Previewpdf
Previewpdf
Previewpdf
Solar Drying
Systems
Om Prakash
Anil Kumar
First edition published 2020
by CRC Press
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author
and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences
of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all
material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to
publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged
please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted,
reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means,
now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microflming, and recording, or in
any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, access www.copyright.
com or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA
01923, 978-750-8400. For works that are not available on CCC please contact mpkbookspermissions@
tandf.co.uk
Typeset in Palatino
by SPi Global, India
Contents
2. Drying Methodology....................................................................................13
2.1 Introduction .........................................................................................13
2.2 Moisture Content ................................................................................14
2.3 Moisture Movement Mechanism......................................................15
2.4 Equilibrium Moisture Content (EMC) .............................................17
2.4.1 EMC Models ...........................................................................17
2.4.1.1 Henderson Equation .............................................18
2.4.1.2 Chung–Pfost Equation..........................................19
2.4.1.3 Modifed Halsey Equation ...................................19
2.4.1.4 Modifed Oswin Equation....................................19
2.5 Drying Theory .....................................................................................19
2.6 Drying Rate Equation .........................................................................20
2.6.1 Constant Drying Rate Period ...............................................21
2.6.2 Falling Drying Rate Period...................................................21
2.7 Shrinkage..............................................................................................22
2.7.1 Shrinkage Model ....................................................................23
2.7.2 Volume Shrinkage..................................................................23
2.7.3 Bulk Density ...........................................................................23
2.7.4 Particle Density ......................................................................23
2.7.5 Dry Solids Density .................................................................24
2.7.6 Equilibrium Density .............................................................. 24
2.7.7 Porosity....................................................................................24
v
vi Contents
Index .....................................................................................................................137
Foreword by Rebecca R. Milczarek
Much regarding the solar drying of food materials has remained unchanged
in the 14,000 years that cultures around the globe have practiced it. Today, mil-
lions of entities—ranging from smallholder farmers in developing regions to
multinational companies operating on thousands of hectares—still employ
open sun drying to preserve fruit, vegetables, grains, and pulses. The contin-
ued popularity of open sun drying is because it is perhaps the most widely
accessible and low-cost food preservation method available.
While much in this feld has remained the same, since the 1990s there
have been rapid technological advancements in solar drying that promise
to enhance product quality, shorten drying time, and (further) improve the
environmental sustainability of the process. While open sun drying still has
a strong presence, indirect, mixed-mode, and active solar dryer designs are
becoming increasingly popular. A deeper understanding of solar drying’s
mass and energy transport phenomena is now possible through computa-
tional multiphysics modeling programs. New dryer designs can be dissemi-
nated across the globe in mere seconds. The drive to reduce greenhouse gas
and carbon emissions in the food processing industry has also renewed inter-
est in exploring and optimizing solar drying technologies.
Solar Drying Systems is a text that meets this moment. Drs Prakash and
Kumar have brought their collective 15-plus years of solar drying research
and teaching experience to bear on this comprehensive reference and instruc-
tional work. The authors have studied the solar drying of a diverse array
of crops and food products—apple, bitter gourd, gooseberry, jaggery, onion,
tomato, and watermelon, to name a few. The Agricultural Engineering com-
munity widely cites their physics-driven approach to designing and ana-
lyzing solar drying systems’ performance, and this approach forms the
framework of their book. Readers will gain an understanding of both the
fundamental principles of solar drying, which have remained constant over
millennia, as well as recent advances in dryer design, analysis, and optimiza-
tion, which are enabling a modern reimagining of the humble solar dryer.
ix
Preface
As the rise in demand for fossil fuel has been increasing on day-to-day basis
there is a need to put more attention on renewable energy sources. The sun
is always being considered as an unlimited source of energy. The use of solar
energy is not a new concept; it has been used since earlier in different ways.
Solar drying is one of the most prominent applications of the solar energy. It
is being used since long time for drying of different agricultural products for
farmers and small scale agro based industries.
There is a rapid advancement in the feld of solar dryer due to intensive
research in the feld of solar drying. Due to consistent effort from last three-
decade, solar drying system becomes cost effective as well as energy effcient.
This book presents complete information related to solar dryer. The whole
book is divided into seven chapters.
The frst chapter deals with various fundamentals related to the solar dry-
ing system. The solar drying system is mainly used to dry the agricultural
produce in the low thermal application. It is good in three prospective mainly
economy, environment, and minimization of post harvest loss. In this chap-
ter, importance of drying is also discussed in details Various others related
topics also discussed like crop drying characteristics, safe storage moisture
contents, dried product quality parameters and classifcation of drying. At
last this chapter, put foundation of the solar drying.
The second chapter deals with various drying methodology for the solar
dryer. This methodology is required to make drying process effective. Various
related concepts are to be discussed in detail such as moisture content, equi-
librium moisture content, drying rate, shrinkage and pre-treatment prior to
drying. By proper understanding the concept, it becomes easy to take maxi-
mum advantage of the drying process.
In the third chapter, a compressive review is being presented of the various
state of art solar dryer. Various type of solar dryer with different design are
discussed in this chapter.
Chapter four deals with the performance analysis of the solar drying sys-
tem. This analysis is very important to justify the utility of the solar dryer.
Any newly developed solar dryer is being evaluated based on these per-
formance parameters and compared the results with previous dryer. The
drying effciency, heat utilization factor, coeffcient of performance, thermal
effciency, overall daily thermal effciency, and exergy analysis are the promi-
nent performance analysis parameters based on that any solar dryer is being
judged. These performance parameters are applicable in the all the dryers
with slight modifcation, which vary from case to case to basis.
xi
xii Preface
Chapter fve deals with the thermal modelling of the solar dryer. By the
help of thermal modelling, these parameters can be predicted with high
accuracy namely inside air temperature, inside air relative humidity drying
rate, drying kinetics, and drying potentials.
