Hiv Immunology Study Case
Hiv Immunology Study Case
Hiv Immunology Study Case
HIV destroys certain white blood cells called CD4+ T cells. These cells are critical to the
normal function of the human immune system, which defends the body against illness.When
HIV weakens the immune system, a person is more susceptible to developing a variety of
cancers and becoming infected with viruses, bacteria and parasites.
Study case
In 5 patients the AD preceded HIV infection. Mean follow-up before HIV infection was 5
years (1;10) and afterwards 13 years (2;19). The diseases were: lupus, Graves disease, RA,
sarcoidosis, and APS/systemic lupus. In 14 patients, HIV infection was diagnosed at the
same time as the AD. Mean follow-up of these diseases was of 8.35 years (1;27). The
diseases were: vasculitis (7/11 patients), APS (2/4 patients), ITP (2/6 patients),autoimmune
hepatitis (1/4 patients), RA/lupus (1/1 patient),and sarcoidosis (1/7 patients). For the 13
patients for which data were available, mean CD4 T lymphocyte count and percentage at
HIV and AD diagnosis were 326/mm3 (83;716) and 21.3% (10;35); the CD4/ CD8 T
lymphocytes ratio was superior to 1 in one patient (Table 2). Thirty-four patients were HIV-
infected when they developed an AD. Mean follow-up before AD diagnosiswas 9 years
(1;20) and afterwards 5.8 years (0.25;22). At AD diagnosis, all patients received antiretroviral
(ARV) treatment except for 7 of them (for one patient data was not available); mean CD4 T
lymphocyte count and percentage were 404.2/mm3 (16;900) (for 2 patients data was not
available) and 24.6% (5;59) (for 5 patients data was not available); CD4/CD8 T lymphocytes
ratio was superior to 1 in 7 patients; and HIV viral load was detectable for 10 of them (for 2
patients data was not available) (Table 2).
Clinical Manifestation of the case
Laboratory Diagnostics:
1. Serology - the diagnosis of HIV infection is usually based on serological tests.
(a) Antibody tests - ELISAs are the most frequently used method for screening of blood
samples for HIV antibody. The sensitivity and specificity of the presently available
commercial systems approaches 100% but false positive and false negative reactions occur.
Other test systems available include passive particle agglutination, immunofluorescence,
Western blots and RIPA bioassays. Western blots are regarded as the gold standard and
seropositivity is diagnosed when antibodies against both the env and the gag proteins are
detected. The sensitivity of the test systems are currently being improved by the use of
recombinant antigens.
(b) Antigen tests - HIV antigen can be detected early in the course of HIV infection before
the appearance of antibody. It is undetectable during the latent period (antigen-antibody
complexes are present) but become detectable during the final stages of the infection. It was
argued that the routine use of antigen screening tests in the blood transfusion service may
result in earlier cases of HIV infection being identified. However a large scale study carried
out in the US failed to show any benefit.
2. Virus isolation - virus isolation is accomplished by the cocultivation of the patient's
lymphocytes with fresh peripheral blood cells of healthy donors or with suitable culture lines
such as T-lymphomas. The presence of the virus can be confirmed by reverse transcriptase
assays, serological tests, or by changes in growth pattern of the indicator cells. However
virus isolation is tedious and time consuming (weeks) and is successful in only 70 to 90% of
cases. Therefore virus isolation is mainly used for the characterization of the virus.
3. Demonstration of viral NA - this can be accomplished by probes or by PCR techniques.
The latter may be useful because of its extremely high sensitivity.
4. Prognostic Tests - the following may be useful as prognostic tests; (1) HIV antigen (2)
Serial CD4 counts (3) Neopterin (4) B2-microglobulin. (5) Viral load. Of these tests, only serial
CD4 counts and HIV viral load are still routinely used.
a. HIV viral load - It appears that HIV viral load has the greatest prognostic value. HIV viral
load in serum may be measured by assays which detect HIV-RNA e.g. RT-PCR, NASBA, or
bDNA. HIV viral load has now been established as having good prognostic value, and in
monitoring response to antiviral chemotherapy. Patients with a low viral load during the
incubation period had a better prognosis than those with a high viral load. Patients whose
viral load decreased significantly following the commencement of antiviral therapy had a
better prognosis than those who did not respond.Among patients who responded to antiviral
therapy, those who had a low pre-treatment viral load had a better prognosis than those who
had a high pre-treatment viral load.
b. CD4 counts - despite the increasing use of HIV-RNA assays, measurement of CD4 still
has important value in monitoring disease progression and response to antiviral
chemotherapy. whereas CD4 count gives an indication of the stage of disease. “The
measurement of HIV viral load tells us where the disease is going, whereas CD4 count tells
us where the disease is at this moment”
5. Antiviral susceptibility assays
Because of the increasing range of anti-HIV agents available, there is increasing pressure
on the provision of antiviral susceptibility assays. There are two types of antiviral
susceptibility assays: phenotypic and genotypic assays
Phenotypic assays define whether a particular strain of virus is sensitive or resistant to an
antiviral agent by determining the concentration of the drug needed to inhibit the growth of
virus in vitro. e.g. Plaque-reduction assay for HSV, plaque-reduction assay for HIV.
However, phenotypic assays can only be used for viruses that can be cultivated. Moreover,
in the case of HIV, plaque reduction assays may not be that appropriate since not all HIV
strains produce plaques in cell culture.
In the case of genotypic assays, mutations that are associated with resistance are assayed
for by molecular biology methods such as PCR and LCR. However, these assays are
tedious and are not suitable for a routine diagnostic laboratory. Moreover, he results of
genotypic assays may prove very difficult to interpret since HIV mutates at a furious pace,
and it is also possible that resistant strains are present right at the beginning of infection.
Prevention: including
Reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors - interfere with a critical step during the HIV life
cycle and keep the virus from making copies of itself
Protease inhibitors - interfere with a protein that HIV uses to make infectious viral
particles
Fusion inhibitors - block the virus from entering the body's cells
Integrase inhibitors - block an enzyme HIV needs to make copies of itself
Multidrug combinations - combine two or more different types of drugs into one
These medicines help people with HIV, but they are not perfect. They do not cure HIV/AIDS.
People with HIV infection still have the virus in their bodies. They can still spread HIV to
others through unprotected sex and needle sharing, even when they are taking their
medicines.
5. Conclusion
HAART is a major therapeutic advance in HIV infection but it probably
favours the development of ADs in certain cases. The risk factors for
these ADs and their pathogenic mechanisms must be determined in
prospective studies.
Take-home messages
• Autoimmune diseases occur in HIV-infected people, most often in
a context of good immunological control (except essentially for autoimmune
hemolytic anemia) or during IRIS (vasculitis, sarcoidosis,
thyroid diseases).
• By improving immune status, HAART might favour autoimmune diseases
onset.
• Several autoimmune diseases may allow HIV infection diagnosis at a
stage of moderate immune deficiency (vasculitis, antiphospholipid
syndrome, immune thrombocytopenia).
• When necessary, immunosuppressant treatments may be used in this
context with good tolerance