1 PB PDF
1 PB PDF
1 PB PDF
org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
Vol.4, No.23, 2014
Introduction
As philosophers of education take interest in analyzing concepts that have relevance to education, they
have also recognized the fact that education itself needs clarification and application. Analyzing and applying the
concept of education is the pre-eminent point of all analysis of educational concepts because determining
concepts that are connected to it that need clarification would be almost impossible in the absence of such a task.
In the effort to analyse the concept of education, Richard S. Peters has been at the front burner. In the opening
paragraph of his edited book The Concept of Education, he pointed out that in exploring the concept of
education, a territory is being entered where there are few signposts. It is not surprising, therefore, that “in
presenting at the start what amounts to a bird’s eye view of the contours of this territory, I have to rely on my
own previous attempt (Peters 1967). Peters has in a consistent manner tried to sharpen his ideas of the concept in
several of his writings following his Famous (1963) inaugural lecture on “Education as initiation”.
As a tribute to Peters, all serious attempts to analyse the concept of education since his initial effort
have been footnotes to his ideas (Enoh 2002). The same line of thought shall suffice here. The first part of the
task shall be to render what may be rightly referred to as his concept of education and the educated man. In the
second part, some attempts shall be made to determine the extent to which leadership recruitment in Nigeria
meets those criteria and the implications of such standard or otherwise on governance. Out of the numerous
books on which Peters has attempted to analyse the concept, only two will be used here. These are chapter One
of his Ethics and Education (1966) and “what is an educational process” the chapter he contributed in his edited
book, the concept of education (1977). References will also be made to other relevant works of his as they
become necessary.
140
Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
Vol.4, No.23, 2014
141
Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
Vol.4, No.23, 2014
Also the attitudinal aspect requires that the knowledge acquired must not be inert in two ways. Firstly, it
must transform the individual’s outlook. Secondly, it must improve some form of knowledge on the part of the
individual who acquired the knowledge (Peters 1966:31). This attitudinal transformation can be regarded as
representing “Good” in education which implies increase in human knowledge, consciousness and
understanding. These goods, Babarinde (2000) regards as “cognitive goods” which must be demonstrated so that
they will not be inert in him. Peters argues that we should refrain from calling anyone educated until he shows
proof that what he claims to know and understand affects his ways of looking at things.
Corroborating Peters criterion Randall as cited by Ekpu (2010:10) demands
…the leader must know, must know that he knows and must be able to make it abundantly
clear to those about him that he knows.
The 1999 Nigeria constitution provides in section 131, four qualifications for the office of president
- He must be a citizen of Nigeria by birth
- He must attain the age of 40 years
- He must be a member of a political party and sponsored by that political party.
- He must be educated up to at least school certificate level or its equivalent.
The first three qualifications should not bother us here. No first school certificate holder today can be made a
managing director of a bank or a manager of a high grade restaurant in Nigeria. Is it not an irony that we should
have school certificate as the qualification for the most important office in the land at a time of great complexity
in world affairs? If our entry qualification is this low, how can we expect a high level of achievement from the
occupant since higher education is part of the preparation for higher office quarried Ekpu (2010).
Indeed, that Nigerian leaders are too inexperienced and could be dismissed as starry-eyed novices will
not leave anyone in doubt. The best instrument for the good training and discipline of the mind is education
which is important not only for all shades of occupation but most importantly for those who aspire to leadership
positions. In the process intellectual comprehension and spiritual depth which are elements of mental discipline
are developed. Plato calls them philosopher-kings-men whose thought and insight are so profound that they help
to chart a pathway for society; men who have read widely and understand the workings of business; men who
appreciate the critical role that fidelity plays in powering business to the top and indeed facilitating their plunge
to the bottom; men who posses the intellectual wherewithal to counsel corporation on tips imperative to
accelerated performance in the market place. These men will overwhelm clients with the potency of their
thoughts and ideas that drive superior market place performance. Agitated by the low level of education of
Nigerian leaders level Esiemokhai (2010:12) has recommended:
a good relevant education preferably in the fields of law, economics, sociology and political
science should frame the synthesis for grasping the complex phenomenon which statecraft actually
represents.
The possession of such knowledge will reduce the incidences of tutoring, mentoring and nurturing political
leaders who should have gone through the brain purification process earlier in life. In most successful countries,
it is the outside people not businessmen that assist government to firm up policies. Azaiki (2008) has noted that
in the United States for instance, 5, 100 think tanks support the government and look at government policies,
polish and return them to government. This process enhances governance. But in Nigeria it is the contractors that
think for government due largely to lack of knowledge and understanding of the workings of the system. When
government does not have structures that can enhance or give it capacity support, it will have problems as we
have always had in Nigeria. The attraction of education system is in its initiation who worthwhile activities of
which Nigeria has remained largely dissonant to that principle. No wonder raw power has remained the cultural
model of leadership in Nigeria (get the power before you know what to do with it)
Cognitive Criterion
Here Peters has distinguished narrowness or specialization from wholeness or broad understanding as in
an arm of knowledge. Educated man should appreciate the interrelatedness of various fields of knowledge.
