Día Transfer. Labarta 3
Día Transfer. Labarta 3
Día Transfer. Labarta 3
1–10, 2020
doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa322
*Correspondence address. Human Reproduction Department, IVI RMA Valencia, Plaza Policı́a Local, 3, Valencia 46015, Spain.
E-mail: elena.labarta@ivirma.com
Submitted on March 9, 2020; resubmitted on October 14, 2020; editorial decision on October 29, 2020
STUDY QUESTION: Is there a serum progesterone (P) threshold on the day of embryo transfer (ET) in artificial endometrium
preparation cycles below which the chances of ongoing pregnancy are reduced?
SUMMARY ANSWER: Serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml on the day of ET lower ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) in both own or donated
oocyte cycles.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: We previously found that serum P levels <9.2 ng/ml on the day of ET significantly decrease OPR in a
sample of 211 oocyte donation recipients. Here, we assessed whether these results are applicable to all infertile patients under an artificial
endometrial preparation cycle, regardless of the oocyte origin.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective cohort study was performed between September 2017 and November 2018
and enrolled 1205 patients scheduled for ET after an artificial endometrial preparation cycle with estradiol valerate and micronized vaginal
P (MVP, 400 mg twice daily).
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients 50 years old with a triple-layer endometrium 6.5 mm underwent
transfer of one or two blastocysts. A total of 1150 patients treated with own oocytes without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploi-
dies (PGT-A) (n ¼ 184), own oocytes with PGT-A (n ¼ 308) or donated oocytes (n ¼ 658) were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the
OPR beyond pregnancy week 12 based on serum P levels measured immediately before ET.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Women with serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml (30th percentile) had a significantly lower
OPR (36.6% vs 54.4%) and live birth rate (35.5% vs 52.0%) than the rest of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed that serum
P < 8.8 ng/ml was an independent factor influencing OPR in the overall population and in the three treatment groups. A significant negative
correlation was observed between serum P levels and BMI, weight and time between the last P dose and blood tests and a positive
correlation was found with age, height and number of days on HRT. Multivariate logistic regression showed that only body weight was an
independent factor for presenting serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes did not differ in patients with ongoing
pregnancy regardless of serum P levels being above/below 8.8 ng/ml.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only women with MVP were included. Extrapolation to other P administration forms
needs to be validated.
†
Present address: IVI RMA Roma, Largo Ildebrando Pizzetti 1, Rome 00197, Italy.
C The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.
V
For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
2 Labarta et al.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study identified the threshold of serum P as 8.8 ng/ml on the day of ET for artificial
endometrial preparation cycles necessary to optimize outcomes, in cycles with own or donated oocytes. One-third of patients receiving
Key words: artificial cycle / serum progesterone / hormonal replacement therapy / pregnancy outcome / luteal phase support
.. Study population
Introduction ..
.. The study enrolled 1205 infertile patients scheduled for ET under
Artificial endometrial preparation with HRT is frequently used for fro- ..
.. an artificial endometrial preparation treatment with HRT, of which
zen embryo transfer (FET) and egg donation cycles (Groenewoud .. 1150 were ultimately included. Among these, 658 cases (57.2%) were
et al., 2018). However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend ..
.. oocyte donation cycles, whereas 492 (42.8%) were own oocyte cycles
any one protocol for endometrial preparation (Ghobara et al., 2017) .. with 308 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)
and there are no clear guidelines for HRT. While estrogen administra- ..
.. treatments and 184 regular FET. Participating women were 50 years
tion is tailored to patient need (Labarta et al., 2017), the same proges- .. old with adequate endometrial pattern (triple layer) and thickness
terone (P) dose is given to all patients without individualization of ..
.. (6.5 mm) after estrogen treatment in the proliferative phase and LPS
luteal phase support (LPS) since an optimal P exposure before embryo .. with only MVP (400 mg twice daily for 5 days) before ET. One or two
transfer (ET) has not been well established (van de Vijver et al., 2016).
..
.. blastocysts were transferred. We wanted to reflect the broad range of
P doses and administration forms (i.e. vaginal or subcutaneous) are .. patients encountered in clinical practice, so all patients meeting eligibil-
instead chosen based on patient and doctor preferences (Vaisbuch
..
.. ity criteria for ET were included in the study. Patients with uterine or
et al., 2014). .. adnexal anomalies did not undergo ET according to our protocol, so
There is likely a minimum serum P concentration below which
..
.. these patients were not recruited for the study.
ET success rates are significantly lower when using natural micron- ...
ized vaginal P (MVP) in artificial endometrial preparation cycles. .. Endpoints
..
Most studies on the relation between serum P and pregnancy out- .. The primary endpoint was the OPR in patients who underwent ET af-
come are retrospective (Yovich et al., 2015; Alsbjerg et al., 2018; .. ter endometrial preparation artificial cycles based on serum P levels
..
