Ermsi Globescan Leaders 2021

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey
2021 Sustainability Leaders

Contents
Introduction page 3
Survey Methodology page 4
Key Findings page 5
Urgency of Sustainable Development Challenges page 6
Institutional Performance on Sustainable Development page 10
Government Leaders page 13
NGO Leaders page 15
Corporate Leaders page 19
COVID-19 Impact on the Sustainable Development Agenda page 25

Back to Table of Contents
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Introduction

Introduction
This year marks the 25th edition of the GlobeScan / companies recognized as leaders has shrunk. Natura &Co
SustainAbility Leaders Survey. Since 1997, we have been enjoys the greatest uplift among the leaders this year, and
tracking sustainability experts’ views on the urgency respondents list the most diverse list of regionally specific
of sustainability issues and asking them to identify the sustainability leaders ever. We find this exciting, as it
companies, NGOs, and governments perceived to be hints that sustainability leadership among companies is
leaders in advancing the sustainable development agenda. becoming more common and more competitive.
This year’s survey comes at a time when many feel there When asked to compare the relative performance of
is new momentum around sustainable development. different types of institutions in terms of advancing
As critical milestones for progress on the SDGs and the the sustainable development agenda, NGOs are again
Paris Agreement move alarmingly closer, forcing us to perceived to be doing the most by survey respondents.
acknowledge the urgency of action, sustainability is being Among NGOs, World Wildlife Fund repeats as the most
mainstreamed into more and more aspects of business widely recognized leader. In the institutional ranking, the
and everyday life. The private sector’s commitment is perception of institutional investors as leaders continue to
reflected by the ever-growing number of companies trend up, while national governments are again seen as
making commitments on climate, biodiversity, diversity, doing the least on sustainable development. When asked
equity, and inclusion, and other issues. Governments are which governments are doing best, the panel points to
aligning policies with ambitions for inclusive, green growth. northern European countries more than others.
NGOs and academics are stressing the myriad urgent
threats globally and calling for transformational change in Even with vaccines reaching more people, the COVID-19
response. With two make-or-break global conferences this pandemic persists. But one encouraging finding in this
year on climate and biodiversity and the post-pandemic year’s survey is a huge shift in the percentage of panellists
recovery accelerating, 2021 presents a fascinating who believe that COVID-19 will make sustainability a lower
moment for the Leaders Survey to dive into what is shifting priority. While 49 percent of experts took that position in
sustainability leadership trends now. 2020, only 24 percent feel that way now.
Our 2021 survey was completed between April 29 and There is no question that this 25th edition of the
June 16 by almost 700 sustainability experts from over GlobeScan / SustainAbility Leaders Survey continues
70 countries. We are pleased to have captured the most to underscore how significant sustainable development
diverse regional Leaders Survey response ever, thanks challenges remain – they are, in fact, more urgent than
especially to increased representation from experts in when the survey began. Still, we remain optimistic, trusting
Latin America and Asia-Pacific. The 2021 survey again that NGOs, governments, companies, and others can use
asks which organizations our expert panel perceives the information in this survey and other resources to deliver
as the leading NGOs, companies, and governments what is expected and needed of sustainability leaders in
in sustainability terms; as in prior years, we asked time to address planetary challenges from climate to equity
respondents for their views on the most urgent sustainable and create the just and sustainable society we need.
development issues. Finally, as in 2020, we sampled
panellist perspectives on how they expect the COVID-19
pandemic to influence sustainable development priorities in
the coming years.
Panellists’ responses in 2021 show the gap narrowing

among corporate leaders. While Unilever and Patagonia
(in that order) are again mentioned as leading companies
by the most respondents, their separation from other
Page 3 of 29
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Survey Methodology

Survey Methodology
Six hundred and ninety-five qualified sustainability experts completed the
online questionnaire from April 29 to June 16, 2021. For the first time, the
survey was offered to respondents in Chinese, French, Portuguese, and
Spanish, in addition to English.
Experience
Respondents have the
following experience
working on sustainability
issues: 69% 22% 9%
More than 10 years 5 to 10 years 3 to 4 years
Geography
Experts surveyed span 72
countries in the following
regions:
26% 24% 23%

