Group 2 Systematic Review Final REV PROPOSAL PDF
Group 2 Systematic Review Final REV PROPOSAL PDF
Group 2 Systematic Review Final REV PROPOSAL PDF
Department of Education
Region V (Bicol)
Schools Division of Ligao City
BICOL REGIONAL SCIENCE HIGH SCHOOL
Tuburan, Ligao City
TEL: (052) 742- 4205 E-Mail: 301814@deped.gov.ph Website: brshs.depedligaocity.net
A Systematic Review
Firdaus-c B. Ibrahim
December 2022
Table of Contents
Introduction……………………………………………………..…………………………3
Research Questions…………………………………………………………………5
Systematic Review……………………………………………………..…………..7
Definition of terms………………………………………………………………….9
Methodology
Search Strategy…………………………………………………………………....12
Content Analysis…………………………………………………………....…..13
References……………………………………………………………………….……..…16
Appendices
A Systematic Review
Viral acute infections are associated with a procoagulant state, and the resultant
coagulation. The excessive activation of coagulation involves the consumption of platelets and
coagulation factors, which may shift the hyper-coagulant state into a hypocoagulant state (Levi
M., 2018). One example of this is the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), an infectious disease
caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Approximately one-fifth of the infected individuals develop
severe to critical diseases requiring intensive care support as a cause of pneumonia (Huang C,
Wang Y, Li X et al., 2020). According to recent studies conducted in China, severe COVID-
analysis showed that D-dimer values are considerably higher in COVID-19 patients with severe
anticoagulant therapy appear to be associated with better outcomes in moderate and severe
COVID-19 patients with signs of coagulopathy and in those requiring mechanical ventilation.
possible protective mechanisms of antithrombotic therapy (in primis anticoagulants) for this
therapy) are guided by the clinical context and the COVID-19 severity. Furthermore, medical
therapies are revealed to effectively prevent the effects of the coagulation observed in COVID-
outcomes in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients with signs of coagulopathy (elevated D-
dimer and fibrinogen and low antithrombin levels) and in those requiring mechanical
ventilation. (Klok F, Kruip M., 2020) There is a direct correlation between SARS-CoV-2
infection and the development of thrombotic events. According to Helmes et al and Fraissé et
al6, respectively, 42.6% and 40% of the individuals under investigation experienced
thrombotic events.
variability in the extent of these alterations and their correlation to disease severity and
hand, can also occur in patients with severe COVID-19, which leads to substantial morbidity
and mortality (C. Huang, Y. Wang, et al, 2020). Additionally, a research report by Tang et al.
(2020) showed that 71.4% of patients who died of coronavirus from thrombosis and
hemostasis.
In the systematic review conducted by Gabbai-Armelin et al., it was mentioned that the
conditions. It was also discussed that in mild symptoms, fever, fatigue, cough, sore throat, and
headache are included. In more complicated cases, however, symptoms of pneumonia and
shortness of breath may be observed. Coagulation disorders and thrombotic events have also
the higher risk of thrombosis. Patients with COVID-19 frequently experienced coagulopathy
and thrombotic episodes, and this frequency increased in those with more advanced disease
stages.
COVID-19. The result is worse for infected patients with extra risk factors since COVID-19 is
linked to a hypercoagulable state (Miesbach W. & Makris M., 2020). The COVID-19
Treatment Guidelines Panel advises that hospitalized COVID-19 patients continue taking
diagnostic imaging is not an option, the Panel advises treating COVID-19 individuals who are
a decreased death rate compared to prophylactic anticoagulation, however this association was
not statistically significant. Thromboembolic illness was frequently found during autopsies.
