PARDI Self 14 V.2.1 Oct 2020
PARDI Self 14 V.2.1 Oct 2020
PARDI Self 14 V.2.1 Oct 2020
PARDI
The Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview
Rachel Bryant-Waugh
Kamryn Eddy
Nadia Micali
Lucy Cooke
Jennifer J. Thomas
Recommended citation: Bryant‐Waugh, R., Micali, N., Cooke, L., Lawson, E. A., Eddy, K. T., & Thomas, J. J. (2019).
Development of the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview, a multi‐informant, semi‐structured interview of
feeding disorders across the lifespan: A pilot study for ages 10–22. International Journal of Eating Disorders.
52(4):378-387
1
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
The PARDI is appropriate for use with children (aged 2 and over), adolescents, and adults.
There are four versions available:
Parent/Carer 2-3: Parents of 2-3 year olds
Parent/Carer 4+: Parents of 4 year olds and over
Self 8-13: 8-13 year olds
Self 14+: 14 year olds and over
A suggested guideline for determining whom to interview and which version of the interview to use
based on respondent age is set out below:
Ages 2-3: Parent/Carer 2-3
Ages 4-7: Parent/Carer 4+
Ages 8-13: Parent/Carer 4+ and Self 8-13
Ages 14 and up: Self 14+ plus Parent/Carer 4+ if required
These are guidelines only, and assessors are encouraged to use their own judgement based on
respondent intellectual ability, maturity, insight, comprehension, and level of co-operation.
Note: When two versions of the interview are used, separate administration is recommended.
The PARDI begins with an explanation of the nature and purpose of the interview. This should be
conveyed in an age-appropriate manner in the interviewer’s own words, but should include:
Informing the respondent that the interview is about the individual’s eating behaviour and
attitudes to food and eating, as well as questions about general health and functional
impairment
Informing the respondent that the interview will focus primarily on the last four weeks to
three months so that the rater can get a picture of the current problem
Clarifying that there are no right or wrong answers
Stating that this is a standard interview with all respondents being asked the same
questions; some may therefore not seem relevant to the individual
Explaining the reason why the interview is being conducted and how the responses will be
used (e.g., clinical assessment, to make a diagnosis, research, etc.)
Informing the respondent of the approximate length of the interview (typically 45-60
minutes). It may be shorter for respondents not affected by feeding or eating problems. The
PARDI should not last longer than 90 minutes
Making clear that the respondent can ask for further explanation if anything is unclear
The interview proceeds with a screen to consider the possible presence of current anorexia nervosa,
bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder or related disorders (e.g. atypical anorexia nervosa).
Additional introductory items cover growth and development, current pattern of feeding or eating,
and medical history to provide important context for potential diagnoses of pica, ARFID, and
rumination disorder, including the ascertainment of potential exclusion criteria. The PARDI then
2
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
assesses the specific diagnostic criteria for pica, ARFID, and rumination disorder, as well as
associated functional impairment. The ARFID section of the PARDI includes questions relating to
three factors underlying the rationale for the limited diet seen in individuals with ARFID: Sensory
Sensitivity, Lack of Interest in Food or Eating, and Concern about Aversive Consequences. These are
not mutually exclusive, given that individuals with ARFID may have more than one rationale for their
limited diets, and can therefore have high scores on one, two, or all three ARFID profiles.
Because some individuals with clinically significant pica, ARFID, or rumination symptoms may also
experience clinically significant symptoms of the other feeding and eating disorders, it may be
appropriate to use the PARDI without the screen if the interviewer would like to maximize the
information obtained. However, the interviewer should keep in mind that only one feeding or eating
disorder diagnosis can ultimately be conferred at the conclusion of the interview, with the exception
of pica, which may co-occur with other feeding or eating disorders.
Note: Individuals with intellectual disability may experience difficulty comprehending and
responding to some of the questions . Under the circumstances of intellectual disability where
the individual is unable to participate to a sufficient level, it is advised to use the parent/carer
version.
If the rater has any doubt, the item response should be rated downwards (e.g., if the rater is
deciding between a 4 and a 5, a 4 should be selected).
It is advisable to obtain weight and height measurements prior to commencing the PARDI.
3
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
SCREEN
The screen sets out to consider the possible presence of current anorexia nervosa, bulimia
nervosa, binge eating disorder, or related disorders (e.g., atypical anorexia nervosa):
1. Over the past 3 months, have you restricted or limited what you eat in order to control your
weight or body shape? (Yes/No) (If yes, go straight to item 2)
2. Over the past 3 months, has your weight or body shape been very important to how you feel
about yourself as a person? (Yes/No)
Note: This is intended to pick up weight/shape concerns characteristic of AN/BN. It does not include
being concerned about being too thin. Confirm that thinness/muscularity is not an important positive
contributor to his/her self-evaluation.
3. Over the past 3 months, has there been a time when you felt as if you couldn’t stop eating, even if
you wanted to? If so, was it a large amount of food? (Yes/No)
4. Over the past 3 months, have you exercised a lot to lose weight? Or to make up for food that
you’ve eaten? (Yes/No)
5. Over the past 3 months, have you done anything else to lose weight or to prevent weight gain?
(Yes/No)
Note: Examples include self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives, diuretics, other medications (e.g.,
appetite suppressants) for weight control without a prescription, using pills or other medication (e.g.,
insulin for a person with diabetes) in a greater amount or at a higher frequency than suggested.