Chapter 6 present the energy analysis of the solar dryer. All the important
parameters related to energy analysis such as embodied energy, energy pay-
back time, carbon credit and CO2 mitigation are being discussed.
The last chapter deals with economic analysis of the solar dryer. All impor-
tant economic parameters are discussed in this such annual cost, payback
period and others.
We hope that the present content of the book in respect of different tech-
nologies of solar drying can serve the useful information to practicing engi-
neers, learner's, faculty members, and various student of the world. Despite
our best concern and effort, we apologize if some errors are in the manuscript
due to inadvertent mistakes. We would appreciate being informed about the
errors and constructive criticism for the enhancement of the quality of this
book.
Om Prakash
Ranchi, India
Anil Kumar
New Delhi, India
Acknowledgments
This book is a tribute to the engineers and scientists who continue to push
forward the practices and technologies of solar drying systems. It would not
have been completed without the efforts of numerous individuals in addi-
tion to the primary writers, contributing authors, technical reviewers, and
practitioners.
Our frst and foremost gratitude is that we have been given the oppor-
tunity and strength to play our part in the service of society. We also
express our heartfelt gratitude to Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor, Delhi
Technological University, Delhi, India, and the Vice Chancellor of Birla
Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India, for their kind encouragement.
We would like to express our thanks to many people, faculty and friends
who provided valuable inputs during the preparation of this text. We
thank especially Dr. Jan Banout, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague,
Czech Republic; Prof. Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghany, King Saud University,
Saudi Arabia; Prof. Shuli Liu, Coventry University, UK; Prof. Cristina L.
M. Silva, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal; Prof. Raquel P. F.
Guiné, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Portugal; Dr. Ashish Shukla, Coventry
University, UK; Prof. Perapong Tekasakul, Prince of Songkla University, Hat
Yai, Songkhla, Thailand; Prof. Samsher, Delhi Technological University, Delhi
(India); Prof. (Retd.) G. N. Tiwari, Centre for Energy Studies, Indian Institute
of Technology, Delhi, India; and Prof. Emran Khan, Head of Department of
Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India, for their
valuable help and suggestions.
We wish to acknowledge our research scholar, Mr. Asim Ahmad, Mechanical
Engineering Department, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India,
and all colleagues for their support and encouragement.
We appreciate our spouses, Mrs. Poonam Pandey and Mrs. Abhilasha, and
our beloved children Ms Shravani Pandey, Master Tijil Kumar, and Ms. Idika
Kumar. They have been a great source of support and inspiration, and their
endurance and sympathy throughout this project have been most valued.
Our heartfelt special thanks go to CRC Press, for publishing this book. We
would also like to thank all those who have been involved, directly or indi-
rectly, in bringing the book to fruition.
Finally, yet importantly, we wish to express our warmest gratitude to our
respected parents – Sh. Krishna Nandan Pandey, Smt. Indu Devi, the late Sh.
Tara Chand, Smt. Vimlesh, and our siblings for their unselfsh efforts to help
in all felds of life.
xiii
Authors
xv
xvi Authors
1.1 Introduction
Plants are the primary source of food for the human population. Human
food is further categorized as perishable, non-perishable, processed, raw,
fresh, manufactured, organic and foods usable in various ways. The preser-
vation of food is also crucial. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO) reported that many people in developing countries
are acutely malnourished (www.fao.org), and it is certain that extra crops
will need to be cultivated to guarantee food safety. This situation is mainly a
result of an increase in population (Chauhan and Kumar, 2016). An alterna-
tive solution is to minimize loss at the levels of pre-harvest, during harvest,
and post-harvest. Among these three types of loss of the crop, post-harvest
loss is the most prominent. Post-harvest loss occurs mainly because of micro-
bial degradation of the crop. Microbial growth depends primarily on storage
conditions and moisture content. However, different kinds of microorgan-
isms have dissimilar growth rates, relating to conditions such as product,
storage atmosphere, content, etc. (Matthews et al., 2019).
The main methods of preservation to ensure the minimization of post-
harvest loss of the food product are freezing, vacuum sealing, canning, and
preserving with sugar, irradiating fruit, applying preservatives, and drying.
Drying is the most environomical method for minimization of post-harvest
loss. The process can be used for various types of food products for long-term
preservation with minimum compromise to the product quality, texture, and
color (Aumporn et al., 2018). The drying process is a very energy-intensive
process. Figure 1.1 represents energy consumption for drying as seen from
the global perspective.
Dried food takes up very little space compared to frozen and canned food.
However, it cannot be used as a substitute for freezing and canning meth-
ods because of their capacity to retain taste, appearance and nutritive value.
Drying occurs through heat and mass transfer of the dryable product. The
fow of energy is presented in Figure 1.2.
1
2 Solar Drying Systems
100%
80%
20%
0%
Global High-GDP Low-GDP
countries countries
~95 EJ-yr–1 ~50 EJ-yr–1 ~45 EJ-yr–1
FIGURE 1.1
Global energy use in the food sector (Lamidi et al., 2019).
SURFACE
FIGURE 1.2
Transportation of heat and mass transfer from the inner to the outer part of the product.
There has been intensive research in the feld of drying, with the aim of
making it more effective and less expensive. Every year, more and more
publications are produced regarding this feld. A graphical representation is
shown in Figure 1.3.
