Bambach 2019

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 35

Accepted Manuscript

Experimental and numerical study of the bending strength of natural fibre com-
posite structural channel sections

M.R. Bambach

PII: S0263-8223(18)31508-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.031
Reference: COST 10396

To appear in: Composite Structures

Received Date: 23 April 2018


Revised Date: 23 October 2018
Accepted Date: 13 November 2018

Please cite this article as: Bambach, M.R., Experimental and numerical study of the bending strength of natural fibre
composite structural channel sections, Composite Structures (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.
2018.11.031

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1 Experimental and numerical study of the bending strength of natural fibre
2 composite structural channel sections
3
4
5 M.R.Bambach
6 School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
7 mike.bambach@sydney.edu.au, T +61 2 9351 2193, F +61 2 9351 3343
8
9
10
11 ABSTRACT

12 Increasing awareness of environmental concerns is leading a drive towards more sustainable

13 structural materials for the built environment. Natural fibres such as flax and jute have increasingly

14 been considered for fibre-resin composites, with a major motivation for their implementation being

15 their notable sustainability attributes. This paper is part of an ongoing effort by the author to

16 demonstrate the structural properties of primary structural elements and members fabricated from

17 natural fibre composites of flax and jute. Previously the structural properties of flat plates, plain

18 channel sections and channel sections with complex stiffeners were investigated under pure

19 compression. This paper presents investigations of channel sections with complex stiffeners under

20 pure bending. A series of sixteen channels with varying geometries, complex stiffener arrangements

21 and composite thicknesses were tested in pure flexure. Material tests indicated that the mean tensile

22 elastic stiffness and strength values were 6,386 MPa and 55.1 MPa for flax, and 6,941 MPa and

23 62.1 MPa for jute. The experimental results indicated that flexural failure of the channel sections

24 was governed by tensile fracturing. The ultimate moment capacities varied from 1.043 to 1.501

25 kNm for four-layered composites, and 2.184 to 2.511 kNm for six-layered composites. The

26 analytical models predicted the experimental ultimate moment capacities well, with a mean and

27 coefficient of variation of the test to predicted ratio of 0.97 and 0.06, respectively. Finite element

28 models used progressive damage analysis via stress-based damage initiation models and damage

29 evolution laws, to replicate the tension fracture failure mode of the channels. The numerical models

1/34
30 predicted the experimental ultimate moment capacities well, with a mean and coefficient of

31 variation of the test to predicted ratio of 0.99 and 0.06, respectively.

32

33 KEYWORDS: natural fibre composites, flax, jute, channels, bending, flexure, finite element

34

35 1. INTRODUCTION

36 Public concerns about the environment, climate change, energy consumption and greenhouse gas

37 emissions are driving demand for the use of sustainable materials in the built environment. There

38 has been substantial attention given to the use of natural fibres in fibre-reinforced plastics in recent

39 decades, where such fibres may be combined with thermoset or thermoplastic polymers to create

40 natural fibre composites. Such natural fibre composites have particularly been identified for their

41 favourable sustainability properties, including for example: renewable resource; carbon sink; short

42 growth cycle time; low herbicide requirements due to rapid growth; low energy production;

43 recyclable; biodegradable; and low hazard manufacturing and composite handling and working [1-

44 7]. Much of this research has been from a materials science standpoint, assessing materials aspects

45 such as fibre processing techniques, composite fabrication methodologies, matrix materials and

46 their effects on the mechanical properties [8-13]. This research has indicated that composites

47 consisting of natural fibres have general characteristics similar to their synthetic fibre counterparts,

48 such as glass and carbon, however have comparably low intrinsic mechanical properties [2-13]. As

49 a result, identifying structural applications such as those in civil infrastructure have thus far been

50 limited [14-22].

51

52 Recently, the author has undertaken to demonstrate the structural properties of primary structural

53 elements and members fabricated from natural fibre composites of flax and jute, including: flat

54 plates and plain channel sections in pure compression [23], and channel sections with complex

55 stiffeners in pure compression [24]. This paper extends these studies to investigate flax and jute

2/34
56 fibre composites in pure bending. It is demonstrated that while the failure modes of the previous

57 members in compression were dominated by elastic local buckling and compression matrix failure,

58 the present failure modes in pure flexure are dominated by tension fracture. The stiffened channel

59 sections were previously demonstrated to have compression capacities suitable for light structural

60 applications such as residential building framing [24]. An aim of the present study is to determine if

61 such channel sections are suitable for resisting the bending loads that such framing members

62 undergo as a result of lateral wind loading.

63

64 Initially a series of sixteen experiments of flax and jute fibre composite structural channel sections

65 subjected to pure (four-point) bending is described. An analytical method developed previously for

66 compression [23,24] is then extended to the case of flexure. Finally, finite element analyses are

67 described which demonstrate the suitability of progressive damage analysis to predict the bending

68 capacity.

69

70 2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

71 2.1 Composite fabrication

72 Two different natural fibres were investigated in the present study; flax and jute. The flax and jute

73 fabrics were commercially produced for fibre-resin composite fabrications by Composites

74 Evolution; Biotex Flax 400g/m2 2x2 Twill weave and Biotex Jute 400g/m2 2x2 Twill weave. The

75 2x2 Twill weave is a generic pattern consisting of bi-directional yarns woven over-over-under-

76 under, where the yarns are perpendicular (i.e. 0º/90º). The fabrics use a low-twist yarn. Nominal

77 density, tensile strength and modulus values for the flax were; 1.5g/cm3, 500MPa and 50GPa, and

78 for the jute were; 1.46g/cm3, 400MPa and 40GPa. The commercial bulk laminating epoxy resin

79 Kinetix R240 with H126 (fast) hardener was used for all composite fabrications, with density

80 1.1g/cm3 and measured (neat) compression ultimate stress of 105.3MPa, tension ultimate stress of

81 33.1MPa and tension ultimate strain of 0.8%. The epoxy is a room temperature out-of-autoclave

3/34
82 cure epoxy resin that does not require heat input to cure. The manufacturers’ technical data for the

83 fabrics and epoxy are summarised in Appendix A. The channels were fabricated with a hand layup

84 technique whereby each layer of fabric was wetted out with resin using a paint brush and roller. The

85 fabric 0º direction was manually aligned with the longitudinal direction of the mandrel. The fabrics

86 were laid over a mandrel and held under a full vacuum during a cure time of a minimum of 5 hours

87 in a constant temperature room at 25ºC, as per the manufacturers recommendation. Due to

88 laboratory scheduling arrangements, the fabricated channels were stored at room temperature for a

89 minimum of one month prior to testing.

90

91 Fibre volume fractions were estimated using the mass of fabric prior to fabrication, the mass of

92 composite after fabrication, and the constituent densities. The fabrication technique generated

93 consistent fibre volume fractions, and for all specimens the mean and standard deviations of the

94 fibre volume fractions were; 39.6% and 1.4% for flax, and 37.0% and 2.2% for jute.

