Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Tahir (2013), is “a customer's perspective based on expectation and then subsequent post
purchase experience”. In other words, it is an evaluation of products or services‟ quality level
that meets or exceeds the customer expectations. The term customer satisfaction has been on the
markets for a long time. In fact, many researchers and academicians emphasized that it is a key
element for a company’s success in the market as well as a crucial factor for company’s survival
as it has a positive effect on company’s profitability.
Novikova, (2009),It cannot be denied that a satisfied consumer has a tendency to buy more than a
less satisfied one. In a highly competitive market, customer satisfaction is, indeed, a crucial key
that builds strong and long-term relationships between the customers and the firm. The measure
of customer satisfaction, therefore, has become a vital concern for many companies and services
providers to achieve such success.
Kincey et al., (1975), Williams,et al(1994). Ahornyet al, (1993) Equally impressive results have
also been found in healthcare research. Satisfied patients are more likely to comply with medical
treatment regimensand are more likely to utilize services in the future. It is therefore an
important business success strategy.
Jay Kandampully (2000) 42, conducted a research study on the customer satisfaction in the hotel
industry. The objective is to identify factors of image and customer satisfaction, which are
positively related to customer loyalty in the hotel industry. The research helps extend the
understanding the relationship between customer loyalty, customer satisfaction, and image.
Berry, (1990), are of the view that the sole judge of service quality is the customer and to get
apositive feedback from him; the service companies should implement the five imperatives of
servicequality viz. Reliability, Assurance, Tangibles, Empathy and Responsiveness in their
services. The authorshave advocated knowing the expectations of the customers on the said
fronts and further measuringtheir actual perception. It becomes imperative for service companies
to improve themselves onwhich ever front expectations of the customers outscores their
perception.
Yavas, (1997), in their study have revealed a positive relationship between customers’
satisfactionthrough service quality and their long term commitment to the bank. Further, the
relationship betweenservice quality and complaint behavior of the customers, was found to be
negative. Better the quality,lower will be the number of complaints received from the customers
and vice-versa.
Grigoroudis, E (2009)57 discuss the customer satisfaction evaluation problem. The authors
provide three classifications of customers: (1) “Self-unit customers – individuals of self-unit
customers with self-inspection, disciplined attitude, and a desire to excellence, (2) Internal
Customers – who are personnel within an organization, and (3) External customers – represented
by the buyers or users of the final products and services of the business organization” (p.9). The
authors present an overview of existing methodologies and also the development and
implementation of an original method dubbed MUSA (Multicriteria Satisfaction Analysis). This
method, the author claims, aims to provide an integrated set of results capable of analyzing
customer needs and expectations and to justify their satisfaction level. The book also deals with
customer satisfaction problem, presenting the various quantitative and related consumer
behavioral models; quality-based approaches; the MUSA method and its extensions and
advanced topics; customer satisfaction surveys and barometers; applications of the MUSA
method in real-world customer satisfaction surveys; and different information technology
approaches related to customer satisfaction. Finally, the book examines the development of a
decision support tool to help understand and apply results and methods of measuring and
implementing service quality is intended for researchers and practitioners in marketing, quality
management, and service management.
Nakan (2005), have observed that privatization of some public banks in Brazil has resulted in
improving their productivity. Such banks have come out of the shackles of Governmentcontrol
and on account of less bureaucratic hurdles; they are spreading their wings in right direction.
Zhilin(2004), worked on customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of
switching costhad mentioned in a competitive setting, such as the Internet market, where
competition may be onlyone click away, has the potential of switching costs as an exit barrier
and a binding ingredient ofcustomer loyalty become altered? The moderating effects of
switching costs on the association ofcustomer loyalty and customer satisfaction and perceived
value are significant only when the level ofcustomer satisfaction or perceived value is above
average.
Kassem (1989), has opined that service companies can ill afford to neglect customer service
qualityissues. In the past, quality was the prerogative of manufacturing sector. However, in the
modern dayfiercely competitive service sector, quality of services has become as important (if
not more) as quality of goods.
Binks (1989), have pointed out that banks are not trying to differentiate their
products/serviceswhile targeting small business sector. They can’t afford to do so in future as the
markets are becomingmore and more heterogeneous. The authors have strongly recommended
that mass marketing mustpave way to nice and customized marketing. They have revealed that
Indian customers have lot ofresentment regarding more time taken by banks in rendering
services at counters. The studies have strongly recommended establishing standard timings for
various banking services which, must be abidedby the banks.
Berry (1990), are of the view that the sole judge of service quality is the customer and to get
apositive feedback from him; the service companies should implement the five imperatives of
servicequality viz. Reliability, Assurance, Tangibles, Empathy and Responsiveness in their
services. The authorshave advocated knowing the expectations of the customers on the said
fronts and further measuringtheir actual perception. It becomes imperative for service companies
to improve themselves onwhichever front expectations of the customers outscores their
perception.
Leonard (1991), has opined that investment in employees leads to better servicequality, which in
turn leads to better customer retention. This assertion is based in the fact thatemployees of the
company are inseparable to customers. A direct interaction between them demands
thatemployees are possessing adequate skills to interact with customers. Such skills add to the
servicequality and go a long way in preventing customers’ churn.
Pyanne (1991),have observed that satisfied banking customers initially become friends ofthe
bank, then they become supporters and finally advocates. Thus, the starting point of
anyrelationship marketing endeavor of any bank should be to leave no stone unturned in
satisfyingcustomers to a desired extent. This, in turn, is possible if and only if the bank iskeeping
a ‘servicequality’ focus.
Rust (1993),have developed a mathematical model for assessing the value that any bankcould
attach to different elements of customer satisfaction. They have suggested that company may
adopt their model to get the best result of their endeavor leading to customer satisfaction.
Keavency (1995),has noticed that factors such as core service failure, service encounter failure
andinappropriate pricing as most important factors contributing to ‘Customer Switch’ in banking
industry.