To take maximum advantage of drying, it is very important to select pre-
and post-processing of the product both before and after the drying event.
Fundamentals of Solar Drying Systems 3
3500
2929
3000
Number of publications
2686
2412 2420
2500
18901888
2000 1758 1748
1486
1500 1371 1314
1259
1019 981
894 883
1000 734* 735 705 736 652
500
0
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
Year
FIGURE 1.3
Trend of research publications from 2000–2019 (Menon et al., 2020).
TABLE 1.1
Post-Harvest Losses of Various Prominent Agricultural Commodities in India
Serial No. Commodities % Loss
1 Grains 4.65–5.99
2 Pulses 6.36–8.41
3 Fruits and vegetables 4.58–15.88
4 Floriculture 30–35
5 Medicinal and aromatic plants Not estimated
6 Oil seeds 3.08–9.96
the agricultural produce is wasted at the post-harvest level. Crop can also
be lost in the pre-harvest and during harvest, but post-harvest loss is very
prominent. Table 1.1 shows the post-harvest loss of agricultural commodities
in India.
It is therefore very important to minimize this loss at the post-harvest level
with a minimum investment of both energy and economy.
Drying emerges as one of the most prominent solutions to minimizing
post-harvest loss with the least use of energy and economy. It is a complex
method that involves at the same time heat and mass transfer along with sev-
eral other processes. This results in physical/chemical damage which leads
to variations in the quality and shape of the product. These are the promi-
nent changes that occur during the drying process, i.e., shrinkage, crystal-
lization, puffng, transformations from shrinkage, variance in color, texture,
and aroma, along with other changes that occur as a result of a compound
reaction (Singh and Shrivastava, 2017).
The important features of food drying are as follows:
1. The working temperature has a wide range, from triple point to the
critical point of the produce’s moisture level.
2. Working pressure is in a wide range, with the lower atmospheric pres-
sure to 25 bar.
3. Drying loads are across a wide range, from 0.10 kg/h to 100kg/h.
4. The drying time has a wide range, from less than 1 second to 5 months.
5. The thickness of the produce is in wide ranges from microns to tens of
centimeters.
6. Porosity of the produce is in a wide range, from 0%–99.9%.
7. All three types of heat transfer take place simultaneously.
Fundamentals of Solar Drying Systems 5
Sustainable agricultural
produce drying
FIGURE 1.4
Classifcation of sustainable agricultural produce drying (Lamidi et al., 2019).
120 140
35
30
100
30
0 .9
25
ty
dii
0% (C)
25
mi
20
10 re
Hu
tu
70 0%
0.9
ra
e
60
tiv
pe
8
90
0
la
% 60%
m
Re
20
Te
15
n
t
io
ra
%
40 atu
50
40
S 15
or 10
ulb %
B 30
0.85
et 10
W
20 20%
5
5
0 10%
0.80
0 –5
0%
0
–10 –5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Temeperature (°C)
FIGURE 1.5
A classical psychometric chart.
TABLE 1.2
Initial and Final Moisture Content and Maximum Allowable Temperatures
for Drying a Range of Crops
Initial Moisture Final Moisture Maximum Allowable
Content Content Temp. (oC)
Crop (%, w.b.) (%, w.b.)
Paddy rice, raw 22–24 11 50
Paddy rice, parboiled 30–35 13 50
Maize 35 15 60
Wheat 20 16 45
Corn 24 14 50
Rice 24 11 50
Pulses 20–22 9–10 40–60
Oil seed 20–25 7–9 40–60
Green peas 80 5 65
Caulifower 80 6 65
Carrot 70 5 75
Green beans 70 5 75
Onion 80 4 55
Garlic 80 4 55
Cabbage 80 4 55
Sweet potato 75 7 75
Chilies 80 5 65
Apricot 85 18 65
Apples 80 24 70
Grapes 80 15–20 70
Bananas 80 15 70
Guavas 80 7 65
Okra 80 20 65
Pineapple 80 10 65
Tomatoes 96 10 60
Brinjal* 95 6 60
Prakash and Kumar (2014).
* Eggplant.
come under the category of low moisture content crops. Each crop has differ-
ent moisture diffusivity, which is the rate of movement of moisture without
any specifed mechanism.
Therefore, based on the type of crop, drying parameters must be adjusted
in order to reach the best outcome from the drying process. For low moisture
content crops, a thick-layer drying process is recommended, but for medium
and high moisture content crops, a thin-layer drying process is advised.
The relative humidity also plays a very important role in the drying process.
The relative humidity of the drying chamber should be kept to a low level.
8 Solar Drying Systems
DRYING ON GROUND DISTRIBUTED TYPE MIXED MODE INTEGRAL TYPE DISTRIBUTED TYPE MIXED MODE INTEGRAL TYPE
MATS OR CONCRETE DRYING ON TRAYS DRYERS DRYERS DRYERS DRYERS DRYERS DRYERS
FLOORS
FIGURE 1.6
Classifcation of drying and dryers (Ekechukwu and Norton, 1999).
9
10 Solar Drying Systems
The drying process is classifed into two types, conventional and solar.
Conventional dryers cover all types of mechanical and electrical dryers.
They are very harmful to the atmosphere and costly in operation. In con-
trast, the operating cost of solar dryers is almost zero and it is very envi-
ronmentally friendly. Solar dryers have been used for generations to dry
agricultural produce using open sun drying, also called natural sun drying.
But one disadvantage of this method is that, because of changes in the cli-
mate, it is not always reliable. Hence controlled solar drying is becoming
increasingly popular. Controlled solar dryers are operated in both modes
of heat transfer, namely the natural convection mode, and the forced mode.