95

96 2.2 Material properties

97 Tension material test specimens were cut from the flat portions of untested flax and jute channel

98 specimens of four fibre layers in accordance with ISO 527 [25]. Tension specimens were cut at 0º

99 and 45º to the channel longitudinal dimension so as to establish the uniaxial tension and in-plane

100 shear strengths of the [0/90] composites, respectively. In the previous study [24], compression

101 material tests of nominally identical flax and jute channel sections (using the same constituent

102 materials and fabrication procedures as the present study) were undertaken, and these values were

103 used in the present study for the uniaxial compression material properties. Mean material properties

104 are summarised in Table 1 and exemplar tension material stress-strain curves are provided in Fig 1.

105

106 It is noted that the measured tension strengths indicated in Table 1 are relatively low compared with

107 an estimate made with the rule of mixtures. For example, the jute composite has a mean tension

4/34
108 strength of 62.1MPa, while the nominal fibre and matrix strengths are 400MPa and 105.3MPa,

109 respectively. Using the rule of mixtures the estimated tension strength of the composite is 140MPa.

110 There are several possible reasons why the measured strengths are relatively low:

111 a) the twill weave and vacuum assisted fabrication technique can result in voids in the matrix

112 b) the natural fibres contain lumens and sometimes the resin cannot penetrate inside the lumens

113 c) the manufacturers’ data for the fibre strength of 400MPa was used for the rule of mixtures

114 estimate, however it is unclear if this value is for a single elementary fibre or for the yarn

115 d) while the manufacturers’ data indicates the yarn is low-twist, the twist is not zero and during

116 tension the twist angle will change

117 e) the yarn consists of elementary fibres which may move relative to each other under tension

118 While the mechanical properties of the fabricated composites are relatively low, the measured jute

119 value of 62.1MPa is reasonably consistent with the manufacturers’ typical mechanical properties,

120 being 59MPa tension strength for vacuum infused fabrication with an unsaturated polyester matrix

121 (Appendix A).

122

123 2.3 Channel specimens

124 Flax and jute fibre-resin composite channels were fabricated with nominal geometries of web depth

125 100mm, flange width 50mm and 650mm length. Two different channel thicknesses of 4 and 6 fibre

126 layers were fabricated for each of the different fibre types. In the previous study [24], structural

127 optimisation of the channel section geometry was demonstrated with the inclusion of flange edge

128 stiffeners and intermediate flange and/or web stiffeners. Based on these previous experimental and

129 analytical optimisation results [24], several optimised shapes were considered for the present study,

130 including: one intermediate web stiffener (Figure 2a,b), two intermediate web stiffeners (Figure

131 2c,d), and two intermediate web stiffeners with one intermediate flange stiffener (Figure 2e,f). All

132 specimens contained flange edge stiffeners. For each different intermediate stiffener arrangement,

133 two different sized flange edge stiffeners were used. For all configurations (Figure 2a to f) the

5/34
134 smaller thickness was tested (4 layers of flax or jute), and for the configuration of two intermediate

135 web stiffeners with one intermediate flange stiffener (Figure 2e,f) the larger thickness was

136 additionally tested (6 layers of flax or jute).

137

138 The different stiffener configurations were fabricated by fixing 12mm diameter half-rounds to the

139 mandrel at specific locations, the mandrel being two 50mm x 50mm steel square hollow (SHS)

140 sections with external corner radius of 6mm. An example mandrel and resulting channel section is

141 exemplified in Figure 3. A split mandrel was required to facilitate extraction of the mandrel after

142 curing. It is noted that 2mm shim was placed between the SHS mandrel members to assist

143 extraction, thus the nominal channel internal web depth was 102mm. For the specimens with two

144 intermediate web stiffeners, the rounded corners of the SHS resulted in a small central stiffener, as

145 some fabric and epoxy was drawn into this space (Figure 3a). This was an unintended artefact of the

146 use of a split mandrel. The stiffeners were centrally located for all elements with one stiffener, and

147 located at the quarter points for elements with two stiffeners (Figure 3b).

148

149 The channels were fabricated with an approximate length of 650mm. The ends did not require

150 trimming due to the test setup used (described in the next section). The flange edge stiffeners were

151 fabricated with approximate length of 40mm, then following curing were trimmed to nominal

152 dimensions of 15mm or 25mm using a high speed rotary tool (Dremel brand), with a carbide cutting

153 wheel. The measured channel geometries are tabulated in Table 2. Exemplar channel specimens are

154 shown in Figure 4.

155

156 2.4 Channel section bending tests

157 The channels were tested in pure flexure using a traditional four-point bending arrangement. The

158 distance between the support points was 600mm, the distance between the support and loading

159 points was 125mm, and the length of the pure flexure region was 350mm (Figure 5a).

6/34
160

161 A steel restraint system was clamped to the composite channels between the support and loading

162 points at both ends to prevent localised flange distortions, web crippling and/or shear failures,

163 restricting the sections to fail in the pure flexure region. The restraint system consisted of two steel

164 channel sections placed over the top and bottom flanges, connected with threaded rods to clamp

165 onto the composite channel sections. Steel rectangular hollow sections (RHS) were inserted inside

166 the composite channels. Additionally, several steel packing plates were inserted between the

167 composite channels and steel channels, while small bolts were inserted through threaded holes in

168 the steel channels and tightened against these packing plates, so as to fully restrain each of the

169 flange and web elements of the composite channels between the steel channel and the steel RHS

170 insert (Figure 5b). Failure occurred in the pure flexure region in all tested channels, demonstrating

171 that the steel restraint system was effective in precluding localised failures outside the pure flexure

172 region.

173

174 An inclinometer was clamped to each steel restraint system to measure the applied end rotations.

175 The channels were loaded in vertical displacement control at a speed of 1mm/min. The channel

176 lengths in the pure flexure region were short enough so as to preclude flexural-torsional buckling,

177 which was confirmed by the experimental results observed, such that the pure section bending

178 moment capacity was established.

179

180 3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

181 3.1 Moment-curvature results

182 The machine vertical applied load was converted to applied moment from the geometry of the test

183 setup, and likewise the inclinometer results were converted to curvature. An exemplar moment-

184 curvature plot with photographs taken throughout the bending test is shown in Figure 6, several

7/34
185 exemplar results are plotted in Figure 7 with photographs of the specimens nearing ultimate, and

186 ultimate moments are tabulated in Table 2.

187

188 3.2 Failure modes

189 The results demonstrated a predominantly linear-elastic response, with some softening prior to

190 failure. Failure was governed by tensile fracturing, initiated in the pure flexure region immediately

191 adjacent to the load point at one end. The fracture initiated in the tension flange and progressed

192 upwards into the web, and thence into the compression flange (Figure 8a). In four jute channels the

193 fracture propagated completely through the compression flange, separating the channel into two

194 pieces (Figure 8b). These tensile fracture failures were sudden and brittle in nature, with only a

195 small amount of softening prior to failure, as evidenced in the moment-curvature plots (Figure 7).