(Nadkarni G, et al., 2020). In addition, Lazaridis D et al. (2021) discovered Prophylaxis and
higher intensity dosed anticoagulation are linked to increased pulmonary oxygenation, lower
coagulopathy indicators, and decreased mortality in COVID-19 patients despite the low quality
of the studies evaluated. However, Reis S. et al. (2022) state that critically sick patients might
Research Questions
With connection to the primary goal of this review, the researchers aim to provide answers to
3. What are the effects of screening and evaluation for Venous Thromboembolism
General Public. This study will give them a deeper understanding of the underlying
thrombotic activities of COVID-19 patients that can enhance the potential effectiveness of the
Public Health Official. Results of this study can also provide feedback on the
alternative implementation of reliable and health value that can be used by the people in the
community.
COVID-19 Patients. Findings of this review can help patients be well aware of
thrombotic agents against COVID-19 virus to the department's communication response and
People Suffering from Cardiovascular and Lung Diseases. Since the anticoagulants
aims to decrease the production of blood clots this study can help for the remediation of the
disease.
Health Care Practitioners. This study will be of great help in maximizing the
utilization of local resources, which will lead to socioeconomic development of the community.
study.
Future Researchers. The result of the study may serve as a reference or provide
information that would be necessary for their studies, project developments, and further
Systematic Review
same time makes it more and more challenging to understand. Hence, this systematic review
aims to provide clinical information and will synthesize current and existing data on
anticoagulant effects in COVID-19 patients. It will not, however, seek to create new
knowledge. The research question was patterned with the use of SPIDER method (Sample,
Phenomenon of Interest, Design of Study, Evaluation Type, Research Type) that will aid in the
search of relevant studies. After identifying the specific question to be answered, abstract and
title screening will be done while excluding research in the criteria. After compiling the
included research, the researchers will extract data and summarize obtained knowledge.
outcomes in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients with evidence of coagulopathy and in
those requiring mechanical breathing, according to C Godino and Andrea Scotti (2020). The
for this viral infection are outlined by the pathophysiology of the prothrombotic state induced
by SARS-CoV-2. The clinical context and the COVID-19 severity serve as a guidance for the
treatment).
Medical therapies are revealed that it effectively prevents the effects of the coagulation
associated with better outcomes in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients with signs of
coagulopathy (elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen and low antithrombin levels) and in those
release of these molecules causes a macrophage activation syndrome-like picture, which causes
endothelial cells, macrophages, and neutrophils to express tissue factor within the lungs,
causing pulmonary coagulopathy and microvascular thrombosis to begin and worsen. IL-6 is a
major cytokine that is significantly enhanced in severe COVID-19 infection and serves as a
key activator of coagulation by stimulating tissue factor expression and enhancing fibrinogen
and platelet formation. This could explain the considerable disparity in coagulation.
according to Tan and Wong (2020). Anticoagulants might help in this situation by reducing the
burden of thrombotic disease and coagulation hyperactivity. They might also directly reduce
inflammation, which would help prevent sepsis and the development of coagulation.
diminish platelet-neutrophil cross-talk, lower NETosis and the neutrophil response, and
produce less IL-1, IL-6, E-selectin, and ICAM-1. Heparins, an anticoagulant, have been shown
to effectively compete with heparan sulfate, reducing viral attachment and cell infection
(Higgins & u 2020). Therefore, combining this knowledge with the actions of UFH and
LMW—which are all inhibitors of several proteases—the study hypothesizes that this can be
Cytokines, particularly the interleukin (IL) family, are recognized to play a major role
in inflammation and to have a direct effect on plasma molecules, erythrocytes, and platelets.
(Bester J., Matshailwe C. et al., 2020). Several inflammatory diseases are characterized by
hypercoagulability and poor fibrinolysis. It has been shown that IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8 might
produce hypercoagulation, which results in dispersed fibrin clots. Patients with severe COVID-
19 showed increased IL-6 levels, implying that the hypercoagulation status of COVID-19
patients may be associated to heightened cytokine levels. (Zhou F. Yu T et al., 2020) Other
heparins are beneficial to COVID-19 patients. Heparins' direct antiviral activity is mediated by
heparan sulfate, a polysaccharide family that is widespread on the cell surface and extracellular
matrix of all species. Heparan sulfate has been shown to act as the first point of interaction
between target cells and a variety of human viruses (including herpesviruses, influenza A virus,
Definition of terms
Systematic Review. a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and
synthesize all available evidence. It answers a clearly formulated research question and
Anticoagulant. It stops the blood from clotting. It will be used in the experiment to
SARS-CoV-2 virus. Most people infected with the virus will experience mild to moderate
This disorder may result in a propensity for prolonged or profuse bleeding (bleeding diathesis).