The solar dryer is classifed based on the operational mode of heat transfer
(Dhalsamant et al., 2018).
FIGURE 1.7
Natural solar drying (Prakash and Kumar, 2014).
Problems
1.1 Describe the need for a solar drying system in the current scenario?
1.2 Explain the importance of the drying of agricultural produce.
1.3 Critically analyze crop drying characteristics.
1.4 Critically analyze the safe storage moisture content.
1.5 Defne the quality for a dried product and its importance?
1.6 Classify the various types of drying processes.
1.7 Discuss the introduction of solar drying in the present scenario.
References
Aumporn, O., Zeghmati, B., Chesneau, X. and Janjai, S., 2018. Numerical study of
a solar greenhouse dryer with a phase-change material as an energy storage
medium. Heat Transfer Research, 49(6), 509–528.
Chauhan, P.S. and Kumar, A., 2016. Performance analysis of greenhouse dryer by
using insulated north-wall under natural convection mode. Energy Reports,
2, 107–116.
12 Solar Drying Systems
Dhalsamant, K., Tripathy, P.P. and Shrivastava, S.L., 2018. Heat transfer analysis
during mixed-mode solar drying of potato cylinders incorporating shrink-
age: Numerical simulation and experimental validation. Food and Bioproducts
Processing, 109, 107–121.
Ekechukwu, O.V. and Norton, B., 1999. Review of solar-energy drying systems II: an
overview of solar drying technology. Energy Conversion and Management, 40(6),
615–655.
Elkhadraoui, A., Kooli, S., Hamdi, I. and Farhat, A., 2015. Experimental investigation
and economic evaluation of a new mixed-mode solar greenhouse dryer for dry-
ing of red pepper and grape. Renewable Energy, 77, 1–8.
Huddar, V.B. and Kamoji, M.A., 2019, March. Experimental investigation on perfor-
mance of small passive solar greenhouse dryer for cashew kernel drying. In AIP
Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2080, No. 1, p. 030001). AIP Publishing.
Kant, K., Shukla, A., Sharma, A., Kumar, A. and Jain, A., 2016. Thermal energy stor-
age based solar drying systems: A review. Innovative Food Science & Emerging
Technologies, 34, 86–99.
Kumar, A., Deep, H., Prakash, O. and Ekechukwu, O.V., 2017. Advancement in
Greenhouse Drying System. In Solar Drying Technology (pp. 177–196). Singapore:
Springer.
Kumar, M., Sansaniwal, S.K. and Khatak, P., 2016. Progress in solar dryers for drying
various commodities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 346–360.
Lamidi, R.O., Jiang, L., Pathare, P.B., Wang, Y. and Roskilly, A.P., 2019. Recent advances
in sustainable drying of agricultural produce: A review. Applied Energy, 233,
367–385.
Matthews, K.R., Kniel, K.E. and Montville, T.J., 2019. Food Microbiology: An Introduction.
John Wiley & Sons.
Menon, A., Stojceska, V. and Tassou, S., 2020. A systematic review on the recent
advances of the energy effciency improvements in non-conventional food dry-
ing technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 100(June), 67–76.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2014. Solar greenhouse drying: A review. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 905–910.
Singh, P. and Shrivastava, V., 2017. Thermal Performance Assessment of Greenhouse
Solar Dryer under Passive Mode. International Journal of Advanced Technology in
Engineering and Science, 5(5), 530–538.
Drying Methodology 27
References
Abou, M.M.N., Boukar, M. and Madougou, S., 2019. Effect of drying air velocity on
drying kinetics of tomato slices in a forced-convective solar tunnel dryer. Journal
of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 9(2), 720–726.
Babalis, S., Papanicolaou, E. and Belessiotis, V., 2017. Fundamental mathematical rela-
tions of solar drying systems. In Prakash, O. and Kumar, A. (eds) Solar Drying
Technology (pp. 89–175). Singapore: Springer.
Babu, A.K., Kumaresan, G., Raj, V.A.A. and Velraj, R., 2018. Review of leaf drying:
Mechanism and infuencing parameters, drying methods, nutrient preserva-
tion, and mathematical models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90,
536–556.
Bala, B.K. and Bala, B.K., 1997. Drying and Storage of Cereal Grains. Enfeld (NH):
Science Publishers.
Bourdoux, S., Li, D., Rajkovic, A., Devlieghere, F. and Uyttendaele, M., 2016.
Performance of drying technologies to ensure microbial safety of dried fruits
and vegetables. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(6),
1056–1066.
Chauhan, P.S. and Kumar, A., 2016. Performance analysis of greenhouse dryer by
using insulated north-wall under natural convection mode. Energy Reports,
2, 107–116.
Chen, C.C. and Morey, R.V., 1989. Comparison of four EMC/ERH equations.
Transactions of the ASAE, 32(3), 983–0990.
Defraeye, T. and Radu, A., 2017. Convective drying of fruit: A deeper look at the air-
material interface by conjugate modeling. International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, 108, 1610–1622.
Ekechukwu, O.V., 1999. Review of Solar energy drying system I: An overview of dry-
ing principles and theory. Energy Conversion and Management, 40, 593–613.
El-Sebaii, A.A. and Shalaby, S.M., 2012. Solar drying of agricultural products: A
review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 37–43.
Gocho, H., Shimizu, H., Tanioka, A., Chou, T.J. and Nakajima, T., 2000. Effect of poly-
mer chain end on sorption isotherm of water by chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers,
41(1), 87–90.