Europe Asia-Pacific North America
21% 6%
Latin America / Caribbean Africa / Middle East
Sectors
Respondents were drawn
from the following sectors:
32% 30% 19%

Service & Media Corporate NGO
14% 4% 2%
Academic & Research Government Other
Page 4 of 29
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Key Findings

Key Findings
Concern about almost all sustainability challenges Sustainable business models and strategy are the
continues to intensify. For the second year in a row, strongest drivers of recognized leadership. In 2021,
experts rate most issues as increasingly urgent. While experts say putting sustainability at the very core of the
concern for climate change remains stable, it also business model is the most important reason they recognize
continues to be perceived as the most pressing issue. a company as a leader.
Other issues ranking high and viewed as increasing in
urgency over the past five years include biodiversity loss, Corporate sustainability leadership has become
water scarcity, poverty, and water pollution. The issues more diverse regionally. When asked specifically about
that have increased the most in perceived urgency over corporate leaders headquartered in their own regions,
the past year include access to energy, food security, and experts in Europe (Unilever, IKEA), Latin America (Natura
diversity and discrimination. &Co), and North America (Patagonia) identify clear leaders,
whereas experts in Asia-Pacific and Africa / Middle East cite
NGOs continue to outperform other institutional a greater variety of leading companies, with many making
actors in terms of perceived contribution to advancing this year’s list for the first time.
sustainable development priorities. When asked to
rate different institutional actors on their contribution Experts no longer believe so strongly that the COVID-19
to progress on sustainable development, over six in pandemic will slow sustainability progress. In 2020,
ten experts say NGOs perform best. Academia, citizen almost half of sustainability professionals (49%) predicted
movements, the UN, and multi-sectoral partnerships are a de-prioritization of the sustainability agenda over the
also seen more positively than negatively. Other actors’ coming decade as a result of the coronavirus – a proportion
performance, including national and local governments, that has decreased to just one-quarter (24%). Nearly four
the private sector, institutional investors, and international in ten experts (38%) now believe that increasing poverty
financial institutions, is viewed mostly negatively, and inequality will be one of the most likely effects of the
although the perception of efforts of institutional investors pandemic, while almost three in ten think one legacy of
and the private sector improved compared to last year. the pandemic will be more attention being given to the
environment.
Northern European governments dominate positive
perceptions of national sustainability leadership.
When asked which countries are leading on sustainable
development, experts name mostly northern European
governments, including those of Germany, Sweden,
Denmark, Norway, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland.
Costa Rica continues to be the only Latin American
country represented among the top-ranked nations and
is tied with New Zealand in sixth place.
World Wildlife Fund remains the most widely

recognized NGO for its contribution to sustainable
development, while Greenpeace continues to be the
second-most recognized. Professionals in the NGO and
corporate sectors and those based in Asia-Pacific and
Europe tend to be more likely to see World Wildlife Fund
as a sustainability leader than respondents from other
sectors and regions.
The top tier corporate sustainability leaders remain

consistent, but some new entrants are recognized.
The same top ten companies are citied as leaders in 2021
as in 2020, including, in order, Unilever, Patagonia, Natura
&Co, IKEA, Interface, Danone, Microsoft, Nestlé, Tesla, and
Ørsted, with Natura &Co pushing ahead to secure the third
spot in this year’s ranking. Companies filling out the top 15
include Google, Schneider Electric, Walmart, Kering, and
Suzano.
Page 5 of 29
Urgency of
Sustainable
Development
Challenges
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Urgency of Sustainable Development Challenges

Growing Urgency of Sustainable

Development Challenges
The perceived urgency of almost all sustainable development challenges tracked in this survey
increased since last year, highlighting the ongoing urgency of the broad sustainability agenda in
the context of the pandemic.
Considering society’s numerous sustainable development challenges,

please rate the urgency of each of the following:
Please use a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 means “not urgent at all” and 5 means
Question “very urgent.”
Climate Change 93%
Biodiversity Loss 90% UP 4 points
Water scarcity 86%
Poverty 84% UP 5 points
Water pollution 84% UP 5 points
Access to medicines/healthcare 81% UP 5 points
Access to quality education 81% UP 5 points
Economic inequality 81% UP 3 points
Food scarcity 81% UP 6 points
Plastic waste 80% UP 3 points
Waste 80% UP 5 points
Air pollution 79% UP 4 points
Diversity/discrimintation 70% UP 6 points
Bribery/corruption 68% UP 4 points
Supply chain labor conditions 66% UP 5 points
Access to energy 65% UP 8 points
Infectious disease 63%
Too much meat in people's diets 55%
Online data and information security 51% UP 5 points
Non-communicable diseases 49% UP 4 points
2021 Change from 2020
% of Experts, “Urgent” (4+5), 2020–2021
Page 7 of 29