Cédrin-Durnerin et al., 2019; Gaggiotti-Marre et al., 2019) except .. measured on the day of ET. Secondary endpoints were (i) the critical
one published by our group (Labarta et al., 2017), which analyzed .. threshold of serum P on the day of ET below which pregnancy rates
..
the relationship between serum P levels on the day of ET and on- .. were significantly lower, (ii) pregnancy outcomes according to
going pregnancy rate (OPR). Patients with serum P < 9.2 ng/ml, .. the threshold, (iii) factors that determine serum P levels and (iv) the
..
which corresponded to the 25th percentile, had a 20% lower OPR .. relationship between serum P levels and obstetric outcomes.
than those with higher values (P < 0.05) in an oocyte donation set- .. Pregnancy outcome was determined by a positive b-hCG test
..
ting. Despite all patients having received natural MVP at 400 mg .. (serum levels of b-hCG > 10 IU/ml 11 days after ET); clinical preg-
twice daily, one in every four patients had inadequate serum
.. nancy was defined as the presence of at least one gestational sac on
..
P levels. .. ultrasound; implantation was defined as the presence of a gestational
We sought to determine whether these findings could be extrap-
.. sac per embryo transferred; miscarriage rate was defined as any preg-
..
olated to the infertile population undergoing artificial cycles for .. nancy loss before Week 12, including biochemical miscarriage with a
ET, including treatments with own or donated eggs. Moreover, we
.. positive b-hCG test without evidence of a gestational sac and clinical
..
utilized a larger sample size to define the critical threshold of serum .. miscarriage after confirmation of an intrauterine gestational sac; ectopic
.. pregnancy was defined as a gestational sac located outside the uterine
P on the day of ET in HRT cycles that significantly alters the OPR ..
and live birth rates (LBRs). We also identified intrinsic factors that .. cavity; OPR was defined as the presence of at least one viable fetus
.. beyond Week 12; and LBR was defined as the number of deliveries
may be predictive of having low serum P levels; finally, we deter- ..
mined whether these low levels influence obstetric or neonatal .. that resulted in at least one live born neonate.
..
outcomes. ..
.. Sample size
.. Based on our previously published results, it was estimated that 25%
..
.. of the population could show inadequate serum P levels on the day of
Materials and methods .. ET (Labarta et al., 2017). The study population was calculated to de-
..
.. tect a 10% difference in OPR between two groups according to serum
Design and setting .. P levels (expected to be 40% in the suboptimal serum P group and
..
This prospective cohort study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov .. 50% in the optimal serum P group). By accepting an alpha risk of 0.05
(NCT03272412) and was approved by the Institutional Review Board .. (95% CI) and a beta risk of 0.2 (80% statistical power) in a two-sided
..
of IVI RMA Valencia, Spain. The study was conducted at IVI RMA .. test, and a ratio of 3:1 between groups (serum P levels >p25 vs
Valencia between September 2017 and November 2018.
.. p25), 1050 patients were needed to determine a statistically
Low serum progesterone impairs pregnancy outcome 3
..
significant difference. A drop-out rate of 15% was anticipated, so 1205 .. All ETs were performed by senior gynecologists under transabdominal
patients were needed. The ARCSINUS approximation was used for .. ultrasound guidance.
..
..
..
was calculated in each group (Fig. 1). Additional results of positive .. Exploratory analysis of factors related to
..
beta-hCG, LBRs and miscarriage rates according to the deciles of se- .. serum P levels on the day of embryo
rum P are shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. ..
Figure 1. Ongoing pregnancy rate according to the deciles of serum progesterone (P) on the day of embryo transfer. Data are
expressed as mean, 95% CI.
Low serum progesterone impairs pregnancy outcome 5
Table I Comparison of baseline clinical characteristics based on serum P level on the day of embryo transfer below or above
8.8 ng/ml, denoted as the critical threshold.