28 Solar Drying Systems
References
Abubakar, S., Umaru, S., Kaisan, M.U., Umar, U.A., Ashok, B. and Nanthagopal, K.,
2018. Development and performance comparison of mixed-mode solar crop
dryers with and without thermal storage. Renewable Energy, 128, 285–298.
Agrawal, A. and Sarviya, R.M., 2016. A review of research and development work on
solar dryers with heat storage. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 35(6),
583–605.
Akpinar, E.K., 2006. Mathematical modelling of thin layer drying process under open
sun of some aromatic plants. Journal of Food Engineering, 77(4), 864–870.
Barnwal, P. and Tiwari, G.N., 2008. Grape drying by using hybrid photovoltaic-thermal
(PV/T) greenhouse dryer: an experimental study. Solar energy, 82(12), 1131–1144.
Bhamare, D.K., Rathod, M.K. and Banerjee, J., 2020. Numerical model for evaluating
thermal performance of residential building roof integrated with inclined phase
change material (PCM) layer. Journal of Building Engineering, 28, 101018.
César, L.V.E., Lilia, C.M.A., Octavio, G.V., Isaac, P.F. and Rogelio, B.O., 2020. Thermal
performance of a passive, mixed-type solar dryer for tomato slices (Solanum
lycopersicum). Renewable Energy, 147.845–855.
Chauhan, P.S., Kumar, A. and Gupta, B., 2017. A review on thermal models for green-
house dryers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 548–558.
Chauhan, P.S. and Kumar, A., 2018. Thermal modeling and drying kinetics of goose-
berry drying inside north wall insulated greenhouse dryer. Applied Thermal
Engineering, 130, 587–597.
Essalhi, H., Benchrifa, M., Tadili, R. and Bargach, M.N., 2018. Experimental and theo-
retical analysis of drying grapes under an indirect solar dryer and in open sun.
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 49, 58–64.
Huddar, V.B. and Kamoji, M.A., 2019, March. Experimental investigation on performance
of small passive solar greenhouse dryer for cashew kernel drying. In AIP Conference
Proceedings (Vol. 2080, No. 1, p. 030001). AIP Publishing, Karnataka, India.
Iranmanesh, M., Akhijahani, H.S. and Jahromi, M.S.B., 2020. CFD modeling and eval-
uation the performance of a solar cabinet dryer equipped with evacuated tube
solar collector and thermal storage system. Renewable Energy, 145, 1192–1213.
Ivanova, D. and Andonov, K., 2001. Analytical and experimental study of combined
fruit and vegetable dryer. Energy Conversion and Management, 42(8), 975–983.
Jain, D. and Tiwari, G.N., 2004. Effect of greenhouse on crop drying under natural and
forced convection II. Thermal modeling and experimental validation. Energy
Conversion and Management, 45(17), 2777–2793.
Kannan, N. and Vakeesan, D., 2016. Solar energy for future world: A review. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1092–1105.
Kumar, A. and Tiwari, G.N., 2006. Thermal modeling of a natural convection green-
house drying system for jaggery: An experimental validation. Solar Energy,
80(9), 1135–1144.
Lakshmi, D.V.N., Layek, A. and Muthukumar, P., 2018, October. Evaluation of
Convective Heat Transfer Coeffcient of Herbs Dried in a Mixed Mode Solar
Dryer. In 2018 International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Green Energy for
Sustainable Development (ICUE) (pp. 1–7). IEEE, Phuket, Thailand.
Various Designs of Solar Drying Systems 53
Lamidi, R.O., Jiang, L., Pathare, P.B., Wang, Y. and Roskilly, A.P., 2019. Recent advances
in sustainable drying of agricultural produce: A review. Applied Energy, 233,
367–385.
Lingayat, A.B., Chandramohan, V.P., Raju, V.R.K. and Meda, V., 2020. A review on
indirect type solar dryers for agricultural crops–Dryer setup, its performance,
energy storage and important highlights. Applied Energy, 258, 114005.
Madhlopa, A., Jones, S.A. and Saka, J.K., 2002. A solar air heater with composite–
absorber systems for food dehydration. Renewable Energy, 27(1), 27–37.
Motahayyer, M., Arabhosseini, A. and Samimi-Akhijahani, H., 2019. Numerical anal-
ysis of thermal performance of a solar dryer and validated with experimental
and thermo-graphical data. Solar Energy, 193, 692–705.
Nabnean, S., Janjai, S., Thepa, S., Sudaprasert, K., Songprakorp, R. and Bala, B.K.,
2016. Experimental performance of a new design of solar dryer for drying
osmotically dehydrated cherry tomatoes. Renewable Energy, 94, 147–156.
Pandey, A.K., Hossain, M.S., Tyagi, V.V., Rahim, N.A., Jeyraj, A., Selvaraj, L. and Sari,
A., 2018. Novel approaches and recent developments on potential applications
of phase change materials in solar energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 82, 281–323.
Prakash, O., Kumar, A. and Laguri, V., 2016a. Performance of modifed greenhouse
dryer with thermal energy storage. Energy Reports, 2, 155–162.
Prakash, O., Laguri, V., Pandey, A., Kumar, A. and Kumar, A., 2016b. Review on vari-
ous modelling techniques for the solar dryers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 62, 396–417.
Sahdev, R.K., Kumar, M. and Dhingra, A.K., 2017. Effect of mass on convective heat
transfer coeffcient during open sun drying of groundnut. Journal of Food Science
and Technology, 54(13), 4510–4516.
Sahu, T.K., Gupta, V. and Singh, A.K., 2016. A review on solar drying techniques and
solar greenhouse dryer. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-
JMCE), 13(3), 31–37.