196

197 The softening resulted from a small amount of compression flange buckling, and matrix damage as

198 the material failure stress was approached, resulting in a reduction in the bending stiffness. Small

199 compression flange buckling is evidenced in the photographs in Figure 7 for channels 1 to 4. A

200 reliable technique to measure the compression flange buckling displacement was not found, as

201 difficulties were encountered in the mounting of displacement transducers from relative movements

202 between the mount base and the flange edge that were unrelated to buckling. Generally, all four

203 layered specimens underwent some compression flange buckling, which was more pronounced for

204 the channels with smaller flange edge stiffeners and without flange intermediate stiffeners.

205

206 3.3 Comparisons between different channel sections

207 The moment capacities indicated that despite the jute composite having a slightly higher uniaxial

208 tension stress (Table 1), the flax channels had slightly higher moment capacities. This may result

209 from the fact that the flax composite has greater ductility than the jute (Figure 1), allowing the flax

210 channels to continue resisting load while undergoing matrix damage for longer.

8/34
211

212 For comparisons of structural efficiencies between different flange and web intermediate stiffener

213 arrangements, and different thicknesses, the average ultimate stress is a better measure than ultimate

214 moment, since the addition of stiffeners also involved the addition of extra material. The average

215 ultimate stress (fult) was calculated from the ultimate moment in the test (Mtest) and the full section

216 bending properties, Equation 1, where yfull is the full section distance from the neutral axis to the

217 extreme bending fibre, and Ifull is the full section second moment of area (where the designation of

218 ‘full’ refers to the gross section, as opposed to the effective section discussed in the next section).

219 These values are tabulated in Table 2. The full section second moments of area were calculated

220 using the cross-section analysis software ThinWall [26].

221

𝑀𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑦𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑙
222 𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑡 = 𝐼𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑙
(1)

223

224 Compared with one web stiffener, the addition of a second web stiffener resulted in a very small

225 increase in average ultimate stress for both the flax and jute channels. The addition of the second

226 web stiffener was designed to increase the strength via restricting compression buckling of the web,

227 however web buckling did not occur in the single web stiffened channels, thus the effect of adding

228 the second stiffener was negligible.

229

230 Compared with no intermediate flange stiffeners, the addition of an intermediate flange stiffener

231 decreased the average ultimate stress for both the flax and jute channels. Since the bottom flange is

232 in pure tension, and is the location of the initiation of tension fracture, this may result from the

233 flange stiffener acting as an inclusion or disturbed region, weakening the flange and precipitating

234 earlier fracture. This was exacerbated by the fact that the stiffener was on the outside of the section,

235 such that the extreme fibre of the section (and thus the location of maximum stress during bending)

236 was the outer fibre of the stiffener. The addition of the stiffener to the flat flange element was

9/34
237 designed to increase the strength via restricting compression buckling of the flange, however it is

238 apparent that it may actually weaken the section as a result of earlier onset of tension fracture.

239

240 This moment reduction was especially notable in the four layer jute channels with two web

241 stiffeners and intermediate flange stiffeners (Table 2), to the extent that these results seemed to be

242 outliers to the rest of the data. To investigate further, tension material specimens were cut from

243 these two jute channels (from inside the steel restraints, post- bending test) and tested in uni-axial

244 tension, indicating a tension strength of 51.9MPa, notably lower than the average jute value of

245 62.1MPa. It is likely that there was a manufacturing defect in these two channels which were

246 fabricated together (for example incorrect epoxy resin mix, incomplete vacuum pressure, etc, which

247 occurs sometimes when composites are fabricated by hand layup).

248

249 While there were differences in the average ultimate stress values between different stiffener

250 arrangements as noted above, these differences were small (except for the two outlier jute channels

251 with lower material strengths). The highest average ultimate stresses were achieved in the thicker

252 channels for both flax and jute. While they may have been negatively affected by the inclusion of

253 intermediate flange stiffeners, the positive effect of the thickness in stabilising the section against

254 compression flange buckling resulted in an overall small positive effect on the strength.

255

256 4. ANALYTICAL ANALYSIS

257 The effective width analytical method was developed to predict the post-buckling strength of thin-

258 walled elements, predominantly steel, and forms the basis for the design of cold-formed steel

259 members in several international structural specifications. In the previous investigations by the

260 author, the method was applied to natural fibre composites to predict the compression capacity of

261 plates and channel sections [23,24]. Relatively good agreement with experiments was observed, due

262 to the realistic depiction of the post-buckling mechanics of thin elements; the assumption is made

10/34
263 that the buckled regions become ineffective in carrying load, redistributing the stress to the

264 unbuckled regions, which resist the load until some limit stress is reached (e.g. the yield stress for

265 steel). The limit stress in compression for the composites was taken as the compression matrix

266 failure stress (fuC, Table 1).

267

268 For design purposes, the method requires a prediction of the buckling stress and an equation that

269 relates the buckling stress to the effective width that ensues at the limit state (the strength equation).

270 The strength equation for natural fibre composites was derived empirically [24] and given by

271 Equations 2 and 3, where ρ is the element effectiveness ratio, λ is the element slenderness and fcr is

272 the element elastic buckling stress;

273

1.28
274 𝜌=
𝜆1.5
≤1 (2)

𝑓𝑢𝐶
275 𝜆= 𝑓𝑐𝑟
(3)

276

277 The application to sections in bending is identical, except that only the regions of the section in

278 compression are susceptible to buckling. The elastic bucking and effective width equations used in

279 the cold-formed steel structural specification AS/NZS 4600 [27] were followed exactly, as was

280 done in the previous compression design analysis [24]. The exception being that the steel strength

281 equation was replaced with the natural fibre composite strength Equation 2. In pure bending, the

282 elastic buckling coefficient for the web is 24 (rather than 4 for pure compression). The compression

283 flange is in uniform compression for both load cases of pure bending and pure compression, thus

284 the flange analysis follows exactly as previously [24]. In [24] the method is fully described, and

285 several worked examples are provided in the supplementary to the article, thus readers are referred

286 to that article for further details. For the natural fibre composite channels in bending the effective

287 width concept is demonstrated in Figure 9. The compressed portion of the web is shown as fully

11/34
288 effective in Figure 9, since this was calculated to be the case for all composite channels in the

289 present study.

290

291 Having established the effective section (Figure 9), the effective section properties (Ieff, yeff) were

292 calculated using the cross-section analysis software ThinWall, and used in place of the full section

293 values, Equation 4, to analytically predict the moment capacity (MApred). The effective section

294 properties and the calculated moment capacities are tabulated and compared with the experimental

295 values in Table 2. An example calculation is shown in Appendix B.

