OCDay Balancing Risks and Benefits
OCDay Balancing Risks and Benefits
OCDay Balancing Risks and Benefits
Benefits in Outdoor
Learning and Play
A briefing for teachers and practitioners
working with children
By Tim Gill
Front cover image from Mission:Explore Outside the Classroom.
Find out more at: www.missionexplore.net
INTRODUCTION
I was director of the Children’s Play Council (now Play England) from 1997 to 2004,
when I went freelance. I now write, research, speak and carry out consultancy
projects on childhood, with a focus on children’s play and free time. My aim is to
challenge the false logic of the zero risk childhood, and to make the case for the
expansion of children’s horizons.
I have campaigned for more child-friendly streets, led the first ever UK Government
review on play, helped to write the Mayor of London’s planning guidance for
outdoor play spaces, debated the nature of childhood on prime-time TV with Robert
Winston, made the case for reconnecting children with nature in the UK, Canada
and Australia, and led a successful global push for more adventurous, exciting
playgrounds. I have spoken to audiences of teachers, parents, planners and decision
makers on four continents. I am delighted to be supporting Outdoor Classroom Day
as part of a global movement to get more children learning and playing out of doors.
My book No Fear: Growing up in a risk averse society came out in 2007 and my
website is at www.rethinkingchildhood.com.
This briefing sets out why a balanced, thoughtful approach to managing risks is
needed in children’s learning and play. It also introduces risk benefit assessment
(RBA) as a suitable response. It is aimed at teachers, childcare workers, playworkers,
managers of schools, early years settings and play and childcare facilities, health and
safety professionals, risk managers, decision makers and parents.
3
WHY IS RISK IMPORTANT?
Children of all ages and abilities are naturally curious. They have an appetite for
experience, and an urge to explore and understand. They want to find out how the
world around them works and what they can do, and to extend their abilities and
build their sense of themselves as competent, capable people.
Whenever children learn, they move from what is routine and familiar – and thus
potentially boring – to what is less certain, more challenging and hopefully more
engaging. This move is especially pronounced, and especially powerful, when
children are learning from their own experiences and efforts, as happens in free play
and child-initiated and child-led learning activities in outdoor environments.
Getting to grips with new challenges often brings a degree of risk; think of a child
learning to take their first steps or to ride a bicycle. These risks can rarely be
completely eliminated without also undermining the learning.
Adults arguably underestimate children’s ability to manage risk. Even so, when
children are given a degree of freedom to play and learn, they often make mistakes.
These may in turn lead to accidents, especially in challenging, adventurous
situations. However, minor accidents and injuries – from which children make a
full recovery – are not in themselves a problem. Indeed children often learn a great
deal from them. Overall, outdoor environments are comparatively safe places, and
learning and playing out of doors is safer than taking part in many other sports or
leisure pursuits.
4
cross it?
Hence at the heart of managing risk is a balancing act between opportunities for
learning and play, and safety – or to put it another way, between risks and benefits.
The need for a balanced approach is all the more important because of wider
changes in children’s everyday lives. The last few decades have seen a decline in
the time that children spend out of doors independently. As a result, they have less
opportunity to encounter and learn how to manage risks by themselves. Giving
children managed opportunities to take risks compensates for this loss of freedom.
“Play outdoors teaches young people how to deal with risk and without
this they are ill equipped to deal with working life.”
In simple terms, the law requires those responsible to take reasonable steps
to ensure the risks are at an acceptable level. There is no legal requirement to
eliminate or minimise risk. The key task is to carry out a ‘suitable and sufficient
risk assessment’, and to act on its findings. What counts as ‘suitable and sufficient’
– for instance, the type of risk assessment, the level of detail and whether or not it
is written down – depends on the circumstances. However, what is expected is a
proportionate approach. The HSE makes it clear that health and safety is not about
generating excessive paperwork.
5
WHAT GETS IN THE WAY OF A BALANCED APPROACH?
Adults often restrict children too much because of misplaced anxieties, based on
myths or misunderstandings, about what might go wrong and what might happen
as a result. The government, the HSE and bodies like the Royal Society for the
Prevention of Accidents (ROSPA) all recognise this problem. And they accept that
the way to tackle it is to promote a balanced, thoughtful approach.
A balanced approach involves bringing together thinking about risks and benefits in
a single process. Recent years have seen the development of risk benefit assessment
as the best way to do this. Risk benefit assessment sets out in a single statement
the considerations of risk and benefit that make up a decision to provide, modify
or remove a facility, activity or feature. The approach is supported by HSE, which
describes it as sensible approach to risk management.
What marks out risk benefit assessment from conventional risk assessment is that
it includes careful consideration of benefits. Because this takes place alongside a
consideration of the risks, it allows for the inherent benefits of some risks to be
properly taken into account. It also emphasises the point that good risk management
does not always mean that risks should be reduced.
You should consider adopting a risk benefit approach. This will be particularly
valuable if you are thinking about providing more adventurous, challenging
play and learning opportunities in outdoor contexts. If you are just starting out
on the process, you may find it helpful to create the opportunity to debate the
issues, explore the barriers and build consensus about a way forward. Ideally this
would bring together as wide a selection of interested parties as possible. In local
authorities and other larger organisations, dialogue between front line staff, service
managers, risk managers, lead officers and parents is crucial.
