Freud Theory
Freud Theory
Freud Theory
Development
Freud proposed that personality development in childhood takes place during five psychosexual
stages, which are the oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genital stages. During each stage sexual
energy (libido) is expressed in different ways and through different parts of the body.
These are called psychosexual stages because each stage represents the fixation of libido
(roughly translated as sexual drives or instincts) on a different area of the body. As a person
grows physically certain areas of their body become important as sources of potential
frustration (erogenous zones), pleasure or both.
Freud (1905) believed that life was built round tension and pleasure. Freud also believed that all
tension was due to the build-up of libido (sexual energy) and that all pleasure came from its
discharge.
In describing human personality development as psychosexual Freud meant to convey that what
develops is the way in which sexual energy of the id accumulates and is discharged as we mature
biologically. (NB Freud used the term 'sexual' in a very general way to mean all pleasurable
actions and thoughts).
Freud stressed that the first five years of life are crucial to the formation of adult personality.
The id must be controlled in order to satisfy social demands; this sets up a conflict between
frustrated wishes and social norms.
The ego and superego develop in order to exercise this control and direct the need for
gratification into socially acceptable channels. Gratification centers in different areas of the body
at different stages of growth, making the conflict at each stage psychosexual.
Oedipus Complex
The most important aspect of the phallic stage is the Oedipus complex. This is one of Freud's
most controversial ideas and one that many people reject outright.
The name of the Oedipus complex derives from the Greek myth where Oedipus, a young man,
kills his father and marries his mother. Upon discovering this, he pokes his eyes out and becomes
blind. This Oedipal is the generic (i.e., general) term for both Oedipus and Electra complexes.
In the young boy, the Oedipus complex or more correctly, conflict, arises because the boy
develops sexual (pleasurable) desires for his mother. He wants to possess his mother exclusively
and get rid of his father to enable him to do so.
Irrationally, the boy thinks that if his father were to find out about all this, his father would take
away what he loves the most. During the phallic stage what the boy loves most is his penis.
Hence the boy develops castration anxiety.
The little boy then sets out to resolve this problem by imitating, copying and joining in
masculine dad-type behaviors. This is called identification, and is how the three-to-five year old
boy resolves his Oedipus complex.
Identification means internally adopting the values, attitudes, and behaviors of another person.
The consequence of this is that the boy takes on the male gender role, and adopts an ego ideal
and values that become the superego.
Freud (1909) offered the Little Hans case study as evidence of the Oedipus complex.
Electra Complex
For girls, the Oedipus or Electra complex is less than satisfactory. Briefly, the girl desires the
father, but realizes that she does not have a penis. This leads to the development of penis
envy and the wish to be a boy.
The girl resolves this by repressing her desire for her father and substituting the wish for a penis
with the wish for a baby. The girl blames her mother for her 'castrated state,' and this creates
great tension.
The girl then represses her feelings (to remove the tension) and identifies with the mother to
take on the female gender role.
Critical Evaluation
Is Freudian psychology supported by evidence? Freud's theory is good at explaining but not at
predicting behavior (which is one of the goals of science).
For this reason, Freud's theory is unfalsifiable - it can neither be proved true or refuted. For
example, the libido is difficult to test and measure objectively. Overall, Freud's theory is highly
unscientific.
Freud may also have shown research bias in his interpretations - he may have only paid attention
to information which supported his theories, and ignored information and other explanations that
did not fit them.
However, Fisher & Greenberg (1996) argue that Freud’s theory should be evaluated in terms of
specific hypotheses rather than as a whole. They concluded that there is evidence to support
Freud’s concepts of oral and anal personalities
Reference
McLeod, S. A. (2019, July 18). Psychosexual stages. Simply Psychology.
www.simplypsychology.org/psychosexual.html
Fisher, S. & Greenberg, R. P. (1996). Freud scientifically reappraised: Testing the theories and
therapy. New York: Wiley.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Standard Edition 7: 123- 246.