296

𝑓𝑢𝑇𝐼𝑒𝑓𝑓
297 𝑀𝐴𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑑 = 𝑦𝑒𝑓𝑓
(4)

298

299 While the analytical method does not incorporate the effects of matrix damage, the use of the

300 measured ultimate tensile stress (fuT, Table 1) produces good agreement with the experiments, with

301 an average test/predicted ratio of 0.97 and coefficient of variation of 0.06. It is interesting to note

302 that the flax and jute channels with 6 layers were calculated to be fully effective, which indicates

303 that the compression flange did not undergo compression buckling. This result is in agreement with

304 the experimental results, where despite the presence of flange intermediate stiffeners (which were

305 demonstrated to weaken the tension flange), these channels reached the highest average ultimate

306 stress. These channels could be considered as the most structurally efficient geometries of those

307 considered in this study.

308

309 5. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

310 5.1 General

311 The finite element model approach did not consider the fibres and the resin as discrete and separate

312 elements, and model them separately with their own individual material properties. Rather, the

313 model used a macro-approach, whereby the fibres and resin are modelled as a composite fibre-resin

12/34
314 matrix with a single set of mechanical properties assigned to this matrix. The material properties of

315 the composite fibre-resin matrix were carefully ascertained in accordance with ISO-specified

316 procedures, and the models were prepared in accordance with typical practice for modelling fibre-

317 resin composites. The material properties of the composite fibre-resin matrix used in the models are

318 provided in complete detail in Appendix C.

319

320 The commercial software ANSYS Workbench version 18.2 [28] was used for the finite element

321 modelling. The channel sections were generated from the measured geometries, and exemplar

322 models are shown in Figure 10a. Parametric studies indicated a mesh size of 5mm was suitable,

323 however in order to accurately articulate the corner radii of the internal stiffeners, a mesh size of

324 3mm was used for all models (Figure 10b). Four-node shell elements with six degrees of freedom

325 per node were used for the mesh. In accordance with the experimental setup and results, the

326 segments of the channels between the load and support points were fully restrained with the steel

327 restraint system, thus these were not required to be modelled. The full 350mm pure flexure length

328 of the channels between the loading points was modelled, and both ends were loaded with enforced

329 pure rotations about the major axis. The reaction moments at the ends were extracted from the

330 results, and the enforced rotation magnitude was increased until such time as the moment reaction

331 decreased beyond the peak value (this magnitude of rotation was defined through several trial

332 values). A large-displacement Newton-Raphson non-linear solution scheme was used, with 10 end

333 rotation steps manually defined and up to 100 sub-steps allowed within each defined step.

334

335 5.2 Material properties

336 The material models in ANSYS are capable of defining different material properties for each

337 individual fibre layer in a composite layup. Since the present composite layups consisted of

338 multiple layers where each individual layer in the layup had the same fibre orientation [0/90], all

339 layups were modelled as a single layer with a thickness equal to the measured total thickness of the

13/34
340 layup. The material was defined as elastic orthotropic, with identical values in both in-plane

341 directions (due to the 0/90 fibre orientation) based on the measured properties (Table 1), and

342 nominal values of 10% of the in-plane values in the through-thickness direction.

343

344 In order to estimate failure and thereby predict peak moment values, a progressive damage analysis

345 via stress-based damage initiation models and damage evolution laws was used. Stress limits in

346 tension and compression were defined by specifying the measured failure stress values in tension

347 and compression (fuT and fuC in Table 1). The stress limits in shear were defined by specifying the

348 failure stress values measured in the tension material tests at 45º to the fibre direction (fuS in Table

349 1). Strain limits were set at 10% such that strain limits were not invoked in the damage initiation

350 model. The default values for the Tsai-Wu constants were used and the Hashin damage initiation

351 criteria was invoked.

352

353 Damage evolution was defined with the continuum damage mechanics model in ANSYS. This

354 models the evolution of damage both within an element and throughout the mesh, and is based on

355 energy dissipation, as opposed to the alternative property degradation method which is an instant

356 stiffness reduction method. While this damage evolution model is more robust than stiffness

357 degradation, it requires the definition of material properties that are difficult to quantify. These

358 include the energy dissipated per unit area from: tensile fibre damage, compressive fibre damage,

359 tensile matrix damage, and compressive matrix damage. Each of these values also has an associated

360 damping constant, which dampens the damage accumulation and is designed to reduce convergence

361 issues associated with material softening. The energy dissipated per unit area (G) is defined as [28];

362

𝑈
363 𝐺 = ∫0 𝑓𝑒𝜎𝑒𝑑𝑈𝑒 (5)

364

14/34
365 where σe is the equivalent stress, Ue is the equivalent displacement, and Ufe is the ultimate

366 equivalent displacement where material stiffness is completely lost. For a simple uni-axial stress

367 state, the equivalent values are equal to the actual (uni-axial) values, and the actual displacements

368 are defined as;

369 𝑈𝑒 = 𝜀𝐿𝑐 (6)

370

371 where ε is the uni-axial strain and Lc is the length of the element in the direction of the stress/strain.

372 Thus for a uni-axial stress state, the energy dissipated per unit area is calculated by integrating the

373 material stress-(strain x Lc) curve up to material fracture. However, material data was not available

374 for the flax and jute composites differentiating between fibre- and matrix-dominated modes, nor

375 material compression stress-(strain x Lc) data up to complete failure. All energy dissipation

376 constants were therefore assumed to be equal to the uni-axial value for tension, which was derived

377 by integrating the flax and jute measured material stress-(strain x Lc) curves (Figure 1). Since all

378 finite element models used a constant element size of 3mm, Lc was taken as 3mm. Accordingly, the

379 calculated energy dissipated per unit area values for flax and jute were: 1.81 N/mm and 1.08 N/mm,

380 respectively. A nominal value for damping of 10% was used for all cases. The complete set of

381 values used for the flax and jute composite material definitions are tabulated in Appendix C.

382

383 5.3 Finite element analysis results

384 The finite element models replicated the moment-curvature response well, with a linear-elastic

385 response up to the initiation of damage, some softening as damage progressed, then failure indicated

386 as a reduction in the bending moment resistance. An exemplar finite element moment-curvature

387 response is compared with the experimental curve in Figure 11. It is noted that the finite element

388 models demonstrated slightly stiffer responses than the tests, likely due to small movements of the

389 composite channels inside the steel restraints in the tests. An exemplar deformed shape at the

390 ultimate state is shown in Figure 12. It is noted that few solution steps were required in the linear-

15/34
391 elastic region, however in the highly non-linear damage phase many more steps were required to

392 correctly identify the softening and failure path (Figure 11b).

393

394 The damage evolution replicated the experimental damage progression well, where damage initiated

395 in the tension flange, then the damaged region grew across the flange and into the web, while the

396 material softened to the point that the section moment resistance began decreasing. With respect to

397 the applied end rotation, the damage progressed quickly to the point of failure (moment reduction),

398 as was found in the experiments. A typical failure progression is shown in Figure 13.