If any of 1-5 are “Yes,” the respondent may have one of the feeding and eating disorders
mentioned above. The PARDI can still be conducted if an individual screens positive, but only one
feeding and eating disorder diagnosis can be conferred at the end (except pica, which can co-occur
with any of the other feeding and eating disorders).
4
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
INTRODUCTION
BMI:
BMI category
Scoring for children and adolescents aged 4 to 19 years:
-2 — severe thinness (BMI centile <0.4th)
-1 — thinness (0.4th ≥ BMI Centile, < 5th);
0 — normal weight; (5th ≥ BMI centile< 85th)
1 — overweight (85th ≥BMI Centile <95th)
2 — obese (BMI centile ≥95th)
Note: National charts should be used to plot height and weight centiles (e.g. CDC, WHO, UK growth
charts). The significance of height centile needs to be understood in reference to previous growth
parameters if available and assessment of expected centiles based on parental parameters.
5
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
Please evaluate the known presence or absence of problems on the Physical and Mental Health
Checklist to determine whether the eating problem may be secondary to a medical problem. If so,
a diagnosis can only be made if the eating problem warrants independent clinical attention.
7. Note: Please enquire about each of the following areas. For all questions in this section note
diagnosis and treatment received. The interviewer should ask individuals whether they have ever
experienced or received a diagnosis for the medical problems listed below. The following stem
question structure is suggested:
Have you ever experienced or received a diagnosis of any [neurological problems]?
The interviewer should proble with examples given
7a. Neurological problems (e.g., epilepsy, cerebral palsy, Down’s syndrome, brain (Yes/No)
abnormalities, bulbar palsy)
7b. Respiratory problems (e.g., chronic lung disease, recurrent chest infections (Yes/No)
[more than 3 per year], assisted ventilation)
7c. Cardiac problems (e.g., previous cardiac surgery, on-going cardiac abnormality) (Yes/No)
7d. Structural abnormalities of the head and neck (e.g., cleft palate, vocal fold (Yes/No)
palsy, tracheostomy, tracheomalacia, tongue tie)
7e. Gastroenterological problems (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux, chronic (Yes/No)
vomiting, cyclic vomiting syndrome, gastroparesis, inflammatory bowel
disease, appendicitis, cystic fibrosis, constipation)
7f. Birth-related medical problems (e.g., prematurity—born at less than 37 (Yes/No)
weeks gestation, low birth weight)
7g. Diabetes, coeliac disease, or any other medical condition that specifically (Yes/No)
affects your eating?
7h. Food allergies/intolerances Note: If possible, determine how the food (Yes/No)
allergy/intolerance was diagnosed. Blood tests and/or supervised elimination
diets are typically more reliable than self-diagnosis.
7i. Mental health problems:
a) Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (Yes/No)
b) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (Yes/No)
c) Anxiety disorder (e.g., panic disorder, phobias, PTSD, OCD (Yes/No)
etc.)
d) Other feeding and eating disorder (Yes/No)
e) Depression or other mood disorder (Yes/No)
f) Others (e.g., schizophrenia) (Yes/No)
7j. Intellectual disability (Yes/No)
6
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
Note: List all the medications that the individual is currently taking. Commonly used medications that
may affect feeding or eating include those that increase appetite (e.g. cyproheptadine, mirtazapine)
and those that decrease appetite (e.g., dextroamphetamine, amphetamine, methylphenidate, and
lisdexamfetamine). Each of these drugs may have a different brand name that varies by region.
10. Summary of medical and mental health problems (for the interviewer to rate based on
judgement): Is there a medical problem or mental health problem or medication that could at least
partially explain the difficulty in feeding or eating? (Yes/No)
If Yes, please explain below:
Note: The respondant can still meet criteria for pica, ARFID, or rumination disorder as long as the
medical problem, mental health problem, or mediction does not fully account for the feeding or
eating difficulty.
0 — No problem
1—
2—
3 — A moderate problem
4—
5—
6 — A very serious problem
12 . I would like to ask you about a typical day of eating and drinking. Starting with when you wake
up, can you tell me about what you typically eat and drink throughout the day? Are there other days
when this hasn’t been your eating/drinking pattern?
Note: Include drink, food, and non-nutritive/non-food substances. If the individual is tube-fed or
taking nutritional supplement drinks, check the pattern of tube-feeding and/or intake of supplement
drinks.
Note: There are several methods of tube feeding. The most common are nasogastric (NG tube),
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG tube], and percutaneous endoscopic gastro-jejunostomy
[PEG-J tube]. In NG feeding, a tube is inserted through the nose into the stomach; NG tubes can be
inserted each time for a one-time feeding, or kept in place for short-term use (e.g., 4-6 weeks). In
contrast, PEG and PEG-J tubes require surgical insertion and can be kept in place for as long as they
are needed. In PEG feeding, a tube is placed through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach. In
PEG-J feeding, a tube is placed through the abdominal wall through the stomach directly into the
small intestine.