Urgency of Top Sustainable Development

Challenges Trends Upward
The perceived urgency of the top five challenges has increased substantially over the past
decade, especially for biodiversity. This year climate change has slightly decreased in
perceived urgency, but overall it retains the top spot as the most urgent challenge according to
sustainability experts.

100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
Climate change (93%) Biodiversity loss (90%) Water scarcity (86%)
Water pollution (84%) Poverty (84%)
Page 8 of 29

Urgency of Social Challenges

is Increasing
In the context of the pandemic and its accompanying challenges of economic hardship and
unequal impact, experts are increasingly seeing social and economic development challenges
as urgent.

84%
Poverty 79%
73%
81%
Economic
78%
inequality
73%
81%
Access to quality 76%
education
71%
81%
Access to medicines /
76%
healthcare
64%
81%
Food security 75%
69%
70%
Diversity / 64%
discrimination
52%
2021 2020 2019
Page 9 of 29
Institutional
Performance
on Sustainable
Development
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Institutional Performance on Sustainable

2021 Sustainability Leaders Development
NGOs, Academia, and Citizen Movements

Demonstrate Strongest Leadership
National governments are overwhelmingly seen by experts as lacking in leadership on
sustainable development, with a majority saying they are doing a poor job.
How would you rate the performance of each of the following types of
organizations in terms of its contribution to progress on sustainable
development since the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio?
Question Please use a scale where 1 is “poor” and 5 is “excellent.”
NGOs 61% 7%
Research / academic
47% 11%
organizations
Citizen-led mass social

47% 16%
change movements
The Untied Nations 41% 21%
Multi-sectoral partnerships 38% 20%
International financial
23% 35%
institutions
Private sector 21% 40%
City / local governments 19% 41%
Institutional investors 18% 48%
National governments 7% 58%
Excellent (4+5) Poor (1+2)
% of Experts, 2021
Page 11 of 29
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Institutional Performance on Sustainable

2021 Sustainability Leaders Development
Positive Assessment of NGOs,

Private Sector, and Institutional
Investors Strengthens
Positive views of NGOs, multi-sectoral partnerships, the private sector, and institutional
investors are trending up slightly, while positive assessments of local governments are down.
How would you rate the performance of each of the following types of
organizations in terms of its contribution to progress on sustainable development
since the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio?
Question Please use a scale where 1 is “poor” and 5 is “excellent.”
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Research / academic Citizen-led mass social

NGOs (61%)
organizations (47)% change movements (47%)
Multi-sectoral International financial

The Untied Nations (41%)
partnerships (38%) institutions (23%)
Private sector (21%) City / local Institutional investors (18%)

governments (19%)
National governments (7%)
% of Experts, “Excellent” (4+5), 2012–2021
Page 12 of 29
Government
Leaders
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Government Leaders

Sweden and Germany Top-Ranked

Among Governments
While Sweden and Germany continue to be viewed as leading among governments, more experts are naming
countries like the UK, Costa Rica, New Zealand, France, Finland, Bhutan, and Singapore.
What specific national governments do you think are leaders in advancing

sustainable development?
Please enter a maximum of three countries in the spaces provided.
Question
22%
Sweden 27%
22%
Germany
25%
20%
Denmark
18%
16%
Norway 14%
16%
UK 11%
15%
Costa Rica
8%
15%
New Zealand
2%
13%
Netherlands
12%
12%
France 5%
8%
Finland
4%
7%
Bhutan 4%
6%
Canada 6%
6%
Singapore
2%
5%
2021 2016
USA
7%
% of Experts, Total Mentions, 2016–2021
5%
Switzerland
5%
Page 14 of 29

