Franceschi2018 PDF
Franceschi2018 PDF
Franceschi2018 PDF
Case Report
Application of Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration in Alveolus
Compromised with Loss of Immediate Implant in Esthetic Area
Rafael de Lima Franceschi ,1,2,3 Luciano Drechsel,1,3,4 and Guenther Schuldt Filho5
1
Brasilian Association of Dental Surgeons, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
2
Dental Institute of the Americas, Balneário Camboriú, SC, Brazil
3
São Leopoldo Mandic University, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
4
Brazilian Dental Association (ABO), Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
5
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Copyright © 2018 Rafael de Lima Franceschi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work
is properly cited.
In the reported clinical case, the immediate dentoalveolar restoration (IDR) technique was applied to reconstruct the buccal bone
wall, with autogenous graft of the maxillary tuberosity, which had been lost due to a root fracture, and to provide the necessary bone
substrate for the installation of an implant and its provisioning. One of the greatest risks inherent in the survival of immediate
implants is the maintenance of their stability during the healing period. In this case, due to a mechanical trauma in sports
activity in the first postoperative month, there was a total failure in the osseointegration process, confirmed by tomographic
examination of both the implant and the bone graft. The deleterious effects of this accident were compensated with a new
approach and reapplication of IDR technique using a smaller-diameter implant and with conical macrogeometry in conjunction
with the new bone reconstruction under the same compromised alveolus; associated, after the period of osseointegration, with
the maneuvers of volume increase of the gingival tissue by subepithelial connective tissue graft. The tomographic result
demonstrated the success of the surgical procedures, and the clinical/photographic analysis obtained showed the stability of the
gingival margin without compromising the esthetic result of the prosthetic restoration.
(a) (b)
Figure 2: Root fracture and its subsequent bacterial contamination caused the vestibular wall to become impaired. (a) Tomography
demonstrating the loss of vestibular bone wall in element 11. (b) The root fracture and invasion of the biological space generated
inflammation on the vestibular face.
(a) (b)
Figure 3: IDR surgical phase. (a) Cortical-medullary blade removed from the right maxillary tuberosity. (b) Cone Morse implant installation
and pillar height test.
(a) (b)
Figure 4: Immediate postoperative preserving the protective tissues with maintenance of vestibular volume and gingival margin. (a) Front
view of the IDR. (b) Occlusal view with incisal relief.
4 Case Reports in Dentistry
(a) (b)
Figure 5: Trauma during sports procedure in the immediate implant region. (a) Due to the trauma, there was vestibularization. (b) Implant-
crown turning compromising the entire osseointegration process.
(a) (b)
Figure 6: The provisional crown was removed and then reinstalled and attached to the neighboring teeth. (a) Presence of bone sequestration
arising from the reconstruction of the vestibular wall. (b) Repositioning of the crown and union to the neighboring teeth with resinous
cement.
found in the abutment region (Figure 6(a)). It was reinstalled as previously described with only the following modifica-
and through the crown fixing screw, the entire structure was tions: total curettage of the alveolus with removal of all the
manipulated towards the palatal in an attempt to reposition it bone fragments and granulation tissue gift was performed;
as close as possible to the original position. Temporary union the new implant had a smaller diameter, 3.5 × 13 mm
with U-200 resin cement (3M Espe) of the acrylic crown was (Intraoss, Brazil), and its macrogeometry was conical; its
performed on the neighboring teeth 12 and 21 (Figure 6(b)). insertion was searching the center of the alveolus, even if it
An implant tomography was ordered to assess the extent of was not possible to make a screwed prosthesis; and the max-
the problem. illary tuberosity that provided the material for grafting was
After ten days of trauma, the tomographic image analysis the left tuft.
recorded that the three-dimensional positioning of the After implanting the implant with 45 Ncm torque, recon-
implant was out of the proper position, compromising the struction of the buccal bone wall was performed with the
entire reconstruction of the vestibular wall. The loss of insertion of medullary bone compacted at the apex of the
implant stability is directly related to the absence of support- implant up to half its length, only after the cortical-
ing bone tissue in the vestibular area (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). medullary lamina was positioned throughout the vestibular
Several treatment alternatives were then presented to the region leaving a 3 mm gap of the lamina to the implant that
patient to remove the implant and to perform alveolar pres- was filled by a new insertion of compacted medullary bone.
ervation through grafting of biomaterials and membranes A new 2.5 mm height abutment was installed with a torque
for guided bone regeneration. However, it was a consensus of 32 Ncm, and immediate provisioning was still possible
among the surgeons that any of the cases presented could with a screwed crown even though the prosthetic connection
lead to a change and instability of the vestibular gingival mar- of the abutment was in a more vestibularized position
gin, further compromising the esthetic outcome of the case. (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)).
