Bovine Mastitis
Bovine Mastitis
Bovine Mastitis
DEFINITION
• Inflammation of the udder/mammary gland
• Almost always due to infection by micro-
organisms
• Affects different animal species (e.g. cattle,
goats, sheep, buffalo, camels) and humans
Anatomy of the udder & mastitis
Physical appearance
AETIOLOGY
• Caused by infectious micro-organisms
– Bacteria
– Yeast/fungi e.g. Candida spp, Aspergillus fumigatus,
Cryptococcus neoformans
– Algae e.g. ??? (Prototheca)
• Common bacteria:
– Gram +ve: Staphylococcus (S. aureus), Streptococcus (S.
agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, S. uberis)
– Gram –ve: Coliforms (E.coli, Enterobacter spp,
Pseudomonas spp. Klebsiella spp etc.)
– Others: Arcanobacter pyogenes (Old
names:Corynebacterium pyogenes/Actinomyces pyogenes)
, Mycoplasma spp., Mycobacterium spp, Brucella spp
etc.)
CLASSIFICATION OF MASTITIS
CRITERION EXAMPLES
• Herd to herd
* purchasing an infected cow
* purchasing a suckling calf
* milker working on more than one farm
* sharing equipment with another farm
• Cow to Cow/ Cow or Quarter to Quarter
* Calves suckling
* Milker hands
* Cloths used for washing or drying
* stripping mastitic milk onto floor of banda
* dirty teat dips or intramammary syringes
* dirty teat lubricant
EPIDEMIOLOGY: PREVALENCE & GEOGRAPHICAL
DISTRIBUTION
• I. CLINICAL MASTITIS
• This form is associated with classical signs of
inflammation which are subdivided into:
– A. Changes of the udder
– Hot to touch
– Painful (kick, reduced milk production)
– Skin colour (red, blue e.g. gangrenous
staphylococcal mastitis)
– Swollen quarter (asymmetry of the udder)
sometimes
– Atrophy (hard, lumpy, scars, shrunken)
– Blind teat(s)
Udder asymmetry: one of clinical signs
I. CLINICAL MASTITIS (CONT’D)
• I. CLINICAL
❖Based on history and clinical signs
(changes of the udder and in the milk)
❖Should be supported by bacteriology
(isolation and identification of causative
agent).
II. SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS
• A) History of reduced milk
• B) Measurement of somatic cells which can be:
• I) Indirect tests such as
California Mastitis Test (CMT)
Whiteside test
Litmus paper
• II) Direct Cell Counts
❖ Using an electronic counter (e.g. Direct Microscopic Somatic
Cell Counting (DMSCC); Coulter Counter, Fossomatic): gives
exact number of cells per ml of milk.
• C) Bacteriology
D) Other tests
– Milk ELISA e.g. ProStaph (detects S.aureus antibodies in milk)
– Milk electrical conductivity test: Mastitic milk has higher
electrical conductivity (measured by sensors) due to increased
Na+ and Cl- ions.
Use of CMT to diagnose subclinical mastitis
IMPORTANCE OF MASTITIS
• Direct AND Indirect losses associated with the
disease
DIRECT INDIRECT COSTS
COSTS
1. Discarded milk 1. Decreased milk yield (udder damage &
2. Drug and subclinical mastitis)
veterinary 2. Extra labour involved in treating and
costs nursing sick animals
3. Death of sick 3. Higher culling and replacement rates
animals (acute leading to loss of genetic potential
form) 4. Decreased milk quality
5. Penalties due to increased SCC
TREATMENT OF MASTITIS
emphasis should be on:
• Early detection, reporting and intervention
(the role of milker/farmer)
• Prevent transmission of infection to other
cows/quarters
• Separation of the mastitic cow (if possible)
and milked last
• As First Aid: frequent milking of affected
quarter (s): every after TWO hrs
TREATMENT (cont’d)
▪ Chemotherapy: use of antimicrobial agents →
Efficacy differs with type of pathogen involved
(Table 1)
▪ Supportive treatment (e.g. coliform mastitis)
▪ Fluid therapy
▪ Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
▪ Oxytocin (20 IU) at each treatment/milking to aid
removal of infected milk
▪ Milk from treated cow(s) should be discarded
according to the recommended withdrawal time
Table 1: Antibiotic spectrum
GROUP OF PATHOGEN(S) ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
Gram +ve bacterial Penicillins, Aminopenicillins,
1st generation cephalosporins
Both Gram +ve and Gram –ve Tetracyclines, Second
(i.e. Broad spectrum) generation cephalosporins (e.g.
cefuroxine)