Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism
V. MULTICULTURAL CRITIQUES I
- Ethnic group: “a named human population with a myth of common ancestry, shared
memories, and cultural elements; a link with a historic territory or homeland; and a measure of
solidarity” (Anthony Smith)
- Ethnic conflict: “a dispute about important political, economic, social, cultural or territorial
issues between two or more ethnic communities”
- explaining ethnic conflicts:
a) systemic level: the groups must reside in close proximity, national authorities must be
too weak to prevent groups from fighting; usually generated when empires collapse,
or ethnic geography changes
b) domestic level:
- they focus on he effectiveness of state in addressing the citizens’ concerns,
the impact of nationalism on interethnic relations, the impact of
democratization on interethnic relations
- Political parties tend to be organized along ethnic lines.
- Politicians tend to appeal to ethnic and nationalistic impulses.
- The state may have inadequate safeguards for minority rights
c) perceptual level
- Many ethnic groups have false histories of themselves and others – in
multiethnic states these perceptions get into conflict.
- Authoritarian regimes typically suppress ethnic histories, and manipulate
historical facts
- Ethnic nationalism leads typically to ethnic conflict
- Implications of ethnic conflict:
a) ethnic reconciliation: Ethnic groups decide to stay together under an overreaching
political and legal framework Belgium, Switzerland, Canada; Little interference by
international forces is needed.
b) ethnic separation: Groups decide to dissolve the existing legal ties – Soviet Union,
Czechoslovakia
c) Ethnic war: Ethnic groups are not be able to agree on new constitutional
arrangements or a peaceful separation
- consequences of ethnic wars: civilian slaughter, weapons of mass destruction, chain reaction
effect, refugees, consequences for international organizations
- recommendations: address problems early, help develop effective states, help groups develop
representative political institutions, insist that cultural diversity be respected, help ethnic
groups develop accurate histories of each other
- ethnic wars and refugees, implications for outside powers:
a) Accepting refugees can bring about military reprisal
b) The ethnic conflict can be imported to the accepting country
c) Accepting refugees involves high economic cost
d) Refugees can be seen as a threat to cultural identity
e) Refugees can become political forces in host countries
- refugee crises:
a) Syrian refugee crisis: the Syrian refugee crisis remains the world’s largest refugee
and displacement crisis of our time
b) The economic collapse of Venezuela
c) Conflicts in South Sudan, Myanmar, and Democratic Republic of the Congo
d) Refugee displacements from Afghanistan and Somalia date back decades
e) Invasion of Ukraine
f) 117.2 million people will be forcibly displaced or stateless in 2023, according to
UNHCR's estimations.
VIII. Contemporary immigration policies in the US (Trump and immigration from mexico)
- More than 44.9 million immigrants lived in the United States in 2019
- Most immigrants (77%) are in the country legally, while almost a quarter are unauthorized
- New arrivals more educated than the general population
- Immigrants make up 17% of the total civilian labor force
- half (53%) are proficient English speakers
- unauthorized immigrants: individuals who arrive in the United States legally and overstay their
visas comprise a significant portion of the undocumented population
- unauthorized immigrants: better at speaking English and more educated than they were a
decade ago
- New arrivals are also more likely than longer-term unauthorized immigrants to hold a college
degree
- mexicans used to be the majority, not anymore
- us immigrants are now seen more of a strength than a burden to the country
- mexican americans: both the oldest and the newest habitants of the nation
- complex position in the U.S. legal system and in U.S. public opinion
- In 2019, Mexicans comprised 24 percent of all immigrants in the United States, a decline from
30 percent in 2000
- Government projections show that, by the next two generations, more than 25 percent of the
U.S. population will be of Latin American origin
- Trump’s immigration policies:
a) more funding for ice
b) no more “catch and release”
c) legal immigration cut in half, most categories blocked
d) the most highly skilled foreign-born blocked or denied at high rates
e) refugees and asylum seekers denied
f) naturalization slowed and ceremonies stopped for many applicants
g) increased fees for becoming a citizen
h) the muslim ban
i) attemps to end daca
j) responses: lawsuits, protests, sanctuary cities
- the number of apprehensions at the u.s.-mexico border has doubled from 2018 to 2019
- terrible conditions of the detention centers
- the wall:
a) “with mexico being one of the highest crime nations in the world, we must have the
wall. mexico will pay for it through reimbursement/other.”
b) questionable in both necessity and feasibility
c) problem of the cost
d) the lack of freedom of movement
e) threatens the ecosystem
- trump’s discourse on immigration:
a) “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” he said. “They’re not
sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of
problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs.