399

400 Despite using the tension value for the energy dissipated per unit area (G) in compression, the

401 progressive damage model performed reasonably well. This may have resulted from the fact that the

402 failure was in fact tension dominated, thus the compression damage values were not especially

403 relevant. The moment capacity results from the finite element models are compared with the

404 experimental moment capacities in Table 2 (Mtest/MFEpred1). The strength of the jute composite

405 channels was predicted well, with all values within 8% of the experimental ones except for the two

406 outliers with possible manufacturing defects discussed previously. For these two defect channels,

407 the measured reduced material failure stress of 51.9MPa was input into the models, which improved

408 their prediction.

409

410 The strength of the flax channels were conservatively predicted in all cases, with results up to 19%

411 lower than the experimental values (Mtest/MFEpred1). Since all material values were accurately

412 defined based on measured values except for the energy dissipated per unit area (G), this value was

413 empirically adjusted to match the experimental moment capacities. Trial and error found that the

414 energy dissipated per unit area was required to be multiplied by three in order to replicate the

415 ultimate moments. When three times the energy dissipated per unit area (i.e. Gflax = 5.43 N/mm)

16/34
416 was used for all flax channels, the moment capacities matched the experimental values well, and

417 were all within 6%. These values are referred to as Mtest/MFEpred2 in Table 2.

418

419 Using the unadjusted jute models and the adjusted flax models (Mtest/MFEpred2), the moment

420 capacities compared well with the experimental capacities, with a mean test/predicted ratio of 0.99

421 and standard deviation of 0.06 (Table 2). Except for one outlier, the maximum error was 8%. These

422 results indicate that using the measured material properties for the elastic properties and the stress

423 limits, and the calculated energy dissipated per unit area values from Equations 5 and 6 based on the

424 measured tension material properties, provides reasonable agreement with experimental values.

425 However, the energy dissipated per unit area may need to be empirically adjusted in order to obtain

426 excellent agreement. Care should be taken in extrapolating these conclusions to loading situations

427 where the failure is not tension dominated, as the use of the tension energy dissipated per unit area

428 value may not be appropriate for such situations. It is noted that the damage progression is not

429 especially sensitive to the magnitude of the energy dissipated per unit area value; an increase of 2

430 times resulted in an average increase in moment capacity of 8%, while an increase of 3 times

431 resulted in an average increase in moment capacity of 14%.

432

433 6. APPLICATION IN RESIDENTIAL STUD WALLS

434 In the previous studies by the author on natural fibre channel sections in compression [23,24], the

435 compression capacities were noted to be only suitable for light structural applications, due to their

436 relatively modest strength. A potential light structural application identified was as stud columns in

437 residential stud walls, and comparisons with steel stud columns demonstrated suitable capacities.

438 Flax and jute channels fabricated with exactly the same dimensions and fibre thicknesses as those in

439 the present study had compression capacities between 27kN and 69kN, while a commercially

440 produced load-bearing steel stud had a compression capacity of 41kN (Rondo channel section with

441 a nominal web depth of 92mm, flange width of 33mm and thickness 1.15mm from 300MPa steel.).

17/34
442 This same steel stud has a moment capacity of 1.26kNm (as reported by the manufacturer Rondo),

443 while the flax and jute channels had moment capacities between 1.04kNm and 2.51kNm. This

444 indicates that many of the natural fibre channels had compression and bending capacities

445 comparable with, or in excess of, commercial steel channels used as residential stud wall columns.

446

447 To quantify the structural suitability of the present natural fibre channels for residential

448 applications, the Australian design criteria for timber-framed residential buildings was applied (AS

449 1720 [29]). Stud wall columns must satisfy the combined compression and bending interaction

450 Equation 7, where N* is the design compression load (from gravity loads), M* the design bending

451 moment (from lateral wind loads), ϕNu is the compression capacity and ϕMu is the bending capacity.

452 The capacity factors are derived from reliability analyses, and the compression capacity factor was

453 calculated as 0.75 in [24], and following a similar procedure was calculated as 0.8 for the moment

454 capacities in the present study.

455

𝑁∗ 𝑀∗
456 𝑁 ‒ 𝑀𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 = 𝜙𝑁 + 𝜙𝑀 ≤ 1 (7)
𝑢 𝑢

457

458 To characterise the compression and bending loads the procedures in [29] were followed, with

459 several assumptions, including; a wind region of N3 (this is the second highest non-cyclonic wind

460 category in Australia), 2.7m wall height, sheet roof, plasterboard claddings, 0.6m stud spacings, etc.

461 Such assumptions result in design compression and bending loads of 8.8kN (N*) and 0.41kNm

462 (M*), respectively. Using the compression test capacities from [24] (Nu), the bending test capacities

463 in the present study (Mu), and the capacity factors of 0.75 and 0.8 respectively, the N-Mlimit values

464 for each of the flax and jute channels were calculated from Equation 7 and are tabulated in Table 2.

465 Similarly, the procedures for assessing the lateral stiffness of the stud columns were followed,

466 whereby a serviceability wind pressure was used with the measured E and I values of the channels

467 (Table 2), to calculate the lateral deflection under service wind loads. The deflection limit for a

18/34
468 2.7m high wall is 18mm, and the calculated deflections are listed in Table 2 (M defl). The results in

469 Table 2 indicate that all flax and jute channels satisfied the strength and stiffness limits for the

470 particular assumed conditions for residential stud walls.

471

472 It should be noted that the above analyses consider only the structural suitability of natural fibre

473 channels for residential stud walls. Clearly, there are many factors that would need to be addressed

474 before natural fibre composites could be introduced into buildings, for example; fatigue-related

475 matrix damage, column buckling, other loading types, connections, fire performance, environmental

476 exposure and durability, etc., which were outside the scope of the present study.

477

478 7. CONCLUSIONS

479 Public concerns about the environment, climate change, energy consumption and greenhouse gas

480 emissions have placed increasing demands for the use of sustainable materials in the built

481 environment. Natural fibre composites such as those consisting of flax and jute fibres, may one day

482 prove a viable and environmentally sustainable alternative to traditional building materials. The

483 present study of natural fibre channels in pure bending complements previous studies of natural

484 fibre channels in pure compression, and further demonstrates the structural properties of primary

485 structural elements fabricated from flax and jute composites. Material tests indicated that the mean

486 tensile elastic stiffness and strength values were 6,386 MPa and 55.1 MPa for flax, and 6,941 MPa

487 and 62.1 MPa for jute. The ultimate moment capacities varied from 1.043 to 1.501 kNm for four-

488 layered composites, and 2.184 to 2.511 kNm for six-layered composites. While these structural

489 properties are modest, structural suitability for light structural applications such as residential load-

490 bearing stud walls has been demonstrated. Combined axial compression and bending capacities

491 were between 0.38 and 0.87, with no channels exceeding the design limit of 1.0. The suitability of

492 the effective width mechanics model for analytically predicting their compression and bending

493 strengths has been further demonstrated. The analytical models predicted the experimental ultimate

19/34
494 moment capacities with a mean and coefficient of variation of the test to predicted ratio of 0.97 and

495 0.06, respectively. Finite element procedures for predicting their strength via progressive damage

496 analysis have also been successfully demonstrated. The numerical models predicted the

497 experimental ultimate moment capacities with a mean and coefficient of variation of the test to

498 predicted ratio of 0.99 and 0.06, respectively.

