Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 21 views

    BAI

    Uploaded by

    Arnand Gregory Dela Cruz
    The document presents the results of a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing four treatments in a taste evaluation study. The ANOVA table shows that the treatments had a sum of squares of 55.09 with 3 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 1.91. The error had a sum of squares of 54.58 with 8 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 0.71. The F-value was calculated as 2.69, which is not significant based on the F-tabular values at 5% and 1% levels.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    BAI

    Uploaded by

    Arnand Gregory Dela Cruz
    21 views5 pages
    The document presents the results of a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing four treatments in a taste evaluation study. The ANOVA table shows that the treatments had a sum of squares of 55.09 with 3 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 1.91. The error had a sum of squares of 54.58 with 8 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 0.71. The F-value was calculated as 2.69, which is not significant based on the F-tabular values at 5% and 1% levels.

    Original Title

    BAI (3)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document presents the results of a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing four treatments in a taste evaluation study. The ANOVA table shows that the treatments had a sum of squares of 55.09 with 3 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 1.91. The error had a sum of squares of 54.58 with 8 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 0.71. The F-value was calculated as 2.69, which is not significant based on the F-tabular values at 5% and 1% levels.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    21 views5 pages

    BAI

    Uploaded by

    Arnand Gregory Dela Cruz
    The document presents the results of a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing four treatments in a taste evaluation study. The ANOVA table shows that the treatments had a sum of squares of 55.09 with 3 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 1.91. The error had a sum of squares of 54.58 with 8 degrees of freedom and a mean square of 0.71. The F-value was calculated as 2.69, which is not significant based on the F-tabular values at 5% and 1% levels.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 5

    STATISTICAL COMPUTATION ON THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF THE STUDY

    “PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT OF RED LADY (CARICA PAPAYA LINN) PAPAYA FRUIT


    KETCHUP”
    Taste
    Evaluatio Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3 Treatment 4
    n
    No.
    J A E I B F J C G K D H L
    1 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
    2 3 4 3 3 5 3 4 5 4 4 5 5
    3 5 3 5 4 3 5 5 5 5 5 4 5
    4 5 5 2 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4
    5 4 5 5 3 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4
    6 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3
    7 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
    8 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4
    9 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 4 4
    10 5 5 5 2 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 4
    11 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4
    12 2 3 4 4 4 3 5 5 5 5 5 5
    13 3 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 3 4
    14 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
    15 3 4 3 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4
    16 5 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
    17 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4
    18 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4
    19 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
    20 4 5 5 3 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
    21 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4
    23 4 4 5 3 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
    24 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
    25 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
    26 3 4 4 5 5 4 5 3 4 5 4 4
    27 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
    28 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
    29 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 5
    30 5 4 3 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
    T 117 112 118 116 122 122 132 131 128 129 126 124
    X 3.9 3.73 3.93 3.86 4.06 4.06 4.4 4.36 4.26 4.3 4.2 4.13
    Step 1. Present the data as in the following Table.

    REPLICATIONS
    TREATMENT TOTAL MEAN
    R1 R2 R3

    TREATMENT1 3.9 3.73 3.93 11.56 3.85

    TREATMENT2 3.86 4.06 4.06 11.98 3.99

    TREATMENT3 4.4 4.36 4.26 13.02 4.34

    TREATMENT4 4.3 4.2 4.13 12.63 4.21

    GRAND 49.19 4.09

    Step 2. The outline analysis of variance table.


    Source of Variance DF SS MS F- VALUE F- TAB

    5% 1%
    Treatment 3 55.09 1.91

    Error 8 54. 58 0.71 2.69 4.07% 7.59

    Total 11 109.67

    Step 3. Determine the degree of freedom (df) for the sources of Variance as follows:
    Total df = total number of observation-1
    =n–1
    = (3) (4) – 1
    = 11
    Treatment df = total number of treatment - 1
    =4–1
    =3
    Error df = total df – treatment df
    = 11 – 3
    =8

    Step 4. Calculate the various sum square (ss)


    a. Correction Factor (CF) = (Grand Total)2
    n
    = (49.19)2
    12
    = 2419.65
    12
    = 201.63

    note: n is the total number of observation


    n=rt
    = (4) (3) – 1
    = 12
    b. Total SS (TSS) = all observation – CF
    = (3.9)2+(3.73)2+(3.93)2+(3.86)2+(4.06)2+(4.06)2+(4.4)2+(4.36)2+(4.26)2+(4.3)2
    +(4.2)2+(4.13)2
    = 202.14 – 201.63
    = 0.51
    c. Treatment SS (TrSS) = (treatment total)2 - CF
    Tr
    = (11.56)2+(11.98)2+(13.02)2+(12.63)2 – 201.63
    4
    = 133.63+143.52+169.52+159.51 – 201.63
    4
    = 586.18 – 201.63
    4

    = 146.54 – 201.63
    = 55.09
    d. Error SS (ErSS) = TSS – TrSS
    = 55.08 – 0.51
    = 54.58

    Step 5. Compute the Mean Square (MS) for each of Various


    a. TrMS = TrSS
    Trdf
    = 54.58
    3
    = 1.91
    b. ErMs = ErSS
    Erdf
    = 5.73
    8
    = 0.71

    Step 6. Compute the observed F – Value


    F – Value = TrMS
    ErMS
    = 1.91
    0.71
    = 2.69
    Step 7. Compute the observation F – Value with that of the F- tabular Value (Appendix 15 F –
    Distribution: Critical Value of F at 1 % and 5%) using Trdf (V1) and (V2).
    Appendix 15 with Trdf and Erdf
    Trdf = 3 5% = 4.07
    Erdf = 8 1% = 7.59
    Step 8. Interpret result as follows:
    a) Not significant (ns) when the F – Value is less than F – Tab at 5%.
    b) Significant (*) when the F – Value is higher than F – Tab at 5% but lower F- Tab at 1%
    c) Highly significant (*) when the F – Value is higher than F – Tab at 1%.

    F – Tab in Appendix 15 based on Trdf and Erdf

    F – Value
    5% 1%

    2.69 4.07 7.59

    Step 9. Determine the degree of precision as:


    Coefficient of Variation (CV) = √ Error MS ×100
    Grand Mean
    = 0.71
    4.09
    = 0.17%
    Final Table on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in Completely Design.
    Sources df SS MS F- Value

    Treatment 3 55.09 1.91


    Error 8 54. 58 0.71 2.69
    Total 11 109.67

    CV = 0.17%
    NS = Not Significant at 5% level

    You might also like