Alhuraibi - From - IT - Business - Versión Corta - PARTE 03
Alhuraibi - From - IT - Business - Versión Corta - PARTE 03
Alhuraibi - From - IT - Business - Versión Corta - PARTE 03
Based on our models which were developed, validated and investigated in this study, and the
statistically significant relationships among the studied factors, we formulate the following four
observations and personal opinions.
(1) Literature has proposed that SIW has positive improvement effects on several levels (public,
organizational, employee, and financial). Our answer to RQ1 states that ITBSA has a positive
effect on SIW. This observation emphasizes that managers need to make this activity (strategic
alignment) a survival duty as opposed to a luxury option. Moreover, we opine that for our
departmental level of analysis it is important to practice strategic alignment at all organizational
levels including the departmental level.
(2) Given the valid mediating effect of SIW on the relationship between ITBSA and performance,
managers should refrain from the harmful competition on innovative resources. Rather, in our
opinion, they should (a) establish an incentive program that ranks rewards of innovative activities
on collective performance across departments, and (b) emphasize the importance of focusing on
the organizational strategic alignment efforts to include (on the business side) strategic objectives
stimulating departmental collaborative actions on social innovation at work (c) spend efforts to
establish an effective and formal network society within the organization. Such organizational and
social structures will enhance innovation-related collaborative activities across functional
departments, leading to an enhanced and sustainable performance levels. On the IT side of the
equation, those strategies may include, for example, an objective stating “enhancing
interdepartmental innovation-related collaborative IT networks” (such as the establishment of
innovative ideas-hunting portals and innovation collaboration platforms).
(3) The ability of this research to identify the EGIT as a moderator for the relationship between the
ITBSA and the departmental innovation, allows IT managers and business managers to focus on
efforts and activities which may lead to efficient use of IT resources. For example, up to now
managers needed to monitor and benchmark the level of IT investment and become satisfied if a
joint committee of a business unit and IT has formed a joint strategy for the next period. This
research has shown that to capitalize on IT investments through effective interdepartmental
collaboration on SIW, managers need to develop and establish effective IT governance structures
and processes. From these observations, we see that the highly-recommended structures include
the establishment of IT strategy committee at the level of Board of Directors, IT projects and
governance function steering committees, and the integration of IT governance tasks into the
From IT Business Strategic Alignment to Performance 153
general roles and responsibilities. While an example of effective IT processes might include the
establishment of a formal IT governance framework, a formal process to define and measure IT
strategic plans, and
prioritizing IT investments in which both IT and business strategies are involved.
(4) Social performance and the consequent Corporate Sustainability performance is a vital factor for
organizational survival. Our research has emphasized the importance of strategic alignment and
the implementation of proper EGIT structures and process. A consequence of such
implementation will implicitly support higher levels of corporate sustainability. For example,
incorporating social responsibility measures (such as pollution monitoring and control) into the
corporate business strategy, aligning the strategy with IT, and implementing an effective IT
portfolio management process by which those pollution reduction projects get priority, will
improve both social performance and sustainability.
This study has four limitations that could be overcome in future research. Those limitations are
summarized below: (1) restricted generalizability, (2) the assumptions of model modification, and (3)
geographical limitations (4) employee layers limitations
Chapter 7
The current research has a prevailing exploratory/descriptive nature. The proposed causal
relationships have not been “confirmed” through experimental theory methods. Therefore, the
outputs of the model cannot formally be considered predictive. Moreover, this research has used
one type of questionnaires and one method of data collection for ITBSA, SIW and performance.
There are several other instruments for the identification of the ITBSA, SIW, and performance
constructs. So, the limitation is in the restricted generalizability. For further research, we suggest
confirming the relationships utilizing different data instruments to conclude more generalizable
results.
For further research, we propose a re-confirmation of the results by using alternative techniques
to test the mediation and moderation relationships.
For future research, we suggest the following five lines of investigation: (l) larger variety of
thematics, (2) deepen the study of the interaction level, (3) using different techniques, and (4)
inclusion of more variables in the model, and (5) involve multiple layers of employees.
Chapter 7
construct is a complicated issue. Inevitably, the model explanatory power will benefit from the
inclusion of other factors of performance such as Corporate Sustainibility. Those factors will
broaden the scope of performance from the cost/production aspects into the more sustainable form
of performance.