P < 8.8 ng/ml P 8.8 ng/ml P P < 8.8 ng/ml P 8.8 ng/ml P P < 8.8 ng/ml P 8.8 ng/ml P
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Number (%) of patients 57 (31%) 127 (69%) 99 (32.1%) 209 (67.9%) 188 (28.6%) 470 (71.4%)
Age 35.6 § 3.3 35.1 § 3.3 0.290 37.4 § 3.6 37.9 § 3.4 0.268 41.5 § 4.5 41.7 § 3.9 0.603
BMI 24.2 § 3.4 23.0 § 3.5 0.034 24.5 § 5.0 23.1 § 3.7 0.014 24.5 § 4.8 23.6 § 4.2 0.019
Weight (kg) 65.5 § 9.9 62.8 § 11.1 0.114 66.7 § 13.7 62.8 § 11.4 0.018 65.7 § 13.1 63.8 § 11.4 0.096
Height (m) 1.64 § 0.1 1.64 § 0.1 0.543 1.64 § 0.1 1.64 § 0.1 0.844 1.63 § 0.1 1.64 § 0.1 0.133
Proliferative phase
Serum E2 (pg/ml) 236 § 156 230 § 168 0.809 220 § 149 273 § 315 0.115 271 § 185 291 § 283 0.371
Serum P (ng/ml) 0.12 § 0.17 0.13 § 0.17 0.828 0.09 § 0.11 0.15 § 0.17 <0.001 0.21 § 0.23 0.19 § 0.20 0.317
Endometrial thickness (mm) 9.0 § 1.8 9.0 § 1.5 0.996 8.9 § 1.5 8.8 § 1.6 0.324 8.6 § 1.5 8.8 § 1.6 0.117
Luteal phase
Serum E2 (pg/ml) 257 § 134 232 § 145 0.279 252 § 215 237 § 173 0.521 224 § 118 250 § 181 0.034
Serum P (ng/ml) 6.5 § 1.5 13.8 § 5.4 <0.001 6.5 § 1.9 14.3 § 10.0 <0.001 6.4 § 1.9 14.8 § 5.7 <0.001
Days on HRT until ET 16.7 § 3.4 16.6 § 3.1 0.908 16.6 § 3.5 16.9 § 3.2 0.531 18.4 § 4.2 18.9 § 4.4 0.124
Time between last P dose and 334 § 160 346 § 120 0.624 346 § 115 336 § 158 0.732 349 § 158 336 § 132 0.354
blood test (min)
No. embryos transferred 1.3 § 0.4 1.2 § 0.4 0.315 1.1 § 0.3 1.1 § 0.3 0.761 1.1 § 0.3 1.1 § 0.3 0.665
Proportion of single embryo 75.4% 81.9% 0.325 91.8% 92.8% 0.817 86.6% 87.9% 0.695
transfer (% SET)
No. previous embryos 1.6 § 2.1 1.3 § 1.7 0.299 0.9 § 1.5 0.6 § 1.3 0.064 2.2 § 3.4 1.4 § 2.2 0.004
transferred
Embryo quality of the best embryo transferred
A (%) 9.8 10.7 0.709 3.9 3.7 0.943 13.8 23.1 0.008
B (%) 56.1 62.1 68.8 71.0 63.1 62.3
C (%) 34.1 27.2 27.3 25.3 22.5 14.6
Gestational outcome (%)
Positive beta-hCG test 52.6 70.1 0.030 52.5 68.4 0.008 56.4 68.2 0.005
(>10 IU/l)
Implantation 44.7 59.4 0.076 42.9 60.0 0.005 43.0 53.7 0.001
Clinical pregnancy 43.9 61.4 0.036 42.4 61.2 0.002 50.0 62.0 0.007
Ongoing pregnancy 38.6 53.5 0.079 34.3 54.1 0.001 37.2 54.7 <0.001
Live birth 36.8 51.2 0.080 34.3 53.1 0.002 35.7 51.8 <0.001
Biochemical miscarriage 16.7 12.4 0.546 19.2 10.5 0.144 11.3 8.5 0.437
Clinical miscarriage 16.0 15.4 1.000 19.0 11.7 0.297 26.6 13.8 0.007
Data are expressed as mean § SD or n (%). Bold entries mean that the P-value was < 0.05, which is statistically significant.
PGT-A, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies; E2, estradiol; P, progesterone; ET, embryo transfer.
..
whereas specificity was 37.1%. The optimal serum P threshold at .. 23. Serum P levels below or above 8.8 ng/ml on the day of ET did not
which sensitivity and specificity for OPR were both >50% was .. influence obstetrical or perinatal outcomes in the overall population;
10.4 ng/ml (63.6% sensitivity, 50.1% specificity).
... e.g. percentages of term deliveries (86.1% vs 85.4%), normal
..
.. birth weight (83.6% vs 91.3%), pregnancy-associated hypertension
.. (12.9% vs 9%), gestational diabetes (8.1% vs 7.4%), risk of preterm
Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes ..
.. labor (4.8% vs 4.9%) and bleeding during the first (32.3% vs 24.6%) or
according to serum P below or above ..
.. second/third trimester (2.4% vs 2.8%). Notably, serum P levels
8.8 ng/ml on the day of embryo transfer .. <8.8 ng/ml trended toward higher risk of pregnancy-associated
..