499

500 8. REFERENCES

501 [1] Summerscales J, Dissanayake NPJ, Virk AS, Hall W. A review of bast fibres and their composites. Part 1 – fibres as
502 reinforcements. Composites: Part A 2010;41:1329-1335.
503 [2] Summerscales J, Dissanayake NPJ, Virk AS, Hall W. A review of bast fibres and their composites. Part 2 -
504 composites. Composites: Part A 2010;41:1336-1344.
505 [3] Ku H, Wang H, Pattarachaiyakoop N, Trada M. A review on the tensile properties of natural fibre reinforced
506 polymer composites. Composites: Part B 2011;42:856-873.
507 [4] Yan LB, Chouw N, Jayaraman K. Flax fibe and its composites – a review. Composites: Part B. 2014;56:296-317.
508 [5] Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their
509 mechanical performance. Composites: Part A 2016;83:98-112.
510 [6] Faruk O, Bledzki A, Fink H, Sain M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibres: 2000 – 2010. Progress in
511 Polymer Science 2012;37:1552-1596.
512 [7] Dicker M, Duckworth P, Baker A, Francois G, Hazzard M. Green composites: A review of material attributes and
513 complementary applications. Composites Part A 2014;56:280-289.
514 [8] Weclawski BT, Fan M, Hui D. Compressive behaviour of natural fibre composite. Composites: Part B 2014;67:183-
515 191.
516 [9] Costa FHMM, D’Almeida JRM. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of sisal and jute fibre
517 composites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 1999;38(5):1081-94.
518 [10] Hargitai H, Racz I, Anandjiwala RD. Development of hemp fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. J Therm
519 Comp Mat 2008;21:165-74.
520 [11] Oksman K. High quality flax fibre composites manufactured by the resin transfer moulding process. J Reinf Plast
521 Comp 2001;20(7):621-7.
522 [12] Van de Weyenberg I, Ivens J, De Coster A, Kino B, Baetens E, Verpoest. Influence of processing and chemical
523 treatment of flax fibres on their composites. Comp Sci Tech 2003;63:1241-46.
524 [13] Lefeuvre A, Bourmaud A, Morvan C, Baley C. Elementary flax fibre tensile properties: Correlation between stress-
525 strain behaviour and fibre composition. Ind Crops Prod 2014;52:762-69.
526 [14] Dittenber D, GangRao H. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure.
527 Composites Part A 2012;43:1419-1429.
528 [15] Yan LB, Chouw N. Crashworthiness characteristics of flax fibre reinforced epoxy tubes for energy absorption
529 application. Mat Des 2013;51:629-40.
530 [16] Yan LB, Chouw N. Behaviour and analytical modelling of natural flax fibre reinforced polymer tube encased coir
531 fibre reinforced concrete composite column. J Comp Mater 2013;47(17):2133-48.

20/34
532 [17] Mak K, Fam A, McDougall C. Flexural Behavior of Sandwich Panels with Bio-FRP Skins Made of Flax Fibers
533 and Epoxidized Pine-Oil Resin. Journal of Composites for Construction 2015;19(6):04015005.
534 [18] Duigou AL, Deux JM, Davies P, Baley C. PLLA/flax mat/balsa bio-sandwich manufacture and mechanical
535 properties. Appl Compos Mater 2011;18:421-38.
536 [19] Uddin N, Kalyankar RR. Manufacturing and structural feasibility of natural fiber reinforced polymeric structural
537 insulated panels for panelized construction. Int J Polym Sci 2011;96:35-49.
538 [20] Shah DU, Schubel PJ, Clifford MJ. Can flax replace E-glass in structural composites? A small wind turbine blade
539 case study. Composites Part B 2013;52:172–81.
540 [21] Corradi S, Isidori T, Corradi M, Soleri F. Composite boat hulls with bamboo natural fibres. Int J Mater Prod
541 Technol 2009;36(1):73–89.
542 [22] Alvarez-Valencia D, Dagher HJ, Lopez-Anido RA, Davids WG, Gardner DJ, Center AC. Behavior of natural-
543 fiber/thermoplastic sheet piling. ACMA-composites and polycon conference, January 2009, Tampa, Florida, USA;
544 2009.
545 [23] Bambach MR. Compression strength of natural fibre composite plates and sections of flax, jute and hemp. Thin-
546 Walled Structures, 2017, 119:103-113.
547 [24] Bambach MR. Geometric optimisation and compression design of natural fibre composite structural channel
548 sections. Composite Structures, 2018, 185:549-560.
549 [25] ISO 527-4:1997. Plastics – Determination of tensile properties. Part 4: Test conditions for isotropic and orthotropic
550 fibre-reinforced plastic composites
551 [26] Papangelis JP, Hancock GJ. Computer analysis of thin-walled structural members. Computers & Structures, 1995,
552 56(1):157-176.
553 [27] AS/NZS 4600:2005. Australian/New Zealand standard: Cold-Formed Steel Structures, Standards Australia; 2005.
554 [28] ANSYS Mechanical APDL, Advanced Analysis Guide. SAS IP Inc, 17th ed.; 2016.
555 [29] AS 1720.3:2016. Australian Standard for Timber structures, Part 3: Design criteria for timber-framed residential
556 buildings. Standards Australia, 2016.
557

21/34
NOTATION

B is the outside width of the channel section


D is the outside depth of the channel section
EC is the compression elastic modulus
ET is the tension elastic modulus
fcr is the elastic buckling stress
fult is the average ultimate stress of the channel section
fuC is the ultimate compression stress
fuS is the ultimate shear stress
fuT is the ultimate tension stress
FS is the internal flange stiffener
G is the energy dissipated per unit area
Ieff is the effective section second moment of area
Ifull is the full (gross) section second moment of area
L is the overall length of the channel section
LL is the longer length flange edge stiffener
MApred is the analytically predicted moment capacity of the channel section
MFEpred is the finite element predicted moment capacity of the channel section
Mtest is the experimental moment capacity of the channel section
NA is the neutral axis
SL is the shorter length flange edge stiffener
Ue is the equivalent displacement
Ufe is the ultimate equivalent displacement where material stiffness is completely lost
WS is the web stiffener
yfull is the full section distance from the neutral axis to the extreme bending fibre
εuT is the failure strain in tension
λ is the slenderness factor
ρ is the effectiveness factor
σe is the equivalent stress

22/34
FIGURES

Figure 1: Measured uni-axial tension stress-strain curves (fibre volume fractions of 39% for jute,
and 40% for flax)

a b c d e f

Figure 2: Channel section geometries

a b
Figure 3: Channel fabrication; a) exemplar fabrication mandrel, b) resulting channel section (B, D,
L are outside dimensions)