14. Are you currently taking any nutritional supplement drinks, liquids, pills, or drops to make sure
you get enough vitamins and minerals? If so, what type and how much are you taking? (Yes/No)
7
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
15. Are you currently taking any high-energy supplement drinks or other products to help you to
maintain or gain weight? If so, what type and how much do you have? (Yes/No)
If yes, specify type of supplement and total amount over 24 hours:
ote: Do not count supplements meant to provide vitamins and minerals only. If the respondent is
taking a single supplement meant to to provide calories as well as vitmains and minerals, count for
both items 14 and 15.
16. Over the past month, have you experienced any difficulties managing food in your mouth, such
as:
holding food in your mouth without swallowing it
eating slower than others due to difficulty managing food in your mouth
difficulty keeping food in your mouth while chewing
difficulty with chewing or swallowing
frequent gagging or choking
Note: If Yes to any of the above note the type of difficulty and the respondent’s understanding of its
cause. Postive ratings should be separated into:
Yes – Known oral-motor difficulties (e.g., poor oral-motor co-ordination, oral dyspraxia, low muscle
tone, protruding tongue)
Yes – Thought to be due to psychological factors (e.g., concern about choking, fear of ingesting
specific foods) [this is returned to later in the schedule]
Yes – But not known whether primarily due to structural/oral-motor or psychological cause
17 Have you ever had any tests for swallowing difficulties (e.g., videofluroscopy study, investigation
for requirement for thickened fluids etc.)? (Yes/No)
What was the result of these?
8
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
18b. Assessor: confirm that items consumed are non-food, non-nutritive Yes/No
19. Assessor: Is pica “persistent”? (i.e., has it occurred on more than two days in the past month?)
Yes/No
19a. In the past month, on how many days have you eaten [non-nutritive/non-food item(s)]?
Rating:
0 — No pica behaviour
1 — Pica behaviour on 1 to 5 days
2 — Pica behaviour on less than half the days (6 to 12 days)
3 — Pica behaviour on half the days (13 to 15 days)
4 — Pica behaviour on more than half the days (16 to 22 days)
5 — Pica behaviour almost every day (23 to 27 days)
6 — Pica behaviour every day
20. In the past month, on the days you have eaten [non-nutritive/non-food item(s)], how many
times have you done this?
Number of episodes per day__________
Note: Do not count each separate bite of non-nutritive/non-food item(s). Instead, consider each
period of continuous eating followed by a pause or break to be a separate episode.
21. DSM-5 Criterion B (Assessor uses judgement): Need to determine if pica behaviour is
inappropriate for developmental stage. Is the respondent at least 2 years old or functioning at a
similar developmental level [SCREEN]? (Yes/No)
DSM-5 Criterion C:
22. Some people believe that eating things like ……… [that aren’t food] is good for them. Do people
in your family believe that? If yes: What do they believe? Is that the only reason why you’ve eaten
things that aren’t food in the past month? (Yes/No)
23. DSM-5 Criterion D (Assessor uses judgement): Need to check in the case that an intellectual
disability [SCREEN], autism spectrum disorder [SCREEN], schizophrenia [SCREEN], or pregnancy
[SCREEN] is present, whether pica symptoms require additional clinical attention (see below for
impairment). Do pica symptoms require additional attention? (Yes/No)
9
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
How old were you when you first started eating things that aren’t food?
Age of onset of Pica: ______
25. Over the past month, have you eaten things that aren’t food because you thought it might
decrease your appetite or otherwise help you control your shape or weight? (Yes/No)
Note: Assessor uses this item to rule out weight/shape motivation for pica behaviour which might
suggest AN or BN.
26. Over the past month, have you eaten things that aren’t food to try to harm yourself on purpose,
to make yourself sick, or to get special attention? (Yes/No)
Note: Assessor uses this item to assess for self-harm motivation for pica behaviour.
10
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
4 — One moderate medical problem or multiple mild medical problems (e.g., mechanical
bowel problems)
5—
6 — At least one severe medical problem (e.g., lead poisoning that requires treatment or
bezoar that requires surgical removal)
Pica Severity Scale: Add ratings for 19a, 24, 27, and 28 and divide by 4. Higher scores indicate
greater pica severity.
Specify as Current or In Remission (i.e., “After full criteria for pica were previously met, the criteria
have not been met for a sustained period of time.”): ______
11
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
If no, Have other people (for example, doctors, family members, significant others) said that you
have a problem with eating that involves avoidance or restriction of food? Do other people say your
eating means that you don’t get enough overall in terms of amount and/or range? (Yes/No)
FINAL RATING: Yes (to either) or No (to both)
Note: If the interviewer has evidence that the person has been seen in a clinical context and there has
been reference to an ARFID-like presentation or a working diagnosis of an eating or feeding problem
of this type (e.g. behavioural feeding disorder; selective eating disorder; food phobia), the interviewer
can still rate. The participant may not endorse thinking they have a problem, but if there is evidence
that others do, then the interviewer can use that to rate the item.
29b. Over the past month, have you been eating a range of vegetables? Which ones?
Rating:
0 — Eats 6 or more types of vegetable
1 — Eats 5 types of vegetable
2 — Eats 4 types of vegetable
3— Eats 3 types of vegetable
4— Eats 2 types of vegetable
5 – Eats just one type or form of vegetable (e.g., carrot sticks only)
6 — Eats no vegetables
29c. Over the past month, have you been eating a range of protein foods (e.g., meat, fish, eggs,
beans, meat substitutes e.g.,tofu, quorn)? Which ones?
