ITFA Solution June 2018 Exam
ITFA Solution June 2018 Exam
ITFA Solution June 2018 Exam
MODEL SOLUTION
Solution to the question No. 2
(a) - i.
Page 1 of 7
Answer to the question no.2(b)
Schedule 1:
Computation of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts at December 31, 2010
Aging Category Balance % Doubtful Accounts
Nov–Dec 2010 10,80,000 2 21,600
(To increase the allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2010, resulting from a
change in accounting estimate)
Page 3 of 7
Solution to the question No. 4
(b)
Cost Retail
Beginning inventory .................................................. Tk. 30,000 Tk. 46,500
Purchases ................................................................ 55,000 88,000
Purchase returns ...................................................... (2,000) (3,000)
Freight on purchases ................................................ 2,400 _______
Totals ............................................................ 85,400 131,500
Add: Net markups
Markups ....................................................... Tk. 10,000
Markup cancellations ................................... (1,500)
Net markups ............................................................. _______ 8,500
Totals ............................................................ Tk. 85,400 140,000
Tk. 85,400
Cost-to-retail ratio = = 61%
Tk. 140,000
(i)
ABC CO.
Bank Reconciliation
June 30, 2015
Balance per bank, June 30 .......................................................................... $4,150.00
Add: Deposits in transit ............................................................................... 3,390.00
Deduct: Outstanding checks ....................................................................... 2,136.05
Correct cash balance, June 30 .................................................................... $5,403.95
Cash ..............................................................................................1,789.80
Page 4 of 7
Accounts Receivable ................................................................ 30.00*
Accounts Payable .................................................................... 523.80**
Notes Receivable ..................................................................... 1,200.00
Interest Revenue ...................................................................... 36.00
(b)
(i) Treasury shares should not be classified as an asset since a corporation cannot own itself.
(ii) The “gain” or “loss” on sale of treasury shares should not be treated as additions to or
deductions from income. If treasury shares are carried in the accounts at cost, these so-called
gains or losses arise when the treasury shares are sold. These “gains” or “losses” should be
considered as additions to or reductions of equity. In some instances, the “loss” should be
charged to Retained Earnings. “Gains” or “losses” arising from treasury shares transactions are
not included as a component of net income since dealings in treasury shares represent equity
transactions.
(iii) Dividends on treasury shares should never be included as income, but should be credited
directly to Retained Earnings, against which they were incorrectly charged. Since treasury
shares cannot be considered an asset, dividends on treasury shares are not properly included in
net income.
(c)
(i) January 1, 2015
Cash ..........................................................................................................
860,651.79
Bonds Payable ............................................................................... 860,651.79
(d)
Report on the effects of a share dividend and a share split
INTRODUCTION
As financial advisor to the Board of Directors for Ortago S.A., I have been asked to report on the
effects of the following options for creating interest in Ortago S.A. shares: a 20% share dividend, a
100% share dividend, and a 2-for-1 share split. The board wishes to avoid adjustments to equity
balances, while stimulating interest in the shares. The Board also thinks that a cash dividend at this
point would be unwise.
RECOMMENDATION
In order to meet the needs of Ortago S.A. the board should choose a
2-for-1 share split. The share split is the only option which would not change the dollar balances in the
equity section of the company’s statement of financial position.
DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS
The three above-mentioned options would all result in an increased number of ordinary shares
outstanding. Because the shares would be distributed on a pro rata basis to current shareholders,
each shareholder of record would maintain his/her proportion of ownership after the declaration. All
three options would probably generate significant interest in the shares.
The problem with this type of share dividend is that IFRS requires these shares to be accounted for at
their par value.
Page 6 of 7
The following journal entry would be made to record the declaration of this dividend:
This option doubles the number of shares issued and outstanding; however, it also cuts the par value
per share in half. No accounting treatment beyond a memorandum entry is required for the split
because the effect of splitting the par value cancels out the effect of doubling the number of shares.
Therefore, Retained Earnings remains unchanged as does the Share Capital—Ordinary and Share
Premium—Ordinary accounts. In addition, the decreased market value will encourage investors who
might otherwise consider the shares too expensive.
CONCLUSION
To generate the greatest interest in Ortago S.A. shares while maintaining the present balances in the
equity section of the statement of financial position, you should opt for the 2-for-1 share split.
= THE END =
Page 7 of 7