Error Correction Observation Sheet-2
Error Correction Observation Sheet-2
EliteInternational
InternationalSchools
Schools
Task Objective.
If teachers corrected every language error made in their class, far too much classroom time
would be given over to correction. This has negative implications in that it might reduce
Teachers necessarily differentiate between errors that require immediate attention and errors
that are better ignored or treated in another way or at another time. This is one of the many
choices a teacher makes in regard to learner error.
This observation task is designed to help you become more aware of the issues involved in
error management. You will be attending to learner error, noting down some examples,
watching for how the teacher responds and noting whether correction is given and how.
Procedure.
Prepare a chart as below to help you record some instances of learner error and teacher
uncountable: hair"
inappropriate language.
2. Note whether the teacher responded and if so, record how she responded i.e. what was said
or signalled.
4. Note whether there was a particular focus at that point in the lesson i.e. accuracy or fluency.
1. Did you observe any pattern in the teacher's way of responding to learner error? Discuss
2. Looking at your data is it possible to distinguish between the errors, or rank them in order of
importance? Which in your opinion were necessary to correct and which could be ignored?
3. How did the other students respond to the error (and the teacher's response? Was there any
peer correction, or peer interaction / discussion of the error? If so, what did the teacher do to
encourage this?
4. Were there any opportunities for the student's to self-correct? If so, how did the teacher
5. Was there a link between the amount of error correction and the focus or phase in the
lesson?
6. When the focus of the lesson is on fluency there may be ways in which a teacher can avoid
interrupting the flow of the students' language. Is it possible to correct in a non-obtrusive way?
How?
7. Was there any evidence of a student processing information? For example having been
corrected did the student appear to adjust their existing knowledge to accommodate the new
information?
8. Were there any occasions when the teacher responded to the error without attending to the
student's intended meaning, that is, attended exclusively to the form of the language?
What effect did this have on the students and the lesson?
Reflection.
What experience do you have of being corrected when speaking a foreign language? Do you
Much, if not all, of what a language teacher says and does in the classroom is a reflection of
that teacher's belief (conscious or otherwise) about how people learn languages. Considering
your own style of managing error, how does this reflect your underlying beliefs.
Write up your observations in not more than 750 words. What aspects would you like to
BN. An alternative plan is filling in the form at the end of this document after understanding error correction types
and strategies.
T: Why may be? Why are you not sure? Cla rif ication req uest
Indication / correction: the teacher repeated the mistake with a rising intonation, then
stated that it was a problem with intonation, then showed which word was faulty on his
fingers
6) Error: “persons”
Indication / correction: the teacher repeated the mistake with a rising intonation,
followed by the student self-correcting
Indication / correction: the teacher explained the difference between the noun phrase
“hard work” and the verb & adverb combination “work hard”. The student then produced
the correct form, which was then reinforced by the teacher
Indication / correction: the teacher repeated the mistake with a rising intonation,
following which, the student offered “if I don’t become successful”
Indication / correction: the teacher repeated the mistake, saying “it’s most important –
no.” The student then self-corrected.
A filled in Sample