HRM
HRM
HRM
Banff Aspen Lodge is a hotel located in the Canadian Rockies. As a popular destination for
adventure seekers, the hotel needs a well-trained, diverse staff that can provide excellent
customer service. This case analysis examines the hotel’s strategies to ensure successful and
adequate staffing.
The first step Banff Aspen Lodge took to ensure staffing success was creating a job
description for each position. This included providing a detailed list of duties, qualifications,
and skills. This confirmed that potential applicants knew precisely what was expected of
them and gave them a better understanding of the job.
The next step was to create a comprehensive recruitment plan. This plan included identifying
the positions that needed to be filled, potentially sourcing candidates, and conducting
interviews. The recruitment process was designed to be highly selective so that only the best
candidates were chosen.
After selecting suitable candidates, Banff Aspen Lodge focused on training and development.
They provided ongoing training and support to their employees, creating a learning and
development culture. This ensured that staff were well-equipped to handle customer service
and other duties.
Finally, Banff Aspen Lodge established a robust performance appraisal and feedback system.
This included setting performance goals and regularly assessing staff performance. This
allowed the hotel to stay on top of its staffing and ensure everyone was meeting their targets.
Overall, Banff Aspen Lodge has successfully implemented effective staffing strategies. Their
recruitment plan, training, and feedback system have created a highly-trained, diverse staff
capable of providing excellent customer service.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses
- Banff Aspen Lodge has an experienced - The Lodge is in a remote area and may
and knowledgeable staff with a wealth of need help attracting qualified staff.
experience in the hospitality industry. - There is a limited pool of applicants
- The Lodge offers competitive staff salaries available for any open positions.
and benefits, making it an attractive
workplace. - There need to be more professional
- Staff members are highly trained in development and career advancement
customer service and friendly and helpful to opportunities for the staff.
guests.
- The Lodge provides a variety of career - The Lodge is unable to provide
development and advancement competitive salaries and benefits due to its
opportunities for its staff. remote location.
Opportunities Threats
- Staff can be trained and developed in - The Lodge may face competition from
various areas, such as customer service, other hotels and resorts.
hospitality, marketing, and management.
- There are limited job opportunities in the
- The Lodge can develop partnerships with area, making it difficult to retain staff.
local businesses and educational institutions
to provide training and development - The remote location means that the Lodge
opportunities to staff. may be disadvantaged in recruiting qualified
staff.
- The Lodge can offer competitive salaries
and benefits to attract qualified staff. - The Lodge may not offer competitive
salaries and benefits to staff, leading to a
- The Lodge can use its remote location as a high turnover rate.
selling point to attract staff who prefer to
live in a rural area.
PACADI Analysis
Problem
The Banff Aspen Lodge had experienced high staff turnover, affecting the quality of service
provided. The hotel's management needed to improve staffing levels and ensure the quality of
service.
Alternatives
The management team considered several alternatives to address the staffing issue:
1. Increase wages and benefits - This would attract more applicants; however, management
was concerned that it could prove expensive and would not necessarily be enough to solve
the issue.
2. Offer more recruitment incentives - The team explored providing extra incentives such as
free meals and discounted accommodations to attract more applicants.
3. Increase the recruitment process - Management looked into streamlining it, making it
easier and quicker for potential employees to apply.
4. Improve working conditions - The team looked into ways to improve the working
environment, such as increasing breaks and providing better employee training.
Criteria
The management team identified several criteria that would help them decide which
alternative to choose:
1. Cost - The chosen alternative should be cost-effective.
2. Effectiveness - The chosen alternative should address the staffing issue effectively.
3. Acceptance - The existing staff and potential applicants should accept the chosen
alternative.
4. Timeframe - The chosen alternative should provide results promptly.
Analysis
The team analysed the various alternatives based on the criteria. It was determined that the
most cost-effective option with the highest potential for success was to increase the
recruitment process and offer more incentives. This would help attract more applicants and
make it easier for them to apply.
Decision
Based on the analysis, the management team decided to increase the recruitment process and
offer more incentives. This would help to attract more applicants and make it easier for them
to apply.
Implementation
The team implemented the new recruitment process, which included making the application
process easier and more streamlined. They also offered incentives such as free meals and
discounted accommodations. Finally, they increased the levels of training for employees,
providing them with the necessary skills to provide the best service.
The new measures proved successful, resulting in a significant improvement in staffing levels
and quality of service.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..