Quality in Dental Practice - Nishant Mehta - GCD Fund Website
Quality in Dental Practice - Nishant Mehta - GCD Fund Website
Quality in Dental Practice - Nishant Mehta - GCD Fund Website
increasing demand for quality healthcare. With the increased standard of living in
India people are becoming health conscious, shaping a new market which is
giving increasing importance to healthy teeth and dental cosmetics. The potential
size of India’s dental market is vast and as per the IDA, India is slated to become
one of the largest single country markets for overseas dental products and
materials. Currently, the Indian dental care services market is estimated at about
US$ 600 million and dental equipment and appliances market is around US$ 90
million, with a yearly growth rate of 10%. As per the report of year 2010
equipments industry is expected to reach US$ 116.43 million, the dental care
services market to US$ 1.16 billion and oral care market to US$ 1.8 billion by
2014 (Agarwal, 2012). Unfortunately this is only side of the coin representing the
flourishing Indian dental market and the other side represents the still grave rural
and less privileged populations’ front. Though great deals of funds have been
raised and numerous acts and institutions formulated to up bring the health
status of poor and needy ones and ensure equitable distribution of dental health
care facilities. Moreover, the lack of tools to measure the quality of dental
practice across the country place an additional hindrance to assess the value
and volume of effective care delivered surpassing all inequalities of region and
financial barriers.
STANDARDS OF DENTAL CARE AND TREATMENT
Primary Care Health Service dental services, including those provided by the
Community Dental Service. The term Primary Care refers to the local dental
services available directly to patients, such as those services from High Street
dentists and Health Centers. The term Secondary Care refers to hospital or
specialist care, to which a patient may be referred from Primary Care. A standard
has been set to achieve six important aims for quality improvement (Fish, 2009) :
1. Safe — avoiding injuries to patients from the care that is intended to help
them.
benefit and refraining from providing services to those not likely to benefit
individual patient preferences, needs, and values and ensuring that patient
4. Timely — reducing waits and sometimes harmful delays for both those who
energy.
6. Equitable — providing care that does not vary in quality because of personal
socioeconomic status.
Health Service or private setting. Their purpose is to ensure that masses receive
consistently high quality care and treatment. The standards can be used to help
The Quality Standards for Health and Social Care, have five key quality themes:
• Safe and effective care: Assessing the needs of individual patients, the
• Promoting, protecting and improving health and social well being: Ongoing
vulnerable adults.
assess quality and efficiency of care has become more urgent. Studies have
Of note are:
• Veterans Administration.
Challenges for Measurement in Dentistry
• Limited information systems for capturing and transmitting data from patient
records
has recognized the need to adopt evidence based principles in the delivery of
evidence. There are very few high-quality prospective clinical trials on oral health
topics. There is limited knowledge of true oral health outcomes, which occurs in
part because dentistry does not have a tradition of formally reporting specific
practices, measure factors under the control of the practitioner, and yield
meaningful information that can be acted upon for improvement .the need to
measure is rooted in the basic responsibility to assure that the public receives
optimal benefits from available knowledge and effective care. Steeply rising costs
and inconsistent quality of medical care have culminated in the national priority to
deliberately seek value from healthcare. To assure that we are providing the
highest quality patient centered dental care, dentistry should be able to measure
what works and what doesn’t and make changes needed to improve health
outcomes.
difference. This was true of patients in both practices, and for patients at
all levels of risk of developing dental caries, that is, with healthy and less
(Sbaraini et al., 2012). People were either unable to pay for care and living
with pain, or were continuously paying for restorative work; although they
were unhappy with this situation, they felt unable to address it.
early as 1883 gained direction with the starting of the first autonomous
has increased significantly in the past two decades. A recent report by the
from 1370 in 1960 to over 26000 in the year 2000; the number is still
established new practices. Patients value the dental care without drilling
and filling” teeth and characterized dentists as\ either “old-school” or “new-
the quality of dental care and the likelihood of them seeking care are
delivery and quality of dental health care. While the delivery of quality care
is important, access to oral health care is a more immediate concern for
rural residents. Though many major steps have been taken by Indian
dental association and impact of mobile dental services has been evident
in improving rural health care services. But still the results are not
of the dental colleges are concentrated in five states of the country and
the dentist to population ratio in India in 2004 was 1:10,000 in urban areas
of oral health care delivery system (Guay, 2004). When rural residents
cannot access care, the delivery and quality of care becomes irrelevant.
Adults in rural areas are more likely to have untreated dental decay,
The oral health care for a 1.1 billion population is one of the fore most
between theory learned and its application. Obviously, the solution is to establish
(Byron L, 2009)
logical reasoning.
evaluation by students.
programs in India has very little scope for research activity. The reasons
range from lack of funds to lack of research mentors. The BDS curriculum
Similarly, very few dental colleges have the facility for evaluation of staff,
by the students, and in those few colleges where such system exists there
hardly seems to be any serious thinking regarding the future and profitable
age, gender and socio economic status. The oral diseases are rampant
of health care is inefficient. The government and private sectors still don’t
consider the oral heath under the health insurance schemes, thus making
it an unattended sector.
sector in India is near to adequate but the problem lies in its skewed
distribution. There are many states viz: Orissa, Jammu and Kashmir,
other hand, in the states like Maharashtra, Punjab and Haryana, dentists
are facing crisis to find jobs and struggle to establish due to ever-growing
Funds are needed to be raised in this respect especially to reach to rural areas.
where government considerations are may work for betterment. The timely
the quality of care delivered. The major problem being encountered is the rising
number of oral cancers and other oral diseases numbers despite of all efforts put
forth till date. The reason behind is failure to diagnose the oral ailments at an
earlier stages. It demands special thought to introduce diagnostic tools and equip
dental personnel to make prompt diagnosis (WHO, 2003) and carry out
preventive regimes to deal with such rampant oral disasters. The quality of dental
extractions done, but incorporating the right lifestyle and habits to ensure good
oral health is sole aim of dentist and number of healthy individuals are indicative
of quality of dental practice. The primordial and primary levels of prevention are
equally important as secondary and tertiary levels. A lot has been done and a lot
of both the consumers and dental personnel are implemented the day is not far
off when every dentist will be delivering a quality dental care and every individual
promises made, promises broken: the impact of chronic uner funding of contract
ENTWISTLE, V., FIRNIGL, D., RYAN, M., FRANCIS, J. & KINGHORN, P. 2012.
Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A
critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. J Health Serv Res Policy, 17,
70-8.
FISH, D. 2009. Filling a dental void in rural Wisconsin. Healthc Exec, 24, 50, 52.
GUAY, A. H. 2004. Access to dental care: solving the problem for underserved
Experiences of dental care: what do patients value? BMC Health Serv Res, 12,
177.
WHO (ed.) 2003. Quality and accreditation in health care services A GLOBAL
REVIEW, Hongkong.