6
CONCLUSION
Risk benefit assessment may sound like a radical idea. But in fact it is widely used
in a range of risk contexts. David Ball, professor of risk management at Middlesex
University, notes:
“Applications ranged from the analysis of the risks and benefits of hands-free
cell phone use while driving, to studies of avalanche protection measures, the
optimal arsenic content of drinking water, and the lifetime of space satellites
in orbit. It was abundantly clear that RBA was being applied in all sectors,
from environmental to public health, fire protection, technological innovation,
natural hazards and many more... This suggests that the original question,
of whether the introduction of RBA to decision making about public space
and activities was radical, should be replaced by a different question. That
question is: Why has decision making about the safety of public space and
activities departed from the norm?”
– Ball and Ball-King, (2011)
Improving play and learning opportunities for children and young people of all ages
and abilities should be a key objective for teachers and practitioners. This means
exposing children to a degree of managed risk. The challenge is to do this without
putting them in undue danger of serious harm. Risk benefit assessment rises to this
challenge by taking a balanced, thoughtful approach: one that allows children and
young people to gain from more engaging, enjoyable learning experiences and more
opportunities for healthy growth and development. The likely result? A happier
childhood and more resilient, competent and confident people.
7
RESOURCES
David Ball and Laurence Ball-King (2011) Public Safety and Risk Assessment:
Improving Decision Making.
David Ball, Tim Gill and Bernard Spiegal (2012) Managing Risk in Play Provision:
Implementation Guide and template RBA Forms:
www.playscotland.org/resources/managing-risk-play-provision
Tim Gill (2010) Nothing Ventured... Balancing risks and benefits in the outdoors:
www.educationscotland.gov.uk/resources/n/genericresource_tcm4616582.asp
Health and Safety Executive (2012) Children’s play and leisure – promoting a
balanced approach:
www.hse.gov.uk/entertainment/childs-play-statement.htm
RoSPA (2013) Planning and Leading Visits and Adventurous Activities: Guidance for
Schools and Colleges Teaching Children and Young People from 5 to 18 years:
www.rospa.com/rospaweb/docs/advice-services/school-college-safety/school-visits-
guide.pdf
Play Australia - Getting the Balance Right: Risk management for play:
www.playaustralia.org.au
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This briefing is based on Play and Risk, published by Play Wales in 2013.
8
RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT:
A WORKED EXAMPLE
9
This section sets out a hypothetical worked example of an RBA for a permanent rope
swing affixed to a tree in a playground. It is adapted from a worked example taken
from an RBA form produced by the Play Safety Forum – a UK-wide expert body –
and published by Play Scotland (see the Resources section of the website).
BENEFITS
• Pleasure and fun
• Physical play
• Rotational possibilities: good potential for some unpredictability and challenge
• Development of self-confidence and well-being
• Learning through experience: accidents from which one might learn
• Users encounter conditions similar to those with self-built tree swings:
experience that will be useful if/when they play on them or make their own
• Engagement with natural environment and natural elements
• Potential for incorporation into imaginative games – eg Jungle Book
• Appeals to a wide age range, encouraging mixing between different children of
different ages.
EQUIPMENT FAILURE
• Swing fitting fails due to wear: wear should be detectable through regular
internal inspection.
• Swing fitting fails due to vandalism: This is the same as for a standard swing.
The swing has a strong steel chain, cable and fitting which would require
concerted effort with a hacksaw to cut.
10
PART OF TREE BREAKS
• Risk of minor injuries e.g. bruises, scrapes and possible long bone fractures:
these would largely be incurred by falling from the swing onto the ground. A
pendulum seat deters multiple users from using the swing simultaneously thus
reducing unpredictability.
• Possibility of head injury upon falling: Fall height does not exceed 1.4m. Surface
and adjacent area are cleared of obstacles and protrusions. Note wide general
prevalence of children and teenagers creating own rope swings over similar
surfaces and generally low risk of this activity.
• Risk of crashing into the tree or support or another person: there are no
obstructions to the visibility of swing users and other users.
OTHER RISKS
DECISION
Proposed tree swing offers an acceptable level of risk. Go ahead with suitable site
modifications and management arrangements. Current ‘natural’ surface appropriate
for setting.
11
RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FORM: EXAMPLE
Location / Activity: Date:
Your overall risk rating – Low, medium or high – is based on your judgement about whether the BENEFITS of the activity or opportunity outweigh the RISKS.
ACTIVITY How will young people Possible hazards Who is at risk? PRECAUTIONS in place to reduce the risk of injury Overall risk
BENEFIT from this activity? RATING:
L/M/H
POND DIPPING: The decking allows close access Slips, trips and falls. Young people; • Banks shallow and planted to prevent accidental Low
Slippery pond to the contents of the pond Cuts, grazes and abrasions. adults entry.
decking or edges and is an essential component Drowning. • No access to banks for young people; use
of exploring this habitat. decking or ‘beach’ area only.
• Deepest area is centre of pond – keep to edges.
• Perimeter kept clear of dense or high foliage so
pond edges are clearly defined and can be seen
/ avoided.
• Dipping platform kept clear of trip hazards (e.g.
nets, trays)
• Pond use rules clearly displayed and reviewed at
the start of each session.
RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FORM
Location / Activity: Date:
Your overall risk rating – Low, medium or high – is based on your judgement about whether the BENEFITS of the activity or opportunity outweigh the RISKS.
ACTIVITY How will young people Possible hazards Who is at risk? PRECAUTIONS in place to reduce the risk of injury Overall risk
BENEFIT from this activity? RATING:
L/M/H
Outdoor Classroom Day is a global campaign to celebrate and
inspire learning and play outside the classroom, supported by
Unilever’s Dirt is Good brands and led by Project Dirt.
Find out how you can get involved and access all the resources
at: www.outdoorclassroomday.com
/outdoorclassroomday @OutdoorClassDay
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/