23/34
a b c d
Figure 4: Exemplar composite channel specimens: a) 4 layered jute (type Figure 2a); b) 4 layered
flax (type Figure 2d); 4 layered jute (type Figure 2e); 6 layered flax (type Figure 2f)

a b
Figure 5: Experimental four-point bending setup; a) elevation, b) section

Figure 6: Exemplar moment-curvature response (flax 4 layers 2WS 1FS LL) with photographs at
periodic intervals; a) 0kNm, b) 0.88kNm, c) 1.13kNm, d) 1.25kNm, e) 1.44kNm

24/34
Figure 7: Moment-curvature responses of exemplar channels with photographs approaching the
ultimate state; 1) jute 4 layers 1WS SL, 2) jute 4 layers 1WS LL, 3) jute 4 layers 2WS SL, 4) flax 4
layers 2WS LL, 5) flax 4 layers 2WS 1FS SL, 6) flax 4 layers 2WS 1FS LL, 7) flax 6 layers 2WS
1FS SL

25/34
a b
Figure 8: Exemplar failure modes (tension flange is the lower flange); a) 6 layered flax, b) 4 layered
jute

Figure 9: Exemplar effective widths (black areas) at the limit state, and the shift of the major axis
bending neutral axis (towards the tension side) between the full section and the effective section

26/34
a b
Figure 10: ANSYS modelling; a) exemplar finite element model geometries, b) exemplar 3mm shell
mesh used in all models

a b

Figure 11: Finite element (ANSYS) solution for specimen flax 4 layers 2WS LL; a) comparison
with experimental moment-curvature response, b) ANSYS solution points and damage initiation

Figure 12: Exemplar deformation at the ultimate state (true scale); flax 4 layers 2WS SL

27/34
a b c

d e
Figure 13: Exemplar progression of damage (jute 4 layers 2WS 1FS LL); a) 1.385kNm, b)
1.399kNm, c) 1.401kNm, d) 1.380kNm, e) 1.349kNm (red is fully damaged, grey is no damage)

28/34
TABLES

ET εuT fuT fuC fuS


(MPa) (%) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
Flax 6,386 1.1 55.1 61.5 33.0
Jute 6,941 1.5 62.1 51.3 34.2

Table 1: Measured material properties of the natural fibre composites (ET is the elastic modulus in
tension, εuT is the failure strain in tension, and fuC, fuT and fuS are the ultimate compression, tension
and in-plane shear stresses, respectively)

29/34
Fibre Fibre Ifull Ieff NA Mtest Mtest Mtest N-M M
Fibre Section layers weight D B L t (x103) ET fuT Mtest fult (x103) shift /MApred /MFEpred1 /MFEpred2 limit defl.
(g/m2) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm4) (MPa) (MPa) (kNm) (MPa) (mm4) (mm) (mm)
Jute 1WS, SL 4 1600 110.4 57.4 17.9 3.4 1478 6941 62.1 1.189 44.4 1344 3.4 1.01 0.97 0.97 0.84 13.3
Jute 1WS, LL 4 1600 110.9 58.2 27.2 3.4 1548 6941 62.1 1.229 44.0 1364 4.8 1.06 0.92 0.92 0.78 12.7
Jute 2WS, SL 4 1600 112.5 57.9 16.2 3.4 1546 6941 62.1 1.234 44.9 1439 2.6 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.87 12.7
Jute 2WS, LL 4 1600 112.0 57.8 26.4 3.4 1622 6941 62.1 1.301 44.9 1434 4.6 1.07 0.95 0.95 0.82 12.1
Jute 2WS, 1FS, SL 4 1600 109.9 57.3 16.2 3.4 1625 6941 51.9 1.109 37.5 1492 3.1 1.03 1.02 1.02 0.87 12.1
Jute 2WS, 1FS, LL 4 1600 109.2 57.4 26.8 3.4 1698 6941 51.9 1.043 33.5 1485 4.9 0.99 0.85 0.85 0.83 11.5
Jute 2WS, 1FS, SL 6 2400 115.1 61.3 16.6 5.5 2764 6941 62.1 2.216 46.1 2764 0.0 0.90 1.03 1.03 0.46 7.1
Jute 2WS, 1FS, LL 6 2400 115.0 61.4 25.8 5.5 2899 6941 62.1 2.511 49.8 2899 0.0 0.97 1.07 1.07 0.41 6.8
Flax 1WS, SL 4 1600 109.6 57.3 17.3 3.3 1434 6386 55.1 1.303 49.8 1354 2.2 0.92 1.12 1.01 0.82 14.8
Flax 1WS, LL 4 1600 109.9 57.5 27.7 3.3 1502 6386 55.1 1.351 49.4 1337 4.5 0.98 1.09 0.94 0.77 14.2
Flax 2WS, SL 4 1600 111.9 57.2 17.5 3.3 1501 6386 55.1 1.393 51.9 1429 2.8 0.94 1.16 1.05 0.79 14.2
Flax 2WS, LL 4 1600 111.0 57.7 27.0 3.3 1575 6386 55.1 1.447 51.0 1447 4.3 0.97 1.11 0.97 0.71 13.5
Flax 2WS, 1FS, SL 4 1600 108.8 57.1 15.4 3.3 1577 6386 55.1 1.355 46.7 1471 2.6 0.87 1.14 0.99 0.75 13.5
Flax 2WS, 1FS, LL 4 1600 108.4 57.0 25.2 3.3 1648 6386 55.1 1.501 49.4 1447 4.9 1.00 1.15 1.05 0.70 12.9
Flax 2WS, 1FS, SL 6 2400 113.5 59.8 15.7 5.1 2512 6386 55.1 2.184 49.3 2512 0.0 0.90 1.14 0.99 0.44 8.5
Flax 2WS, 1FS, LL 6 2400 114.0 60.1 24.2 5.1 2635 6386 55.1 2.489 53.8 2635 0.0 0.98 1.19 1.01 0.38 8.1
Mean: 0.97 1.06 0.99
COV: 0.06 0.10 0.06

Table 2: Natural fibre composite channel section dimensions and test results compared with analytical and finite element predictions (dimensions refer
to Figure 3, MApred refers to analytically predicted values, MFEpred refers to finite element predicted values, f refers to stress, M refers to moment, I refers
to second moment of area, ET is the tension elastic modulus) (WS is web stiffener, SL is shorter length flange edge stiffener, LL is longer length flange
edge stiffener and FS is internal flange stiffener)