A total of 555 pregnant women remained pregnant beyond Week 20. .. hypertension in oocyte donation cycles but did not reach statistical
Of them, 529 had a confirmed live birth; there were two stillbirths .. significance (15.7% vs 8.2%, P ¼ 0.07). This was not seen in treatments
..
and one perinatal death; and no birth was confirmed for the remaining . with own oocytes (8.9% vs 9.9%, P ¼ 1.00).
6 Labarta et al.
Clinical Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Ongoing Pregnancy
Live Birth
BiochemicalMiscarriage
Clinical Miscarriage
Figure 2. Crude odds ratios for the clinical outcomes in patients with serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml on the day of embryo transfer
compared to patients with higher levels. All differences were statistically significant except for biochemical miscarriage.
..
Discussion .. subcutaneous or intramuscular) is lacking. Serum P can be measured
.. only when using natural-like progestogens, such as MVP. Indeed, syn-
This prospective study aimed to analyze the relationship between se- .. thetic progestogens like dydrogesterone make P measurements futile
..
rum P levels on the day of ET in artificial cycles and pregnancy out- .. because the molecule completely differs and will not be detectable by
comes. Our results confirm that low serum P levels on the day of ET ..
.. this test (Griesinger et al., 2019).
lead to worse pregnancy outcomes. In fact, regardless of the type of .. Serum P levels vastly differ when using MVP compared to subcuta-
treatment (own oocytes with or without PGT-A and oocyte dona- .. neous or intramuscular P, due to different pharmacokinetics (PK) and
..
tion), the impact of serum P on the day of ET is present after adjusting .. pharmacodynamics (PD) of the distinct compounds (Miles et al.,
for all possible confounding factors. Two important messages can be ..
.. 1994). Compared to injected P, MVP leads to lower serum P levels
obtained from this study. First, all patients who receive MVP in HRT .. and higher intrauterine P levels due to the first uterine pass effect
cycles need to reach a minimum of 8.8 ng/ml circulating P to maintain
..
.. (Bulletti et al., 1997). Moreover, steady levels are more stable when
pregnancy, regardless of the origin of the oocytes. Second, 30% of .. using vaginal P (Duijkers et al., 2018), which facilitates its measurement
patients receiving MVP at a dose of 400 mg twice daily are below the
..
.. and interpretation. Although no direct correlation between uterine
optimal P level. .. and serum P levels have been found in PK and PD studies (Paulson
This study allowed us to better define the critical threshold of serum
..
.. et al., 2014), current evidence showing an association between serum
P values needed in artificial endometrial preparation cycles to maintain .. P levels and OPR or LBR demonstrates the relevance of serum P lev-
..
OPRs above 45%. The threshold hereby defined (8.8 ng/ml) is slightly
... els in determining pregnancy success (Yovich et al., 2015, Labarta
different to the one described in our previous study (9.2 ng/ml) .. et al., 2017, Alsbjerg et al., 2018; Cédrin-Durnerin et al., 2019;
(Labarta et al., 2017). The goal of the present study was to better de- .. Gaggiotti-Marre et al., 2019). We hypothesize that one of the reasons
..
fine this threshold; for that purpose, a much larger population (1150 in .. for this relationship is the immunomodulatory role of P in early preg-
the current study vs 211 in the previous one) of every-day patients .. nancy stages (Shah et al., 2018), which favors embryo tolerance and
..
was included. .. prevent miscarriage. This is not a direct effect on the uterus, but
Our research focused on women using natural MVP for LPS. Thus, .. rather a systemic effect that requires adequate P levels in the blood-
..
applicability to other forms of P administration needs to be validated. .. stream to have positive effects on maintaining pregnancy.
In fact, information about the percentage of patients with inadequate
.. Since the first published study that demonstrated a relation
..
serum P levels using other administration routes (e.g. rectal, oral, . between serum P levels and pregnancy outcome in artificial cycles
Low serum progesterone impairs pregnancy outcome 7
Table II Multivariate logistic regression evaluating the effect of variables on ongoing pregnancy rate.
Results were calculated in each type of treatment and in the overall population. Data are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval. Bold entries mean that the P-value
was < 0.05, which is statistically significant. Impact of low serum progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer on pregnancy outcome. A prospective cohort study in artificial
cycles with vaginal progesterone.
8 Labarta et al.
..
(Yovich et al., 2015), several studies have found similar results. .. threshold level (9.2 ng/ml) between our first study (Labarta et al.,
However, they were all retrospective analyses that reached the .. 2017) and the current one (8.8 ng/ml) is not due to the timing of
..
same conclusion: a minimum threshold of serum P levels needs to .. measurement (mean time 5.7 h in the current study). Regarding ob-
programme: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Reprod .. et al. Increased preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance
..
Biomed Online 2018;37:415–424. .. with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a corpus luteum.
Volovsky M, Pakes C, Rozen G, Polyakov A. Do serum progesterone
.. Hypertension 2019;73:640–649.
..