DMSSF ACC003 Review Questions Templates
DMSSF ACC003 Review Questions Templates
DMSSF ACC003 Review Questions Templates
Chapter 2
Exercise 2–30
1. Product Cost:
Period Cost:
Exercise 2-32
Costs DM DL MOH
Jars
Sugar
Fruit
Pectin
Boxes
Depreciation on the factory building
Cooking equipment operators’ wages
Filling equipment operators’ wages
Packers’ wages
Janitors’ wages
Receptionist’s wages
Telephone
Utilities
Supervisory labour salaries
Insurance on factory building
Depreciation on factory equipment
Oil to lubricate filling equipment
Exercise 2–33
Page 1 of 27
Exercise 2–34
Exercise 2–37
2.
3. Direct materials + Direct labor + Manufacturing Overhead
Page 2 of 27
Exercise 2–38
Cost of Goods Sold = COGM + Finished Goods 1 Mar - Finished Goods Mar 31
Exercise 2-39
Cost of Goods Sold = Direct materials + Direct labor + Manufacturing Overhead
Exercise 2-40
Sales revenue = Number of units sold x Selling price
Jasper Company
Income Statement
For Last Year
Sales revenue
Gross profit
Less:
Selling expense
Administrative expense
Operating income
Page 3 of 27
Chapter 2
E x 3-22
E x 3-30
High point:
Low point:
Page 4 of 27
Using the high-low method means that Luisa’s estimate of the cost formula and cost behavior
patterns is based on only 2 data points ignoring other data points.
Issues:
1 Investigate to make sure that both the high and low point are not outliers that distort
the results of the cost formula.
2 Compute the cost formula 6 to 12 months later after a longer time period has passed
since the commencement of the tanning business. More time, more data will help
Luisa to judge whether the high and low points are outliers.
3 Ensure that all data from previous 8 months was collected within the relevant range of
operations .which is very necessary when estimating total fixed costs and variable cost
per unit.
Problem 3-43
2 Cost formula:
Variable receiving cost =
Chapter 4
Exercise 4–24
1. Direct materials
Direct labor
Variable overhead
Variable selling and administrative expense
Unit variable cost
Unit contribution margin = Unit Selling Price – Unit variable cost
Page 5 of 27
2. Contribution margin ratio =
3. Break-even units =
Operating income
Exercise 4–26
Exercise 4–28
1 Break-even units =
Page 6 of 27
Unit variable manufacturing cost includes the variable costs of production on a unit
basis:
= DM per unit + DL per unit +Variable OH per unit
Unit VC is used in CVP because it includes all variable costs, not just
manufacturing costs.
Exercise 4–29
1 Break-even units =
4 A decrease in Unit Selling price will cause a decrease in Unit CM which leads to an
increase in Breakeven Point. A higher breakeven point will cause a decrease in the
margin of safety which means increased risk for the company.
Page 7 of 27
Ex. 4-30 Key Answers:
Laertes
TFC = $9500; Units sold= 3,000; UVC = $1.67; UCM = $3.33; CMR= 67%;
BEP (units) = 2,853
Ophelia
Sales = $15,600; Operating income = ($100); USP = $12; CMR = 25%; BEP (units) =
1,333.
Fortinbras
Sales = $16,250; TCM = $6,500; TFC = $6,136; UVC = $78; UCM = $52;
BEP (units) = 118
Claudias
VC = $5,300; TCM = $5,300; USP = $10.60; UVC = $5.30; UCM = $5.30;
CMR = 50%; BEP (units) = 840.
Exercise 4–31
2. Because all fixed costs are covered by break-even, any revenue above break- even
yields contribution directly to operating income.
Page 8 of 27
5. Margin of safety if sales revenue is $380,000?
Exercise 4–32
1. Sales mix is
2. Sales
Product USP – UVC = UCM x Mix = Total
CM
DVDs
Equipment sets
Package CM
Break-even packages =
Break-even( DVDs) =
Exercise 4–33
1 Sales mix is
2 Sales
Product USP – UVC = UCM x Mix = Total CM
DVDs
Equipment a.
sets sets
Yoga
Package CM
Break-even packages =
Break-even DVDs =
Page 9 of 27
Break-even yoga mats =
Sales $418,500
Less total variable Cost (261,000)
Contribution Margin $157,500
Less total fixed cost (114,100)
Operating income $43,400
CMR =
Margin of Safety =
Problem 4–42
1. Break-even units =
4. Current units =
Page 10 of 27
Problem 4–43
CM
CM ratio
2. Contribution margin:
Operating income
3. Sales mix:
Door handle
Trim kit
Package CM
Break-even packages =
Door handles =
Trim kits =
4. Revenue
Variable cost
Contribution margin
Fixed cost
Operating income
Yes operating income is $ higher than when both door handles and trim kits
are sold.