Rating:
0 — Eats 6 or more types of protein
1 — Eats 5 types of protein
2 — Eats 4 types of protein
3— Eats 3 types of of protein
12
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
29d. Over the past month, have you been eating a range of dairy or calcium-enriched dairy
substitute foods (e.g., milk, cheese, soya milk)? Which ones?
Rating:
0 — Eats 6 or more types of dairy foods
1 — Eats 5 types of dairy foods
2 — Eats 4 types of dairy foods
3— Eats 3 types of of dairy foods
4— Eats 2 types of dairy foods
5 – Eats just one type or form of dairy foods (e.g., milk only)
6 — Eats no dairy foods
29e. Over the past month, have you been eating a range of starchy/carbohydrate foods (e.g. rice,
pasta, bread, cereal)? Which ones?
Note: All forms of potatoes (e.g., French fries, chips/crisps, mashed potatoes, baked potatoes) count
as a starchy/carbohydrate food, not a vegetable
Rating:
0 — Eats 6 or more types of carbohydrates
1 — Eats 5 types of carbohydrates
2 — Eats 4 types of carbohydrates
3— Eats 3 types of carbohydrates
4— Eats 2 types of carbohydrates
5 – Eats just one type or form of carbohydrates (e.g., plain spaghetti only)
6 — Eats no carbohydrates
13
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
1—
2 — Has become tired or bored of one or two foods, but has not stopped eating them
3—
4 — Has become tired or bored of a few foods and is eating less of them in the past month,
or has become tired or bored of one food and has not been eating it in the past month
5—
6 — Has become tired or bored of many foods and has not been eating them in the past
month
14
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
appropriately; or young person has fallen off his/her individual weight curve but not crossed
a standard centile line for BMI
3—
4 — Moderate difficulty; adult has lost a significant amount of weight or has been at a
significantly low weight (i.e. BMI between 16.00 and 16.99) and has had difficulty gaining
weight appropriately; or young person has lost weight and crossed one standard centile line
below his/her individual BMI curve
5—
6 — Extreme difficulty; adult has lost a substantial amount of weight or has been at an
extremely low weight (i.e. BMI is less than 16.00) and has had difficulty gaining weight
appropriately;or young person has lost weight and crossed multiple standard centile lines
below his/her individual BMI curve
Note: Percentile lines on a specific growth chart refer to standard cut-offs to assess weight, height
and body size; each centile line represents the percentage of individuals of that age and gender who
fall below that line. For example the 25th centile indicates that 25% of normally developing children
or adults of that age and gender fall below that line; the 50th centile line indicates that the average
child/adult at that age and gender falls on that line.
If the interviewer has evidence that the person has been seen in a clinical context and there has been
concern about their weight, the interviewer can still rate. The participant may not have been
concerned, but if there is evidence of concern from others, then the interviewer can use that to rate
the item.
15
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
Note: Common nutritional deficiencies observed among individuals with ARFID include iron deficiency
(anaemia), low Vitamin D, low Vitamin B12, low calcium, low folate, among others
If yes, please provide details of when prescribed, what is taken and how much:
Note: If prescribed, clarify that the individual is taking the supplement.
16
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
If the young person/adult does not endorse any impact, “Did it impact your family/significant other in
the past? Have they got(ten) used to your way of eating and made special accommodations to avoid
any difficulties? Have they made these accommodations in the past month?”
Note: Examples of special accommodations include family not going on holiday/vacation without
packing special foods, family members not cooking in communal kitchen while the individual is
present, not being able to easily select a mutually agreeable restaurant for entire family. If the
individual does not live with family, enquire about what happens when visiting family or with a
significant other.
If the young person/adult does not live with family or significant other and is not in contact with
family consider rating as 888 (not applicable)
Rating:
0 — No impact
1—
2 — Mild impact (e.g., family members/significant others are somewhat concerned, or
family selects among a handful of restaurants for family outings to avoid difficulties)
3—
4 — Marked impact (e.g., family members/ significant others are seriously concerned and
this occasionally impacts family functioning, or family can only go to social events or on
vacation if packing preferred food to avoid difficulties)
5—
6 — Extreme impact (e.g., family members/significant others are seriously concerned and
this greatly impacts family functioning, behaviour; family does not go to any social events or
on any vacations to avoid difficulties)
If the young person/adult does not live with family or significant other and does not visit family often
consider rating as 888 (not applicable)
Rating:
0 — No difficulty
1—
2 — Mild difficulty (e.g. occasional disputes/difficult behaviour)
3—
4 — Marked difficulty (e.g. regular disputes /difficult behaviour)
5—
6 — Extreme difficulty (e.g. constant disputes/disrupted relationships/unmanageable
behaviour)
Rating:
17
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
0 — No impairment; young person/adult is able to join the family or others eating together
comfortably with minimal difficulties/tensions or young person/adult eats alone for reasons
other than difficulty with eating
1—
2 — Mild impairment (e.g., cannot sit at the table for duration of the meal, frequent
complaints, or young person/adult sometimes eats alone due to eating difficulties)
3—
4 — Moderate impairment (e.g., frequent tantrums/disputes/distress at mealtimes, or
young person/adult often eats alone due to eating difficulties)
5—
6 — Severe impairment (e.g., refuses to eat with others, considerable disruption,
behavioural difficulties, distress or young person/adult always eats alone due to eating
difficulties)
18
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
2 — Some coaxing required (e.g. after some period of independent eating or only with
certain foods)
3—
4 — Frequent coaxing required (e.g. needs encouragement for each mouthful)
5—
6 — Extreme coaxing required (e.g. required to be fed every mouthful)
If the young person/adult does not endorse difficulties but the interviewer is aware from an earlier
item that special accommodations have been made (e.g., young person brings special food to camp,
adult bring special food to parties, person goes to parties only after they know the dinner portion of
the evening will be completed), ask “If these accommodations were not in place, would that cause
you difficulties?”