Selvaraj, M., Sadagopan, P., Balakrishnan, N. and Bhuvaneswaran, M., 2018. A Review
of solar energy collection technology to heat air as thermal, using fat plate
collector and integrated with drying chamber for drying food products. Indian
Journal of Scientifc Research, 281–287.
Sharma, A., Chen, C.R. and VuL an, N., 2009. Solar-energy drying systems: A review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(6–7), 1185–1210.
Singh, S. and Kumar, S., 2012. Testing method for thermal performance based rating
of various solar dryer designs. Solar Energy 86(1), 87–98.
Slimani, M.E.A., Amirat, M., Bahria, S., Kurucz, I. and Sellami, R., 2016. Study and
modeling of energy performance of a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal solar col-
lector: Confguration suitable for an indirect solar dryer. Energy Conversion and
Management, 125, 209–221.
Sodha, M.S., Dang, A., Bansal, P.K. and Sharman, S.B., 1985. An analytical and experi-
mental study of open sun drying and a cabinet tyre drier. Energy Conversion and
Management, 25(3), 263–271.
Yadav, S., Lingayat, A.B., Chandramohan, V.P. and Raju, V.R.K., 2018. Numerical anal-
ysis on thermal energy storage device to improve the drying time of indirect
type solar dryer. Heat and Mass Transfer, 54(12), 3631–3646.
Performance Analysis of Solar Drying Systems 71
References
Akbulut, A. and Durmus, A., 2010. Energy and exergy analyses of thin layer drying of
mulberry in a forced solar dryer. Energy 35, 1754–1763.
Akpinar, E.K., 2010. Drying of mint leaves in a solar dryer and under open sun:
Modelling, performance analyses. Energy Conversion Management 51, 2407–2418.
Fudholi, A., Ruslan, M.H., Othman, M.Y., Azmi, M.S.M., Zaharim, A. and Sopian, K.,
2012. Drying of palm oil fronds in solar dryer with fnned double-pass solar col-
lectors. WSEAS Transactions on Heat and Mass Transfer 4(7), 105–114.
Fudholi, A., Sopian, K., Othman, M.Y. and Ruslan, M.H., 2014a. Energy and exergy
analyses of solar drying system of red seaweed. Energy Buildings 68, 121–129.
Fudholi, A., Sopian, K., Yazdi, M.H., Ruslan, M.H., Gabbasa, M. and Kazem, H.A.,
2014b. Performance analysis of solar drying system for red chili. Solar Energy
99, 47–54.
Leon, M.A., Kumar, S., and Bhattacharya, S.C., 2002. A comprehensive procedure for
performance evaluation of solar food dryers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 6, 367–393.
Luh, B.S. and Woodroof, J.G., 1975. Commercial vegetable processing. USA: The Avi
Publishing Company.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2014. Design, development, and testing of a modi-
fed greenhouse dryer under conditions of natural convection. Heat Transfer
Research 45(5), 433–451
Singh, S. and Kumar, S., 2012a. New approach for thermal testing of solar dryer:
Development of generalized drying characteristic curve. Solar Energy 86(7),
1981–1991.
Singh, S. and Kumar, S., 2012b. Testing method for thermal performance based rating
of various solar dryer designs. Solar Energy 86(1), 87–98.
Sutar, R.F. and Tiwari, G.N., 1996. Temperature reductions inside a green-
house. Energy 21(1), 61–65.
Tiwari, S. and Tiwari, G.N., 2017. Energy and exergy analysis of a mixed-mode green-
house-type solar dryer, integrated with partially covered N-PVT air collector.
Energy 128, 183–195.
102 Solar Drying Systems
References
Ahmad, A. and Prakash, O., 2019. Thermal analysis of north wall insulated green-
house dryer at different bed conditions operating under natural convection
mode. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38(6), e13257.
Ahmad, A. and Prakash, O., 2020. Performance evaluation of a solar greenhouse
dryer at different bed conditions under passive mode. Journal of Solar Energy
Engineering, 142(1).
Arun, K.R., Srinivas, M., Saleel, C.A. and Jayaraj, S., 2019. Active drying of unripened
bananas (Musa Nendra) in a multi-tray mixed-mode solar cabinet dryer with
backup energy storage. Solar Energy, 188, 1002–1012.
Chauhan, P.S. and Kumar, A., 2018. Thermal modeling and drying kinetics of goose-
berry drying inside north wall insulated greenhouse dryer. Applied Thermal
Engineering, 130, 587–597.
Chauhan, P.S., Kumar, A., Nuntadusit, C. and Banout, J., 2018. Thermal modeling
and drying kinetics of bitter gourd fakes drying in modifed greenhouse dryer.
Renewable Energy, 118, 799–813.
Kumar, A. and Tiwari, G.N., 2006a. Thermal modelling of a forced convection green-
house drying system for jaggery: An experimental validation. International
Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(3), 265–279.
Kumar, A. and Tiwari, G.N., 2006b. Thermal modelling of a forced convection green-
house drying system for jaggery: An experimental validation. Solar Energy, 80,
1135–1144.
Kumar, A. and Tiwari, G.N., 2006c. Effect of shape and size on convective mass
transfer coeffcient during greenhouse drying (GHD) of Jaggery. Journal of Food
Engineering, 73, 121–134.
Kumar, A. and Tiwari, G.N., 2007. Effect of mass on convective mass transfer coef-
fcient during open sun and greenhouse drying of onion fakes. Journal of Food
Engineering, 79, 1337–1350.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2014a. Design, development, and testing of a modi-
fed greenhouse dryer under conditions of natural Convection. Heat Transfer
Research, 45(5), 433–451.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2014b. Performance evaluation of greenhouse dryer with
opaque north wall. Heat Mass Transfer, 50, 493–500.
