomes. Its main goal
is to be the perceived forerunner in development and greatness of the entire development area. Its
administration group has the broadness of mastery and profundity of information to drive our
system, develop income, and keep on conveying productive execution from our center business
activities

The goal of each successful business is to gain a foothold in its target market through the use of a
unique and sustainable competitive advantage. It is predicated on the idea that top management
has insider knowledge of what it takes to thrive in a given market and includes making
projections about which areas are more promising and how the company can provide unique
value to customers in those markets. Thus, strategic management is a procedure that begins with
introspection and culminates in setting up a company for success in a cutthroat industry (Baroto
MB, 2014;).

To help steer a company in the right direction as it implements its strategy, it is crucial to first
evaluate that strategy. Because of this, while assessing a company's strategy, it's important to go
deeper than just the surface data to determine whether or not the company is headed in the right
direction (Braduţan S, 2012).

An organization's approach to business can be evaluated in light of the following criteria.

1. First, the strategy must be consistent, meaning that it presents the organization's goals and
policies in a way that is consistent with one another.
2. A competitive advantage must be created and maintained for the strategy to be
successful.
 3. There must be harmony between the strategy and the external environment and the
crucial changes that arise as a result of putting the plan into action.
4. Practicability: The plan ought to be within budget and shouldn't generate intractable
problems as a byproduct of its implementation.

Issue
What we're doing here is developing even more comprehensive strategies for handling
environmental advantages and disadvantages, as well as our own organization's strengths and
weaknesses, in the future. It entails articulating the company's purpose, settling on attainable
goals, developing viable strategies, and establishing ground rules (JM, 1988). Questions that
must be answered while formulating a strategy include: which firms to enter, which to leave,
where to put your money, whether to grow domestically or internationally. For the simple reason
that all organizations have finite means. Therefore, it is up to the company's strategists to
determine which of the available alternatives has the most potential for success. Managers at the
top of an organization are in the greatest position to assess the impact of a strategy's
development, and they also have the ability to provide the resources needed to put it into action.

Different organizational tactics are employed at various tiers. Corporate strategy, business
strategy, functional strategy, and operating strategies are the four tiers (FR., 2011.).

a) The primary focus of a corporate level strategy is the selection of businesses, products,
and markets.
b) Operational strategies: these focus on how the company's many departments are
structured to implement the overarching and departmental strategies, as well as the
functional strategies, established at the corporate and business unit levels. That's why
operational strategy is concerned with things like procedures, people and monetary
resources, and so on. Decisions made on the shop floor by managers and employees
about things like invoicing, supply chain management, and the allocation of assets and
other resources (such as human capital) are all examples of these techniques.
c) Business unit strategy: Depending on the company and the industry, a strategic business
unit could be a department, profit center, region, etc. Business-level strategic challenges
include, but are not limited to, competitive positioning, technology adoption, vertical and
horizontal integration, lobbying, political networking, and other similar activities.
d) Strategies at the functional level: Business processes and the value chain are at the heart
of functional-level strategic challenges. Methods in marketing, production, R&D, and
funding are all part of this category.

The ability to make decisions is crucial to the success of any business. Particularly when there
are numerous problems that need to be resolved, HRM's effectiveness decreases, and pressure
builds. When management puts off making decisions, tension rises and becomes the norm for
people's daily lives. The management should immediately forward any issues that need to be
addressed by another division to that division (H, 1994).

Firm and Strategic Goal

LAING O'ROURKE aims to accomplish advancement and greatness of the entire development
area by 2025. While, the organization made the declaration as a feature of its new supportability
system, it has been inquired as to why it chose to set an objective - by its own workers and by
outer partners.

Although strategists agree that companies must use strategies in order to achieve their stated
goals, they also note that doing so is fraught with a wide variety of obstacles that might derail
even the best-laid plans. It's possible for leaders to misalign strategic planning with other
important decision-making activities. The author makes the observation that even with a strategic
planning framework in place, there is no assurance that the company will accomplish its strategic
goals and objectives (Eisenhardt, 1997).

It recognizes that public sector organizations have greater challenges and limits than private
sector companies, but he believes that public organizations may still profit from adopting a
strategic approach to their operations.

Several reasons why companies fail to adopt plans have been identified.

a) It's hard to delegate specific responsibilities to those who weren't engaged in developing
the plan, which might have unintended consequences.
b) Strategic planning blunders have far more severe repercussions in the near term because
of the rapid shifts in focus that occur with the introduction of new goods and the launch
of investment initiatives, as well as the appearance of unexpected business prospects.
c) Expensive to carry out for small and medium-sized businesses due to the need to hire
managers or strategic planners, the time and energy spent on conducting an in-depth
analysis of the external and internal environments, and the development of specific tools
for putting the strategic planning process into action.
d) Managers should have strong conceptual capabilities and capacities to formulate strategic
plans, which need knowledge, training, and experience in the sector. However, some
companies lack managers with the expertise to design strategic plans, which have the
impact of not achieving the intended goals and resulting in massive financial losses as the
company wastes time and resources pursuing ideas that will ultimately fail.
e) Employees should be incentivized enough to help the company achieve its strategic
objectives.
 f) Every member of staff has to be familiar with the company's long-term objectives and
objectives.
g) The strategic planning process should be integrated into the budgeting procedure to
provide sufficient funding for strategic endeavors.