Rating:
0 — No impairment
1—
2 — Mild difficulty
3—
4 — Marked difficulty
5—
6 — Extreme difficulty
How old were you when the avoidant or restrictive eating began?
19
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
50. Over the past month has it bothered you to have food around your mouth or on your hands?
Rating:
0 — No sensitivity
1—
2 — Mild sensitivity
3—
4 — Moderate sensitivity
5—
6 — Extreme sensitivity leading to avoidance (e.g., frequent wiping or washing)
51. Over the past month has brushing your teeth bothered you?
Rating:
0 — No oral sensitivity
1—
2 — Mild oral sensitivity
3—
4 — Moderate oral sensitivity
5—
6 — Extreme oral sensitivity leading to avoidance
Note: Only score if young person/adult does not like to brush teeth because of oral sensitivity. Do not
score if oral sensitivity is absent and failing to brush teeth is part of a broader picture of difficult
behaviour or poor self-care or self-neglect.
52: Over the past month have strong food smells bothered you?
Rating:
0 — No sensitivity to smell
1—
2 — Mild sensitivity to smell
3—
4 — moderate sensitivity to smell
5—
6 — Extreme sensitivity to smell leading to avoidance
53. Over the past month, have you been sensitive to variation in taste? Do you notice slight
differences in the taste of foods? (e.g., rejecting one type of orange juice because it tastes slightly
different to their preferred type; noticing if recipe is prepared slightly differently from before)
Rating:
0 — No sensitivity to variation in taste
1—
2 — Mild sensitivity to variation in taste
3—
4 — Moderate sensitivity to variation in taste
5—
6 — Extreme sensitivity to variation in taste leading to avoidance (even if only one or two
foods)
20
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
54. Over the past month, have you had strong temperature preferences? (e.g., all foods must be
served cold)
Rating:
0 — No temperature sensitivity
1—
2 — Mild temperature sensitivity
3—
4 — Moderate temperature sensitivity
5—
6 — Extreme temperature sensitivity leading to avoidance (even if only one or two foods)
55. Over the past month have you been particularly sensitive to the texture or consistency of food?
If so, which foods, drinks or textures/consistencies? Have you had difficulty eating foods that have
multiple components mixed together (e.g., pasta with sauce; sandwiches)?
Rating:
0 — No sensitivity to texture/consistency
1—
2 — Some sensitivity to certain textures/consistencies
3—
4 — Moderate sensitivity to certaintextures/consistencies
5—
6— Extreme sensitivity to certain textures/consistencies (e.g., resulting in gagging/choking
or leading to complete avoidance)
56. Over the past month, has the smell of food been important to you in deciding whether to eat it?
Rating:
0 — Never
1—
2 — For some foods
3—
4 — For most foods
5—
6— For all foods without exception (smells all foods before eating)
Note: Probe with extra question. For example, do you have to smell food before you decide whether
to eat it?
57. Over the past month, have you been put off food if it doesn’t look “right” (e.g., burnt ends of
chips/fries, broken biscuits/cookies)?
Rating:
0 — Not sensitive to the appearance of food
1—
2 — Sensitive to the appearance of some foods
3—
4 — Sensitive to the appearance of most foods
5—
6— Extremely sensitive to the appearance of food (e.g., it must look “just right” before
eating)
58. Over the past month, have you preferred foods to be a certain colour (e.g. beige, brown)?
21
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
Rating:
0 — Eats food of a variety of colours
1—
2 — Eats foods of most colours
3—
4 — Eats foods of a limited range of colours (e.g. a range of beige/brown foods plus one
other)
5—
6— Only accepts foods of a certain colour group
Note: The respondent need not choose foods specifically for their colour. This item can still be rated
positively if the patient primarily eats foods of a certain colour group (e.g., white, beige) but says that
he or she prefers those foods for other reasons (e.g., taste, texture, familiarity).
59. Over the past month, have you preferred to eat food of a specific brand? If the packaging of
your preferred food changes, has it put you off?
Rating:
0 — Does not mind about which brand food is
1—
2 — Some foods must be of a specific brand
3—
4 — Most foods must be of a specific brand
5—
6— Only eats foods of specific brands
Note. This item differs from item 53 (taste variation). Whereas 53 probes whether the person can
differentiate between foods after having tasted them, 59 probes whether the person would opt not
to eat something, based only on the brand.
61. Over the past month, how often have you forgotten to eat or found it difficult to make time to
eat?