Page 11 of 27
Chapter 5
Exercise 5–32
Actual overhead $
Applied overhead
Underapplied overhead
Exercise 5–33
Actual FOH
Applied FOH
Over/Under applied FOH
Page 12 of 27
Exercise 5-40
Key Answers:
Job 213- Total Sales revenue: $1,200; DLC (dept 1): $150; Overhead applied (dept 2) $200.
Job 214- USP: $12.50; DMU: $1,453; FOH applied (dept 1): $420; Unit cost: $8.78.
Job 217- DLC (dept 2): $100; MH (dept 2): 20; total manufacturing cost: $3,948.
Job 225- MH (dept 2): 0; number of units: 230; Unit cost: $2.50.
Exercise 5–41
Plant wide
1. Direct materials
Direct labor:
Department A
Department B
Overhead
Total manufacturing costs..
2. Unit cost =
Departmental
3. Direct materials
Direct labor:
Department A
Department B
Overhead:
Department A
Department B
4. Unit cost =
Page 13 of 27
Problem 5–47
1. OH rate =
2. Department A:
Department B:
3. Job 73 Job 74
Plantwide:
Departmental:
8,000 MH
Page 14 of 27
Job 73 Job 74
Plantwide:
Assuming that machine hours is a good cost driver, the departmental rates reveal that
overhead consumption is the same in each department. In this case, there is no need
for departmental rates, and a plantwide rate is sufficient.
Problem 5–51
1. Overhead rate =
Beginning WIP
Direct materials
Direct labor
Applied overhead
Total
3. Since Jobs were completed, the others must still be in process. Therefore, the
ending balance in Work in Process is the sum of the costs of Jobs:
Page 15 of 27
4 PavlovichProsthetics Company
Sales $14,339
Gross margin $ 3, 3 0 9
Chapter 9
Exercise 9–34
Stillwater Designs
Sales Budget
For the Year 2012
S12L5:
Units
× Price
Sales
Total sales
2. Stillwater Designs will use the sales budget in planning as the basis for the production
budget and the succeeding budgets of the master budget. At year end, the company can
compare actual sales against the budgeted sales to see if expectations were achieved.
Exercise 9–35
Stillwater Designs
Production Budget (S12L7)
For the Year 2012
1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. Total
Sales
+ Desired closing stock
Total needs
- Opening stock
Units produced
Page 16 of 27
Stillwater Designs
Production Budget (S12L5)
For the Year 2012
1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. Total
Sales
+ Desired closing stock
Total needs
- Opening stock
Units produced
Exercise 9–38
Fang Company
Direct Materials (DM) Purchases Budget
For July, Aug, and Sept
July Aug Sept Total
Units to be produced 2,800 20,000 30,000 52,800
DM per unit (ounces)
Production needs
+Desired closing stock (ounces)
Total needs
-Opening stock
DM to be purchased (ounces)
Cost per ounce × $0.08 × $0.08 × $0.08 × $0.08
Total purchase cost $ 2,496 $8,800 $9,760 $ 21,056
Exercise 9–39
Joaquin Company
Direct Labor Budget
For March, April, and May
March April May Total
Units to be produced
x Direct labor per unit (hours)
Total hours needed
x Cost per hour
Total direct labor cost $12,000 $72,000 $78,000 $162,000
Exercise 9–42
Workings:
1. Credit sales in May = $240,000 × 0.65= $156,000
Credit sales in June = $230,000 × 0.65 = $149,500
Credit sales in July = $240,000 × 0.65 = $156,000
Credit sales in August = $250,000 × 0.65 = $162,500
Page 17 of 27
Lopez Inc.
Schedule of Cash Receipts For July and August
July August
Cash sales $ 84,000 $ 87,500
August $162,500 x
0.25=
Total
Payments on account:
From May credit sales: $7,800
(0.05 × $156,000)
Page 18 of 27
Exercise 9–44
Draper Company
Schedule of Cash Payments
For August
Overhead
Loan repayment
Cash payments.
Exercise 9–45
Receipts:
Cash sales
Credit sales:
Current month
May credit sales
April credit sales
Less disbursements:
Inventory purchases:
Current month
Prior month
Salaries and wages
Rent
Taxes
Total cash needs
2. Yes, the business does show a negative cash balance for June. One way to deal with it
would be for the owner to consider taking less cash salary.