Qiu, G., Sun, J., Nie, L., Ma, Y., Cai, W. and Shen, C., 2020. Theoretical study on heat
transfer characteristics of a fnned tube used in the collector/evaporator under
solar radiation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 165, 114564.
Singh, R.G. and Tiwari, G.N., 2020. Simulation performance of single slope solar still
by using iteration method for convective heat transfer coeffcient. Groundwater
for Sustainable Development, 10, 100287.
Tiwari, G.N., 2003. Greenhouse Technology for Controlled Environment. Alpha Science,
UK.
Energy Analysis of Solar Drying Systems 119
References
Ahmad, A. and Prakash, O., 2019. Thermal analysis of north wall insulated green-
house dryer at different bed conditions operating under natural convection
mode. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38(6), 1–12.
Ahmad, A. and Prakash, O., 2020. Performance evaluation of a solar greenhouse
dryer at different bed conditions under passive mode. Journal of Solar Energy
Engineering, 142(1), 1–10.
Akbulut, A. and Durmus, A., 2010. Energy and exergy analyses of thin layer drying of
mulberry in a forced solar dryer. Energy, 35(4), 1754–1763.
Akinola, A.O. and Fapetu, O.P., 2006. Exergetic analysis of a mixed mode solar dryer.
Journal of Engineering Applied Science, 1(3), 205–210.
120 Solar Drying Systems
Akpinar, E.K. and Sarsilmaz, C., 2004. Energy and exergy analyses of drying of apri-
cots in a rotary solar dryer. International Journal of Exergy, 1(4), 457–474.
Amer, B.M.A., Hossain, M.A. and Gottschalk, K., 2010. Design and performance eval-
uation of a new hybrid solar dryer for banana. Energy Conversation Managament,
51(4), 813–820, .
Ananno, A.A., Masud, M.H., Dabnichki, P. and Ahmed, A., 2020. Design and numeri-
cal analysis of a hybrid geothermal PCM fat plate solar collector dryer for
developing countries. Solar Energy, 196, 270–286.
Bagheri, H., Arabhoseini, A. and Kianmehr, M.H., 2015. Energy and exergy analyses
of thin layer drying of tomato in a forced solar dryer. Iranian Journal of Biosystems
Engineering (Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences) Spring–Summer, 46(1), 39–45.
Baird, A.G. and Haslam, P., 1997. The energy embodied in building materials-updated
new zealand coeffcients and their signifcance. IPENZ Transactions, 24, 46–54.
Bolaji, B., 2011. Exergetic analysis of solar drying systems. Natural Resources, 2(2),
92–97.
Chauhan, P.S. and Kumar, A., 2016. Performance analysis of greenhouse dryer by
using insulated north-wall under natural convection mode. Energy Reports, 2,
107–116.
Chowdhury, M.M.I., Bala, B.K. and Haque, M.A., 2011. Energy and exergy analysis of
the solar drying of jackfruit leather. Biosystem Engineering, 110(2), 222–229.
Choab, N., Allouhi, A., El Maakoul, A., Kousksou, T., Saadeddine, S. and Jamil, A.,
2019. Review on greenhouse microclimate and application: Design parame-
ters, thermal modeling and simulation, climate controlling technologies. Solar
Energy, 191, 109–137.
Condorı, M., Echazu, R. and Saravia, L., 2001. Solar drying of sweet pepper and garlic
using the tunnel greenhouse drier. Renewable Energy, 22(4), 447–460.
Dejchanchaiwong, R., Arkasuwan, A., Kumar, A. and Tekasakul, P., 2016. Mathematical
modeling and performance investigation of mixed-mode and indirect solar dry-
ers for natural rubber sheet drying. Energy for Sustainable Development, 34, 44–53.
Edalatpour, M., Kianifar, A., Aryana, K. and Tiwari, G.N., 2016. Energy, exergy, and
cost analyses of a double-glazed solar air heater using phase change material.
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 8(1), 015101.
Eltawil, M.A., Azam, M.M. and Alghannam, A.O., 2018. Energy analysis of hybrid
solar tunnel dryer with PV system and solar collector for drying mint
(MenthaViridis). Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 352–364.
Fudholi, A., Sopian, K., Othman, M.Y. and Ruslan, M.H., 2014. Energy and exergy
analyses of solar drying system of red seaweed. Energy and Buildings, 68, 121–129.
İçier, F., Çolak, N., Erbay, Z., Hancioğlu, E. and Hepbasli, A., 2008. A comparative
study on exergetic effciencies of two different drying processes. Tarım Makinaları
Bilimi Dergisi, 4(3), 279–284.
Jain, D. and Tewari, P., 2015. Performance of indirect through pass natural convective
solar crop dryer with phase change thermal energy storage. Renewable Energy,
80, 244–250.
Janjai, S., Lamlert, N., Intawee, P., Mahayothee, B., Bala, B.K., Nagle, M. and Müller,
J., 2009. Experimental and simulated performance of a PV-ventilated solar
greenhouse dryer for drying of peeled longan and banana. Solar Energy, 83(9),
1550–1565.
Energy Analysis of Solar Drying Systems 121
Kumar, A. and Tiwari, G.N., 2006. Thermal modeling of a natural convection green-
house drying system for jaggery: An experimental validation. Solar Energy, 80,
1135–1144.
La Madrid, R., Marcelo, D., Orbegoso, E.M. and Saavedra, R., 2016. Heat transfer study
on open heat exchangers used in jaggery production modules–Computational
Fluid Dynamics simulation and feld data assessment. Energy Conversion and
Management, 125, 107–120.