Rating:
0 — Never forgets or doesn’t make time to eat
1—
2 — Sometimes forgets or doesn’t make time to eat
3—
4 — Often forgets or doesn’t make time to eat
5—
6 — Always forgets or doesn’t make time to eat
62. Over the past month, how often have you looked forward to eating (even if just preferred food)
22
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
before mealtimes?
Rating
0 — Always
1—
2 — Often
3—
4 — Sometimes
5—
6 — Never
63. Over the past month, how often have you had a good appetite (i.e. when food is in front of you,
even just preferred foods, do you feel like you want to eat it)?
Rating:
0 — Good appetite at all meals
1—
2 — Good appetite at most meals
3—
4 — Poor appetite at most meals
5—
6 — Poor appetite at all meals
64. Over the past month, have you ever needed prompting or reminding to eat, even if it is your
preferred food?
Rating:
0 — Never needs prompting to eat
1—
2 — Sometimes needs prompting to eat
3—
4 — Often needs prompting to eat
5—
6 — Always needs prompting to eat
65. Over the past month, have you ever eaten less when you were anxious, upset or worried?
Rating:
0 — Never eats less in response to negative feelings
1—
2 — Sometimes eats less in response to negative feelings
3—
4 — Often eats less in response to negative feelings
5—
6 — Always eats less in response to negative feelings
66. Over the past month, have you ever eaten less when you were happy, excited or looking forward
to something?
Rating:
0 — Never eats less in response to positive feelings
1—
2 — Sometimes eats less in response to positive feelings
3—
4 — Often eats less in response to positive feelings
5—
23
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
67. Over the past month, to what extent have you found eating to be a chore?
Rating:
0 — Not at all
1—
2 — Slightly
3—
4 — Moderately
5—
6 — Totally
68. Over the past month, how often have you enjoyed food or eating (even if only a narrow range of
foods)?
Rating
0 — Always
1—
2 — Often
3—
4 — Sometimes
5—
6 — Never
69. Over the past month, how often have you been full before your meal is finished or sooner than
others?
Rating:
0 — Never gets full before meals are finished
1—
2 — Sometimes gets full before meals are finished
3—
4 — Often gets full before meals are finished
5—
6 — Always gets full before meals are finished
70. Over the past month, how often have you felt uncomfortable when you are full?
Rating:
0 — Never feels uncomfortable when full
1—
2 — Sometimes feels uncomfortable when full
3—
4 — Often feels uncomfortable when full
5—
6 — Always feels uncomfortable when full
71a. Have you ever had an experience where you thought you might choke that has made you more
careful about eating (e.g., a choking episode, tube insertion, medical investigation)? (Yes/No)
24
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
71b. Over the past 4 weeks, have you been concerned that eating will make you choke to the extent
that it has restricted the amount or the type of food that you eat?
Rating
0 — Never
1—
2 — Sometimes
3—
4 — Often
5—
6 — Always
72a. Have you ever had an episode of vomiting (e.g., norovirus, food poisoning) or diarrhoea that
has made you more careful about eating? (Yes/No)
72b. Over the past 4 weeks, have you been concerned that eating will make you vomit (i.e.,
involuntarily) or cause diarrhea to the extent that it has restricted the amount or the type of food
that you eat?
Rating
0 — Never
1—
2 — Sometimes
3—
4 — Often
5—
6 — Always
73a. Have you ever had an allergic or other adverse physical reaction to a food that has made you
more careful about eating? (Yes/No)
73b. Over the past 4 weeks, have you been worried that food might be harmful to you in any way
(e.g., that your food might contain an allergen, even though you has been reassured that it does not)
to the extent that it has restricted the amount or the type of food that you eat?
Rating
0 — Never
1—
2 — Sometimes
3—
4 — Often
5—
6 — Always
74a. Have you ever had severe stomach pain or other abdominal discomfort (e.g., bloating,
constipation) after eating? (Yes/No)
74b. Over the past 4 weeks, have you been worried that eating might cause you pain (e.g., stomach
pain) to the extent that it has restricted the amount or the type of food that you eat?
0 — Never
1—
2 — Sometimes
3—
25
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
4 — Often
5—
6 — Always
75. Over the past month, have you felt afraid of eating? (Note: The fear must be of the act of eating
itself and any immediate aversive consequences. Do not count fear of becoming fat.)
Rating
0 — No fear
1—
2 — Mild fear
3—
4 — Marked fear
5—
6 — Extreme fear
76. Over the past month, have you spent much time worrying that something bad might happen if
you eat? Has worrying about eating interfered with your ability to concentrate on things you were
actively engaged in, for instance, watching television, reading, playing computer games (etc.)?
(Note: Do not count fear of becoming fat.)
Rating
0 — No concentration impairment
1—
2 — Some concentration impairment
3—
4 — Marked concentration impairment
5—
6 — Extreme concentration impairment
77. Over the past month have you been avoiding or restricting the amount or type of food you eat,
because you were afraid that something bad might happen, like being sick, choking, having an
allergic reaction, or being in pain?
Note: Individuals with vomiting phobia may avoid foods that they worry are spoiled, or restrict
overall amount in order to avoid feeling uncomfortably full. Individuals with choking phobia may
avoid eating entirely (in extreme cases), or avoid foods that they perceive as difficult to chew or
swallow. For individuals with allergies, only count food restriction that is beyond what would be
medically required to avoid an actual allergic reaction.
