Ocratoxina A
Ocratoxina A
Ocratoxina A
Introduction
766 Reproduction (photocopying) of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.
Kuca(09-044).qxd:Article template 9/1/10 9:09 AM Page 2
With regards to cases of chronic exposition of OTA from con- 2.8 ng/mL. The mixture was injected into flow of water (flow rate
taminated food, there is a need to develop new faster and more 0.2 mL/min) and delivered to fluorescence detector. Then fluo-
sensitive methods for its determination. Chromatographic rescence spectra were collected in the range λex = 200–420 nm
methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (step 5 nm) and λem = 300–500 nm (step 5 nm). The bandwidth
(9–14) or thin-layer chromatography (15,16), are the most used of monochromator was 20 nm. Fluorescence spectra were evalu-
in OTA determination. Fluorescence detection is still preferred ated, and excitation and emission wavelength yielding maximum
beyond the more expensive mass spectrometry (17). fluorescence intensity were recorded.
Fluorescence intensity and sensitivity of analytical analysis
strongly depends on solution composition, such as concentra- Calibration solutions
tion and type of ions, pH, aqueous-to-organic phase ratio, Calibration solutions were prepared fresh from stock solution
cyclodextrin addition (10), terbium (III) ion presence (13), etc. In of OTA by dilution with an appropriate amount of mobile phase.
this work the influence of commonly used buffers, phosphate All solutions were stored at 4°C in dark place until the analysis.
and acetate, was investigated with relation to fluorescence inten- Spiked samples were prepared by addition of pure mycotoxin
sity of OTA. standard into wheat flour samples and stored for one day. After
767
Kuca(09-044).qxd:Article template 9/1/10 9:09 AM Page 3
tonitrile-buffer ratio. The second excitation maximum was pH- at 230 nm with the exception of phosphate-acetonitrile ratio
dependent and observed at either 335 nm or 380 nm. Otherwise, 14:86. Acetates had significantly higher fluorescence emissions
the maximum emission wavelength was pH-dependent. While for acetate adjusted with potassium hydroxide than ammonium
solutions with pH 3.0 showed fluorescence maximum emission at 380 nm. Phosphates buffers adjusted with potassium
at 460 nm, the samples with higher pH (5.0 and 9.0) did it at hydroxide had 50% higher fluorescence intensity than those
445 nm. adjusted with ammonium in solutions with high aqueous por-
OTA is presented in two forms at pH 3.0, where the non-disso- tion content. This behavior is changing in solution with higher
ciated one is predominant (96%) and dissociated at carboxylic acetonitrile content.
group of phenylalanine moiety is in minority (4%) (Figure 2).
Influence of acetonitrile
Selection of pH and composition of buffer The fluorescence intensity of most of measurements per-
There were not significant differences between OTA fluores- formed was constant or decreased with increasing acetonitrile
cence intensity in buffers with pH 3.0. No influence of phos- content. Also, this rule is applicable for water-acetonitrile mix-
phate, acetate, potassium, ammonium, and oxonium ions were tures. There were some abnormalities registered at buffer-ace-
768
Kuca(09-044).qxd:Article template 9/1/10 9:09 AM Page 4
Discussion The detection limit reached for samples with pure OTA was 0.3
ng/mL. This is comparable with results obtained by other
For buffer solutions, a concentration of 83 mM anion (acetate authors, which used pH 9.8 and 20 mM NH4Cl/NH3 buffer (20).
respective phosphate) was selected, which is the most often used Finally, the developed method was applied for analysis of
in OTA determination by high-performance liquid chromatog- spiked cereal samples, and obtained results were compared with
commonly used method (22). Reference method uses ODS-
Hypersil C18 reversed-phase column (Supelco; 250 × 4.6 mm, 5
raphy (18). OTA shows excitation maximum at 335 nm in acidic
solutions (pH 3.0 and 5.0) and 380 nm in alkaline buffers. All
these observations can be explained by phototautomerization µm). The mobile phase flow rate was 1 mL/min, and isocratic
(19, 20). OTA is a weak acid with dissociation constant pKa equal elution with a mixture of acetonitrile–water–acetic acid (99:99:2;
approximately to 4.4 for carboxyl group of phenylalanine and 7.1 v/v/v) was applied. The sample injection volume was 50 µL. OTA
for phenolic group (20). The measured fluorescence spectra at was detected by fluorescence detector with excitation wave-
pH 3.0 are mostly of non-dissociated OTA. The dissociated OTA length of 333 nm and emission wavelength of 477 nm.
undergoes a structural change in the excited state (phototau- While the standard method has the detection limit for OTA
tomerization) that increases conjugation to generate the red- determination in real samples 2.3 µg/mL, the newly developed
Acknowledgment
Table II. Fluorescence Emission of Ochratoxin A*
This work was supported by Internal Grant Agency of Mendel
Acetonitrile-83 mM buffer ratio University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno number
Buffer composition 2:98 13:87 50:50 86:14 100:0 MP32/AF-2008.
pH anion cation LU LU LU LU LU
769
Kuca(09-044).qxd:Article template 9/1/10 9:09 AM Page 5
5. V. Sava, O. Reunova, A. Velasquez, and J. Sanchez-Ramos. Can low performance liquid chromatography with enhanced fluorescence
exposure to ochratoxin A cause parkinsonism? J. Neurol. Sci. 249: detection and immunoaffinity column cleanup: methodology and
68–75 (2006). Swiss data. J. Chromatogr. B 666: 85–99 (1995).
6. F.N. Kotsinos and G.A. Burdock. Food Toxicology. In Klaassen, C.D. 14. S. Kumagasi and K. Airaba. Intestinal absorption and secretion of
(ed.) Casarett & Doull’s Toxiology, The Basic Science of Poisons, 7th ochratoxin A in the rat. Appl. Pharmacol. 64: 94–102 (1982).
Edition, McGraw Hill Medical, New York, pp. 1191–1236 (2008). 15. N.B. Büchmann and B. Hald. Analysis, occurrence and control of
7. JECFA. Evaluation of Certain Mycotoxins in Food. (56th Report of Ochratoxin A residues in Danish pig kidneys. Food Addit. Contam.
the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives). 2: 193–199 (1985).
Technical Reports Series No. 906, 2002. 16. S. Sforza, C. Dall’Asta, and M. Rosangela. Recent advances in
8. IARC: Ochratoxin A. In: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of mycotoxin determination in food and feed by hyphenated chro-
Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, IARS Press Vol. 56, matographic techniques/mass spektrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev.
Lyon, France, pp. 489–521 (1993). 25: 54–76 (2006).
9. P. Galtier, M. Alvinerie, and J.L. Charpenteau. The pharmacokinetic 17. H. Reinhard and B. Zimmerli. Reversed-phase liquid chromato-
profiles of ochratoxin A in pigs, rabbits and chickens. Food Cosmet. graphic behavior of the mycotoxins citrinin and ochratoxin A.
Toxicol. 19: 735–738 (1981). J. Chromatogr. A 862: 147–159 (2001).
10. V. Seidel, E. Poglits, K. Schiller, and W. Lindner. Simultaneous deter- 18. C. Frenette, R.J. Paugh, M. Tozlovanu, M. Juzio, A. Pfohl-
mination of ochratoxin A and zearalenone in maize by reversed- Leszkowicz, and R.A. Manderville. Structure-activity relationships
770