components of both arterial and venous thrombi, antithrombotic drugs encompass antiplatelets,
The aim of this study is to undertake a thorough analysis of the effectiveness and roles
patients. This study will formulate research questions using the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon
of Interest, Design, Evaluation Type, and Research Type) model. Then, preliminary inquiries
will be asked to ensure that no other study has been evaluated and to validate the current study.
For evaluating the research papers and journals, the researchers will consider exclusion and
inclusion criteria for selecting relevant and related studies that will contribute to the systematic
review. In addition, sites such as PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and ERIC
will be utilized in the current study’s approach. Next, Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
will be performed to guarantee the absence of confounding variables, and this data will be put
Since the current systematic review is qualitative study, the researchers will explain the
data through content analysis. Further, due to expected bias and human error, a Systematic
Review Research expert will evaluate and identify errors in the publication. In this approach,
Methodology
quasi-experimental studies to generate findings on the impact and role of Thrombotic agents in
qualitative synthesis to combine and interpret the evidence from included studies.
The study intended at responding to the query: What are the roles of Therapeutic
Based on the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation type, and
Research type) strategy for the systematic review, this question was created, with S (studies
Online research was done before the actual conduct of the systematic review. The
method was used to determine whether the current study is still relevant and whether no
research has been conducted on it. The researchers began by searching Google Scholar and
PubMed for studies titled "thrombotic activities of COVID-19 patients." While doing so, they
discovered that patients infected with the COVID-19 virus are prone to coagulation and are at
risk of bleeding. This insight is significant for a deeper understanding of the effects of
Exclusion and Inclusion Criteria will be conducted for identifying the study population
Exclusive criteria refrain the researchers from bias in conducting the systematic review.
Hence, the criteria include: a) studies in non-human subjects or in vitro studies. b) abstract-
only papers or articles without available full text. c) case reports, case series, and systematic
review studies. d) studies with unreliable, duplicate, overlapping data e) non-English Language
studies.
Inclusive criteria contain information related to the research study and would answer
the research questions. Thus, this includes: a) observational human studies in accordance with
published from 2019-2022. d.) Studies associated with thrombotic events in patients diagnosed
with COVID-19.
Search Strategy
A standard search strategy will be used in PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, ERIC,
and Science Direct then later it will be modified according to each specific database to get the
best relevant results. The basic search strategy will be developed using controlled vocabulary
based on the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and on the formulation of the research
questions to identify relevant studies. The following terms will be utilized: Covid-19,
selected by the reviewers by evaluating the titles and abstracts. Further, manual elimination
The researchers will pool adjusted and unadjusted data to be used in the analysis of the
review to ensure confounding results. Two impartial reviewers will carry out the process. The
extracted data will then be put into an excel sheet and classified into the study characteristics
and quality assessment. Data in form of graphs and plots shall be extracted utilizing the Web
Plot Digitizer application. The following data will be retrieved from individual studies: a) year
of publication. b) study design c) country conducted. d) sample size. e) control group. f) role
To assess the risk of bias, the quality of individual studies will be assessed using an
appropriate quality appraisal tool. 2-3 independent reviewers shall conduct the assessment
using the NIH tool for observational and cross-sectional studies assessment tool (APPENDIX
B) designed for use in systematic reviews. The researchers will categorize each classification
as yes, no, or not applicable. An overall score is computed by summarizing the scores of all the
items, where yes equals one and no and NA = zero. Each publication will be assigned a score
to categorize it as poor, fair, or good research, with a value ranging from 1 to 10.