Rating:
0 — No food restriction due to fear of aversive consequences
1—
2 — Mild food restriction of amount and/or variety due to fear of aversive consequences
3—
4 — Moderate food restriction of amount and/or variety due to fear of aversive
consequences
5—
6 — extreme food restriction (e.g., no oral intake at all) due to fear of aversive consequences
78. Over the past month have you experienced physical anxiety symptoms (e.g., racing heart, sweaty
palms, nausea) when you have seen something that reminded you of: vomiting, choking, having an
allergic reaction, or being in pain while eating?
(Ask according to type of fear)
26
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
Note: A trigger for an individual with choking phobia might be witnessing another person choking
(e.g., in person or on video) or exposure to a food similar to the one on which they initially choked. A
reminder for an individual with vomiting phobia might be seeing actual vomit, witnessing a person
vomiting, or being in proximity to someone at risk for vomiting (e.g., a person with the flu). A
reminder for someone who has undergone a painful medical procedure might be viewing a feeding
tube or related equipment.
Rating:
0 — no physical anxiety symptoms
1—
2 — mild physical anxiety symptoms
3—
4 — moderate physical anxiety symptoms
5—
6 — extreme physical anxiety symptoms, or avoids all opportunities for exposure due to
fear of physical anxiety symptoms
79. Over the past month have you avoided food or eating situations that you were worried might
make you vomit, choke, have an allergic reaction, or be in pain while eating?
Note: Do not count instances where the fear restricts travel modalities (e.g. air, sea, car) or activities
such as riding amusement park rides, for fear of vomiting, as this might be more indicative of specific
phobia. Individuals with choking phobia may avoid social eating situations in which they cannot
control the type of food that will be presented. For individuals with food allergies, the avoidance
must be above and beyond what would be realistically required to manage the allergy (e.g., an
individual with coeliac disease must avoid eating gluten, but typically could safely sit at the table
with others eating gluten, so avoiding eating with others due to exposure fears would count as
problematic avoidance for this item).
Rating:
0 — no avoidance
1—
2 — avoids some opportunities for exposure
3—
4 — avoids most opportunities for exposure; interferes with functioning
5—
6 — avoids all opportunities for exposure; greatly interferes with functioning
80. Over the past month have you done anything special before or during eating to prevent you from
gagging, vomiting, choking, having an allergic reaction, or being in pain while eating?
Note: Examples might include chewing very slowly, taking long breaks in between bites, drinking
more fluids than necessary during the meal.
Rating:
0 — no safety behaviours
1—
2 — mild safety behaviours or infrequent use of safety behaviours
3—
4 — moderate safety behaviours or frequent use of safety behaviours
5—
6 — severe safety behaviours that must be repeated at every single eating opportunity
81. DSM-5 Criterion B: (Assessor uses judgement): The disturbance is better explained by a lack of
available food or by an associated culturally sanctioned practice. (Yes/No)
27
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
82. DSM 5 Criterion C: (assessor uses judgement) The respondent has anorexia nervosa (SCREEN) or
bulimia nervosa (SCREEN) or related disorder, and there is evidence of a disturbance in the way the
individual experiences their body weight or shape. (Yes/No/NA)
83. DSM-5 Criterion D: (Assessor uses judgement): If the respondent has a medical condition
[SCREEN], an intellectual disability [SCREEN], other neurodevelopmental disorder [SCREEN], or other
mental disorder [SCREEN] that explains the eating disturbance, its severity exceeds that usually
associated with the condition and requires additional clinical attention? (Yes/No/NA)
Sensory Profile: To obtain a score on this profile, add 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, and divide
by 10. Higher scores indicate a sensory component to ARFID. Further, if one or more items are
scored ≥ 4, this indicates a possible sensory component.
Lack of Interest Profile: To obtain a score on this profile, add 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 66, 67, 68, 69, 70,
and divide by 11. Higher scores indicate a lack of interest component to ARFID. Further, if one or
more items are scored ≥ 4, this indicates a possible ‘lack of interest’ component.
Concern Profile: To obtain a score on this profile, add 71b, 72b, 73b, 74b, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, and
divide by 10. Higher scores indicate a concern component to ARFID. Further, if one or more items
are scored ≥ 4, this indicates a possible concern component.
ARFID Severity Scale: Add: items 29a, 29b, 29c, 29d, 29e, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47,
48, and divide by 17. However, if the respondent did not answer item 30 (because 100% tube-fed)
and/or items 40, 41, and/or 46 (because not applicable or not developmentally appropriate), then
instead of dividing by 17, divide by the total number of items actually rated. The higher the score,
the greater the ARFID severity.
Note: Item 45 is measured in minutes and therefore cannot be included in the rating above
Specify as Current or In Remission (i.e., “After full criteria for ARFID were previously met, the
criteria have not been met for a sustained period of time.”): ______
28
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
DSM-5 Criterion A:
84. Over the past month, has food come back up into your mouth during or after eating, or have you
brought food back up into your mouth? (Yes/No)
DSM-5 Criterion B:
85. To differentiate from vomiting:
Does it feel different from “throwing up” or “being sick”, and in what way? (Yes/No)
Note: In contrast to frank vomiting, rumination-related regurgitation appears effortless and occurs
without apparent nausea, retching, or disgust.