According to Peters, an individual who acquires competence in some limited area may not qualify to be
described as educated because in the case of a scientist:
…the man could have a very limited conception of what he is doing. He could work
away at science without seeing its connection with much else, its place in a coherent
pattern of life: for him it is an activity which is cognitively adrift (1966:31)
Peters would be guarding against the tendency for individual becoming too restricted in what they know as such
narrow interest makes them to become like hermits without seeing the relationship between what they know or
engage in to related ones (Enoh 2002).
142
Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
Vol.4, No.23, 2014
In uncountable circumstances, our leaders have shown themselves as people who are not good chase
players. For instance, president Goodluck Jonathan in one week in 2010 has made a wrong move twice that if
Nigeria were a chessboard he would have lost his king and the game would be over. His ban on Super Eagles
and subsequent reversal of same shows that there was no blueprint for Nigeria’s football or the ban was not
thought through. Also the award of National honours to 186 in the same year on Nigerians is an indication that
national awards have been bastardized as honorary degrees that universities award to people that are not “clean”
as long as they can afford it. Just recently in the same year, a catholic university awarded former dictator General
Ibrahim Babangida and two serving governors honorary degree for exemplary leadership among other simplistic
reasons. IBB? exemplary leadership? When national awards are bestowed on people who should be ostracized
for the ignominious role they played in knocking national engine does it not say something to the rest of the
citizens? Is it not a signal that it pays to plunder your country and not to plough?
Does it not annoye common sense that Nigerian government in October 2010 decided to import 600,
000 units of plastic waste disposal with N1bn for Federal Capital territory when plastics is one industry where
she is open on equal footing with every part of the world given that the basic raw materials from crude and gas
are easily available in the country?. It could also have given the country a comparative advantage. Does such
decision not undermine the country’s image and aspiration to become one of the industrialized nations by 2020?
It is poignant to point out a recent narrowness of mind exhibited by a minister of state for education
Kenneth Gbagi in 2010 when he shamelessly confessed that his daughter was schooling in Ghana because of the
hydra-headed problems of Nigerian education. It is unthinkably that a managing director of the soap I patronize
would say his wife does not use the product he manufactures. Should a man who is not a stakeholder in Nigerian
education be allowed to remain in such a ministry? Whatever happened to moral? The same position accounts
for why Nigerian leaders never bother to rescue education from collapse. The president of Ghana waded in and
averted the strike early enough embarked upon by the University Teachers Association of Ghana. If it were in
Nigeria, the government would have shown apathy until the issue becomes a scandal. If militants threaten to
strike and lecturers threaten same, it is sure the former will get attention first. In the little mind of Nigerian
leaders, militants are more powerful. Little do they realize that teachers/lecturers can do worse in crippling
minds and paralyzing children’s future and outright destruction of a generation. When the chips are down,
leaders whose children school abroad would realize lately that they are not safe as one thing is always the
consequence of another. Is it surprising therefore that the narrowness of mind of leadership in Nigeria prompts
them to repeat effective gauge and plaster therapy for deep national problems?
Indeed, the same lack of cognition is at play when political office holders shamelessly defect from the
parties on whose platform they are serving to other parties and still retain such mandates. Morality is thrown to
the wind. They need to be reminded that ethics has to do with creating values which symbolizes excellence in
behaviour. Accordingly, ethics shape behaviour while behaviour drives performance in every facet of life. It is
therefore of utmost importance to ensure connectivity and where there is any disconnect as we have seen, leaders
are bound to under perform which has been a collective experience in Nigeria. Is it not sickening to note that
25% of annual national budget is spent on national assembly members while the ordinary worker is fighting to
earn a paltry N18,000 a month. Does such a situation not amount to the height of disservice and portend danger
for such a country? Total absence of cognition in leadership is a dangerous weapon that can destroy a nation.
143
Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
Vol.4, No.23, 2014
legitimate votes cast in periodic election as constitutionally prescribed. A democratic system of government
observed Fashola (2008) must pass the credibility test on at least two levels.
Credibility of the government in power at a particular time in terms of its capacity to retain the
confidence of the people through fulfilling the electoral promises that earned it the popular mandate. In exchange
for the mandate conferred on it on trust by the people, the government is under obligation to fulfill its electoral
promises. The degree of success with which it does this will be a critical determinant of its triumph or failure in
future elections.
Credibility of the integrity of the electoral process and its capacity to ensure that government assumes
and retains power only in accordance with the majority will expressed in free and fair election.
That elections in Nigeria are brazenly rigged as exemplified in multiple thumb-printing, figure juggling,
mass violence, ballot box snatching and stuffing is no longer news. That weak capacity is a preponderant quality
of Nigeria’s leaders, a quality shared by their aids and consultants is a naked truth. That these parliamentary
support persons are mostly drawn from their friends and cronies for personal reason rather than added value
professionalism or expertise stares every Nigerian on the face. Given this scenario, gross inability to discharge
the two aspects of legislators responsibility- representation and oversight is a common experience. Because they
were appointed and not elected, their accountability is first to their godfather and so they have no business with
their constituencies. In conducting their oversight, there have been many cases of compromise and lack of
patriotism. The case of Farouk Lawal in the fuel subsidy scam where the hunter has become the hunted is a case
in point. The flaws associated with the mode of transmission criterion in respect of elections in Nigeria has
paved the way for the wide gulf between promises and performance and thus create credibility crises both for the
government in particular and the democratic system as a whole.