NGO Leaders
Page 15 of 29
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey NGO Leaders

World Wildlife Fund Dominates

Recognition for Leadership
Four in ten sustainability experts recognize World Wildlife Fund as an NGO leader in sustainable
development. Although the selection of most-recognized NGOs has remained almost the same compared
to last year, Greta Thunberg’s climate-focused youth movement, Fridays for Future (School Strike for
Climate), appeared on this year’s list for the first time.
What specific NGOs do you think are leaders in advancing

Please enter a maximum of three NGOs in the spaces provided.
Question
World Wildlife Fund 41%
Greenpeace 17%
World Resources Institute 11%
The Nature Conservancy 9%
Oxfam 8%
United Nations / Global Compact 5%
Ceres 4%
World Business Council for 4%

Sustainable Development
Ellen McArthur Foundation 4%
Conservation International 3%
Environmental Defense Fund 3%
Fridays for Future 3%
% of Experts, Unprompted, Total Mentions, 2021
Page 16 of 29

World Wildlife Fund and Greenpeace

Maintain Their Leading Positions
The group of most-recognized NGOs has remained relatively consistent since 2015. World Wildlife Fund and
Greenpeace continue to retain the top two spots, although the former receives far more recognition by experts than
any other organization. World Resources Institute has now retained third place for the past two years.

Question
50
40
30
20
10
World Wildlife Fund (41%) Greenpeace (17%) World Resources Institute (11%)
The Nature Conservancy (9%) Oxfam (8%) United Nations / Global Compact (5%)
Ceres (4%) World Business Ellen McArthur Foundation (4%)

Council for Sustainable
Development (4%)
% of Experts, Unprompted, Total Mentions,

2015–2021
Page 17 of 29

Perceptions of NGO Leadership Vary

Widely by Sector and Region
Although World Wildlife Fund is consistently recognized as the leading NGO by experts in all sectors and from
all parts of the world, its lead is particularly evident among sustainability professionals in the NGO and corporate
sectors and those based in Asia-Pacific and Europe.

Question
Africa / Latin
Govern- Academic Service / Asia- North
NGO Corporate Middle Europe America /
ment / research media Pacific America
East Caribbean
World Wildlife Fund 20% 53% 33% 47% 35% 29% 46% 51% 34% 34%
Greenpeace 8% 15% 20% 18% 16% 12% 17% 24% 18% 8%
World Resources Institute 8% 12% 7% 14% 11% 5% 10% 12% 9% 17%
The Nature Conservancy 16% 12% 6% 6% 11% 5% 7% 3% 13% 17%
Oxfam 4% 4% 12% 7% 10% 10% 5% 14% 6% 6%
United Nations / Global Compact 0% 4% 5% 8% 4% 7% 4% 6% 6% 3%
Ellen McArthur Foundation 0% 1% 5% 8% 4% 0% 2% 7% 3% 7%
Ceres 0% 2% 5% 5% 5% 0% 3% 2% 1% 12%
World Business Council for 4% 2% 2% 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5%

Sustainable Development
Environmental Defense Fund 4% 5% 4% 2% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 11%
Fridays for Future 0% 5% 5% 2% 4% 0% 2% 7% 1% 3%
Conservation International 0% 8% 3% 2% 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% 6%
% of Experts, by Sector and Region,

Unprompted, Total Mentions, 2021
Page 18 of 29

Corporate Leaders
Page 19 of 29
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Corporate Leaders

Unilever, Patagonia, Natura &Co, and IKEA

Are the Companies Most Recognized For
Their Sustainability Leadership
Natura &Co has overtaken IKEA and Interface to enter the top three companies most recognized by
experts for their sustainability leadership. While reordered, the companies in the top ten remain the same
as in 2020.
What specific companies do you think are leaders in integrating

sustainability into their business strategy?
Please enter a maximum of three companies in the spaces
Question provided.
Unilever 31%
Patagonia 25%
Natura &Co 16%
IKEA 13%
Interface 6%
Danone 5%
Microsoft 4%
Nestlé 4%
Tesla 4%
Ørsted 3%
Google 2%
Kering 2%
Schneider Electric 2%
Suzano 2%
Walmart 2%
% of Experts, Unprompted, Total Mentions, 2021
Page 20 of 29