87. Have you ever received a medication for reflux, and if so, did it reduce the regurgitation?
(Yes/No)
Note: A formal diagnosis of gastroesophogeal reflux disease [GORD/GERD] would have been caught
earlier on in the screen, but these items may help detect undiagnosed reflux that could better explain
regurgitation symptoms. Gastroesophageal reflux is not a rule-out for rumination disorder, but the
rumination-related regurgitation must occur in addition to any regurgitation that would normally be
associated with reflux. Importantly, whereas GORD/GERD medication should reduce the frequency
and severity of reflux in an individual with GORD/GERD, it may have no effect, a partial effect or even
an exacerbatory effect on regurgitation in an individual with rumination disorder.
RD Severity Item
88. Can you control whether food comes back up into your mouth during these episodes? If yes, how
often?
Rating:
0 — can control on 100% of occasions
1—
2 — can control on more than 50% of occasions
3—
4 — can control on less than 50% of occasions
5—
6 — cannot control at all (NB: i.e. a habitual response but not due to reflux)
RD Severity Item
89. In the past month, how many days have you had rumination (i.e., food coming back up into your
mouth)?
Rating:
0 — No rumination
1 — Rumination on 1 to 5 days
2 — Rumination on less than half the days (6 to 12 days)
3 — Rumination on half the days (13 to 15 days)
4 — Rumination on more than half the days (16 to 22 days)
29
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
90. Now let’s ONLY think about the days over the past month that you HAVE brought food back up
into your mouth. Has the number of regurgitations varied much from day to day? …Over the past
month, on the days you have regurgitated, what is the lowest number of times that food has come
back up into your mouth? What is the highest number of times?
91. Over the past month, on the days that you HAVE regurgitated, what would you say is the
AVERAGE number of times that food has come back up into your mouth?
Rating: Average number of regurgitations on days when rumination has occurred________
Note: The average number should fall between the minimum and maximum provided in item 90.
Some individuals may be unable to specify a number as it is too high. In this instance a rating of 777
should be made.
93. Over the past month, how often after eating did you re-chew, re-swallow, or spit out the food
that came back up into your mouth?
Rating:
Re-chewed on ____% of eating episodes in past month
Re-swallowed on _____% of eating episodes in past month
Spat out on _____% of eating episodes in past month
94. On a typical day over the past month when rumination has occurred, how much time have you
spent ruminating?
Rating: Minutes per day______________
(on days when rumination has occurred, to include all episodes):
Advise that if all day every day rater should score 777
95. DSM-5 Criterion C: (Assessor uses judgement): The respondent has an eating disorder [SCREEN]
or ARFID [ARFID section], which would trump a diagnosis of rumination disorder. (Yes/No)
96. DSM-5 Criterion B: (Assessor uses judgement): The respondent has a medical condition
[SCREEN], which explains the regurgitation. (Yes/No)
30
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
97. DSM-5 Criterion D (Assessor uses judgement): If the respondent has an intellectual disability
[SCREEN], other neurodevelopmental disorder [SCREEN], or other mental disorder [SCREEN], do the
rumination symptoms require additional clinical attention (see below for impairment)? (Yes/No)
How old were you when the rumination symptoms first began?
99. Over the past month, has bringing food back up into your mouth caused any serious problems
for you at home, at school/work, or with your family/friends? Have you had to do anything special
to hide your regurgitations from other people?
Note: Examples include experiencing bullying, teasing or name calling, contributing to relationship
difficulties, inability to eat with others, attempts to avoid detection of rumination such as turning
head away, covering mouth, or walking away from others etc.
Rating:
0 — No psychosocial impairment
1—
2 — Mild psychosocial impairment (e.g., endures social situations with distress)
3—
4 — Marked psychosocial impairment (e.g., avoids some social situations, friends frequently
teasing about smell of vomit)
5—
6 — Extreme psychosocial impairment (e.g., avoids all social situations, does not spend time
with friends due to fear of rejection based on regurgitation behaviour)
100. Over the past month, have you experienced any medical problems from bringing food back up
into your mouth (examples include heartburn, dental cavities, weight loss, etc.)?
Rating:
0 — No medical problems
1—
2 — One mild medical problem (e.g., possibly related dental cavities or mild heartburn)
3—
4 — One moderate medical problem or multiple mild medical problems (e.g., moderate
weight-loss or heartburn requiring additional medical attention or medication)
5—
6 — At least one severe medical problem (e.g., severe weight loss or several obviously
related dental cavities requiring dental treatment)
31
PARDI Self 14+ Oct 2020
Criteria met for diagnosis of Rumination Disorder?: Assessor evaluates based on judgement, but a
diagnosis of Rumination Disorder is likely given the following response pattern: 84-yes; 85-yes; 89—
4 or greater; 92–yes to one or more; 95—no; 96 no, 97—yes).
Severity: Add ratings for 88, 89, 98, 99, 100 and divide by 5.
90a, 90b, 91, 93 and 94 are additional severity measures but do not have a 0-6 scale. These might be
used when more data are available.
Specify as Current or In Remission (i.e., “After full criteria for rumination disorder were previously
met, the criteria have not been met for a sustained period of time.”): ______
32