Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Currently, two or three chains control 80% of the retail sales volume,
with a few scattered independent operators accounting for the remaining
20%. Because of this concentration, the supplier will pass over margin to
the retailer through the mechanism of the trading terms and by
demanding more frequent promotions and significant price reductions
on important branded goods.
Data Price- Specific cigarette price data from 1999 to 2009 were
obtained for packs of 20 cigarettes . No single source covering the same
geographical area was available for the whole period. The main source of
price data until October 2005, when it ceased publication, was
PriceChecker, a supplement to the Retail Newsagent magazine from
which data were extracted by hand. This gave recommended retail prices
(RRP) for all major cigarette brands for the UK market. From November
2006 Nielsen started to publish cigarette sales data, including volume
and price, for the Great Britain market and obtained, via scan, data
inputs covering 87% of total sales . Comparisons between these two
datasets, supermarket retail prices and manufacturers’ RRPs showed
that manufacturers’ RRP and Nielsen data were almost identical,
indicating that our two data sources could be relied on to provide
comparable price data over time. The expense of Nielsen data precluded
our ability to collate monthly data. . Volume market share data Data on
market share by volume were obtained from two sources: Nielsen from
November 2006 until November 2009 as detailed above and the General
Household Survey (GHS), now known as the General Lifestyle Survey ,
for the period 2001 to 2008 (2008 being the most recent survey
available at the time this work was undertaken). The GHS is an annual
survey designed to be representative of the population of the UK. Each
year, one question, posed only to smokers of manufactured cigarettes
aged 16 years plus, asks which brand of cigarettes they smoke. This
question, combined with the number of sticks smoked per week by each
smoker, was used to calculate market share by brand and price segment.
Analysis Trends in cigarette prices, volumes and revenue by price
segment Weighted average prices for a pack of 20 cigarettes were
calculated for the period 2001 to 2009 by price segment.
RESULTS TRENDS - Cigarette prices, volumes and revenue by price
segment While the real weighted average price of premium, midprice
and economy brands has increased gradually between 2001 and 2009 ,
the real price of ULP cigarettes has barely changed. Consequently, the
real price gap between these segments has widened. Volume data
comparisons show that the two data sources are consistent and provide
a reasonable assessment of volume trends over time . The market share
held by ULP cigarettes has increased markedly in recent years, doubling
between 2006 and 2009 alone. The largest market share, around 50% of
the market, is still held by the economy segment, although this has fallen
recently owing to gains in the ULP segment. The market share of both
premium and mid-price brands has fallen from 2001 onwards, although
mid-price brands are far fewer in number and have never been a major
part of the market. Consistent with the price data, there is a wide and
increasing gap in revenue between premium and ULP brands. Revenue
from premium and mid-price brands has increased in real terms, while
revenue from ULP brands has not and the gap in average revenue
between these segments now stands at about £1.00. An interesting
pattern occurs with economy brands; their revenue is virtually static
between 2001 and 2005 but, once ULP brands emerge, revenue in the
economy segment starts to increase . Industry pricing strategy Across the
market as a whole, the industry is increasing prices over and beyond tax
increases However, the extent to which tax increases are shifted to
smokers varies both over time and by brand segment. Taxes were
overshifted in each of the 3 years examined and in all brand segments
other than the ULP segment in 2007–08 when taxes were absorbed.
Across the 3-year period as a whole, average prices of ULP brands
increased by just 1.3 pence compared with between 4.1 and 4.9 pence on
more expensive brands. If this 3-year analysis is limited to brands with a
market share over 0.2% price falls of -1.2 pence are seen on ULP brands
and price increases of between 4.0 and 5.0 pence in the other segments.
The time period in which industry-initiated price changes occur also
varies by brand segment. For premium and mid-price segments, price
increases during the November–May period are greater than for the
May–November period.
ITC Distribution Channel
Distribution channel is having an important role in positioning of the
product because we
know that distribution channel is tool by which we can make reach our
product to the final
consumers. That's why selecting a distribution channel is an important
aspect of building a
competitive advantage for businesses of every size. Distribution channels
include your own
direct sales force, retailers, distributors and the Internet. The right
distribution channel
ensures that customers in different locations around the country, or
around the world, can
buy your products and get the right level of service from your company.
To select the right
distribution channel for your business, you need to consider what a
channel can offer,
including location and reach, skills and resources, management costs
and degree of control.
References-
1) https://
www.freecasestudysolutions.com/
case-study-Pricing-Strategies-Of-
Itc.aspx
2) https://
economictimes.indiatimes.com/
industry/cons-products/fmcg/itc-
expects-collaborations-with-unlikely-
partners-to-open-new-supply-
channels/articleshow/75158609.cms
3) https://www.itcportal.com/