Plea Agreement & Evidence Redacted
Plea Agreement & Evidence Redacted
Plea Agreement & Evidence Redacted
vs.
Defendant.
Attorney for the District of Montana, and the defendant, Kevin Patrick Smith, and
the defendant's attorney, Andrew J. Nelson, have agreed upon the fo llowing:
i sA
~ /115
DEF
if%;/
ATTY
7 /1.-tli
Date(
7
Page 1
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 2 of 9
Office for the District of Montana and the defendant. It does not bind any other
At the time of sentencing, if the CoUti accepts this plea agreement, the
3. Nature of the Agreement: The parties agree that this plea agreement
United States: a) moves to dismiss, and the Court agrees to dismiss, count 2
1(/!3 pw
DEF ATTY Page 2
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 3 of 9
withdraw the plea, even if the Court does not accept or follow the
Third, the defendant made the threat with the intent to impede,
intimidate, interfere with, or retaliate against that official; and,
prosecution for pe1jury or false statement, any statement given under oath during
(b) The defendant has the right to plead not guilty or to persist in a
xl «ti fffiJ
fysv DEF ATTY Page 3
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 4 of 9
(c) The defendant has the right to a jury trial unless, by written
waiver, the defendant consents to a non-jury trial. The United States must also
necessary, have the Court appoint counsel at trial and at every other stage of these
proceedings.
laypersons selected at random. The defendant and the defendant's attorney would
ave a say in who the jurors would be by removing prospective jurors for cause
peremptory challenges. The jury would have to agree unanimously before it could
return a verdict of either guilty or not guilty. The jury would be instructed that the
defendant is presumed innocent, and that it could not convict unless, after hearing
all the evidence, it was persuaded of the defendant' s guilt beyond a reasonable
doubt.
(f) If the trial is held by the judge without a jury, the judge would
find the facts and determine, after hearing all of the evidence, whether or not the
be required to present its w itnesses and other evidence against the defendant. The
;£ts IH'a-J
DEF ATTY Page 4
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 5 of 9
could present witnesses and other evidence. If the witnesses for the defendant
wou ld not appear voluntarily, their appearance could be mandated through the
the defendant could decline to testify and no inference of guilt could be drawn
from the refusal to testify. Or the defendant could exercise the choice to testify.
(i) If convicted, and within 14 days of the entry of the Judgm ent
and Commitment, the defendant would have the right to appeal the conviction to
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for review to determine if any errors were made
U) The defendant has a right to have the district court conduct the
By execution of thi s agreement, the defendant waives that right and agrees to hold
that hearing before, and allow the Rule 11 colloquy to be conducted by, the U .S.
the United States may be removed from the United States, denied citizenship, and
ATTY Page 5
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 6 of 9
agreement, the defendant is waiving all of the rights set forth in this paragraph.
The defendant' s attorney has explained those rights and the consequences of
responsibility, pursuant to USSG §3E 1.1 ( a), unless the defendant is found to have
obstructed justice prior to sentencing, pursuant to USSG §3C 1.1, or acted in any
way inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility. The United States will move
under the Guidelines. The parties reserve the right to make any other arguments at
the time of sentencing. The defendant understands that the Court is not bound by
this recommendation.
understands that the law provides a right to appeal and collaterally attack the
Based on the concessions made by the United States, the defendant knowingly
_if2- {1J!
DEF ATTY Page 6
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 7 of 9
waives any right to appeal or collaterally attack any aspect of the sentence,
the admitted conduct does not fall within any statute of conviction. This waiver
does not prohibit the right to pursue a collateral challenge alleging ineffective
assistance of counsel.
U.S. Probation Office to release to the Financial Litigation Unit of the U.S.
defendant to the U.S. Probation Office and any info rmation obtained by the U.S.
Probation Office about the defendant through its investigation. The defendant
further agrees to fully complete a financial statement in the form prescribed by the
evaluate the defendant's abi lity to satisfy any financial obligation imposed by the
Court. The defendant consents to being immediately placed on the Treasury Offset
Program to help meet the defendant's obligation to pay restitution and/or a fine.
f1!5 Af,J
DEF ATTY Page 7
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 8 of 9
induce the defendant to plead guilty, and that this agreement is freely and
unless (A)( i) the Court finds there is a substantial likelihood that a motion for
acquittal or new trial will be granted or (ii) this agreement provides that the United
States wil l recommend that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed and (B) the
Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant is not likely to
flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community. Then, if exceptional
12. Breach: If the defendant breaches this plea agreement, at any time, in
any way, including but not limited to appealing or collaterally attacking the
conviction or sentence, the United States may prosecute the defendant for any
counts dismissed or not charged pursuant to this plea agreement. Additionally, the
United States may use any factua l admissions made by the defendant pursuant to
for a gui lty plea to count 1 of the indictment by the defendant, the United States
agrees to not prosecute the defendant for the possession of an unregistered silencer,
41/ Ii
"7 !tt
D~tel
"'t
ATTY Page 8
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 22 Filed 03/22/23 Page 9 of 9
in violation of26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5845(a)(7), 5861(c), that was found in his
United States, the defendant, or defense counsel prior to the full execution of this
representations have been made by the United States except as set forth in writing
in this plea agreement. This plea agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties. Any term or condition which is not expressly stated as part of
TIMOTHY J. RACICOT
First Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for the United States, Acting
Under Authority Conferred by
28UC!d A}~
RY~da- -
Asvstant/U. S. Attorney
Date: 2,
12 } cll9
r~tll
KEVIN PATRIC SMITH
Defendant
Date: - o]
-'=/-'W--',lc.......::.._.:c...
Defense Co/-tse/2
Date: 7 --i ( Z- '(
r <
f USA,-,;{/
5 ;w
DEF ATTY Page 9
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 25 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 4
RYAN G. WELDON
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Attorney’s Office
P.O. Box 8329
Missoula, MT 59807
101 E. Front, Suite 401
Missoula, MT 59802
Phone: (406) 542-8851
FAX: (406) 542-1476
E-mail: Ryan.Weldon@usdoj.gov
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
1
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 25 Filed 03/30/23 Page 2 of 4
THE CHARGE
two counts of Threats to Injure and Murder a United States Senator, in violation of
PLEA
guilty to count 1 of the indictment. The motion for change of plea filed with the
Court represents, in the government’s view, the most favorable disposition of the
case against the defendant. See, e.g., Missouri v. Frye, 132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012).
ELEMENTS
Third, the defendant made the threat with the intent to impede,
intimidate, interfere with, or retaliate against that official; and,
PENALTY
2
Case 9:23-cr-00015-DLC Document 25 Filed 03/30/23 Page 4 of 4
The United States would have presented this evidence through the testimony
TIMOTHY J. RACICOT
First Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for the United States, Acting
Under Authority Conferred by
28 U.S.C. § 515