Page 19 of 27
Chapter 8
Ex 8-26
1 Absorption-costing:
Unit product cost = DM + DL + Total OH (VOH + FOH)
2 Variable-costing:
Unit product cost = DM + DL + VOH
Ex 8-27
Absorption-costing income:
Sales 550,400
Gross margin/profit $2
Less:
Page 20 of 27
2 Unit product cost =
Variable-costing income:
Sales ,400
Operating income $1
Ex 8-31
1 Orders per year = Annual no. used units / no. of units in an order
= 4,000 units / 400 units per order
=10
2. Total ordering cost = Number of orders × Cost per order
= 400/2 x $4
= $800
4 Total inventory-related cost = Total ordering cost + Total carrying cost
$1,000
5.No, Zellen’s order size of 600 units is not the economic order quantity (as the ordering costs
of $75 do not equal the carrying costs of $300). Zellen could get closer to the EOQ amount by
ordering more frequently (increasing order cost) in smaller amounts per order (decreasing
carrying costs).
Page 21 of 27
Ex 8-32
1 EOQ = √( 2 x CO X D/CC )
= √( 2 x Cost per order x Annual demand (units)/ Cost of carrying one unit in inventory )
= √( 2 x 20 x 4,000/$4 )
= 200 units
2. Number of orders = Annual no. used units / no. of units in an order
= 4,000 / 200
= 20 per year
3. Total ordering cost = Number of orders × Cost per order
= 20 x $20
= $400
4 Total carrying cost = Ave no. of units in inventory × Cost of carrying one unit in inventory
=200/2x$4
= $400
5 Total inventory-related costs = Total ordering cost + Total carrying cost
Chapter 12
Ex 12-29
1. Maximum TP:
2. Minimum TP:
Benefit to company =
Page 22 of 27
Chapter 10
Ex 10-28
3. Yes the labour variances exceed the budget by more than 10% and the absolute dollar
amount of the materials variance is also large enough to merit investigation.
Ex 10-29
Formula approach:
Columnar approach:
AP x AQ SP x AQ SP x SQ
Page 23 of 27
2. A favourable materials price affects both materials usage and labour variances. If
quality is low, more waste and more rework which may more than offset the favourable
materials price variance.
Ex 10-30
Formula approach:
Columnar approach:
AR x AH SR x AH SR x SH
2. The favourable MPV is due to purchase of low quality leather strips which cause
unfavourable MUV, LRV and LEV.
Corrective action: Go back to suppliers that provide the good quality material according
to the price standard.
Chapter 13
Exercise 13–24
2. Alternatives Differential
Make Buy Cost to Make
DM
DL
VOH
Purchase cost
Total relevant cost
Page 24 of 27
Exercise 13–25
Alternatives Differential
Make Buy Cost to Make
DM
DL
VOH
Avoidable fixed overhead
Purchase cost
Total relevant cost
(Avoidable fixed overhead is relevant because if Zion makes the component, it will incur the
cost, but if the component is purchased, that fixed overhead will not be incurred.)
Decision: Zion should ___________ the component in-house from Bryce because it will
save___________ ( ) over making it in-house.
As percentage of avoidable FC increase (above 75%), total relevant costs of making the
component also increases, causing the “buy” option more appealing.
As percentage of avoidable FC decreases (below 75%), total relevant costs of making the
component also decreases, causing the “make” option more appealing.
Exercise 13–26
2. DM
DL
VOH
Total
Exercise 13–27
Revenue
Decision: Smooth Move Company should ___________ the special order because it will
______________ income by $5,000.
Page 25 of 27
Exercise 13–31
1.If HS is sold at split-off , TCM =
Revenue
Less further processing cost
Contribution margin
Decision: Bozo should ______ HS at split-off; profit from ___________at split-off will be
_______________ higher ( ) than if it were processed into
_____________________into CS.
Exercise 13–32
1. Reno Tahoe
Unit contribution margin
Painting department hours
Contribution margin per unit scarce resource
3. Contribution margin =
Page 26 of 27
Exercise 13–33
1.If 500 units of each product can be sold, then the company will
Optimal mix:
Exercise 13–34
Challenges:
(i) Setting mark-up percentage: too high lose customers because selling price high
but if too low may earn too little profits or even incur losses.
(ii) Costs estimation must be accurate. If cost price is understated, selling price
understated and revenue understated. If cost price is overstated, selling price
overstated and revenue overstated.
Page 27 of 27