Best Practices For UFAD System PDF
Best Practices For UFAD System PDF
Best Practices For UFAD System PDF
For Underfloor
Design Phase: Cooling-Airflow
Calculations
During the design phase, engineers
carefully must determine load calcula-
tions for the building. These will differ
Air Systems
from the calculations for a ceiling-based
air-distribution system.
One difference is the amount of a partic-
ular load that enters the occupied zone. For
a ceiling-based system, the occupied zone
is effectively floor-to-ceiling, because the
space is well-mixed. For UFAD systems,
By Mike Filler the occupied zone is the vertical space from
B
the floor to 6 ft (1.8 m) above the floor.
etween 1995 and 2002, the number of new office build- This means that some loads never enter the
occupied zone. Further, if return-air grilles
ings with raised floors that use underfloor air distribution
are placed close to the building’s perimeter
(UFAD) increased approximately 40%.1 This rapid growth can be wall, convective heat gain occurring there
can be carried into the return air before it
attributed to four potential benefits UFAD offers over traditional has an opportunity to enter the occupied
zone. Both of these factors can reduce the
ceiling-based air distribution: heat load in the occupied zone. Ultimately,
this reduction in space heat gain affects
1. Lower churn costs—allows for fast and refrigeration energy, and the calculation of cooling airflow in direct
and inexpensive reconfiguration of of- 4. Potential to reduce floor-to-ceiling proportion (see Figure 1).
fice space, heights—creates cost savings in struc-
2. Improved IAQ—supplies condi- tural and façade systems. About the Author
Mike Filler is a product marketing engineer,
tioned air directly to the breathing zone, Although UFAD has increased in Engineered Systems Group, YORK International,
3. Lower energy costs—reduces fan popularity, knowledge of how to apply York, Pa.
Thermostat
Occupied Radiant
Zone Energy
Figure 1: Typical loads that do and do not enter the occupied zone. Figure 2: Temperature stratification in UFAD-cooled space.
Another difference is the room-air temperature that is used near each occupant will result in greater temperature satisfac-
for load calculations. With a ceiling-based system, the room-air tion. However, it has been found that most occupants do not
temperature is considered to be uniform, floor to ceiling. With understand that they can control airflow in their workspace, and
UFAD, there is temperature stratification within the space, with that those who do understand typically do not make changes
heat and pollutants concentrated in the upper levels. In fact, ANSI/ anyway.4 As a result, engineers may find that automatic VAV
ASHRAE Standard 55–2004 allows a vertical temperature varia- diffusers provide better comfort than manual VAV diffusers.
tion of 5.4°F (3°C) between head and ankle levels. (If an all-air
UFAD system is designed for no stratification in the occupied zone, Design Phase: Ventilation
it will use more airflow, wasting fan energy [see Figure 2]). In any VAV system, ensuring minimum ventilation is always a
Because of stratification, it is recommended that engineers con- concern, because reduced loads could cause supply-air volumes
sider using 2–3°F (1–2°C) higher thermostatic temperature for to fall so far that insufficient ventilation is supplied to the room.
UFAD systems, compared to overhead distribution.2 This should To prevent inadequate ventilation in VAV/UFAD systems, some
have a direct impact on the cooling airflow calculations. manufacturers offer optional collars to serve as a minimum
The third airflow-calculation difference concerns the heat stop for their dampers. Other manufacturers recommend using
transfer from the warm, occupied zone above, and from the a series fan-powered VAV box that pulls supply air from the
warm, return airway below in multistory buildings, into the underfloor airway and heats the air as necessary.
cool underfloor airway3 (see Figure 3). Minimum-ventilation requirements may also be met if the
This heat transfer and the resulting thermal decay (loss of sup- designer takes into account leakage from the underfloor airway
ply-air cooling ability) should be counted as part of the airflow into the conditioned space.
requirement for each zone. The heat transferred from the occupied Like the ducts in an overhead system, the underfloor airway
zone would be a credit (reduction) for cooling supply airflow quan- experiences a small amount of air leakage — through diffusers,
tities. As a rule of thumb, the supply-air temperature should not be raised-floor panels, and power-voice-data (PVD) boxes. This
allowed to increase more than 3°F (2°C) from the time it enters the leakage may meet much, if not all, of the minimum-ventilation
underfloor airway until it is discharged into the conditioned space requirement. This will also affect the amount of diffuser airflow
through the furthest terminal. If a greater thermal decay is possible needed to satisfy the space heat gain.
because of a large floorplate, unlined stub ductwork should be With precise CO2 monitoring of the room, UFAD may also
used to carry the supply air further into the airway. be able to reduce overall ventilation-air quantities more than
overhead systems. Rather than having to ventilate the entire
Design Phase: Variable-Air-Volume floor-to-ceiling space, a UFAD system only requires ventilation
Versus Constant-Air-Volume of the occupied zone. A CO2 monitoring system will recognize
Thermal decay is another good reason to specify a variable- when the occupied zone is adequately ventilated, regardless of
air-volume (VAV) UFAD system. It has been found that the the situation above 6 ft (1.8 m).
supply-air temperature is not always uniform in an underfloor
airway, and may change throughout the day. A properly de- Design Phase: Leakage Rates
signed VAV/UFAD system is adept at accommodating these While a small amount of airway leakage is desirable to handle
temperature variations. minimum ventilation requirements, excessive leakage through
There is a belief that placing a manually adjustable diffuser the floor panels into the space and other uncontrolled airflow
High-Efficiency
Filters
Damper
Dampers Supply
Outside Cooling Air
Air Coil
Supply
Fan
Filters
Commissioning Phase
Following the construction phase, the UFAD system is com-
missioned, which should include an airway-leakage test and an
airflow test. Begin by testing each primary supply fan to check
for minimum airflow with all diffusers closed or at the minimum
stop. If uncontrolled leakage (leakage not coming through the
diffusers and not what is expected through the floor) is too high,
the leakage needs to be found and corrected, and the primary
supply fan must be retested. The leakage test itself should be
repeated every few years or after any remodeling that includes
reconfiguring the UFAD system.
An airflow/SP test determines that the system can provide
adequate air to all diffusers. Typically, test one diffuser per zone
and verify that the zone controllers are functioning properly
(based upon the predefined sequence of operation). Balancing
the diffusers is necessary only on ducted diffusers (often used
along the perimeter).