They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”
(2015)
b) “Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?” (2018)
c) “Some people call it an ‘invasion,’” he said. “It’s like an invasion. They have violently
overrun the Mexican border.” (2018)
d) "We have people coming into the country or trying to come in, we're stopping a lot of
them, but we're taking people out of the country. You wouldn't believe how bad these
people are," "These aren't people. These are animals.“
e) “Trump’s binary worldview—good versus evil, the West versus Islam, “shithole”
countries versus those sending desirable immigrants—is present in all his
communication, from official speeches to inflammatory tweets.” (Romero 2018)
READINGS
1. Paul Claval: “Multiculturalism and the Dynamics of Modern Civilizations”
Cultures are complex and dynamic realities. They evolve constantly. They are highly
dependent on the technologies of communication upon which rests the passing over of inheritance
from individual to individual and generation to generation. The forms of modernization
characteristic of the 20th century were responsible for a rapid standardization of many aspects of
material cultures all over the World, and the substitution of a new couple of cultures (mass
cultures and technical or scientific ones) for the traditional one (low and high cultures).
The cultures present in a society are diverse, but are generally hierarchically structured. It was
the case in traditional societies, in which low cultures were up to a point controlled by high ones.
Thanks to the development of axial systems of thought, a process of civilization was in this way
introduced in the dynamics of cultures.
This process worked for a long time in all the countries in which the written word played an
important role. Western civilization was just one of these civilizations, with its special brand of
axial values. From the 18th century, a shift occured; its religious bases lost a part of its
significance. The idea of Progress gained prominence.
During the last fifty years, globalization has triggered a proliferation of multicultural
situations. At the same time, Western societies have lost what was central to their civilization
because of the crisis of the idea of Progress. In order to find a new basis for their creeds, Western
people stress the social dimension of the idea of progress, examplified, according to them, by the
ideals of democracy, human rights, multiculturalism and sound ecological management.
The author highlights three factors that contributed to the rise of national consciousness. First, the
transformation of Latin from a sacred and universal language to an esoteric language of the
intellectual elite undermined its role in the imagined community. Second, the impact of the
Reformation, facilitated by print capitalism, allowed for the rapid dissemination of religious ideas and
propaganda in vernacular languages, mobilizing new reading publics. Third, the development of
administrative vernaculars by certain monarchs, though initially independent of print and religious
changes, further eroded the imagined community of Christendom.
The author emphasizes that while linguistic diversity is a fundamental aspect of human society, it was
the interplay between capitalism, print technology, and linguistic diversity that led to the emergence of
national communities. Print languages created unified fields of exchange and communication,
facilitating comprehension among speakers of different vernaculars. Print technology also contributed
to the fixity of languages, slowing down linguistic change and creating an image of antiquity
associated with the subjective idea of the nation. Additionally, certain dialects that were assimilable to
print languages gained higher status, while others lost caste.
Weber argues that ethnic groups play a crucial role in shaping social and political dynamics. They can
serve as a basis for social solidarity, providing individuals with a sense of belonging and identity.
Ethnic groups often possess distinct cultural practices, traditions, language, and customs that
contribute to their uniqueness and strengthen their group cohesion.
Furthermore, Weber discusses how ethnic groups interact with other social groups, such as classes
and political entities. He acknowledges that ethnicity is not the sole determinant of social and political
behavior but argues that it can significantly influence social stratification, political mobilization, and the
formation of interest groups. Ethnicity can also impact economic activities and patterns of social
inequality.
Weber also highlights the significance of power relations in understanding ethnic group dynamics. He
argues that dominant groups often have more influence in shaping the collective identity and social
status of ethnic groups, while marginalized or minority groups may face discrimination and exclusion.
Chin discusses the initial optimism and goals of multiculturalism, which aimed to promote diversity,
equality, and social cohesion by recognizing and accommodating different cultural and ethnic groups
within European societies. However, she also explores the rise of criticism and opposition to
multiculturalism over time.
The article addresses the factors that have contributed to the crisis of multiculturalism in Europe,
including concerns over national identity, cultural integration, religious tensions, and issues related to
immigration and diversity. It analyzes specific events and political shifts that have influenced the
debates and policy changes surrounding multiculturalism in different European countries.
7. Nieto, Sonia: “Multicultural education in the United States Historical realities, ongoing
challenges, and transformative possibilities”
discusses the concept of multicultural education in the context of the United States. The article
explores the historical background of multicultural education, examines the ongoing challenges faced
in its implementation, and explores the transformative potential of this approach to education.
Nieto delves into the historical realities of multicultural education, discussing the struggles and
achievements of marginalized communities in their quest for educational equity. The article addresses
the importance of acknowledging and valuing the diverse cultural backgrounds and experiences of
students from various racial, ethnic, and linguistic backgrounds.
Furthermore, Nieto highlights the challenges faced by educators and policymakers in promoting
multicultural education effectively. These challenges include systemic barriers, such as
institutionalized racism, unequal resource allocation, and biased curriculum and pedagogy.
Finally, the article explores the transformative possibilities of multicultural education. It emphasizes
the need for culturally responsive teaching practices, inclusive curricula, and educational policies that
promote equity and social justice. Nieto argues that multicultural education has the potential to
empower students, foster inclusive learning environments, and contribute to a more equitable society.