Mokhtarian, M., Tavakolipour, H. and Kalbasi-Ashtari, A., 2016. Energy and exergy
analysis in solar drying of pistachio with air recycling system. Drying Technology,
34(12), 1484–1500.
Nayak, S., Kumar, A., Singh, A.K. and Tiwari, G.N., 2014. Energy matrices analysis
of hybrid PVT greenhouse dryer by considering various silicon and non-silicon
PV modules. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 33(2), 336–348.
Nawaza, I. and Tiwari, G.N., 2006. Embodied energy analysis of photovoltaic (PV)
system based on macro- and micro-level. Energy Policy, 34, 3144–3152.
Panwar, N.L., 2014. Experimental investigation on energy and exergy analysis of cori-
ander (Coriadrum sativum L.) leaves drying in natural convection solar dryer.
Applied Solar Energy, 50(3), 133–137.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2013. ANFIS prediction model of a modifed active green-
house dryer in no-load conditions in the month of January. International Journal
of Advanced Computer Research, 3(1), 220.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2014a. Environomical analysis and mathematical mod-
elling for tomato fakes drying in a modifed greenhouse dryer under active
mode. International Journal of Food Engineering, 10(4), 669–681.
Prakash, O., Kumar, A. and Laguri, V., 2016a. Performance of modifed greenhouse
dryer with thermal energy storage. Energy Reports, 2, 155–162.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2014b. ANFIS modelling of a natural convection green-
house drying system for jaggery: An experimental validation. International
Journal of Sustainable Energy, 33(2), 316–335.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2014c. Thermal performance evaluation of modifed
active greenhouse dryer. Journal of Building Physics, 37(4), 395–402.
Prakash, O. and Kumar, A., 2015. Annual performance of a modifed greenhouse
dryer under passive mode in no-load conditions. International Journal of Green
Energy, 12(11), 1091–1099.
Prakash, O., Kumar, A. and Laguri V., 2016b. Performance of modifed greenhouse
dryer with thermal energy storage. Energy Reports 2, 155–162
Rabha, D.K., Muthukumar, P. and Somayaji, C., 2017. Energy and exergy analyses of
the solar drying processes of ghost chilli pepper and ginger. Renewable Energy,
105, 764–773.
Reyes, A., Mahn, A. and Vásquez, F., 2014. Mushrooms dehydration in a hybrid-solar
dryer, using a phase change material. Energy Conversion and Management, 83,
241–248.
Sajith, K.G. and Muraleedharan, C., 2014. Economic analysis of a hybrid photovoltaic/
thermal solar dryer for drying amla. International Journal of Engineering Research
& Technology (IJERT), 3(8), 907–910.
Scanlin, D., Renner, M., Domermuth, D. and Moody, H., 1999. Improving solar food
dryers. Home Power, 69, 24–34.
122 Solar Drying Systems
Shalaby, S.M. and Bek, M.A., 2014. Experimental investigation of a novel indirect
solar dryer implementing PCM as energy storage medium. Energy Conversion
and Management, 83, 1–8.
Shrivastava, V. and Kumar, A., 2017. Embodied energy analysis of the indirect solar
drying unit. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 38(3), 280–285.
Simate, I.N., 2001. Simulation of the mixed-mode natural-convection solar drying of
maize. Drying Technology, 19(6), 1137–1155.
Singh, P., Shrivastava, V. and Kumar, A., 2018. Recent developments in greenhouse
solar drying: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3250–3262.
Vijayan, S., Arjunan, T.V. and Kumar, A., 2020. Exergo-environmental analysis of an
indirect forced convection solar dryer for drying bitter gourd slices. Renewable
Energy, 146, 2210–2223.
Watt, M., Johnson, A., Ellis M. and Quthred, N. (1998). Life cycle air emission from PV
power system. Progress in Photovoltaic Research Application, 6(2): 127–136.
Xu, C., Li, X., Xu, G., Xin, T., Yang, Y., Liu, W. and Wang, M., 2018. Energy, exergy
and economic analyses of a novel solar-lignite hybrid power generation process
using lignite pre-drying. Energy Conversion and Management, 170, 19–33.
Economic Analysis of Solar Drying Systems 133
References
Aravindh, M.A. and Sreekumar, A., 2015. Solar drying—a sustainable way of food
processing. In A. Sharma and S. Kumar Kar (eds) Energy Sustainability through
Green Energy (pp. 27–46). Springer, New Delhi.
Banout, J., Ehl, P., Havlik, J., Lojka, B., Polesny, Z. and Verner, V., 2011. Design and
performance evaluation of a Double-pass solar drier for drying of red chilli
(Capsicum annum L.). Solar Energy, 85, 506–515.
Elkhadraoui, A., Kooli, S., Hamdi, I. and Farhat, A., 2015. Experimental investigation
and economic evaluation of a new mixedmode solar greenhouse dryer for dry-
ing of red pepper and grape. Renewable Energy, 77, 1–8.
Fudholi, A., Sopian, K., Bakhtyar, B., Gabbasa, M., Othman, M.Y. and Ruslan, M.H.,
2015. Review of solar drying systems with air based solar collectors in Malaysia.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1191–1204.
Sreekumar, A., Manikantan, P.E. and Vijayakumar, K.P., 2008. Performance of indirect
solar cabinet dryer. Energy Conversion and Management, 49, 1388–1395.
Shrivastava, V. and Kumar, A., 2017. Embodied energy analysis of the indirect solar
drying unit. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 38(3), 280–285.