The Gap between Unilever and Other

Leaders Continues to Narrow
The proportion of sustainability experts selecting Unilever as a leading company continues to trend down after an
uptick in 2020, diminishing the dominance that it has maintained over the past decade. Instead, a broad selection of
companies is increasingly recognized. Expert mentions of Natura &Co have increased compared to 2020, bringing it to
third position.
What specific companies do you think are leaders in integrating

sustainability into their business strategy?
Please enter a maximum of three companies in the spaces provided.
Question
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
Unilever (31%) Patagonia (25%) Natura &Co (16%)
IKEA (13%) Interface (6%) Danone (5%)
Tesla (4%) Nestlé (4%) Microsoft (4%)
Ørsted (3%)
% of Experts, Unprompted, Total Mentions, 2010-

2021
Page 21 of 29

Strategic, Sustainable Business Models

Drive Corporate Leadership
Experts are becoming less focused on ambitious targets and commitments, values and purpose, and high-profile
executive leadership as drivers of recognized sustainability leadership. Instead, putting sustainability at the core of the
business models and strategy is the most frequently cited factor as to why companies are considered leaders.
Why do you think [insert company #1] is a leader in sustainable

development?
Please enter up to two responses in the spaces provided.
Question
21%
Core business model / strategy 19%
15%
12%
Ambitious targets / SDG 19%
commitment 12%
12%
Sustainability values / purpose 13%
20%
11%
Sustainable products / services 11%
12%
10%
Communication / advocacy 12%
8%
10%
Supply chain management 9%
9%
10%
Leadership / setting standards 6%
8%
9%
Circularity / zero-waste 9%
9%
9%
Innovation / science-based / 8%
knowledge 7%
9%
Long-term commitment / 6%
experience 6%
7%
2021 2020 2019
Executive leadership 10%
12%

2019–2021
Page 22 of 29

Drivers of Recognized Corporate

Leadership Vary across Sectors and
Regions
Although putting sustainability at the core of business models and strategy is the top reason experts across most
sectors and regions cite for naming a leading company, there are some differences. North American sustainability
professionals tend to name a broader range of top drivers than do other experts.
Why do you think [insert company #1] is a leader in sustainable

development?
Please enter up to two responses in the spaces provided.
Question
Africa / Latin
Academic Service / Asia- North
NGO Corporate Middle Europe America /
/ research Media Pacific America
East Caribbean
Core business Sustainable Core business Core business Core business Core business Core business Core business Ambitious
Most model / products / model / model / model model / model / model / targets SDG
important strategy services strategy strategy strategy strategy strategy strategy commitment;
(19%) (19%) (26%) (22%) (29%) (18%) (27%) (19%)
driver Core business
model /
strategy
(17% each)
2nd most Supply chain Circularity / Ambitious Sustainability Circularity / Sustainability Leadership Ambitious Circularity /
management zero-waste; targets / SDG values / zero-waste values / / setting targets / SDG zero-waste;
important (13%) commitment purpose (16%) purpose standards commitment
driver Long-term (15%) (16%) (14%) (14%) (16%) Supply chain
commitment management;
/ experience
(16% each) Sustainability
values /
purpose
(12% each)
Ambitious
3rd most targets / SDG
Core business Leadership Communication Sustainable Ambitious Sustainability Supply chain Communication
model / / setting / advocacy products / targets / SDG values / management / advocacy;
important commitment;
strategy standards (12%) services commitment; purpose; (14%)
driver Sustainability
(12%) (13%) (13%) Innovation /
Leadership Long-term science-based
values /
/ setting commitment / knowledge
purpose
standards / experience (11% each)
(12% each)
(12% each) (11% each)

Unprompted, Total Mentions, 2021.
Government sector was not included in this

analysis due to small sample size.
Page 23 of 29

Focus on Regional Leaders Reveals

Greater Diversity of Corporate
Sustainability Leadership
When experts are asked to identify sustainability leaders among companies headquartered in their regions, a large
variety of companies are mentioned. Experts in Latin America / Caribbean and North America elect Natura &Co and
Patagonia to the respective number one positions by a large margin, while in other regions companies are more evenly
ranked. This year sees the emergence of several new names that have not been mentioned in previous years.
Which companies headquartered specifically in [region where respondent

is based] do you think are leaders in integrating sustainability into their
business strategy?
Question Please enter up to three responses.
North America Asia-Pacific

