GL Refill Final
GL Refill Final
GL Refill Final
2
Background
3
Shanafelt. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017, Rim. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018, Schlosser. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2020
Background
▪Existing literature
▪Refill request verification lead by pharmacy technicians
▪Workflow/protocol
▪Findings
⎻ Increased quality and quantity
⎻ Decreased refill turnaround time
⎻ Decreased physician workload/burnout
▪Pharmacy staff role expansion
▪Technicians
▪Pharmacists
4
Schlosser. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2020, Nguyen. J Prim Care Community Health. 2015, Rim. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018
E-Rx Workflow
Protocol med? Same provider? If refills available →
Chronic med? Provider within Reject (too soon)
(>9 mo) network? Recent refills?
No labs/appointments “Yes”
Med discontinued to all Approve
within time range →
→ Reject steps refill
Reject
Dose/info match? request
Up to date?
Forward
“No” to any step to
provider 5
Question #1
▪Which of the following is a positive impact of streamlining refill
requests with pharmacy technicians?
A: Decreases pharmacy technician burnout rates
B: Reduce turnaround time for controlled medication requests
C: Increase medication adherence
D: Reduction in pharmacist workload
6
Question #1
▪Which of the following is a positive impact of streamlining refill
requests with pharmacy technicians?
A: Decreases pharmacy technician burnout rates
B: Reduce turnaround time for controlled medication requests
C: Increase medication adherence
D: Reduction in pharmacist workload
7
Methods
Retrospective chart review
• Feb. 2022 – Feb. 2023
• 3 Indiana University Health Clinics: Greenbush, Frankfort, Otterbein
• 5-8 primary care providers, urgent care, radiology services
Refill requests
• Processed by technicians
• Protocols for approval/denial
• Non-protocol requests forwarded to provider's office
Requests received via
• Electronic prescriptions
• Consumer messages or voicemail
• Fax 8
Methods
▪Data collection
▪Outcomes recorded manually
▪Excel and physical forms
▪Audits performed for accuracy
▪5-20% of daily processed requests
▪Verify prescription details
image: Flaticon.com
9
Primary Endpoints
10
Primary Endpoints
Non-
Reasons for requests sent to the provider that did
Completion not meet protocol and/or required further review
Reasons
11
Secondary Endpoints
12
Secondary Endpoints
13
Secondary Endpoints
14
Secondary Endpoints
Not Completed
Completed
Average
Processing 6 minutes
Time
Average
Turnaround 26 hours
Time
Accuracy 98.68%
Rate
19
Results – Secondary Endpoints
20
Good Catch Example #1
21
Good Catch Example #2
Technician denied
request
Pharmacy
requested refill Chart review: Dose change
Prescription
for insulin instructed to at hospital
inactivated
glargine 60 take 30 units discharge
units daily
23
Question #2
▪Interventions made by pharmacy technicians can improve which of
the following aspects of prescription quality?
A: Ensure follow-up appointments are made to assess the
appropriateness of medications
B: Making therapeutic interchanges to help with financial
assistance
C: Correcting dose errors on refill requests using chart notes
review
D: A and C
24
Question #2
▪Interventions made by pharmacy technicians can improve which of
the following aspects of prescription quality?
A: Ensure follow-up appointments are made to assess the
appropriateness of medications
B: Making therapeutic interchanges to help with financial
assistance
C: Correcting dose errors on refill requests using chart notes
review
D: A and C
25
Limitations
▪Lack of initial baseline data
▪Refill request turnaround time
▪Error rates
Addition of a pharmacist
• Process non-protocol requests
• Allow for clinical review
28
Questions?
Contact Peter LeMere at plemere@iuhealth.org
29
References
1. Schlosser EG, Neff E, Francis SM, Vormohr H, Hincapie AL. Implementation of a protocol-driven pharmacy technician refill process at a large physician network. J
Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020;60(6):e341-e348.
2. Nguyen M, Zare M. Impact of a clinical pharmacist-managed medication refill clinic. J Prim Care Community Health. 2015;6(3):187-192.
3. Rim MH, Thomas KC, Hatch B, Kelly M, Tyler LS. Development and implementation of a centralized comprehensive refill authorization program in an academic
health system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018;75(3):132-138.
4. Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo
Clin Proc. 2017;92(1):129e146.
5. Pharmacy Technician Certification Board. Certified pharmacy technician (CPhT). Available at: https://www.ptcb.org/credentials/certified-pharmacy-
technician#get-certified.
6. Bhakta K, Lee KC, Luke T, Bouw J. Impact of a pharmacist-run refill and prior authorization program on physician workload. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003).
2022;62(3):727-733.e1
7. Baron RJ. What’s keeping us so busy in primary care? A snapshot from one practice. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1632e1636
8. D’Achille KM, Swanson LN, Hill WT. Pharmacist-managed patient assessment and medication refill clinic. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978;35(1):66-70.
9. Jones RJ, Goldman MP, Rockwood RP, Imhoff TE. Beneficial effect of a pharmacist refill evaluation clinic. Hosp Pharm. 1987;22(2):166-168.
10. Suzuki NT. Pharmacy medication refill clinic decreases waiting time for patients. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1987;44(1):64, 67.
11. Jones RJ, Goldman MP, Rockwood RP, Imhoff TE. Beneficial effect of a pharmacist refill evaluation clinic. Hosp Pharm. 1987;22(2):166-168.
12. National Healthcareer Association. NHA certified pharmacy technician (CPhT): test plan for the EcCPT exam. Available at: https://www.nhanow.
com/docs/default-source/pdfs/exam-documentation/test-plans/nha-2016- excpt-test-plan_public_detail.pdf?sfvrsn=2
13. National Healthcareer Association. NHA certified medical administrative assistant (CMAA) test plan. Available at: https://www.nhanow.com/docs/ default- 30
source/pdfs/exam-documentation/test-plans/nha-certified-medicaladministrative-assistant-(cmaa).pdf?sfvrsn=2