Alternatively, the possibility of retreatment through a new The tubal suture was identical to the previous report, and
IDR was suggested. Although there were no reports of this, the postoperative care was reinforced and amplified even
the idea behind the treatment was to consider the implant with the use of an acrylic total plate in the upper arch to pro-
lost as if it were a root compromised with total loss of the ves- tect against any new trauma. The patient was monitored
tibular bone wall, aided at this time by the absence of the weekly until the ninety days of the surgical intervention
infectious process. and then every two weeks for a further two months. In this
With the endorsement of the patient, all the steps of the period, two CBCT scans were performed: the first ten days
protocol of the technique were initiated through previous after the new IDR (Figures 9(a) and 9(b)) and the second
antibiotic therapy, and the surgical sequence was the same after five months, confirming the osseointegration of the
Case Reports in Dentistry 5
fenest
01
implante
11
(a) (b)
Figure 7: Radiographic analysis ten days after the trauma. (a) The tomographic image registers the implant in an inadequate three-
dimensional position. (b) Loss of vestibular wall that had been rebuilt.
(a) (b)
Figure 8: Immediate postoperative of the second IDR applied to element 11 with peri-implant tissue normality. (a) Immediate frontal view
and (b) occlusal view demonstrating the maintenance of vestibular volume.
enxerto
oi 1
cn
fenest
11
(a) (b)
Figure 9: Tomography 10 days after surgery to visualize the 3D position of the implant and the presence of the cortical-medullar lamina. (a)
Tomographic section where it is possible to visualize the grafted bone tissue. (b) Image recording bone reconstruction.
6 Case Reports in Dentistry
fenest
11 implante
(a) (b)
Figure 10: Tomography after five months of the second IDR. (a) Tomography performed with oral retractor to reveal soft tissues. (b)
Recording of total graft incorporation and presence of a new vestibular bone wall.
(a) (b)
Figure 12: Connective tissue graft. (a) Subepithelial connective tissue removed from the palate. (b) Suture of the graft divided into the
vestibular flap using the provisional crown as a foundation for better position and support of the gingival margin.
(a) (b)
Figure 13: Grafted tissue in maturation process. (a) Occlusal view of the scar area after 30 days with increased volume. (b) Positioning of the
new vestibular gingival margin.
(a) (b)
Figure 14: Correct delineation of the emergency profile is crucial to the long-term success of the technique. (a) Concave emergency profile in
the cervicovestibular region. (b) The critical line corresponds to the position of the gingival margin, and below it is the subcritical area that
should accommodate and maintain healthy peri-implant soft tissues.
(a) (b)
Figure 16: Prosthetic phase using custom zirconia abutment. (a) Screwed zirconia abutment and pure ceramic crown. (b) Occlusal view
of the abutment screwed with the screw in the incisal line of the other incisors proving the more vestibular positioning of the prosthetic
connection.
3. Discussion
The literature describes that the buccal bone plate has on
average less than 1 mm thickness and that the bone remodel-
ing that occurs after the exodontia will alter the vestibular
gingival margin independent of the installation of an imme-
diate implant [8, 9].
Among the various methods to prevent spontaneous
remodeling of tissues and to preserve the alveolar ridge, the
most used is through biomaterials of low rate of reabsorption
and protection with membranes, called guided bone regener-
Figure 17: Lateral view of the abutment test and the stratified ation (GBR) [10].
ceramic crown demonstrating adaptation to the peri-implant The major challenge for performing immediate implants
tissues, appropriate color, and shape. is when one or more bone walls are lost. Clinically, the most
common is the total or partial loss of the buccal bone wall,
and IDR is presented as an alternative for the use of GBR.
so that there was no infiltration into the peri-implant tissues The idea of the technique is similar, and in the case of IDR,
(Figure 18(a)). All occlusal adjustments were reviewed, and the cortical-medullary bone graft installed in the shape of
the disocclusion guides were checked (Figure 18(b)). A the defect to be reconstructed will be a barrier to stabilize
new tomography was performed with a buccal retractor in the particulate bone graft that will exist in the gap between
order to record the measurements of the hard and soft tis- the implant and the new bone wall. The use of the autoge-
sues in the vestibular region after twelve months of the nous bone material of the maxillary tuberosity provides
IDR reapplication to determine the zero (follow-up zero) factors different from traditional biomaterials [11]. As the
momentum, serving as a basis for follow-up and future vascular pattern is vital for the success of bone grafts, the
comparisons (Figures 19(a) and 19(b)). Measurements at medullary nature of the grafts harvested at this site indicates
two points on the vestibular wall (cervical 4.6 mm and api- that there is indeed a possibility of transferring bone mate-
cal 6.3 mm at the implant) recorded the formation of the rial with viable and high-capacity osteoprogenitor cells into
new vestibular wall with a considerable increase of the bone the receptor bed which provides faster and more effective
tissue, mainly in relation to the homologous tooth (21), healing with minimal alteration to the involved tissues. In
whose measurements at similar points recorded a typical addition to early and low-intensity stimulation that does
buccal bone board as described in the literature with values not compromise mechanical stability, increased blood flow
lower than 1 mm in the cervical and median and only in the and contact osteogenesis will accelerate the full incorpora-
apical region of the root with a measurement of 2.3 mm. In tion of the bone graft, ensuring the substrate necessary for
relation to the soft tissues, the subepithelial connective tis- the success of the implant and peri-implant tissues [12, 13].
sue graft practically doubled the values found in the contra- The risks inherent in immediate loading techniques such
lateral tooth (8.2 mm versus 4.6 mm cervical, 11.2 mm as a minimally traumatic and flapless surgery, a 3D implant
versus 6.9 mm apical), being of paramount importance for position, a gap filling, and its provisioning may not prevent
maintaining a stable gingival margin and avoiding possible postexodontic alveolar changes, and recessions may compro-
recessions that can affect the vestibular face of the immedi- mise the gingival margin and longevity of supporting and
ate implants. protective tissues [14].
