NDTAudit Checklist

SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRCRAFT DEPARTMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL CHECKLIST TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH CA145-03 / CA148-02 FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF AGENCIES PERFORMING NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING 1. 1 NAME OF ORGANISATION 1.2 Date of Assessment / Audit 1.3 Certificate of Approval number 1.4 Physical address 1.5 Postal address 16 1.8 1.10 Phone number Cell number
Audit team:
1.7 1.9 1. 3. 2. 4.
Fax no e-mail:
1.11
Date application received (SA-CATS-MORG):
1.12 Test rating applied for: Magnetic Particle Inspection Ultrasonic Inspection
Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection Radiographic Inspection
Eddy Current Inspection Please delete whichever is not applicable
1.13 Accountable Manager: 1.14 Number of personnel:

REQUIREMENTS N/A YES *NO Note no.
2. QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL

2.1 Do trainees obtain work experience only under the direct supervision of a Level II, Level III or instructor in the same method? 2.2 Do personnel qualified to Level I have the skills and knowledge to perform specific tests and specific calibrations? 2.3 Do personnel qualified to Level II have the necessary skills and knowledge to set up and calibrate equipment, conduct tests, and to interpret, evaluate, and document results? 2.4 Are personnel qualified to Level II familiar with the codes and standards that control the methods? 2.5 Does training for the certification of personnel to Level I & II cover basic principles, products, equipment, operating procedures, techniques, applicable specifications, codes and instructions used by the organisation? 2.6 Are minimum experience requirements for certification i.a.w Table 1
CA1/4/2/3/2/11: CA 148-04
21 July 2003
Page 1 of 5

2.7 Table 1 Method Condition (1) Condition (2) 130 hrs 270 hrs Penetrant 130 hrs 400 hrs Magnetic Particle 130 hrs 1200 hrs Eddy Current 400 hrs 1200 hrs Ultrasonic 400 hrs 1200 hrs Radiography Conditions: (1) Trainee, total NDT experience for Level I.* (2) Level I, total NDT experience for Level II.* (3) Trainee, total NDT experience for direct certification to Level II.*
Condition (3) 400 hrs 530 hrs 1330 hrs 1600 hrs 1600 hrs
Note-Experience in method can be half this time, provided that remaining time is in other NDT methods. 2.8 Are near vision tests administered annually? (Jaeger #1 test chart at not less than 12 inches, or equivalent as determined by medical personnel with one eye, either natural or corrected) 2.9 Are colour perception tests administered prior to certification or recertification? (Distinguish and differentiate between the colours used in the method for which certification is sought)
3.
RADIOGRAPHY
3.1 Does the film viewing area have subdued lighting to preclude reflective glare from the surface of the film? 3.2 Does the film viewer contain a variable control to allow the selection of optimum intensities for film with varying densities? 3.3 Does the film viewer furnish a uniform brightness level over the entire viewing screen? 3.4 Does the film viewer provide stable temperature at the viewing port to avoid damage to the radiographic film? 3.5 Does the film viewer contain any aperture or method to reduce the viewing area to suit the area in interest? 3.6 Does the facility have a suitable magnifier able to provide magnification of between 3x and 10x? 3.7 Is the darkroom facility capable of producing radiographs free from blemishes or artifacts? 3.8 Is the density in the area of interest above 1.0 on a randomly selected film? 3.9 Is there a maximum readable density posted on each respective viewer? 3.10 Does the film contain sufficient information to trace it back to the aircraft and w/c? 3.11 Are results of all radiographic examinations recorded and kept on file? 3.12 Are retention periods of radiographs and reports as specified in the MOP? 3.13 Does the examination reports reference a standard practice or procedure used? 3.14 Does this report include the inspectors identification, date of inspection, disposition of item in question and the reason for rejection? 3.15 Is there a weekly processor solution control (regarding the testing of processor concentrations) monitoring programme in place? 3.16 Does history for these checks exist for the preceding 4 weeks? 3.17 Does the densitometer have the capability of measuring the light Transmitted through a radiograph with a film density up to 4.0 with a density unit resolution of 0.02? 3.18 Are densitometers calibrated and does history of preceding calibrations exist? 3.19 Does the facility contain image quality indicators of the appropriate type for the relevant inspections? 3.20 Are intensifying lead screens free from any cracks, creases, scratches or foreign material? CA1/4/2/3/2/11: CA 148-04 21 July 2003 Page 2 of 5

4.
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 5. 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9
FLUORESCENT PENETRANT INSPECTION