30/34
APPENDIX A

This Appendix describes the commercially produced fabrics used to fabricate the composite channel
sections, and summarises relevant manufacturers data for the fabric and the epoxy used. The fabrics
were commercially produced by Composites Evolution (compositesevolution.com), specifically for
fibre-resin composites manufacture: Biotex Flax 400g/m2 and Biotex Jute 400g/m2. Both fabric
products are a 2x2 Twill weave, which is a generic pattern consisting of bi-directional yarns woven
over-over-under-under, where the yarns are perpendicular (i.e. 0º/90º), as demonstrated in Figure
A1 (a). Examples of the commercial fabric are shown in Figure A1 (b, c). Composites Evolution
provides technical data for the Biotex fabrics as summarised in Table A1. The commercial epoxy
resin Kinetix R240 with H126 (fast) hardener was used for all composite fabrications. The epoxy is
a room temperature out-of-autoclave cure epoxy resin that does not require heat input to cure.
Kinetix provides technical data for Kinetix R240 with H126 as summarised in Table A2.

a) b) c)
Figure A1: 2x2 Twill weave fabric: a) generic pattern, b) Biotex Jute 400g/m2 c) Biotex Flax 400g/m2

Typical Typical Typical


Fibre Fibre composite composite composite
tension tension fibre volume tension tension
Fabric Yarn Weight Density strength modulus fraction* strength* modulus*
(g/m2) (g/cm3) (MPa) (GPa) (%) (MPa) (GPa)
Biotex 2x2 Low-
Flax Twill twist 400 1.5 500 50 30 72 8.5
Biotex 2x2 Low-
Jute Twill twist 400 1.46 400 40 29 59 8.1
* vacuum infused unsaturated polyester matrix

Table A1: Manufacturers’ data for the Biotex fabrics

Pot Life - 100g @ 25ºC (in air) 20 minutes


Thin-laminate Open Time @ 25ºC 2 hours
De-mould time @ 25ºC 5 hours
Mix viscosity @ 25ºC 880 mPas
Shore D Hardness -1 day 79
Shore D Hardness – 2 weeks 82

Table A2: Manufacturers’ data for Kinetix R240 with H126

31/34
APPENDIX B

This Appendix contains an example calculation of the moment capacity using AS/NZS4600 [27]
and the procedures outlined in Section 4. Further examples of effective width calculations for
natural fibre channels to AS/NZS4600 are provided in the supplementary file of [24]. The following
calculation is for a four layered flax channel with one intermediate web stiffener and shorter flange
edge stiffener (Figure B1, Table 2), with relevant notation:

b is the flat width of the flange, excluding the corner radii (r)
dL is the flat width of the flange edge stiffener, excluding the corner radii (r)
Is is the second moment of area of the flange edge stiffener
Ia is the limit value for the second moment of area of the flange edge stiffener
k is the buckling factor of the flange
fcr is the buckling stress of the flange
λ is the slenderness of the flange
ρ is the effectiveness factor of the flange
beff is the effective width of the flange
dLeff is the effective width of the flange edge stiffener
EC is the compression elastic modulus
fuC is the maximum compression stress
fuT is the maximum tension stress
Ieff is the effective section second moment of area
yeff is the effective section neutral axis position
MApred is the analytically predicted moment capacity of the effective section

𝑏 = 57.3 ‒ 2𝑡 ‒ 2𝑟 = 57.3 ‒ (2 𝑥 3.3) ‒ (2 𝑥 6) = 38.7𝑚𝑚


𝑑𝐿 = 17.3 ‒ 𝑟 ‒ 𝑡 = 17.3 ‒ 6 ‒ 3.3 = 8𝑚𝑚
𝐸𝐶 4199
𝑆 = 1.28 = 1.28 = 10.6
𝑓𝑢𝑐 61.5

𝑡 𝑥 𝑑3𝐿
𝐼𝑠 = = 141𝑚𝑚3
12

𝐼𝑎 = 399𝑡4 ( 𝑏
𝑆𝑥𝑡 ) (
‒ 0.328 ≤ 𝑡4
115𝑏
𝑆𝑥𝑡 )
+ 5 = 15715𝑚𝑚4

𝑏
𝑛 = 0.582 ‒ ≥ 0.33 = 0.33
4𝑆 𝑥 𝑡

32/34
𝑛

𝑘= ( )(
𝐼𝑠
𝐼𝑎
4.82 ‒
5𝑑𝐿
𝑏 )
+ 0.43 = 0.97

𝑘𝜋2𝐸 𝑡2
𝑓𝑐𝑟 = = 27𝑀𝑃𝑎
12(1 ‒ 𝜐2)𝑏2
𝑓𝑢𝐶
𝜆= = 1.52
𝑓𝑐𝑟
1.28
𝜌= = 0.68
𝜆1.5
𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 𝜌 𝑥 𝑏 = 26.5𝑚𝑚
𝐼𝑠
𝑑𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 𝑑𝐿 = 0.1𝑚𝑚
𝐼𝑎

The web is fully effective. The effective section was entered into the cross-section analysis software
ThinWall, providing the following:

Ieff = 1.354 x 106 mm4


109.9
𝑦𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 2
‒ 2.2 = 52.6𝑚𝑚 where the neutral axis shifted 2.2mm towards the tension side
𝑓𝑢𝑇𝐼𝑒𝑓𝑓 55.1 𝑥 1.354𝑒6
𝑀𝐴𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑑 = = = 1.42𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑦𝑒𝑓𝑓 52.6

Figure B1: Flat widths of the flange (b) and flange edge stiffener (dL) of a channel with one
intermediate web stiffener

33/34
APPENDIX C

Jute Flax Units


Orthotropic elasticity
Young’s modulus X-direction 6941 6386 MPa
Young’s modulus Y-direction 6941 6386 MPa
Young’s modulus Z-direction 694 639 MPa
Poisson’s ratio XY 0.29 0.26
Poisson’s ratio YZ 0.29 0.26
Poisson’s ratio XZ 0.29 0.26
Shear modulus XY 2690 2534 MPa
Shear modulus YZ 269 253 MPa
Shear modulus XZ 269 253 MPa
Orthotropic stress limits
Tensile X-direction 62.1 55.1 MPa
Tensile Y-direction 62.1 55.1 MPa
Tensile Z-direction 62.1 55.1 MPa
Compressive X-direction -51.3 -61.5 MPa
Compressive Y-direction -51.3 -61.5 MPa
Compressive Z-direction -51.3 -61.5 MPa
Shear XY 34.2 33 MPa
Shear YZ 34.2 33 MPa
Shear XZ 34.2 33 MPa
Orthotropic strain limits
All values 0.1 0.1
Tsai-Wu constants
All values -1 -1
Damage initiation criteria
All values Hashin Hashin
Damage evolution law
G for tensile fibre damage 1.08 1.81a N/mm
Damping for tensile fibre damage 0.1 0.1
G for compressive fibre damage 1.08 1.81a N/mm
Damping for compressive fibre damage 0.1 0.1
G for tensile matrix damage 1.08 1.81a N/mm
Damping for tensile matrix damage 0.1 0.1
G for compressive matrix damage 1.08 1.81a N/mm
Damping for compressive matrix damage 0.1 0.1
a The modified value used to fit the experimental data was 5.43N/mm

Table C1: Material properties used in ANSYS finite element models

34/34

You might also like