The end result in relation to the reconstruction of sup- The alveolus-dental topography in the anterior maxilla
port and protection tissues projects clinical success in the region, due to the inclination of the teeth, results in a very
long term (Figure 20). thin vestibular bone board and a thicker and more robust
Case Reports in Dentistry 9
(a) (b)
Figure 18: Final result after cementation with resin cement. (a) Front view of the cemented crown. (b) Occlusal view showing the correct 3D
positioning of the prosthetic crown.
(a) (b)
Figure 19: CBCT scan of the follow-up of the IDR reapplication. (a) Tomography with measures of bone and gingival tissue in the vestibule of
implant 11 which was reconstructed by the surgical procedures. (b) Tomography where it is possible to compare the volumes of bone and
gingival tissue in the vestibular area of a healthy tooth 21.
[14] D. P. Tarnow, S. J. Chu, and M. A. Salama, “Flapless postex- [26] H. Su, O. González-Martin, A. Weisgold, and E. Lee, “Consid-
traction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part erations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical
1. The effect of bone grafting and/or provisional restoration contour and subcritical contour,” The International Journal
on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change—a retrospective of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, vol. 30, no. 4,
cohort study,” The International Journal of Periodontics & pp. 335–343, 2010.
Restorative Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 323–331, 2014. [27] T. Waki and J. Y. K. Kan, “Instalação e provisionalização ime-
[15] D. E. Azar, “Minimally invasive single-implant treatment in diatas de implante unitário anterossuperior com procedimen-
the esthetic zone,” The Compendium of Continuing Education tos de regeneração óssea guiada, enxerto de tecido conjuntivo e
in Dentistry, vol. 38, no. 4, article 28368132, pp. 241–247, retalho posicionado coronalmente,” The International Journal
2017. of Esthetic Dentistry, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 442–453, 2016.
[16] S. T. Chen, I. B. Darby, E. C. Reynolds, and J. G. Clement,
“Immediate implant placement postextraction without flap
elevation,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 8, no. 91, pp. 163–
172, 2009.
[17] L. W. Vasconcelos, D. A. Hiramatsu, L. G. P. Paleckis, C. E.
Francischone, R. C. B. Vasconcelos, and T. G. Chaves,
“Implante imediato e preservação de alvéolo com Bio-Oss
Collagen® em área estética,” The International Journal of
Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 472–480,
2016.
[18] U. Grunder, “Crestal ridge width changes when placing
implants at the time of tooth extraction with and without
soft tissue augmentation after a healing period of 6 months:
report of 24 consecutive cases,” The International Journal of
Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 9–
17, 2011.
[19] G. O. Sarnachiaro, S. J. Chu, E. Sarnachiaro, S. L. Gotta, and
D. P. Tarnow, “Immediate implant placement into extraction
sockets with labial plate dehiscence defects: a clinical case
series,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 821–829, 2016.
[20] B. Gjelvold, J. Kisch, B. R. Chrcanovic, T. Albrektsson, and
A. Wennerberg, “Clinical and radiographic outcome following
immediate loading and delayed loading of single-tooth
implants: randomized clinical trial,” Clinical Implant Dentistry
and Related Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 549–558, 2017.
[21] S. Yoshino, J. Y. K. Kan, K. Rungcharassaeng, P. Roe, and J. L.
Lozada, “Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gin-
gival level following single immediate implant placement and
provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized
controlled prospective study,” The International Journal of
Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 432–440,
2014.
[22] J. Cosyn, H. De Bruyn, and R. Cleymaet, “Soft tissue preserva-
tion and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant
restorations: a 1-year prospective study,” Clinical Implant
Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 847–857,
2013.
[23] G. Paniz and F. Mazzocco, “Tratamento cirúrgico-protético de
defeitos de tecidos moles vestibulares em próteses sobre
implantes unitários anteriores,” The International Journal of
Esthetic Dentistry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 142–155, 2016.
[24] K. M. Chochlidakis, A. Geminiani, P. Papaspyridakos,
N. Singh, C. Ercoli, and C. J. Chen, “Buccal bone thickness
around single dental implants in the maxillary esthetic zone,”
Quintessence International, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 295–308, 2017.
[25] I. Gamborema and M. B. Blatz, Evolution: Protocols for Ante-
rior Single-Tooth Implants, Quintessence, Chicago, 2015.
Advances in
Preventive Medicine
International Journal of
Biomaterials
Pain
Research and Treatment
Hindawi Hindawi
www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Journal of
Environmental and
Public Health
Computational and
Mathematical Methods Advances in Radiology Surgery
in Medicine
Hindawi
Orthopedics
Hindawi Hindawi
Research and Practice
Hindawi
Research and Practice
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018