Does the inspection area have a visible light background not exceeding 2fc (20lx) at the examination surface? Does the blacklight provide a minimum acceptable intensity of 1000W/cm at 15 from the front of the filter? Does the drying oven temperature not exceed 160F (71C)? Does the drying oven contain a calibrated device capable of maintaining the oven temperature at 15F of the temperature for which it is set? Is the drying oven temperature indicator accurate to 10F of the actual oven temperature? If a manual spray is used, is the water pressure less than 40 psi (275kPa)? If hydro-air nozzles are used, does the air pressure not exceed 25psi (172kPa)? Is the water temperature within the range of 50-100F (10-38C)? Is the washing of components conducted under appropriate illumination to ensure adequate removal of the surface penetrant? If shop air is used to dry any components, is it filtered & less than 25p.s.i? If an immersion wash is used, is the water air agitated & in good circulation whilst maintaining a temperature of between 10-38C? ARE THE FOLLOWING TESTS BEING PERFORMED WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED FREQUENCIES: System PerformanceDaily Penetrant ContaminationDaily Developer ContaminationDaily Water Wash PressureEach Shift Black Light IntensityDaily Black Light Reflector & FilterDaily Inspection Area CleanlinessDaily Drying Oven CalibrationQuarterly
5.10 Light Meter CalibrationSemi-annualy 5.11 Does records of the above checks exist? 5.12 Are the results of the daily performance checks documented in sufficient detail to allow an internal audit to detect deterioration of performance below satisfactory levels? 5.13 Do tested components have identifiable labels?
6.
MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION

or group of parts under testing?
6.1 Are all inspections performed i.a.w a written procedure applicable to the parts 6.2 Is the intensity of visible light maintained at a minimum of 1000lx for nonFluorescent magnetic particle inspection? 6.3 Does the fluorescent magnetic particle inspection area have a maximum visible light level of 2fc(20lx) measured at the part surface? 6.4 Do dry particles meet the requirements of AMS3040? 6.5 Do wet particles meet the requirements of AMS 3041, 3042, 3043, 3044, 3045, or 3046 as applicable?
CA1/4/2/3/2/11: CA 148-04
21 July 2003
Page 3 of 5

6.6 If a light petroleum distillate suspension vehicle is used, does it conform to AMS2641 or DoD-F-87935? 6.7 If a water suspension vehicle is used, does the maximum alkalinity not exceed a pH of 10.0 & the acidity not less than a pH of 6.0? 6.8 Is the particle concentration within the range of 0.1-0.4mL in a 100mL-bath sample for fluorescent particles & 1.2-2.4mL in 100mL bath sample for nonfluorescent particles? 6.9 During inspection, are small openings & holes leading to passages or cavities that could entrap or remain contaminated with inspection media plugged with a suitable non abrasive material, and in the case of engine parts, is soluble with oil. 6.8 Are components that have been inspected and found to be serviceable demagnetized, cleaned & corrosion protected?
7.
7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4
EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION

Does the agency have adequate equipment to perform the necessary inspections for which their license reflects? Is all equipment calibrated as per manufacturers instructions? Is there a record of previous calibrations for the above equipment? Does the agency have the necessary reference standards for the calibration/setup of the above equipment for the necessary inspections performed?
7.5
Do these reference standards each hold a conformance certificate to drawing?
8.
8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4
ULTRASONIC INSPECTION
Does the agency have adequate equipment to perform the necessary inspections for which their license reflects? Is all equipment calibrated as per manufacturers instructions? Is there a record of previous calibrations for the above equipment? Does the agency have the necessary reference standards for the calibration/setup of the above equipment for the necessary inspections performed?
8.5
Do these reference standards each hold a conformance certificate to drawing?
CA1/4/2/3/2/11: CA 148-04
21 July 2003
Page 4 of 5
Notes
CA1/4/2/3/2/11: CA 148-04
21 July 2003
Page 5 of 5

NDTAudit Checklist

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NDTAudit Checklist

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NDTAudit Checklist

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRCRAFT DEPARTMENT

Date application received (SA-CATS-MORG):

Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection Radiographic Inspection

Eddy Current Inspection Please delete whichever is not applicable

1.13 Accountable Manager: 1.14 Number of personnel:

2. QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL

SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRCRAFT DEPARTMENT

SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRCRAFT DEPARTMENT

FLUORESCENT PENETRANT INSPECTION

MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION

SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRCRAFT DEPARTMENT

EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION

Do these reference standards each hold a conformance certificate to drawing?

Do these reference standards each hold a conformance certificate to drawing?

SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRCRAFT DEPARTMENT

You might also like