The results shall determine eligible studies consistent with the standard quality
Content Analysis
Framework content analysis will be undertaken to distill the key themes of the
reviewed studies. The content analysis of the selected studies suggests that research on
anticoagulation can be categorized into 14 broad dimensions: (i) author; (ii) year of publication;
(iii) type of study; (iv) LoE, Level of evidence according to Oxford Center for Evidence- Based
Medicine; (v) sample size; (vi) mean age; (vii) most frequent comorbidities; (viii) death toll;
(ix) control group; (x) exams performed; (xi) medication; (xii) prognostic factor; (xiii)
influence of COVID-19 on thrombosis; and (xiv) main conclusions and outcomes. Electronic
databases shall be thoroughly searched in order to locate studies discussing the effects of
analysis.
For writing the four sections: introduction, systematic review overview, methods,
results, discussion and conclusion, the researchers shall send it to a Systematic Review expert
to revise it and choose a suitable journal for the manuscript which fits with considerable impact
factor and fitting field and they will pay attention by reading the author guidelines of journals
DATE DELIVERABLES/ACTIVITIES
References
Al-Samkari H, Karp Leaf RS, Dzik WH, Carlson JCT, Fogerty AE, Waheed A, Goodarzi K,
Bendapudi PK, Bornikova L, Gupta S, Leaf DE, Kuter DJ, Rosovsky RP. COVID-19
Billett, H. H., Reyes-Gil, M., Szymanski, J., Ikemura, K., Stahl, L. R., Lo, Y., … Bellin, E.
Flumignan RLG, Civile VT, Tinôco JD et al. Anticoagulants for people hospitalised with
Gabbai-Armelin, PR, de Oliveira, AB, Ferrisse, TM, et al. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection
and thrombotic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest.
Hadid, T., Kafri, Z., & Al-Katib, A. (2022, February 26). Coagulation and anticoagulation in
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2020.100761
Helms, J., Tacquard, C., Severac, F. et al. High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe
SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 46,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00453-4
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X. et al. (2020, January 24). Clinical features of patients infected
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-
5/fulltext?__hstc=162943075.886492c93a27f69636b6ede1cd14267c.1582690572243.
1582690572243.1582690572243.1&__hssc=162943075.1.1582690572243&__hsfp=
3511415567
Jin, S., Jin, Y., Xu, B., Hong, J., & Yang, X. (2020, July 17). Prevalence and Impact of
Paparella, D., Colucci, M., Squiccimarro, E., Raimondo, P., De Palma, F., Ranieri, P.,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.09.015
Tawfik, G.M., Dila, K.A.S., Mohamed, M.Y.F. et al. A step by step guide for conducting a
systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Trop Med Health 47, 46
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6
Teimury, A., Khameneh, M. T., & Khaledi, E. M. (2022, February 15). Major coagulation
Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., et. al (2020, February). Clinical features of patients infected with
Xiang, G., Hao, S., Fu, C. et al. The effect of coagulation factors in 2019 novel coronavirus
Yasuda, H., Mayumi, T., & Okano, H. (2022). Efficacy of different anticoagulant doses for
Appendices
of COVID-19 patients.
COVID-19.
Appendix B. Risk of bias for included studies: NIH Quality Assessment Tool for
4. Were all the subjects selected or recruited from the same or similar
populations (including the same time period)? Were inclusion and exclusion
criteria for being in the study prespecified and applied uniformly to all
participants?
6. For the analyses in this paper, were the exposure(s) of interest measured
prior to the outcome(s) being measured?
7. Was the timeframe sufficient so that one could reasonably expect to see an
association between exposure and outcome if it existed?
8. For exposures that can vary in amount or level, did the study examine
different levels of the exposure as related to the outcome (e.g., categories of
exposure, or exposure measured as continuous variable)?
10. Was the exposure(s) assessed more than once over time?
11. Were the outcome measures (dependent variables) clearly defined, valid,
reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants?
12. Were the outcome assessors blinded to the exposure status of participants?
Rater #1 initials:
Rater #2 initials: