i n an ci a l

f es
n on- d servic defi Envir
nd ts an nit
io
uc

on and p
np a
Gree ncial

me u t i
rod

n
nta n pla
Fina

l s tr
ategy
ce
ties n tal
M a n a isk s a n

ort o n m e
ge m

o pp n v ir
r

u ni
e n t d opp

nv n d of E
of o

o
rtu iro n m a ti a
n
E

fi c
n it e n t ti s
ie s al Id e n risk

green index 3.0

MAINSTREAMING GREEN INCLUSIVE FINANCE

Prepared by the e-MFP Green Inclusive and Climate Smart

Finance Action Group (GICSF-AG) under the coordination of
the group co-Heads: Davide Forcella (JuST Institute, CERMi)
and Natalia Realpe Carrillo (HEDERA Sustainable Solutions
GmbH, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS))
November 2022
GREEN INDEX 3.0 2

THE EVOLUTION OF THE GREEN INDEX FOR ASSESSING

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF FINANCIAL
SERVICES PROVIDERS
The Green Index was developed by the e-MFP The Green Index 3.0 was released in March 2022.
Green Inclusive and Climate Smart Finance Ac- It results from an extensive and collaborative ef-
tion Group (GICSF-AG) in 20141 and was updated fort within the whole sector. The GICSF-AG and
(Green Index 2.0) in 20162. Since its first launch, its members have developed the Green Index 3.0
it has become the main framework for assessing through a comprehensive review of experiences
the environmental performance of financial ser- using previous versions of the tool and stake-
vices providers (FSP) in green inclusive finance holders consultation. This process included the
and defining action plans to improve it. following:
Today, many different stakeholders have incorpo- • The analysis of 1500+ environmental assess-
rated the Green Index in their product lines and in ments of FSPs conducted since 2011
their governance: investors (as part of their due
diligence), microfinance networks (as means of • The review of 10+ years of green inclusive fi-
support to the sector), rating agencies (embed- nance projects
ding the tool in social ratings), consultants, and
consulting companies (within their advisory ser-
• Mapping of 70+ international initiatives and
standards
vices), and FSPs themselves (pursuing a holistic
social and environmental performance manage- • Surveys and interviews with 250+ stakeholders
ment).
• Two rounds of review involving 150+ partici-
Nevertheless, since 2016, the sector has evolved pants.
remarkably with many new projects, products,
processes, regulations, and standards. For this The Green Index has evolved over the years to
reason, in 2020, the e-MFP GICSF-AG decided to ensure its relevance and alignment with existing
begin the process of developing a new version of practices and experiences.
the Green Index framework.

FIGURE 1: EVOLUTION OF THE GICSF-AG GREEN INDEX

2014 2016 2021

Green Index 1.0 Green Index 2.0 Green Index 3.0
- The most accepted tool to assess MFIs’ - Incorporates lessons learnt from MFI’s - Inclusion of (climate) vulnerability
environmental performance use, ability, and willingness to track - lessons learnt from 1000+ assessments
- Publication available online on e-MFP AG environmental management & 6 years of use, 300+ stakeholders
webpage - Quantitative components for green inputs
- Green Index available in SPI4 products - Alignment to international initiatives
(optional Dimension 7) - Integrated into SPI4 (only qualitative) - Aligned with Universal Standards for
Social and Environmental Performance
Management 'Dimension 7', developed with
Cerise+SPTF, new mandatory dimension of
USSEPM

THE ORIGIN UPGRADING MAINSTREAMING

1
Green Index 1.0: https://www.e-mfp.eu/sites/default/files/resources/2014/10/Green_Index__2014_Block_final.pdf
2
Green Index 2.0: https://www.e-mfp.eu/sites/default/files/resources/Green_Index_Nr_2_2016.pdf
GREEN INDEX 3.0 3

TO WHOM AND FOR WHAT IS IT USEFUL?

The Green Index 3.0 is designed to be a core • IT providers: to provide the sector with flexible
tool to support the inclusive finance sector en- software solutions aligned with the framework
gagement in the definition, implementation, and and the environmental indicators included in
monitoring of environmental practices and to the Green Index; and to support FSPs to as-
mainstream green inclusive finance. More than sess environmental risks, vulnerabilities and
an assessment tool, the Green Index 3.0 provides practices of their clients, and better under-
a detailed framework to support the inclusive fi- stand their needs, to verify the green products
nance sector to: they finance, to report internally and externally,
and to monitor their progress along the various
• Raise awareness and increase commitment dimensions of Green Index 3.0.
• Assess activities
• ​​Support strategic planning • Researchers and academia: to collect data,
• Prioritise activities and to formulate and test hypothesis within a
• Monitor progress at institutional and sector standard research framework.
level
• Microfinance networks: to support their mem-
The Green Index 3.0 aims to be useful for all bers in defining a common evaluation frame-
inclusive finance stakeholders: work and to enhance their capacities.
• FSPs: to identify relevant actions to be under- • Rating agencies & auditors: to assess the sta-
taken in green inclusive finance, to benchmark tus and outlook and align their financial and
their performance against peers and internal social rating / audit.
objectives, to define priorities and action plans,
to monitor their actions, and to report internally • Regulators and central banks: to support
and externally. financial institutions to improve their Envi-
ronmental Social and Governance (ESG) per-
• Investors: to ensure inclusion of environmen- formance and to manage their financial risks
tal performance in their financial and social (physical and transition) derived by climate
assessment, to define their green investment change, biodiversity losses and other environ-
strategy and operations, and to monitor their mental related threats.
outcomes.
• International agencies and development
• Consulting companies & consultants: to ad- banks: as a framework to define baselines and
vise investors and FSPs on strategic and op- monitor their projects and programmes.
erational choices and to support the creation/
development of their capacities. Note: The Green Index 3.0, as its previous version,
is a tool to be used with FSPs management and
• Microfinance clients: by supporting institu- field officers. It assesses the strategy, processes,
tions in taking data-driven decisions fostering and products of the FSPs and not of their clients
climate resiliency, preserving the ecosystems or investors.
their clients depend on, and targeting their
needs and demand, ultimately contributing to
make households and enterprises key actors
of a just green transition.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 4

HOW WAS IT DEVELOPED?

The Green Index 3.0 was developed in the pe- REVIEW OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL
riod October 2020-March 2022, and included ASSESSMENTS
extensive work by the GICSF-AG, its members,
and partners. Below is a description of the main The GICSF-AG, together with its members and ad-
activities performed for the development of the ditional sector stakeholders, gathered a database
Green Index 3.0. composed of 1233 environmental assessments
of 866 FSPs worldwide, performed between
REVIEW AND LESSONS LEARNED FROM 2011 and 2019. The dataset has been built from
PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCES 13 different databases11, aggregating them using
the four standards of the Green Index 2.0:
The GICSF-AG reviewed 10+ years of green inclu-
sive finance key projects and tools implementa- • Environmental Strategy: the definition, man-
tion, among which: agement, and monitoring of an environmental
strategy.
• EcoMicro1 (IDB since 2012, 30+ FSPs)
• MEbA2 (since 2012, 40+ FSPs) • Internal Environmental Risks: the manage-
ment and monitoring of the FSP’s ecological
• Proyecto CAMBio3 (2008-2013, 28 FSPs) footprint (e.g., using renewable energy sourc-
• Green Performance Agenda4 (HIVOS, 2005) es, recycling waste produced, and/or reducing
• FMO ESG Toolkit5 (2009) energy usage, water usage, paper usage, fuel
• MEPI6 (2012) consumption, waste production, and/or GHG
emissions at headquarters and branches).
• Energy & Microfinance – CleanStart7
• Green Energy – ADA8 • External Environmental Risks: the assess-
• Knowledge gathered from the European ment and management of clients’ environ-
Microfinance Awards on Microfinance and mental risks (e.g., evaluating the environmen-
the Environment (2014)9 and Strengthening tal risks of clients’ activities, categorising loan
Resilience to Climate Change (2019)10. applications according to the level of environ-
mental risk, and applying specific procedures
This review aimed to map experiences and col- according to each risk category).
lect the lessons learned in the sector.
• Green Opportunities: the design and delivery
of green financial products (e.g., loans for re-
newable energy or energy efficiency, sustain-
able agriculture or other green activities, agri-
culture/climate insurance) and non-financial
services such as client training on environmen-
tally-friendly practices or businesses.

1
https://www.ecomicro.org/home
2
https://unepmeba.org
3
https://www.bcie.org/acerca-del-bcie/alianzas-estrategicas/programas/proyecto-cambio
4
http://gpa4mf.blogspot.com
5
https://www.fmo.nl/esg-toolkit
6
https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/2013-98806.html
7
https://www.uncdf.org/cleanstart
8
https://www.ada-microfinance.org/en/our-projects/green-microfinance
9
​​https://www.e-mfp.eu/european-microfinance-week-2014/5th-european-microfinance-award
10
https://www.e-mfp.eu/european-microfinance-award-2019
11
Data sources include Foundation Grameen Credit Agricole, YAPU Solutions, Enclude-Palladium, e MFP, Inter-American Development
Bank – IDB Lab, ADA, SIDI, Marion Allet, European Microfinance Network and European Microfinance Centre.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 5

The GICSF-AG also reviewed the results of the sessments based on the Green Index 2.0 in the
aggregated statistical analysis of two addition- period 2016-2019.
al databases containing environmental assess-
ments aligned with the Green Index framework: • MicroFinanza Rating (MFR)13: Environmental
assessment information from 245 social rat-
• SPI412: 29 environmental assessments con- ings in the period 2007-2022.
ducted following the Green Index 1.0 in the
period 2014-2016, and 69 environmental as-

FIGURE 2: SAMPLE OF INITIATIVES, STANDARDS REGULATIONS REVIEWED

MAPPING OF INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES for additional areas and indicators. On the one
hand, these consultations focused on the follow-
The GICSF-AG reviewed more than 70 initiatives, ing aspects of the indicators used to assess the
standards, regulations, and taxonomies on envi- environmental performance of FSPs: usage, rele-
ronmental performance, to ensure the inclusion vance, easiness to track, usefulness for decision
of these concepts into the Green Index 3.0. The taking, and order of importance of the indicators.
building blocks of the Green Index 3.0 have been
defined to enable alignment with the relevant in- On the other hand, different questions focusing
dicators included in the reviewed initiatives, and on future perspectives were considered to as-
hence to favour the translation of the standard sess the proposals for a new dimension includ-
frameworks into manageable and operationalisa- ed in the Green Index 3.0 - ‘vulnerability’. This
ble concepts for FSPs and for the whole inclusive dimension consists of indicators on the vulnera-
finance sector. bility of the FSP’s portfolio and clients to different
aspects related to climate change and environ-
NEEDS ASSESSMENT mental degradation; and integrates quantitative
indicators to monitor implementation and assess
During the preparation and development of the outcomes of the FSP’s activities.
Green Index 3.0, the GICSF-AG launched exten-
sive stakeholder consultations to understand To answer these questions, the GICSF-AG col-
actual environmental assessment practices, to lected stakeholders’ feedback using two different
measure the appreciation of the sector with re- channels:
spect to the standards and the indicators used
in the Green Index 2.0, and to assess the needs

https://cerise-spm.org/en/spi4/
12

https://www.mf-rating.com
13
GREEN INDEX 3.0 6

• Web-surveys (6 surveys, ENG, ESP, FR, Nov sultants, networks, international/development

2020-Feb 2021), completed by 272 inclusive agencies, development banks, rating agencies,
finance stakeholders (financial service pro- regulators, banking sector and financial servic-
viders, investors, consultants, researchers, es providers. The expert participants were invit-
among others), three of them done in collabo- ed to provide feedback both on the Green Index
ration with FinDev14. 3.0 and on the Dimension 7 of the USSEPM. The
scope of this first feedback round was to receive
• Semi-structured interviews with 22 experts, in-depth inputs on the first final version of the two
selected among regulators, investors, consult- tools. Until the end of May 2021, 42 experts (out
ants, and FSPs. of the 75 contacted) provided 300+ in depth feed-
back, inputs and suggestions on the standards,
COLLABORATION WITH CERISE+SPTF essential practices and indicators of the Green In-
AND ALIGNMENT WITH THE USSEPM dex 3.0 and/or Dimension 7 of the USSEPM. The
GICSF-AG reviewed in detail the inputs received
In 2020, the GICSF-AG started a collaboration15
in 2 workshops, and it updated the Green Index
with the Social Performance Task Force (SPTF)
3.0 integrating the experts’ suggestions. This
and CERISE, both members of the GICSF-AG, to
included rephrasing some indicators, including
co-develop the new environmental dimension of
new indicators, and merging or deleting pre-exist-
the Universal Standards for Social and Environ-
ing indicators..
mental Performance Management (USSEPM),
i.e., ‘Dimension 7’. The GICSF-AG has been work- In July 2020, a second feedback round was or-
ing closely with SPTF and CERISE to ensure that ganised. This second feedback round was open
the new Green Index 3.0 is aligned with the social to all stakeholders, with the following scope: a)
performance framework and reporting. validation that the feedback received in the first
feedback round was correctly integrated; b) to
The contents of Dimension 7 of the Cerise+SPTF
receive further feedback on the updated version;
USSEPM and the e-MFP GICSF-AG’s Green In-
c) to receive the first inputs on the relevance of
dex 3.0 are fully aligned at the concept level of
each standard, essential practice and dimension
the standards and essential practices. The Green
of the Green Index 3.0, by ranking them in order
Index 3.0 provides an in-depth analysis and helps
of importance.
establish a detailed improvement action plan on
green inclusive finance. Dimension 7, co-devel- By September 2021, the GICSF-AG had received
oped by Cerise+SPTF and the e-MFP GICSF-AG, inputs from 100 participants that were reviewed
helps establish a detailed improvement action in a series of internal workshops of the GICSF-
plan in the framework of the Universal Standards. AG for the Green Index 3.0, and joint workshops
with SPTF and CERISE for the Dimension 7 of the
FEEDBACK AND REVIEW ROUNDS USSEPM. The updated version of the Green Index
3.0 was then designed.
The GICSF-AG coordinated 2 rounds of review of
the Green Index 3.0, as well as in parallel of the The inputs from all participants in these 2 con-
Dimension 7 of the USSEPM. sultations were included in the final version of the
Green Index 3.0.
The first feedback round “Experts feedback”
was opened in April 2021, and included 75 key
industry experts from academia, investors, con-

https://www.findevgateway.org/findev-webinar/evaluation-and-support-improving-inclusive-green-finance-mfis-green-index
14

https://sptf.info/working-groups/green-microfinance
15
GREEN INDEX 3.0 7

INTRODUCING THE GREEN INDEX 3.0

STANDARDS AND ESSENTIAL PRACTICES

The Green Index 3.0 is composed of four stand- Each essential practice contains both qualitative
ards (GI.0, GI.1, GI.2, GI.3 as summarised in Fig- and quantitative indicators.
ure 3), each one containing two essential practic-
es (GI.i.1 and GI.i.2 as summarised in Figure 4).

FIGURE 3: GREEN INDEX 3.0 STANDARDS

GI.3 GI.0
Green Financial and Non-Financial Environmental Strategy
Products and Services Definition and Implementation
It is about the supply and delivery of "green" products and It is about how the environmental strategy is defined, and
services to customers. Both financial or non-financial services how it is put in place, including roles an responsibilities,
are assessed. Financial products include "green" credits, but also alignment with local or international standards, and how the
as insurance, savings or money transfer, Non-financial services institution monitors and reports on the implementation of its
includes awareness raising, training, technical assistance, environmental strategy.
partnerships.

GI.2 GI.1
Management of Environmental Identification of Environmental
risks and opportunities risks and opportunities
It is about the processes and tools in place to analyse and respond to It is about the institution's ability to identify the vulnerability
the vulnerability, negative environmental impacts, client demand and of clients/portfolio and the institution itself, the negative
needs identified in GI.1 environmental impacts generated on ecosystems by clients
It is about how the institutions translates vulnerability, negative and the institution itself, and the clients' needs and demand for
environmental impacts, demands & needs into actual risks and green practices and technologies, as well as the opportunities
opportunities. for the institution itself.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 8

FIGURE 4: SUMMARY OF STANDARDS, ESSENTIAL PRACTICES, AND CONTENT OF THE GREEN INDEX 3.0 INDICATORS

GI.0 GI.1 GI.2 GI.3

Environmental strategy Identification of Management of Green products and services
Definition and put in place Environmental risks Environmental risks Financial and non-financial
and opportunities and opportunities

GI.0.1 GI.1.1 GI.2.1 GI.3.1

Definition of the Strategy Identification of Indirect risks Management of Indirect Financial products
& opportunities risks & opportunities & services

- detailed goals, mission, Identification of clients Inclusion of vulnerability, negative Green Loans
documented strategy - Vulnerability env Impacts and demand/needs in: - Clean energy /energy
- compliance with applicable - Negative environmental impacts - (financial) risks management efficiency
standards and regulation - Demand and needs processes, tools indicators - Sustainable agriculture
- Credit processes & product - Clean water - sanitation
- Circular economy / others
- Savings, remittances, emergency
loans
- Climate / production insurance

GI.0.2 GI.1.2 GI.2.2 GI.3.2

Put in place the Strategy Identification of Direct Management of Direct Non-financial products
risks & opportunities risks & opportunities & services

- Responsibilities & processes Identification of building and staffActions and processes to reduce - Awareness raising
- Management & governance - Vulnerability the institution vulnerability and - Training
- Monitoring: - Negative environmental impacts negative env impacts and grab - Technical assistance
- Economic opportunities for the institution - Partnerships
Identification of opportunities for
- Vulnerability itself
the institution to engage in green
- Negative environmental
impacts

Through the Green Index 3.0, an FSP’s green in- The Green Index 3.0 indicators are both qualita-
clusive finance performance is assessed based tive and quantitative. The qualitative indicators
on three key concepts: consist of multiple-choice questions where each
FSP can report the existing details of their actions
• Vulnerability: how clients and the institution in green inclusive finance for each indicator. For
are affected by the environment (including cli- example, if the FSP finances clean energy tech-
mate change, degradation of the ecosystems, nologies, it can answer “yes” by reporting which
energy poverty, etc.). technologies it actually finances among a possi-
• Adverse environmental impacts: how clients ble set of technologies provided in the list, plus
and the institution affect the environment (in- an open text field “other”, where it can specify the
cluding air, water & soil pollution, GHG emis- technology if it is not part of the list. The quanti-
sions, deforestation and land degradation, etc.). tative indicators consist of free text fields where
the FSP can specify the quantitative details of its
• Green economic opportunities: how green actions, e.g., the volume of clean energy financed
practices, products, and services can satisfy (in EUR) over the past year.
demand and increase revenue for clients or be
an opportunity for the FSP.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 9

THE GREEN INDEX 3.0 IN DETAILS:

THE INDICATORS
This section provides the full set of qualitative
questions and a selection of quantitative indica-
tors contained in the Green Index 3.0. The full
list of choices, as well as the full list of associat-
ed quantitative indicators are not reported here
in detail. The complete set of questions and an-
swers can be found in the publicly available on-
line digital solution for the Green Index 3.01.

1 https://hedera.online/gicsf_ag_tools/green-index-digital.html
GREEN INDEX 3.0 10

environmental
strategy
 STANDARD GI.0
Exact wording: “The institution has an environ- • GI.0.2 Essential Practice: “The institution has
mental strategy and systems in place to imple- systems in place to implement its environ-
ment it”. It is composed by two Essential Practic- mental strategy”
es, whose exact wording is:
Figures 5 and 6 provide the details concerning
• GI.0.1 Essential Practice: “The institution de- the indicators of the standard GI.0.
fines its environmental strategy”

FIGURE 5: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.0.1 “THE INSTITUTION DEFINES ITS ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY”

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.0.1.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institution’s environmental engagements are formalised in mission, vision, values Annual budget assigned for the achievement of
2. The institution has a documented strategy that specifies its intention to achieve its environment strategy (EUR and % of total)
environmental goals
3. The institution’s environmental strategy specifies items required to implement the
strategy
4. The institution operates in accordance with applicable laws and regulation, non-
mandatory industry initiatives, international standards and regulations, green
taxonomy
5. The institution has established partnerships
6. The institution has assigned an annual budget for the achievement its environment
strategy
GREEN INDEX 3.0 11

FIGURE 6: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.0.2: “THE INSTITUTION HAS SYSTEMS IN PLACE TO IMPLEMENT ITS ENVIRONMENTAL

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.0.2.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institutions defines roles and responsibilities in implementing the environmental - Full time equivalent staff appointed to
strategy execute the environmental strategy
2. The board and management make strategic decisions based on environmental - % of fulfilment of each KPI
performance data - % of Total Obtainable Market reached for
3. The institution trains board members and management on their environmental financial products
performance management responsibilities - …
4. The institution ensures the implementation of its environmental strategy
5. The institution implements a complete Environmental and Social Management
System
6. The institution has defined processes to monitor the progress of implementing its
environmental strategy
7. The institution has integrated indicators into its MIS that are used to track the
implementation of its environment
8. The institution collects data on an ongoing basis to measure whether it is achieving its
environmental goals ( Minimum frequency: annually)
9. The institution assesses and manages the proper implementation of its strategy
and potential side effects
10. The institution collects data on an ongoing basis to measure whether it is achieving its
environmental goals, in terms of the evolution client or portfolio vulnerability 
(Minimum frequency: annually)
11. The institution collects data on an ongoing basis to measure whether it is achieving
its environmental goals in terms of the evolution client-or portfolio-level adverse
environmental impacts (Minimum frequency: annually).
12. The institution collects data on an ongoing basis to measure whether it is achieving its
environmental goals, in terms of the evolution of its own adverse environmental
impacts
or vulnerability at level of HQ, branches or HR ( Minimum frequency: annually)
13. The institution reports environmental performance data (Minimum frequency:
annually)
GREEN INDEX 3.0 12

Identification of
Environmental risks
and opportunities

 STANDARD GI.1
Exact wording: “The institution identifies environ- • GI.1.2 Essential Practice: “The institution iden-
mental risks and opportunities”. It is composed by tifies its own environmental risks at headquar-
two Essential Practices, whose exact wording is: ters and branch level and its own environmen-
tal opportunities”
• GI.1.1 Essential Practice: “The institution iden-
tifies client- or portfolio-level environmental Figures 7 and 8 provide the details concerning
risks and opportunities” the indicators of the standard GI.1.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 standard gi.1 13

FIGURE 7: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.1.1: “THE INSTITUTION IDENTIFIES CLIENT- OR PORTFOLIO-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL
RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES”

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.1.1.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institution identifies vulnerability at client-level or portfolio-level to climate - Number of loan officers and staff who
change, environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, etc. received training on client or portfolio vulne-
2. The institution trains its loan officers and back office staff on how to identify, evaluate rability/ adverse environmental impacts
and categorize client-level / portfolio-level vulnerability assessment
3. The institution has partnerships with technical or technologies providers to evaluate - Number of awareness raising events inclu-
client or portfolio vulnerability ding vulnerability / adverse environmental
impacts organized for the staff during the
4. The institution identifies adverse environmental impacts at client-level or
last year
portfolio-level related to greenhouse gas emissions, land degradation, waste production
and management, etc. - Total market for green financial products
and services (number of clients and EUR)
5. The institution trains its loan officers and back office staff on how to identify, evaluate
and categorize client-level / portfolio-level adverse environmental impacts - Total market for green non-financial pro-
ducts and services (number of clients)
6. The institution has partnerships with technical or technologies providers to evaluate
client or portfolio level adverse environmental impacts …
7. The institution conducts market research and it identifies demands and needs for
green practices and technologies, …
8. The institution identifies needs or demand of each client for access to affordable,
reliable and clean energy; clean water and/or sanitation; increase productivity, quality of
production or revenues
9. The institution trains its loan officers and back-office staff on the identification,
evaluation and categorization client and clusters of client needs and demand for green
practices and technologies
10. The institution has partnerships with technical or technologies providers to evaluate
client needs or demand for green practices and technologies

FIGURE 8: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.1.2: “THE INSTITUTION IDENTIFIES ITS OWN ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
AT HEADQUARTERS AND BRANCH LEVEL AND ITS OWN ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES”

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.1.2.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institution assesses its own vulnerability to weather threats, climate change - Amount of energy generated and consu-
(etc) at headquarters’ properties, buildings, branches’ properties, buildings, staff med by the institution from renewable
2. The institution assesses the adverse impacts of its internal activities on the sources on a yearly basis
environment (ecological footprint) - Gasoline or diesel consumption at head-
3. The institution trains its loan officers and back-office staff on the assessment of quarters and branches on a yearly basis
the institution energy expenses, waste produced, paper expenses, fuel expenses, etc. - Waste disposed
4. The institution assesses its own opportunities to develop and implement an - …
environmental strategy, an environmental and/or climate risks management system,
green products and services
GREEN INDEX 3.0 standard gi.2 14

Management of
Environmental risks
and opportunities

 STANDARD GI.2
Exact wording: “The institution manages environ- • GI.2.2 Essential Practice: “The institution man-
mental risks and opportunities”. It is composed by ages its own environmental risks at headquar-
two Essential Practices, whose exact wording is: ters and branch level and its own environmen-
tal opportunities”
• GI.2.1 Essential Practice: “The institution man-
ages client- or portfolio-level environmental Figures 9 and 10 provide the details concerning
risks and opportunities” the indicators of the standard GI.2.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 standard gi.2 15

FIGURE 9: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.2.1: “THE INSTITUTION MANAGES CLIENT- OR PORTFOLIO-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
AND OPPORTUNITIES”

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.2.1.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institution incorporates into its financial risk management policies and - Number of loans with vulnerability assess-
processes the identified vulnerability of clients or portfolio ment
2. The institution recognizes identified vulnerability of clients as a factor of risks - Volume of loans with vulnerability assess-
to achieve its social mission or environmental objectives, and it has processes ment
in place to manage it - Number of loan applications rejected due
3. The institution incorporates the identified client vulnerabilities into its risk management to adverse environmental impact
processes thanks to indicators and scores, categorization of each client, definition - Number of loans with environmental
or level of risks acceptance, proposal of specific financial or non-financial products, impact assessment
awareness raising, …
- Volume of loans with environmental
4. The institution incorporates the identified adverse environmental impacts impact assessment
of client or portfolio level into its credit risk management policies and
- …
processes
5. The institution recognizes the identified adverse environmental impacts of clients
or portfolio as a factor of risks for the achievement of its social mission or
environmental objectives, and it has processes in place to manage them
6. The institution incorporates identified adverse environmental impacts of clients
into its risks management processes thanks to indicators and scores, exclusion list,
categorization of each client, definition or level of risks acceptance, proposal of specific
financial or non-financial products, awareness raising, …
7. The institution identifies green practices and technologies that create benefits
for clients
8. The institution ensures that the practices or technologies identified are
recognized as "green" by an environmental taxonomy and/or comply with clear
environmental criteria.
9. The institution recognizes the identified demands and needs for green practices and
technologies as economic opportunities and it incorporates them into its credit
processes and manuals; its clients segmentation
10. The institution has in place processes to select and propose specific financial or
non-financial products and services aiming to address identified needs or demand
of each client
GREEN INDEX 3.0 standard gi.2 16

FIGURE 10: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.2.2: “THE INSTITUTION MANAGES ITS OWN ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS AT HEADQUARTERS
AND BRANCH LEVEL AND ITS OWN ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES”

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.2.2.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institution has a contingency plan (and budget) in place to mitigate risks resulting - Number of staff who received information
from the effects of climate change on the institution’s environmental footprint
2. The institution avoids, minimizes and/or offsets the adverse impacts of its during the past year
internal activities, at headquarters and branch level, on the environment. - Number of staff that implemented or
3. The institution raises staff awareness on: the adverse environmental impact of their participated in activities reducing the
activities, vulnerability to climate changes of institution properties and trains its employees institution’s environmental footprint
on good practices to reduce the institution’s own adverse impacts on the environment - ...
4. The institution is certified to meet the requirements of an accredited green building
program or is certified under an environmental standard such as ISO 14000
5. The institution purchased certified carbon credits in the reporting period
6. The institution manages its own identified opportunities to develop and implement an
environmental strategy, an environmental and/or climate risks management system, green
products and services.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 standard gi.3 17

green products and

services financial
and non-financial
 STANDARD GI.3
Exact wording: “The institution offers green fi- • GI.3.2 Essential Practice: “The institution offers
nancial and non-financial products and services”. green non-financial products and services ”
It is composed by two Essential Practices, whose
exact wording is: Figures 11, 12, and 13 provide the details con-
cerning the indicators of the standard GI.3.
• GI.3.1 Essential Practice: “The institution offers
green financial products and services”
GREEN INDEX 3.0 standard gi.3 18

FIGURE 11: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.3.1: “THE INSTITUTION OFFERS GREEN FINANCIAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICE”
(FIRST PART)

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.3.1.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institution offers loans that allow its clients to implement or maintain clean - Number of loans for renewable energy
energy and / or energy efficient equipment technologies / energy efficiency
2. The institution finances clean energy and/or energy efficient technologies through technologies disbursed over the fiscal year
dedicated loan products, including specific characteristics (12 months)
3. The institution supports the development of its specific capacities on clean energy - Volume of loans for renewable energy
and/or energy efficient technologies lending thanks to provision of dedicated regular technologies / energy efficiency
trainings to staff or partnerships with providers of technologies or technical technologies disbursed over the fiscal year
assistance, etc. (12 months)
4. The institution applies specific procedures and/or tools to support the loan - Number of sustainable agriculture/animal
provision for clean energy and/or energy efficient technologies, such as technical breeding/fishery loans disbursed over the
documented information, indicators to verify or track the technologies and practices fiscal year (12 months)
that qualify as "green”, etc. - Volume of sustainable agriculture /animal
5. The institution offers loans that allow its clients to implement or maintain breeding/fishery loans disbursed over the
sustainable agriculture, animal breeding or fishery practices ( e.g. nature- fiscal year (12 months)
based solutions), supporting climate change adaptation or biodiversity conservation - Number of loans for clean drinking water
6. The institution finances sustainable agriculture, animal breeding or fishery practices and/or sanitation disbursed over the fiscal
( e.g. nature-based solutions) through dedicated loan products, including specific year (12 months)
characteristics. - Volume of of loans for clean drinking
7. The institution supports the development of its specific capacities on sustainable water and/or sanitation disbursed over the
agriculture, animal breeding or fishery practices ( e.g. nature-based solutions) lending fiscal year (12 months)
thanks to provision of dedicated regular trainings to staff or partnerships with - Number of loans for "circular economy" or
providers of technologies or technical assistance, etc. other green activities disbursed over the
8. The institution applies specific procedures and/or tools to support the loan fiscal year (12 months)
provision for sustainable agriculture, animal breeding or fishery practices ( e.g. nature- - Volume of loans for "circular economy" or
based solutions) such as technical documented information, indicators to verify or other green activities disbursed over the
track the technologies and practices that qualify as "green”, etc. fiscal year (12 months)
9. The institution offers loans that allow its clients to implement or maintain technologies
for improved access to clean drinking water and sanitation
10. The institution finances technologies for improved access to clean drinking water and
sanitation through dedicated loan products, including specific characteristics.
11. The institution supports the development of its specific capacities technologies for
improved access to clean drinking water and sanitation lending thanks to provision
of dedicated regular trainings to staff or partnerships with providers of
technologies or technical assistance, etc.
12. The institution applies specific procedures and/or tools to support the loan
provision for technologies for improved access to clean drinking water and sanitation,
such as technical documented information, indicators to verify or track the
technologies and practices that qualify as "green”, etc.
13. The institution offers loans that allow its clients to implement or maintain green
practices and technologies for "circular economy" or other green activities
14. The institution finances green practices and technologies for "circular economy"
or other green activities through dedicated loan products, including specific
characteristics.
15. The institution supports the development of its specific capacities technologies for
green practices and technologies for "circular economy" or other green activities
lending thanks to provision of dedicated regular trainings to staff or
partnerships with providers of technologies or technical assistance, etc.
16. The institution applies specific procedures and/or tools to support the loan
provision for green practices and technologies for "circular economy" or other green
activities, such as technical documented information, indicators to verify or track the
technologies and practices that qualify as "green”, etc.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 19

FIGURE 12: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.3.1: “THE INSTITUTION OFFERS GREEN FINANCIAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICE”
(SECOND PART)

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.3.1.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

17. The green practices or technologies financed are specified by the EU taxonomy, - Number of borrowers with an active
other international taxonomy, or a local taxonomy. agricultural or climatic micro-insurance
18. The institution offers specific loans to clients when affected by sudden climate change contract
events, including: emergency loans, loans rescheduling, loans restructuring - Hectares of lands insured with an active
19. The institution offers: non dedicated or dedicated SMEs loans for local enterprises agricultural or climatic micro-insurance
producing or assembling or distributing clean energy or energy efficient technologies, - Number of deposits or savings used by
providing inputs or services for sustainable agriculture, animal breeding or fishery clients against probable vulnerability event
practices, providing waste recycling, waste collection services, etc. - Amount existing of guarantee (EUR)
20. The institution offers , alone or in partnership, insurance products to help clients and - …
/ or the portfolio becoming more resilient to environmental shocks or climate risks.
21. The institution had developed its specific capacities to provide agricultural or climatic
micro-insurance thanks to training / partnerships
22. The institution applies specific procedures or tools to support its insurance product
23. The institution offers other financial products dedicated to helping clients to become
more resilient to environmental shocks or climate threats, including: saving products,
remittances, money transfer, guarantees, etc.
24. The institution has developed its specific capacities to assess damages of climate
change on clients' activities and properties thanks to training / partnerships
25. The institution applies specific procedures or tools to support non-insurance
financial products to cope with climate disasters, such as dedicated restructuring or
refinancing assessment

FIGURE 13: INDICATORS OF ESSENTIAL PRACTICE GI.3.2: “THE INSTITUTION OFFERS GREEN NON-FINANCIAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES”

INDICATORS QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS

(GI.3.2.X, description of questions, multiple choices are not shown) Examples

1. The institution raises awareness of its clients on: their vulnerability to climate change, - Number of clients or non-clients who
environmental degradation or biodiversity, or the adverse environmental impact of their received information on vulnerability/
activities, adverse environmental impacts during
2. The institution facilitates or offers to its clients: trainings, on going technical the past year
assistance, field visits or peer-learning opportunities - Number of clients that received training on
3. The institution had developed capacities to provide trainings or technical assistance green technologies and practices in the last
to its clients on how to address and mitigate vulnerability and adverse environmental year
impacts thanks to provision of dedicated trainings to its staff, partnerships with - Number of clients that received technical
a third-party specialized institutions assistance support for green technologies
4. The institution (alone or through its partners) applies specific procedures or tools and practices in the last year
for planning and delivery training or technical assistance to clients, such as physical or - …
virtual training material with visual elements, experience exchange programs, practical
activities, etc.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 standard gi.3 20

SCORING SYSTEM
FSPs filling the Green Index 3.0 receive a score Independently from the scoring system chosen,
between 0% (min) and 100% (max) for each in- the FSP shall not target the achievement of a
dicator according to their answers to the ques- score of 100% in all indicators but rather use the
tion(s) for that indicator. The scores received Green Index 3.0 to understand its performance
per each indicator are then averaged to provide across the various dimensions, to compare its re-
aggregated scores for each Essential Practice sults against other peer FSPs’ achievements and
and Standard they belong to, as well as for the the FSP’s own objectives, and to define priorities
full Green Index 3.0. The resulting scores can be and an action plan to improve its green inclusive
visualised in a radar chart (see examples in Fig- finance performance.
ures 14 and 15).
The standard visualisation of the scoring is based
An FSP can receive different and consistent sets on the 4 standards of the Green Index 3.0. It al-
of scoring for the Green Index 3.0. The GICSF-AG lows FSPs, investors, and any other stakeholders,
promotes the use of different scoring systems if to understand the status of the FSP along these
this helps each actor to make informed and da- 4 standards, as well as to identify the main gaps
ta-driven decisions. Nevertheless, the GICSF-AG and opportunities to improve. Beyond this stand-
also promotes comparability to allow the sector ard visualisation provided in Figure 14, the Green
to communicate, coordinate, learn, and grow as a Index 3.0 was designed to also provide additional
sector. Hence a reference scoring is of key impor- visualisation of the FSP’s green inclusive finance
tance to ensure comparability and sector learn- performance, including a risk management lens
ing. For these reasons, the GICSF-AG has also (left plot in Figure 15) and a products and servic-
developed a reference scoring that is aligned with es perspective (green opportunities, right plot in
the scoring used by Cerise+SPTF in Dimension 7 Figure 15).
of the USSEPM. It consists in assigning a score
of 0% to a qualitative indicator if none of the pos- The ‘Risk Management View’ measures the ca-
sible (multiple-choice) answers has been ticked, pacity of an FSP to identify and manage environ-
a score of 50% if at least one answer has been mental risks, in particular the direct risks (of the
ticked, and a score of 100% if at least 2 answers institution itself) and the indirect risks (of its cli-
have been ticked. The quantitative indicators are ents), as well as the vulnerability and the negative
not scored, but they provide further details for the environmental impacts of the institution and its
assessment and planning. clients’ activities. The scores in the ‘Green Oppor-
tunities View’ illustrate the capacity of an FSP to

FIGURE 14: EXAMPLE OF GREEN INDEX 3.0 ASSESSMENT RESULT, SHOWING THE SCORES PER STANDARD

GI.0
Environmental Strategy

90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
GI.3 GI.1
Green products Identification of Environmental
& services risks and opportunities

GI.2
Management of Environmental
risks and opportunities

The Risk Management Overview

 70 90
60 80
50 70
40 60
30 50

GREEN INDEX 3.0 21

20 40
10 30

GI.3 GI.1 20
10
Green products Identification of Environmental
& services risks and opportunities Identification & mgt. Identification & mgt.
of vulnerabilities of neg env. impacts

identify opportunities to implement or to finance actual financial and non-financial green products
green practices and technologies, as well as its and services of the FSP and of its partnerships.
capacity to monitor and report its outputs and
GI.2
outcomes. It also provides
Management an overview on the
of Environmental
risks and opportunities Direct risks

FIGURE 15: EXAMPLE OF GREEN INDEX 3.0 ASSESSMENT, SHOWING THE SCORES RELATED TO RISK MANAGEMENT CAPACITY OF THE FSP (LEFT
PLOT) AND THE ABILITY OF THE FSP TO EXPLOIT GREEN OPPORTUNITIES (RIGHT PLOT).

The Risk Management Overview The Green Opportunities Overview

Indirect risks Green financial products and services

90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
Identification & mgt. Identification & mgt. Identification Monitoring progress
of vulnerabilities of neg env. impacts of opportunities

Direct risks Green non-financial products & services

ENABLERS AND OUTREACH PILOT ASSESSMENTS

To ensure high quality
The Green assessment
Opportunities Overview and spread To test and assess the actual use of the Green
of best practices, the Green Index 3.0 includes in
Green financial products and services Index 3.0, the GICSF-AG has performed a set of
its framework, at the level of standards, essential
90
80
first pilots that have laid the foundation for main-
practices and indicators, the following concepts:
70
60
streaming the use of the Green Index 3.0. As of
50 July 2022, the GICSF-AG has piloted both train-
• Enablers: aim to assess how the FPS imple-
40
30 ings on the Green Index 3.0, and data collection
ments the actions, processes and products,
20
10
and assessment of status, gaps, priorities, and
i.e., they assess:
Identification
of opportunities
Monitoring progress
action planning, as follows:
- the capacity in place: the capacity of the in- • Trainings on the Green Index 3.0 for FSPs (Oct-
stitution to implement the activities in each Nov 2021):
standard is assessed. This can be internal
through trainings to the institution’s staff or - 6 events (SAM 2021, REDCAMIF Foro Verde,
external through partnerships.
Green non-financial products & services EaSI – EC, Webinars)
- the tools in place: the tools the institution - 250 + participants
is using to implement the activities in each
standard are assessed. These can include - 45 FSPs completed the Green Index 3.0 dur-
indicators, documents, material, IT solutions ing these events
or other. • More than 20 presentations to different stake-
• Outreach: through the systematic inclusion of holders.
quantitative indicators in each standard, the • In-depth analysis with 4 FSPs partners of Fi-
actual outreach of each action is assessed, nance in Motion, encompassing their environ-
and the actual implementation of actions is mental performance, gap analysis, prioritisa-
checked. This supports better monitoring of tion, as well as improvement action plans.
progress and planning implementation.
These first pilots allowed us to validate the com-
pleteness of the tool as well as to refine the meth-
odology and its practical implementation.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 Where to find and how to use the Green Index 3.0? 22

WHERE TO FIND AND HOW TO USE THE GREEN INDEX 3.0?

The Green Index 3.0 is open source, and it is li- The digital tool for the Green Index 3.0 has been
censed under a Creative Commons Attribution conceptualised by Davide Forcella, Natalia Re-
4.0 International License. For the first time, the alpe Carrillo and Alfonso Caiazzo, and it has been
GICSF-AG provides a digital version of the Green developed by Alfonso Caiazzo (HEDERA) as a
Index that can be publicly accessed via the GICSF- service for the GICSF-AG. The digital tool is cur-
AG website: https://www.e-mfp.eu/green-index. rently maintained by HEDERA, IT partner of the
GICSF-AG.
It can be used for free both for data collection
and training. This web version is mainly provided
for demonstration purposes. You are welcome to
contact the GICSF-AG co-Heads, Davide Forcel-
la and Natalia Realpe Carrillo, to receive instruc-
tions and support on how to obtain a dedicated
web page and database for an institutional as-
sessment. The digital Green Index 3.0 can be also
installed independently by any institution on their
own cloud resources.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 acknowledgements 23

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to acknowledge the precious Alterfin, Antwerp University, Baobab, Banco
support, engagement, and expertise of all the Codesarrollo, Basix, BIO, Blue Orchard, BNP
members of the Green Inclusive and Climate Paribas, Catholic Relief Services (CRS),
Smart Finance Action Group and their partners CAURIE, CLARMONDIAL, DSE Consultores,
institutions and network, without which this Eco Bank, EIB, EMN, ESAF, FAO, FDL-
work would have not been possible. Nitlapan, FIDECO, FMBBVA, FMO, GABV,
GEF, Grameen Crédit Agricole MF , Inpulse,
We would like in particular to thank: Interactuar, ISO, Le Gouvernement du
- The e-MFP Secretariat for all the coordination, Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Ministère des
support, and stakeholders engagement work. Affaires Étrangères et Européennes, MAIN,
MEI, MFC, MFR, NAB – Dutch Institute on
- SPTF and CERISE, as well as Geert Jan Impact Investing , Oiko Credit, Opportunity
Schuite and Palladium for their precious work International, Palladium, PAMIGA, REDCAMIF,
and collaboration in the development of the ResponsAbility, RFD, SBFIC, SIDI, SOS Faim
Dimension 7 of the USSEPM, and ensuring the Belgium, Symbiotics, The Frankfurt School –
alignment between the Dimension 7 and the UNEP Collaborating Centre , The Rabobank
Green Index 3.0 foundation, Triodos, Triple Jump, ULB-CERMi,
UNCDF, Université de Genève, University of
- FinDev for the coordination of webinars that Bergamo, World Bank, World Benchmarking
allowed to collect information from various Institute, YAPU Solutions, Cerise, and the
stakeholders on their needs for environmental independent consultants Micol Guarneri,
performance indicators Jesus Diaz Buendia, Claudia Daza, Stefan
- AFI for ongoing exchanges on green inclusive Platteau, John Guzowski, Jessica Jimenez,
finance and the perspective of the regulators Rene Mendoza, and Juana Ramirez.
and central banks. - Cerise for having shared its analysis
- The 250+ stakeholders that participated in the over the 29 environmental assessments
surveys for the design of the Green Index 3.0 conducted with the Green Index 1.0, and 69
environmental assessments with the Green
- The people interviewed for the design of the Index 2.0.
Green Index 3.0, affiliated to the following
institutions: Sidi, Credit Agricole Grameen - MFR for having shared its aggregated
Foundation, EIB, ADA, Impulse, BNP Paribas, analysis and lessons learnt on environmental
COFIDES, Pula, and Louvain Cooperation. performance from 245 social ratings.

- The participants in the two review rounds - Silvia Recupero for her precious work in
of the Green Index 3.0, and in particular structuring the analysis of the feedback
the staff affiliated to the institutions: ADA received on the first versions of the Green
Chair (University of Luxembourg), AFD, AFI, Index 3.0.
GREEN INDEX 3.0 24

EUROPEAN MICROFINANCE PLATFORM (e-MFP)

The European Microfinance Platform (e-MFP) is the leading network of organisations
and individuals active in the financial inclusion sector in developing countries. It
numbers over 130 members from all geographic regions and specialisations of the
microfinance community, including consultants & support service providers, investors,
FSPs, multilateral & national development agencies, NGOs and researchers. Up to
two billion people remain financially excluded. To address this, the Platform seeks to
promote co-operation, dialogue and innovation among these diverse stakeholders
working in developing countries. e-MFP fosters activities which increase global access
to affordable, quality sustainable and inclusive financial services for the un(der)banked
by driving knowledge-sharing, partnership development and innovation. The Platform
achieves this through its numerous year-round expert Action Groups, the annual
European Microfinance Week, which attracts over 400 top stakeholders representing
dozens of countries from the sector, the prestigious annual European Microfinance
Award and its many regular publications.

39 rue Glesener
L-1631 Luxembourg
contact@e-mfp.eu
www.e-mfp.eu

e-MFP Green Inclusive and Climate Smart Finance Action Group

The e-MFP Green Inclusive and Climate Smart Finance Action Group (GICSF-AG) is a
unique multi-stakeholder think tank that brings together inclusive finance practitioners to
discuss, exchange experiences and finds a common path in dealing with environmental
issues, grab green opportunities and create new practical tools to advance green
inclusive and climate-smart finance. Built in 2013, it has more than 150 members
affiliated with more than 75 institutions worldwide, representing all sector stakeholders.
jafonso@e-mfp.eu
https://www.e-mfp.eu/gicsf-ag

Illustrations: © Camille Dassy

ISBN 78-99987-949-2-4
 www.e-mfp.eu

With the support of

THE GOVERNMENT
OF THE GRAND-DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG
Ministry of Finance