Businesses that invest time and energy into strategic planning and management are better
prepared to anticipate and respond to changing market conditions. Organizational stability and
consistency are enhanced by the use of a strategic plan, which allows for the establishment of as-
realistic-as-possible objectives and goals (Mintzberg, 1987,).

Strategic Initiative
Strategic planning boosts motivation and creativity because it requires top-level managers to be
invested in the organization's goals and plans and to come up with novel approaches to putting
them into action. Knowing that work is helping the company achieve its objectives is also a great
source of inspiration for those lower in the hierarchy. In order to reduce potential losses,
businesses often use risk-mitigation measures, and strategic management is a key part of this
process (Zitani, 1985,).

Strategic planning creates actual changes in the atmosphere of an organization, which improves
their performance and paves the way for the use of strategic management. Since strategic
planning integrates all of an organization's efforts toward its long-term objectives, it is
imperative that strategic management begin with careful planning (Bryson, 1988). Because of the
narrowed emphasis on objectives, workers will have a much better idea of where they should be
aiming their efforts. Strategic planning helps with resource allocation and goal-seeking by
providing explicit guidelines for doing so throughout the strategy-forming and planning phases.

Strategic management can't effectively depict the future. A thorough depiction of an

organization's future comprises of qualitative desires about the state it intends to be in the future,
its market and commercial position, and its culture. As a theory that specifies how and what to
do to solve difficulties or conditions and a business and management philosophy or ideology,
strategic management cannot be constrained to normal rules, procedures, and deadlines, and it
may be a source of dispute among managers.

Discussion
Organizational performance is a crucial idea for every firm. Considering how much time and
effort is spent strategizing about how to define and quantify success, it stands to reason that
improving and overseeing performance is central to strategic management. In order for an
organization to succeed, performance drivers at all levels need to be recognized, and strong
returns must be realized. In addition, the article touched on the functions of the operations
department in factories. Operations staff at manufacturing companies is primarily responsible for
producing goods for sale by the firm. The division is responsible for making plans to ensure
sufficient production of the necessary amounts (Conway, 2009). The unit is responsible for
acquiring the necessary supplies. In addition to making the goods, they are also responsible for
transporting and evaluating them. A manufacturing company's operations department, together
with HR and marketing, is the backbone of the enterprise.

Having a comprehensive approach in strategy formulation and execution by inviting everyone in

the organization to contribute and participate is essential for a company's success in strategic
planning and implementation. The implementation of a strategy, meanwhile, should be both
successful and efficient. Successful plan execution relies on constant monitoring and accurate
assessment, both of which may be greatly improved with timely and useful feedback. In order to
successfully formulate and execute a strategy in the face of competition, businesses should put
the needs of their customers first. But keep in mind that even with a well-thought-out strategy,
accomplishment is no certainty (Askarany, August 6, 2012 ). However, success is guaranteed by
a well-thought-out, original, and creative strategy that is carried out flawlessly. A company's
ability to capitalize on its strengths and make the most of its chances while mitigating its
vulnerabilities may be improved by conducting a SWOT analysis.

Conclusion
Strategies for a company are essential to its survival in today's cutthroat economic world.
Without a method to measure progress toward goals, a strategic plan serves no useful purpose.
Recruitment of qualified and motivated employees, with subsequent promotion to higher levels
of management based on successes, is essential for successful plan execution in businesses. Each
company's management and employees need to have a clear idea of where they want the
company to go. A high-performance culture may then flourish as a result. On the other side,
becoming more financially independent allows for more strategic leeway and action. Creative
and original planning is essential, as is the efficient and successful implementation of such plans.
Accurate and timely responses will improve monitoring and assessment, streamlines plan
execution, and reduces the likelihood of failure. In order to successfully formulate and execute a
strategy in the face of competition, businesses should put the needs of their customers first.
Rather of focusing only on fixing the company's deficiencies and trying to avoid or downplay the
risks it faces, a good strategic plan builds on the organization's strengths and capitalizes on its
potential. It's important to remember that even if you have a well-thought-out strategic plan; it
doesn't mean you'll definitely achieve your goals. However, a strategy that's been carefully
designed, is inventive and creative, and is then successfully implemented, will almost certainly
achieve those goals.
References
1. Askarany, D. a. Y. H., August 6, 2012 . Strategic Management Tools and Organisational
Performance,.

2. Baroto MB, A. N. A. F., 2014;. Effective Strategy Implementation.. Journal of Advanced

Management, pp. :50-54..

3. Braduţan S, S. A., 2012. Advantages and disadvantages of the strategic management in the
current economic context.

4. Bryson, J. M. &. E. R. C., 1988. Strategic planning threats and opportunities for
planners,American Planning Association, . In: Chicago.: Planners Press: .

5. Conway, M., 2009. Environmental Scanning:. p. Slideshare. Web..

6. Eisenhardt, K., 1997. Strategic Decisions and all that Jazz. Business Strategy Review, , vol. 8 (no.
3,), p. pp. 50 – 91..

7. FR., D., 2011.. Strategic management concepts and cases.. ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:
Prentice.

8. H, M., 1994. The rise and fall of strategic planning: reconceiving roles for planning, plans,
planners.. New York: Free Press,..

9. JM, B., 1988. Strategic planning process for public and nonprofit organization. Long Range
Planning, pp. 73-81..

10. Mintzberg, H., 1987,. Crafting Strategy. Harvard Business Review, Volume vol. 7,, p. pp. 66 – 75..

11. Zitani, A. M., 1985,. Strategic planning in the public sector: prospects and limitations, . In: New
York.: Cornell University Publishers,.