Patagonia 39% City Developments Limited 7%
Interface 10%
Tata 7%
Microsoft 9%
Tesla 8% China Light and Power 5%
HP 7%
Swire 5%
Walmart 7%
Google 5%
Mahindra 4%
Starbucks 5% Kao 3%
Apple 4%
Olam 3%
Ben & Jerry's 4%
PepsiCo 4% Toyota 3%
Latin America / Caribbean Africa / Middle East

Natura &Co 66% Woolworths 15%
Suzano 17% Nedbank 10%
Boticário 7% Anglo American 7%
AmBev 6% Safaricom 7%
Arcor 5% Sappi Limited 7%
Banco Itaú 4%
Votorantim 3%
Klabin 3%
Petrobras 3%
Europe
Unilever 33%
IKEA 22%
Ørsted 12%
Danone 10%
Iberdrola 4%
Kering 4%
Nestlé 4%
% of Experts in Each Region, Unprompted, Total
Schneider Electric 4% Mentions, 2021
Marks & Spencer 3%
Page 24 of 29

COVID-19 Impact
on the Sustainable
Development Agenda
Page 25 of 29
GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey COVID-19 Impact on the Sustainable

2021 Sustainability Leaders Development Agenda
Experts Predict More Inequality and Increased

Poverty as Main Effect of COVID-19 and Expect
Greater Attention to Environmental Issues
Last year, almost half of experts expected that sustainability would become a less urgent priority due to the effects of
the COVID-19 pandemic. This year, sustainability experts are much less likely to predict this outcome. Instead, most
experts believe that the main effect of the pandemic will be a rise in inequality and poverty as well as a rise in attention
to environmental issues.
How will the COVID-19 pandemic crisis affect sustainable development

priorities between now and 2030?
Please enter up to three impacts in the spaces provided.
Question
38%
More inequalities/poverty
30%
29%
More attention to environment/
biodiversity/climate 29%
24%
Sustainability lower priority
49%
22%
Impact on public health /
hygiene / H&S 24%
Less money/capital / 21%

financial collapse 25%
Less travel / impact on 10%

transportation 9%
9%
More focus / shift in priorities 10%
Unemployment / shifting labor 8%

patterns 19%
8%
More waste/plastic
8%
More focus on social issues 7%

instead of environment 16%
More local production / 7%

rethinking supply chains 8%
7%
Impact on education/research 2021 2020
5%

2020–2021
Page 26 of 29

Experts in Different Sectors and Regions

Vary in their Predictions of COVID-19
Impact
Sustainability professionals based in Africa / Middle East and Latin America / Caribbean are more likely than experts
in other regions to say that the COVID-19 pandemic will impact the sustainability agenda mainly in terms of increasing
inequality and poverty. European experts instead tend to predict increasing attention to the environment as the main
outcome from the crisis.

Question
Aca- Africa / Latin

Govern- Corpo- Service / Asia- North
NGO demic / Middle Europe America /
ment rate media Pacific Caribbean America
research East
More inequalities/poverty 28% 42% 42% 37% 36% 43% 29% 26% 69% 33%
More attention to environment/

biodiversity/climate
16% 36% 23% 32% 28% 19% 30% 42% 22% 25%
Sustainability lower priority 20% 27% 25% 20% 27% 17% 29% 23% 22% 24%
Impact on public health / 20% 22% 19% 21% 24% 26% 23% 14% 25% 24%
hygiene / H&S
Less money/capital / 36% 20% 20% 21% 22% 24% 26% 26% 19% 14%
financial collapse
Less travel / impact on 24% 10% 9% 6% 11% 7% 11% 10% 7% 11%

transportation
More focus / shift in priorities 4% 5% 13% 13% 6% 5% 10% 12% 4% 8%
Unemployment /
8% 5% 7% 9% 10% 12% 8% 3% 19% 4%
shifting labor patterns
More waste/plastic 8% 8% 11% 8% 7% 5% 7% 5% 8% 13%

Unprompted, Total Mentions, 2021
Page 27 of 29

COVID-19 Impacts: Quotes from Experts
Below we share some verbatim quotes from respondents around the world on how COVID-19 is likely to impact the
sustainable development agenda.