Consequences
It is widely believed and rightly too, that no nation, no matter how wishful she thinks, can just wake up
to greatness as greatness, either for nation or individuals is a product of great planning, thinking, focus,
concentration and preparation. Where these qualities are lacking as in the case of Nigeria as a reference point,
what should be expected? Can the Nigeria project from the exploration so far show evidence of greatness? If any
greatness is observed, can it be in the positive or negative direction? Does any one require extra ordinary insight
to appreciate the fact that the criteria of education and the educated man are far from constituting the hallmark of
leadership in Nigeria hence the stories of woes that are daily being told about the country that parades herself as
a “giant”.
The common currency among Nigerian leaders has been sheer greed, inordinate ambition and
desperation for power. Their actions have been such that offend civil society through mis-implementation of
budget, mismanagement of national and world economy, the over manipulation of the stock market, the banks
and the financial sector, the constraining of the manufacturing sector and industries, and utmostly, the provision
of more darkness than light, less power and energy, less food for the tables and less money for the pockets by
way of corruption and bad policies. To Nigerian leaders, civil society should be sub-human with only them
approximating the human conditions of the second and third worlds.
As a result, the country has become a place where savage instincts enjoy free rein and life too cheap and
utterly worthless as government no longer exercises monopoly over the instruments of force, authority and
violence as should be the case in every enclave ruled by sane humans. No thanks to bad roads, dilapidated
vehicles, reckless driving, drugless hospitals, striking doctors, nurses and lecturers, bad and trigger-hungry
policemen, undisciplined armed forces members, hunger and diseases, generally polluted and un-hygienic
environment, decline of the rule of law, weak civil service, economic decay, hopelessness and declining life
expectancy. The fall out of embarking on a mission they are ill-equipped to accomplish-mentally, strategically,
politically and spiritually translates to a house built on the quick sand of illegalities, imposition and injustice,
which will continue to crumble under the weight of truth and incontrovertible evidence. The struggle is not of
brawn but of the brains. The list is endless. In the face of all these negativities, staying alive in Nigeria is a
miracle and an achievement worth celebrating. No nation, no matter how wishful she thinks, can just wake up to
greatness. Greatness, either for nation or individual is a product of great planning, thinking, focus, concentration
and preparation.
144
Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
Vol.4, No.23, 2014
sight. The glaring disconnect between the people and those that lead them is a function of the nexus between the
ineptitude of the leadership and the acute poverty that characterizes the lives of the citizens. Because they are
convinced, lacked character and have learnt nothing to transform themselves through conscientious service to the
people, the country that should have been flying by now is still in a crawling position. Falling short of the criteria
of education has presented leadership in Nigeria as an establishment that has destroyed the dreams of their
fathers at independence, frittered away the wealth of the children and seeing nothing wrong about destroying the
future of their grand children.
It is hereby recommended that leadership recruitment is a challenge and should be for people who have
intermingled with history, battled with vision and have sieved out pragmatic vision from frwolous illusion, men
who have developed a sense of love for the well being of others whose hand can reach the higher strata including
the celestial stratum and whose love can subdue innate jealousy and can use their strategies to score needle-point
excellence. Education of the citizenry that will arm them with the boldness to insist on a genuine debate on the
pedigree, character, competence and ideas offered by each aspirant and to freely make a choice that must be
respected is the answer to Nigeria’s lunatic leadership” as described by Chinweizu.
REFERENCES
Adeyeye, J. (2010). Something better than generational shift in The Punch Newspaper Tuesday, September 28,
back page.
Azaiki, S. (2008). We are building our democracy more on hope in The Guardian Newspaper Thursday October
2 p. 8
Babarinde, K. (2000). Is patriotism educationally relevant in K. Babarinde (ed) Education and the challenge of
patriotism in Nigerian. Ibadan: The Caxton Press pp.21-26.
Enoh, A. (2002). Social and Philosophical foundations of education: a collection of papers. Jos: Saniez
Ekpu, R. (2010). Leadership: the flock or the fleece in Newswatch magazine 52 (14) pp. 10-13.
Esiemokhai, E. O. (2010). Law and morality in Nigeria. Retrieved from http://wwwfocusnigeria.com Assessed
on 14/2/2013.
Fashola, B. (2008). Setting a new agenda for credible governance in Nigeria, being a lecture delivered at the
maiden annual democracy day organized by Nigerian Union of Journalists, Lagos State chapter on June
12.
Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999) Constitution of the federal Republic of Nigeria. Lagos: Federal Government
press.
Peters, R. S. (1966) Ethics and Education. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Peters, R. S. (1972) What is an educational process? in R. S. Peters (ed) The Concept of Education. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
145