Question
" "
Increased awareness of Unequal recovery
nature and health nexus
Highlight the link between destruction Inequity of recovery due to vaccination
of natural environment and spread of disparities will result in further impacts
disease. -USA on the most vulnerable countries and
communities. -USA
More awareness of interconnections
between nature and health. -Hong Kong
" "
Realization of potential Wake-up call
for action
If the world can find the money to deal Hopefully, it will be a wake-up call for
with the economic and health impacts of society to act in a more sustainable
the pandemic it must do the same for the manner. This is a wave that all
climate crisis. -Singapore governments and companies should
ride. -Laos
Increased recognition that we can act on
climate change with the will to act. -UK
Page 28 of 29
Chris Coulter
CEO
chris.coulter@globescan.com
twitter.com/GlobeScan
Eric Whan
Director
linkedin.com/company/ eric.whan@globescan.com
globescan
insight@globescan.com
globescan.com Tove Malmqvist

Senior Project Manager
tove.malmqvist@globescan.com
Mark Lee
Director
mark.lee@erm.com
twitter.com/SustInsti
Aiste Brackley
Head of Research & Insights
linkedin.com/company/ aiste.brackley@erm.com
sustainabilityinstituteerm
Institute@erm.com
sustainability.com Laura Street

Research Manager
laura.street@erm.com
© Copyright 2021 by GlobeScan Incorporated and

ERM Worldwide Group Limited and/or its affiliates
(‘ERM’). All Rights Reserved. No part of this work
may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
by any means, without prior written permission of
GlobeScan Incorporated and ERM.

Ermsi Globescan Leaders 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ermsi Globescan Leaders 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ermsi Globescan Leaders 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey

2021 Sustainability Leaders

Survey Methodology page 4

Key Findings page 5

Urgency of Sustainable Development Challenges page 6

Institutional Performance on Sustainable Development page 10

Government Leaders page 13

NGO Leaders page 15

Corporate Leaders page 19

COVID-19 Impact on the Sustainable Development Agenda page 25

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Introduction

Panellists’ responses in 2021 show the gap narrowing

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Survey Methodology

26% 24% 23%

32% 30% 19%

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Key Findings

World Wildlife Fund remains the most widely

The top tier corporate sustainability leaders remain

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Urgency of Sustainable Development Challenges

Growing Urgency of Sustainable

Considering society’s numerous sustainable development challenges,

Climate Change 93%

Biodiversity Loss 90% UP 4 points

Water scarcity 86%

Poverty 84% UP 5 points

Water pollution 84% UP 5 points

Access to medicines/healthcare 81% UP 5 points

Access to quality education 81% UP 5 points

Economic inequality 81% UP 3 points

Food scarcity 81% UP 6 points

Plastic waste 80% UP 3 points

Waste 80% UP 5 points

Air pollution 79% UP 4 points

Diversity/discrimintation 70% UP 6 points

Bribery/corruption 68% UP 4 points

Supply chain labor conditions 66% UP 5 points

Access to energy 65% UP 8 points

Infectious disease 63%

Too much meat in people's diets 55%

Online data and information security 51% UP 5 points

Non-communicable diseases 49% UP 4 points

2021 Change from 2020

% of Experts, “Urgent” (4+5), 2020–2021

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Urgency of Sustainable Development Challenges

Urgency of Top Sustainable Development

Considering society’s numerous sustainable development challenges,

Climate change (93%) Biodiversity loss (90%) Water scarcity (86%)

Water pollution (84%) Poverty (84%)

% of Experts, “Urgent” (4+5), 2011–2021

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Urgency of Sustainable Development Challenges

Urgency of Social Challenges

Considering society’s numerous sustainable development challenges,

Food security 75%

2021 2020 2019

% of Experts, “Urgent” (4+5), 2019–2021

GlobeScan / SustainAbility Survey Institutional Performance on Sustainable

NGOs, Academia, and Citizen Movements

Citizen-led mass social

The Untied Nations 41% 21%

Multi-sectoral partnerships 38% 20%